|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t*****p
发帖数: 150 | 1 Original Contributions: The record reflects that the beneficiary has:
1.Worked as a researcher and scientist in the field of mechanical
engineering.
2.Skills, knowledge experience, and in the field of mechanical engineering.
However，you have not provided sufficient evidence to establish:
1. What the beneficiary's original scientific, scholarly, or business-
related contributions are
2. Why the beneficiary's contributions are original; and/or
3. Why the beneficiary's contributions are of major significance in the
field.
Please submit additional evidence to establish how the beneficiary's
contributions are considered original and are contributions of major
significance in field of mechanical engineering.
这个我能想到的就是再要推荐信？
Authorship:
To establish eligibility under this criterion, the research must be shown to
have affected the field in a way that sets the beneficiary above others in
the field, or is otherwise indicative of national or international acclaim.
Objective evidence, such as the citation of the beneficiary’s work by
others, may satisfy the requirement for extensive documentation of
extraordinary ability.
The record reflects that the beneficiary has authored two articles in
professional journals and two other papers. However, you have not provided
sufficient evidence of the beneficiary’s authorship of scholarly articles
in the field of mechanical engineering in professional journals, or other
major media.
Moreover, it is expected that researchers will publish articles discussing
their research. It does not follow that all researchers who publish articles
in peer-reviewed journals enjoys sustained acclaim in their field. The
record does not reflect that the beneficiary’s articles or papers have been
extensively cited by others in the field of mechanical engineering. Also,
you have not provided sufficient evidence to establish that the beneficiary
enjoys a measure of influence in the field of mechanical engineering through
his publications. The material you submitted does not distinguish the
beneficiary from other engineers, researchers, or scientists in his field.
Please provide evidence of the beneficiary’s authorship of scholarly
articles in the field, in professional journals, or other major media. Also,
please provide evidence to establish the significance and importance of the
beneficiary’s scholarly articles in the field. Additionally please provide
evidence to establish the significance and importance of the professional
journals or other major media that have punished the beneficiary’s
scholarly articles. Indicate if the publication has local, national, or
international circulation, How often it is printed, and the number of copies
printed.
本人3篇第一作者的文章，claim authorship这一项的时候只是列出了几个杂志的名字
，没有具体说明每个杂志的重要性。 文章没有引用，杂志也是一般般. | l*****s
发帖数: 240 | 2 我觉得你应该把杂志的排名列出来，比如JCR的排名，来强调你的significance
完全没有引用吗？多查几个网站，有时候他们之间是互补的
另外，你有没有review过paper或者grant之类的，这也是很重要的贡献。
能有公司support O-1很难得，祝你好运，早日拿到O-1
【在 t*****p 的大作中提到】
: Original Contributions: The record reflects that the beneficiary has:
: 1.Worked as a researcher and scientist in the field of mechanical
: engineering.
: 2.Skills, knowledge experience, and in the field of mechanical engineering.
: However，you have not provided sufficient evidence to establish:
: 1. What the beneficiary's original scientific, scholarly, or business-
: related contributions are
: 2. Why the beneficiary's contributions are original; and/or
: 3. Why the beneficiary's contributions are of major significance in the
: field.
| t*****p
发帖数: 150 | 3 review有啊，也承认了。
完全没有引用，3篇中2篇是博士期间11，12年发的，文章比较新还有可能也比较水没人
引用，另外一篇是国内的硕士的。
contribution怎么回复呢，我越来越没有信用了。
公司还claim了high salary连这一项律师都他妈的搞不定，就提供一个很简单网站统计
的类似职位的平均工资，连比较都没有。
【在 l*****s 的大作中提到】
: 我觉得你应该把杂志的排名列出来，比如JCR的排名，来强调你的significance
: 完全没有引用吗？多查几个网站，有时候他们之间是互补的
: 另外，你有没有review过paper或者grant之类的，这也是很重要的贡献。
: 能有公司support O-1很难得，祝你好运，早日拿到O-1
| w********m
发帖数: 1137 | | l*****s
发帖数: 240 | 5 既然有律师，就听律师的。另外，找独立推荐人帮你写比较有力的推荐信，可能是最可
行策略之一。没事的，肯定能过得去，就是过程比较煎熬罢了。
【在 l*****s 的大作中提到】
: 我觉得你应该把杂志的排名列出来，比如JCR的排名，来强调你的significance
: 完全没有引用吗？多查几个网站，有时候他们之间是互补的
: 另外，你有没有review过paper或者grant之类的，这也是很重要的贡献。
: 能有公司support O-1很难得，祝你好运，早日拿到O-1
| t*****p
发帖数: 150 | 6 我本来就交了6封推荐信，3封独立的，都不知道在去那里找独立推荐人
【在 l*****s 的大作中提到】
: 既然有律师，就听律师的。另外，找独立推荐人帮你写比较有力的推荐信，可能是最可
: 行策略之一。没事的，肯定能过得去，就是过程比较煎熬罢了。
| t*****p
发帖数: 150 | 7
【在 t*****p 的大作中提到】
: Original Contributions: The record reflects that the beneficiary has:
: 1.Worked as a researcher and scientist in the field of mechanical
: engineering.
: 2.Skills, knowledge experience, and in the field of mechanical engineering.
: However，you have not provided sufficient evidence to establish:
: 1. What the beneficiary's original scientific, scholarly, or business-
: related contributions are
: 2. Why the beneficiary's contributions are original; and/or
: 3. Why the beneficiary's contributions are of major significance in the
: field.
| l***9
发帖数: 432 | 8 Bless!
【在 t*****p 的大作中提到】
: Original Contributions: The record reflects that the beneficiary has:
: 1.Worked as a researcher and scientist in the field of mechanical
: engineering.
: 2.Skills, knowledge experience, and in the field of mechanical engineering.
: However，you have not provided sufficient evidence to establish:
: 1. What the beneficiary's original scientific, scholarly, or business-
: related contributions are
: 2. Why the beneficiary's contributions are original; and/or
: 3. Why the beneficiary's contributions are of major significance in the
: field.
| t***s
发帖数: 1247 | 9 没有引用的话确实看上去不大significant，因为IO比较都是外行，所以你的告诉他们
你得工作怎么样significant，列一下杂志排名，或者找杂志编辑写个信
另外，有没有conference paper？如果是international的也可以吹一下
其他的workshop之类的，通通通算上
另外，请问你得公司怎么样？算业内大牛吗？
【在 l*****s 的大作中提到】
: 我觉得你应该把杂志的排名列出来，比如JCR的排名，来强调你的significance
: 完全没有引用吗？多查几个网站，有时候他们之间是互补的
: 另外，你有没有review过paper或者grant之类的，这也是很重要的贡献。
: 能有公司support O-1很难得，祝你好运，早日拿到O-1
| T******o
发帖数: 244 | 10 完全没引用是IO的攻击点。只能从侧面证明你牛b了。找你老板再找几个牛b的推荐人吧
。 最好写写你的研究方向引用本来就少，或者你的文章很新，所以没引用。 | t*****p
发帖数: 150 | 11 不算大牛啊，但还不错把，大中型公司，每年销售额也有好几个Billion，谢谢的你建
议，只能去找杂志排名了，然后找编辑写信了。有几个国际会议的poster。这个也只能
对付authorship了，contribution只能再去找推荐信。
【在 t***s 的大作中提到】
: 没有引用的话确实看上去不大significant，因为IO比较都是外行，所以你的告诉他们
: 你得工作怎么样significant，列一下杂志排名，或者找杂志编辑写个信
: 另外，有没有conference paper？如果是international的也可以吹一下
: 其他的workshop之类的，通通通算上
: 另外，请问你得公司怎么样？算业内大牛吗？
| t*****p
发帖数: 150 | 12 谢谢，只要再找推荐信了来对付contribution,找编辑写信说明杂志的重要性， 研究方
向引用少，文章很新。
悲剧哦，CSC加弱背景。
【在 T******o 的大作中提到】
: 完全没引用是IO的攻击点。只能从侧面证明你牛b了。找你老板再找几个牛b的推荐人吧
: 。 最好写写你的研究方向引用本来就少，或者你的文章很新，所以没引用。
| g*****a
发帖数: 1692 | 13 请问你得Review大概多少呢？
不是号称要claim 3 条，authorship, contribution 和judgement? | t*****p
发帖数: 150 | 14 review承认了。有10个左右，2个杂志，8个行业会议。
【在 g*****a 的大作中提到】
: 请问你得Review大概多少呢？
: 不是号称要claim 3 条，authorship, contribution 和judgement?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
