n********e 发帖数: 518 | 1 今年弄到一个会议的committee成员,最多可以审5-6篇文章。是不是可以抓
住这个机会,多审几篇,攒个数量。有两个问题:
1. 会议和杂志审稿分量,在IO看来是一样的吗?还是杂志审稿分量要重一些?
2. 同一会议审稿几篇,在IO看来会不会不太好?
各位高人能否给些建议,不胜感激啊! | n********e 发帖数: 518 | | T*******y 发帖数: 6523 | 3 I would think that journal reviews are weighted more, but there is never a
number requirement. As long as you have enough journal reviews, more
proceeding reviews would only make your case look stronger.
No problem. That's often what a TPC member does. Also, being in a TPC is
better than being a regular reviewer. You can even get a letter from the
General Chair to say something nice for you. Such a letter is not a full-
blown reference letter, but it can be used to strengthen your review part. | n********e 发帖数: 518 | 4 太谢谢您了!看了会议审稿分量还是不行,呵呵。
【在 T*******y 的大作中提到】 : I would think that journal reviews are weighted more, but there is never a : number requirement. As long as you have enough journal reviews, more : proceeding reviews would only make your case look stronger. : No problem. That's often what a TPC member does. Also, being in a TPC is : better than being a regular reviewer. You can even get a letter from the : General Chair to say something nice for you. Such a letter is not a full- : blown reference letter, but it can be used to strengthen your review part.
|
|