由买买提看人间百态

topics

全部话题 - 话题: contribution
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 下页 末页 (共10页)
p********r
发帖数: 3243
1
这些是我从在准备RFE期间所研究的近百个EBI-AAO判例中的从贡献部分摘录的关键评判
语句,加上了我本人的解析。
移民局的很多观点仅供参考,不可全信(比如证据的交叉使用之类的),但它们确实给
我们提供了论证贡献major的正确方向,告诉了我们移民局最倚重哪些证据,而哪些证
据又是费力而不(怎么)加分的,哪些错误又是确实该避免的。我想这对于还在战斗的
、背景不强的战友们来说,还是非常有参考和学习意义的。
希望把我RFE期间体会到的、学到的,都毫无保留的献给各位背景不太强的新战友们参
考!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
文章本身能否说明贡献----------
Any research, in order to be accepted for publication, must offer new and
useful information to the pool of knowledge. It does not follow that every... 阅读全帖
o******r
发帖数: 168
2
XM0405 RFE求助 网站主流媒体 和 contribution is major siginificance
洋洋洒洒rfe写了十页,真心被移民官的敬业折服了。
------------------------media report---------------------
The petitioner has
not provided any documentation which demonstrates that XXX or
XXX are major media. It should also be noted that the list of websites which
the petitioner claims
has featured his app is not sufficient. lt is the petitioner's
responsibility to provide
information on each individual site and provide evidence which clearly shows
that these a... 阅读全帖
z****a
发帖数: 143
3
来自主题: Immigration版 - 【请教】Contribution 怎么组织?
我也考虑过这个问题,
领域A
Contribution 1
Contribution 2
Contribution 3
Contribution 4
然后把这4篇文章的引用,small percentage,影响力等一起说
领域B
Contribution 5
Contribution 6
然后把这2篇文章的引用,small percentage,影响力等一起说
但是这样一来,又会显得领域B的contribution比较薄弱。
感觉一篇文章一个contribution的写法条理很清晰,但是条理太清晰了,导致弱点暴露
的很明显。我也看过一些PL不是按照这个套路写,contribution总结的比较虚,但是又
怕那样的让审的人看不明白。
s*******o
发帖数: 30
4
来自主题: TAX版 - help with 401k over-contribution
I have a question about how to deal with the over-contribution of my 401k
account.
My combined 401k contribution from current employer and previous employer
for 2011 exceeds the IRS annual limit. I would like to take the contribution
back from my previous employer because my current employer has better match
. Does anyone know what procedures for doing that?
I called my prior employer plan’s 401(k) administrator and they said I
shall submit a request to roll over all my contributions (including ... 阅读全帖
s****n
发帖数: 11
5
来自主题: Immigration版 - EB1A RFE 中 contribution 补材料的困惑
IO 在 EB1A contribution RFE 中要求补材料证明 contributions are significant
as compared to others:
objective documentary evidence of the significance of contributions;
documentary evidence that people consider your work important;
contributions have provoked widespread public commentary or have been widely
cited;
contributions were implemented by others.
但是我在 PL 的contribution 部分已经分以下方面说了evidence:
publications
citations
prizes
applications of my contributions
media reports on my contributions
难道这些还不是object... 阅读全帖
y***l
发帖数: 1095
6
正打算写contribution这部分,看到模板有不同的写法,想问一下关于几个要点怎么分
配的问题。
我同事的1A RFE刚过不久,所以我本来是想按他RFE contribution部分来写的:
1. My original scientific research work has been published in top
scientific journals and conferences with very high impacts.
2. My original scientific research work has been selected to present orally
in the largest international conference in my field.
3. My original scientific research work has been widely cited in
publications on top scientific journals by experts in my field from leading
re... 阅读全帖
a********x
发帖数: 12
7
刚才收到RFE,说contribution没过,细节如下:希望版上的高手给支支招,看看怎么
一个思路来回复. 这个推荐信的他们说的不对;我五份只有一分不是independent的。
还有就是中文的引用原来在Google schloar查只有80,最近在知网查有230,不知道这个
怎么应用到RFE里面来。
本人做的比较基础,不知道怎么在短期内找到这种大量应用成果的例子。
还有就是不是说PP的RFE都是只有30天么?本人怎么给了84天?
谢谢大家先了。
You have submitted evidence of the following:
(1) several letters of support
(2) Your work has been cited ~300 times, according to Google scholar
(3) Your work has been published in notable journals, according to Google
scholar
(4) You invented an XXX technique to treat X... 阅读全帖
f******i
发帖数: 451
8
来自主题: Immigration版 - 几个Contributions?
Evidence of the alien's original scientific, scholarly, artistic, athletic,
or business-related contributions of major significance in the field;
我看大家在说自己contributions的时候都有很多个,有强的,也有不是那么强的,但
是都是4,5个contributions,然后再证明是major significance。
我只总结出了两个contributions,但是有很多证据来证明都是major significance。
我的问题是:2个contribution(s)够吗? 虽然越多越好,但是与其说一堆很难证明
major significance的contributions,不如集中火力来证明两个contributions(因为
看AAO判据里经常强调这个复数是只要多于一个)。 2个contributions of major
significance够吗? 谢谢。
j*****8
发帖数: 12
9
I Have Made Significant and Internationally Recognized Scientific
Contributions to the Area of Medical Genetics, and to the Field of Genetics
of Mental Diseases in Particular
1. My significant contributions to XXXX at The University of Chicago (
Feb. 2005~Jun. 2008)
As Dr. GGGG stated, “It is well known that BBBBB disorder is one of
the most costly psychiatric conditions. It ranks among the top ten in
disability in the World Health Organization’s Global Burden of Disease.
More than 2... 阅读全帖
f*******n
发帖数: 12623
10
来自主题: Investment版 - 问个Roth IRA contribution问题
可以,但是有点复杂。
你2013的contribution可以报税之前(就是2014年4月15号之前)拿出来,就算退回你
的contribution,等于你没有contribute一样。但是拿出来的时候要拿出来
contribution + earnings。而且earnings要交税。看http://www.irs.gov/publications/p590/ch01.html#en_US_2012_publink1000230703
就是说如果你一月份contribute了5500,跟着长了一点,可能二月份要拿出来的是55xx
。既然你拿出来了25500,那就肯定把2013年的contribution全拿出来了。但是如果譬
如你要拿出来5505才算拿出来2013的contribution,那你其实只拿出来了19995的basis
,还剩了一些basis。
c******g
发帖数: 9273
11
来自主题: Immigration版 - [合集] media report还是contribution?
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
LAsummer (LAsummer) 于 (Tue Sep 13 14:41:57 2011, 美东) 提到:
各位高手,真心请教。
我有一片文章,在发表的时候被以下报道过. 注意,报道的文章,不是我。
Faculty 1000, rating exceptional
Faculty 1000, selected as "broad impact" by the editor
Faculty 1000, top 1 paper in that month
ScienceDirect top 25 hottest paper
Top 1 in three month
Top 25 in a year
Nature, Cell hightlights
ScienceDaily.com,physorg.com等一堆网站转载一片学校报道。
另外有5,6片JOURNAL PAPERS对我的文章有整段评述
两个问题:
1) 我应该放media report还是contribution?
2) 如果放medi... 阅读全帖
z****a
发帖数: 143
12
来自主题: Immigration版 - 【请教】Contribution 怎么组织?
1)如果主要做的涉及三个领域A/B/C,而C领域还没有发文章,是不是在PL里应该就略
过不提?
2)如果A领域发了4篇文章,其中2篇引用最多,反响最大,证据最强,另外2篇一般,
而B领域的2篇文章引用很少,这种情况下应该怎么写contribution为好?
我看板上很多的例子是一篇paper一个contribution:
-Contribution 1(based on paper A):发表在哪,有多少引用,有多少媒体报道,
reference怎么说
-Contribution 2(based on paper B):……
但是如果按这种写法,A领域的前2个contribution可以写的很强,有各种硬证据,
包括高引用,small percentage,被书和媒体报道,别人大段引用,等等。但是剩下的
A领域的2个contribution和B领域的2个contribution就显得很弱,因为或者领域没那么
热门,或者太新而引用不多,只能有一些推荐信里的软证据。
我想这种文章引用集中在一两篇上的情况也不少见,不知道大家有什么好的建议。
w*******p
发帖数: 19
13
来自主题: Immigration版 - EB1B申请详解5 —— Contribution
简介请见http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/Immigration/32702511.html
EB1B 申请详解1 —— DIY和签字http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/Immigration/32702881.html
EB1B 申请详解 2 —— EB1B AAO判例关键点http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/Immigration/32702889.html
EB1B 申请详解3 —— 界定研究领域及Petition Letter Petition Letter http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/Immigration/32703109.html
EB1B 申请详解4——media reports http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t0/Immigration/32712139.html
版上流行的版本一般是直接提出在几方面做出了贡献,然后在每个方面罗列出证据。之
后再总结性地用引用、review、承担的课题等证据再次证明contributi... 阅读全帖
G***n
发帖数: 877
14
来自主题: Immigration版 - 关于PL的contribution, 求建议
总之,要大胆吹,但也得u很小心,特别是Award和fellowship,非直接证据要小心。贴
个我以前的贴子吧,可能会对你有用。
Geman (Delta30) 发于 Thu Jan 22 20:37:09 2015, 美东, 信区: Immigration
标�0�2 题: TSC EB1A PP approved - weak citation
15分钟前收到的短信,现在心情还是没有平静下来。太感谢大家了!感谢神!感谢LD,
感谢律师!从去年1月份开始准备,4月份开始写推荐新,6月份联系律师。一共
折腾了将近1年。上个月底寄到的TSC,9天前PP。
12/26/2014 RD
01/13/2015 PP
01/22/2015 AD
化学专业。2流phd,1流学校薄厚。
9篇文章,6篇一坐。引用只有140,而且独立不到110(没敢单独列出独立),32个审稿
的IF 1-6。一坐文章IF还不错,5到12之间,平均IF 8.2,包括JACS和nature最差的子
刊 。没有媒体,没有奖项。有2篇文章被国家实验室highlight列了出来。得过ACS等很
多 奖... 阅读全帖
f*******n
发帖数: 12623
15
I don't think recharacterization is right. Recharacterization is usually for
turning a Roth IRA contribution into a traditional IRA contribution or vice
versa. But neither traditional nor Roth IRA is right -- both traditional
and Roth IRA do not allow you to contribute more than your income.
LZ can withdraw the excess plus the earnings from the excess before April 15
and it will be treated as having never been contributed. I think the IRA
broker will be able to help figure out exactly how much, ... 阅读全帖
g*****n
发帖数: 1428
16
如果你的收入沟底的话, 可以claim the saver's tax credit:
Example 2
Susan and John are married and file their federal income-tax return jointly.
For 2010, their adjusted gross income would have been $34,000 if they had
not made any retirement contributions. During 2010, Susan elected to have $2
,000 contributed to her employer's 401(k) plan. John made a deductible
contribution of $2,000 to an IRA for 2010.
As a result of these contributions, their 2010 adjusted gross income is $30,
000. If they had not made t... 阅读全帖
r*****8
发帖数: 538
17
首先要确认你的contribtuion是不是pre tax的?
如果你的contribution是pre-tax,也就是说你没付federal income tax 在这部分
contribution,那么这部分钱会算在employer contribution里面,也就是说,你的w2
上box 12w的contributions实际上是employer contribution 加上employee
contribution.你应该把这个数字填在8889的line 9,并且在line 2不填数字就可以了。
r**3
发帖数: 1779
18
有一个Roth Ira ,前几年contribute过两次,但是我当时没有在1040表上填
contribution,好像当时我是早早报完税再去contribute还是什么其他原因了。
我想问irs如何知道我符合contribute Roth IRA ,我是不是要填个什么表格来说明我
有个Roth IRA账户?我如何fix这个漏报的contribution?我担心到了我59.5岁取钱,
irs会不会要求我提供当年contribute那年的收入来重新审查吧?
万分感谢!
f*********y
发帖数: 127
19
来自主题: Immigration版 - EB1A收到RFE了,contribution不承认
case比较弱,5篇journal paper, 7篇conference paper, 150 citations (26个国家)
,20几个review。5篇推荐信。IO认了authorship, review, 但是说没有足够的证据证
明contribution of major significance. 基本上IO就是引用了一些推荐信里的话,然
后引用了一些PL里的话,最后说Although some colleagues think you have made
significant contributions, you did not submit enough evidence to prove that
you have made contributions of major significance to the field endeavored.
剩下的部分就都是模板了。说可以提供:
Objective documentary evidence of the significance of the beneficiary’s
contribution to the... 阅读全帖
l******t
发帖数: 2243
20
thanks for sharing

发信人: tgyh (Busy as a bee), 信区: Immigration
标 题: Re: 请问如何回复Contribution RFE标准模板(第一条)?
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Jul 28 14:25:51 2011, 美东)
Here is my response, just for reference of RFE: (I follow the outline for
the response)
A.Objective documentary evidence of the significance of my contributions to
the field
(A)My work has been honored two nationally recognized awards for excellence
As stated above, due to my outstanding accomplishments and significant
contributions, I was honore... 阅读全帖
z****a
发帖数: 143
21
来自主题: Immigration版 - 【请教】Contribution 怎么组织?
哈哈,感谢你的建议,我同意你的观点,AB应该可以很容易地归成一个大领域,A,B领
域分开说的话反而让人觉得在B的方面contribution很弱。
不知你有没有什么好的建议,应该如何解决只有一两篇牛文章,其他文章都一般的问题。
可不可以先提所有的contribution 1,2,3,4,5,
然后再给硬证据
-我的contribution大,因为引用多,然后把那两篇牛的引用提出来说
-我的contribution大,因为被报道,被书收录
-我的contribution大,因为……
这样可以把其他的那些不那么牛的文章的证据也穿插在里面用起来
这样的缺点就是IO一上来看到一堆contribution claim,但是没有直接的证据支持,会
不会觉得很不客观?
A**********n
发帖数: 824
22
公司愿意出证明证明的contribution都可以写。不是说你申请的时一定要交公司证明,
而是,你写了是你的contribution,万一RFE,你拿不到证明,可以就麻烦了。
是你的contribution,公司不承认不出证明就不是你的contribution
不是你的contribution,公司承认并出证明就是你的contribution
t*****p
发帖数: 150
23
Original Contributions: The record reflects that the beneficiary has:
1.Worked as a researcher and scientist in the field of mechanical
engineering.
2.Skills, knowledge experience, and in the field of mechanical engineering.
However,you have not provided sufficient evidence to establish:
1. What the beneficiary's original scientific, scholarly, or business-
related contributions are
2. Why the beneficiary's contributions are original; and/or
3. Why the beneficiary's contributions are of major si... 阅读全帖
a******n
发帖数: 166
24
看这两段:
USCIS officers must evaluate whether the original work constitutes major,
significant contributions to the field. Although funded and published work
may be “original,” this fact alone is not sufficient to establish that the
work is of major significance. For example, peer-reviewed presentations at
academic symposia or peer-reviewed articles in scholarly journals that have
provoked widespread commentary or received notice from others working in the
field, or entries (particularly a goodly n... 阅读全帖
a******8
发帖数: 80
25
用销售额作为证据之一支持 contributions应该可以。让电视台出证明是必须的,以此
表示你的作品被报道引用(虽然不是个人),而且也要证明电视台的受众范围,数量,
最好有电视台的排名。
贡献要先列出两三个,为什么是原创,要专业化文字说明,再通俗化文字说明其好处,
接下来是证据证明它们是major significance,
贡献的证明,USCIS曾说过,最常规的要么是获奖,要么是大量的独立引用,来表明你
在领域里的影响力。
摘抄自USCIS:REQUEST FOR EVIDENCE, 里面也提到了你的RFE
the petitioner may submit:
• Objective documentary evidence of the significance of the
beneficiary’s contribution to the field.
• Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently
consider the beneficiary’s work im... 阅读全帖
k**c
发帖数: 22
26
来自主题: Investment版 - 请教一个401k contribution limit的问题
2013年401k的contribution limit是17500。
我的理解是这个17500的limit是自己的contribution部分,不算公司的match。
想请问下如果自己的contribution如果又分为pre-tax和after-tax两部分,
那么这个17500的limit是pre-tax contribution的limit还是pre+after contribution
总和的limit?
多谢!
g*****g
发帖数: 34805
27
来自主题: Investment版 - After tax contribution (
明年公司开始允许after tax contribution.
看了一下,如果还在公司,after tax contribution, earning tax deferred. 如果离
开公司,contribution可以rollover到Roth IRA,earning 可以roll over到
tradition IRA。任何时候可以把contribution tax free得拿出来,没有penalty。
貌似完胜plan外的普通投资,加上fidelity允许brokerage link,投资并不局限于401K
fund。
特别是contribution换工作可以进入Roth IRA,很划算呀。有啥catch没?
s*********y
发帖数: 689
28
一个10多人的小公司,老板让我自己开个traditional IRA的账户,然后每年公司都会
按照工资的一
定比例向里面contribute。这部分钱叫SEP IRA的contribution,每年的上限是工资的25
%最多不
超过50k。我知道个人每年做多可以contribute 5k到traditional IRA。我的问题是公
司和个人
的contribution加起来一年做多可以contribute 55k到IRA里面吗?还是说个人加公司
的总共不可
以超过50k?
f********y
发帖数: 79
29
Contribution RFE 较难,回复也比较长,今天贴整理好的上半部分.
IO: (e) Submit evidence of any major contributions you have made to your
field.
My response: Thank you so much for requesting more details about the major
contributions I have made to my field, which is the second criterion that I
claimed in my petition to support my eligibility for Alien of Extraordinary
Ability.
I have made at least four major contributions to the field of X, which
include:
(a) I have pioneered and contributed major breakthroughs to
l******5
发帖数: 3030
30
来自主题: Immigration版 - EB1A RFE 中 contribution 补材料的困惑
你讲的HARD EVIDENCE是什么? 真的HARD吗? 单纯的PUBLICATION不是什么
CONTRIBUTION, 列出的FOOTNOTES CITATION也不能用来证明CONTRIBUTION, 这些都是
你的AUTHORSHIP, 不知你如何证明你的applications of my contributions和
media reports on my contributions的。 所谓CONTRIBUTION必须是有关你的工作中有
什么新的思想、 新的观点、 新的创造, 而这些个新的东西是如何影响他人的, 要从
这方面来证明。 新的推荐信是必须的, 但作用有限, 不要在推荐信上押宝。
r******n
发帖数: 351
31
来自主题: Immigration版 - 请问写书能不能算contribution?
我不是很确定。但我的理解contribution的证据主要不是提供你做了什么,而是提供其
他人对你的出版物,成果承认的证据:比如引用并评论了你的文章或者书;用了你的方
法解决实际问题;索取你的文章和帮助;以及通过推荐信对你的研究进行评价。所以我
个人觉得出书本身对contribution的作用不是很大(当然对authorship那是相当的大了
,要好好强调)。 但是可以换一个角度看出书的问题,比如说因为你在这个领域的
contribution很大,所以这个出版社慕名”邀请“你作为领域专家出书,这就是对你的
contribution的一个承认的证据,可以从这个角度利用出书强调你的contribution。
t**h
发帖数: 82
32
Here is my response, just for reference of RFE: (I follow the outline for
the response)
A.Objective documentary evidence of the significance of my contributions to
the field
(A)My work has been honored two nationally recognized awards for excellence
As stated above, due to my outstanding accomplishments and significant
contributions, I was honored with two national-level awards: First Class of
the “State Natural Science Award” granted by the Ministry of Education of
China and Third Class of “Chi... 阅读全帖
o**y
发帖数: 1466
33
来自主题: Immigration版 - Contribution两点够不够
看了网友们提供的PL,contribution里都写了四五点,我也好不容易在contribution里
写了四点,但只有二个比较强一些,另外两点都没有很有力的证据(比如说citation多
少年来只有10个,也没有牛人牛杂志引用),除了可以搞推荐信来说事。我准备把弱的
两点去掉,想少而精,免得有弱的影响了整体。contribution里有两点够不够?我是办
Eb1B. Eb1B跟Eb1A一样,也要求orginal contribution,但Eb1B没有“major
significance”的要求。
另外我的N作的文章citation比较多,但拿这个来说事恐怕不太好,因为不好说这个
contribution是我的,毕竟只是一个N作者而已。有不有什么好办法?
谢谢了
f*******l
发帖数: 1604
34
只给一个杂志review过数篇文章,太单薄了,不准备再单独claim它,考古说把它放在
contribution里可以加强contribution. 查读了AAO案例,这contribution应该是指
research contribution,换句话说,就是自己研究成果在社会上的贡献。review他人文
章只是个人行为,与自己研究成果无直接关系,怎么才能将它挂靠在contribution里?
请有经验的通学给个模板, 谢谢!
w****i
发帖数: 520
35
谢谢 wenha的回答,其实这封邮件具体的内容是:
Dear Dr. xxx,
I am Bella, the editor of Journal of Food Research which is a peer reviewed,
open access journal published by Canadian Center of Science and Education.
I have read your paper titled "XXX", which was published on "International
Journal of XXX". I believe you are an expert in this area, and that is what
I am interested.
Right now, with the Next issue scheduled to publish in February 2012, it is
a great pleasure to invite you to contribute your best knowledge... 阅读全帖
d*******n
发帖数: 4778
36
你的petition中,肯定要说你的contribution了,如果IO只是RFE你的contribution,
应该是IO觉得的你的contributions不够,所以,再挖掘一下。
contribution就是作文题目,point to point,就是让你一点一点地强调contribution
,有些证据可以多次提到呀,

IO
n*******l
发帖数: 308
37
来自主题: Immigration版 - 问几个contribution 的问题
请问:
1) 一般列几个contribution呢? 是列的越多越好还是挑几个重点的强化?
2)看了几个模板, 都是一个重点文章写一个contribution 。 可以把一篇文章写到几
个contribution的点里面吗?
3)二作的文章可以用来claim一个contribution吗?
4) book chapter 有什么比较好的点claim contribution?
Many Thanks.
e*******u
发帖数: 109
38
在准备eb1b的材料, 准备得很迷茫
1. 我claim 4个contributions, 对应4个paper,推荐信里就这么写:每封吹一个
paper,重点的那一两个可以用两封来吹。
2. 非一作的paper可以当一项contribution写吗?
3. authorship,是否可以放弃一些非一作又没有什么引用的paper不claim?这样
average citation比较好看
4. 是否只claim比较strong的paper的contribution?比如引用比较多而且paper发表的
地方都不错的那种。 如果能找到3个这样的contributions,就不需要再画蛇添足地把
一些不很strong的paper来作为第4个contribution,这些paper引用都还没多少而且发
表源也不是顶级期刊或者会议。
问题有点多,盼解答,非常感谢
p********r
发帖数: 3243
39
工作保不住了,老板最后通牒,一月底走人。望大家群策群力,救小弟出坑。
我是DIY.大致说一下我的背景:生物医学基础研究,中英文20篇,大部分是中文老文水
文。总引用不到200,大部分中文引用,独立180左右。近两年发的文章质量可以但是没
引用。我用来claim贡献的引用总计估计也就60多个。别的属于三无人员。没列引用排
名等各种%比较,因为拿不出手。
在PL里,我是这么论述贡献的:列了三项贡献,逐项介绍(领域里存在的问题,我解决
了啥,影响了领域),工作被别人implemented(全是引用的例子);三个贡献中各穿
插一个引用文章的独立推荐人来背书;被综述和书引用来证明被广泛讨论和赞扬;引用
推荐人的话证明工作意义重大。
上周直接PP的,几天后被RFE,昨天收到信,同意文章和审稿,质疑contribution。已经
联系了大蜜帮忙。在他老人家去北极看日出归来前(呵呵),先麻烦大伙给看看,想想
主意对付这个0444.感觉这个0444还是很高效仔细的,揪住了我的贡献不足使劲咬。
贴一下关于贡献的RFE信件内容如下:
The petitioner has submitted letters ... 阅读全帖
p******b
发帖数: 379
40
来自主题: Immigration版 - 关于PL的contribution, 求建议
最近研究了版上各位大牛的帖子, 并学习了精华区和一些PL模版, 打算这样组织我的
模版, 请大家帮忙看看有什么可以改进的地方。
背景:
生物医学, 研究论文12篇, 一作4篇,IF 2-9, 另有一篇一作的评论commentary(
IF20),和一篇一作综述(IF38).
引用:130
review: 25, 两个小破杂志(没有影响因子)editor
打算老三样, 看了很多帖子, RFE大多都是关于contribution的, 所以打算在
contribution上下足功夫, 参考了很多模版和各位兄弟姐妹的成功经验我打算这样吹
我的contribution:
contributions:
1:我发了很多牛文章,在国际会议上展示我的研究, 并给牛杂志写评论和综述
2:我文章被牛校牛人引用
3:因为我的牛贡献,被邀请做reviewer和editor
4:我的研究很重要, 老板基于我的结果申请到大经费,推荐人说我的研究对他们的研
究提供了基础。
5:因为我的重要贡献, 一个牛基金会(postdoc fellowship)决定支持我的研究,基
金会网上上说他们支持“best young sc... 阅读全帖
H*H
发帖数: 1244
41
来自主题: Immigration版 - EB1A rfe contribution 问题
收到的RFE 是下面英文中的,大概是个模版:
是以下几条都要符合吗。 如果有一条非常强的话,能不能过呢?
能不能推荐信证明我的research 是original的 就是独一无二的, 我的推荐信中列出
的事实 (objective evidence) 只能证明是独一无二的,就是我是唯一做这个的人。
我的research 是original。 但是证明major significance 有难度,只能是专家说是
major significance,没有媒体报道等来支持。(但是可以用第5条来支持,说能做第
5条的人 多么多么牛啊)。
第5条我可以找到3个强有力的证据, 都是objective evidences。
这个思路可以吗
这样我算满足了3)和5)还是只满足 5)
This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show
that the beneficiary’s contributions are considered to be of major
significance in ... 阅读全帖
m********r
发帖数: 350
42
DIY的EB1a收到TSC的XM1102的RFE,承认的authorship和judge,质疑contribution.现
在文章很少,只有7篇(5篇一作),引用不到70(严格的它引估计30不到,所以140的时
候就没有怎么提)。推荐信找了8封,5个独立,美国国内的有学校和政府研究机构,国
外的有中国,德国,加拿大等。重要评语是“Simply going on record and
explaining the work is not sufficient to establish that contributions are of
major significance. It is unclear if the contribution is original or built
upon others work”并且质疑"not widely implemented or cited"。
我这个行业的数据和模型都是政府的研究机构支持的,一般也不会直接使用别人的方法
或者修改过的模型。引用偏少,行业内最好的杂志IF也就是4-5。发文章比较慢,而且
一般都是一大堆coauthor,所以严... 阅读全帖
c*******a
发帖数: 653
43
怎么区分contribution和earnings呢?
比如说俺第一次contribute了2500,第二次也contribute了2500。
如果后来跌到3000,俺能取出3000刀without penalty么?
要自己记住一共contribute了多少,取不超过这些钱的数额就不会被罚了吗?
s***n
发帖数: 121
44
来自主题: Investment版 - a question on 401K contribution limit
I understand that the contribution limit for 2009 is 16,500. My question is:
Does this 16,500 include employer matching contribution?
My company match 10% of the base salary. I googled, and found that "employer
matching contributions up to six-percent of an employee’s pre-tax salary a
re not included in the contribution."
Then, what if the employ matching > 6%?
Anybody knows? Thanks.
w****t
发帖数: 137
45
来自主题: Investment版 - After-tax contribution to 401(k)?
My company allows after-tax money, as well as pre-tax money, for 401k
contribution. After-tax contribution limit is 20% of my after-tax pay.
Do you guys think which one I should maximize *first*,
$16500 pre-tax 401k contribution OR after-tax 401k contribution?
Thanks for any advice.
t*m
发帖数: 4414
46
我在单位存401K, conventional 401K (not roth 401K)
放满16500.
每年December,16500满了,多contribution的钱就变成"after tax contribution"
(1)所以每年都有几百块的after-tax contribution (ATC)
(2) ATC也享受公司的match
(3)放ATC的钱,应经被扣了federal和state 税
(4) ATC的钱也是tax defer growth, like a traditional IRA
(5) ATC也可以买401K里面的所有funds (选择还不错)
(6) ATC 象个traditional IRA, 59.5岁可以取,获利要交税
(7) 提前取ATC要罚获利部分的10%
(8)单位规定401K plan每年放钱要小于45000 (before tax contribution + ATC)
我们每年放满traditional IRA
所有投资和消费和供房之后,目前我家每个月结余大约4~5K.但是有330K mortgage.
我应该多放ATC吗? 谢谢
t*m
发帖数: 4414
47
I put 16500 into 401K as "before tax contribution" every year.
by the way, I can rollover the 401K "after tax contribution"
to IRA (without quiting the job)
in this case, I have more invest option; and opportunities to convert to
roth.
Taken together, should I put more many into "after-tax contribution 401K" on
top of $16500/year "before-tax contribution"?
Thanks!

the
都放
f*******n
发帖数: 12623
48
来自主题: Investment版 - 请教一个401k contribution limit的问题
17500是所有自己contribution的limit。就是Traditional contributions+Roth
contributions总和的limit

contribution
m*********t
发帖数: 1250
49
来自主题: Investment版 - After tax contribution (
It looks like you are right.
http://news.morningstar.com/articlenet/article.aspx?id=682209
More importantly, the tax treatment of Roth 401(k) contributions and afterta
x contributions is different. The earnings on Roth 401(k) contributions begi
n compounding tax-free from the get-go.
Meanwhile, to the extent that the aftertax contributions generate investment
earnings inside the 401(k), those earnings compound on a tax-deferred--not
tax-free--basis (***).
Only when the aftertax dollars are remov... 阅读全帖
y***n
发帖数: 114
50
Just noticed that I have reached this year's personal contribution limit (e.
g. $16,500) and cannot contribute any more for the rest of the year. Does
this mean the company will also top matching since my contribution will be
zero? Should have checked the balance earlier to make sure at least
contribute some amount every month in the year.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 下页 末页 (共10页)