n********e
发帖数: 518 | 1 今年弄到一个会议的committee成员，最多可以审5-6篇文章。是不是可以抓
住这个机会，多审几篇，攒个数量。有两个问题：
1. 会议和杂志审稿分量，在IO看来是一样的吗？还是杂志审稿分量要重一些？
2. 同一会议审稿几篇，在IO看来会不会不太好？
各位高人能否给些建议，不胜感激啊！ | n********e
发帖数: 518 | | T*******y
发帖数: 6523 | 3 I would think that journal reviews are weighted more, but there is never a
number requirement. As long as you have enough journal reviews, more
proceeding reviews would only make your case look stronger.
No problem. That's often what a TPC member does. Also, being in a TPC is
better than being a regular reviewer. You can even get a letter from the
General Chair to say something nice for you. Such a letter is not a full-
blown reference letter, but it can be used to strengthen your review part. | n********e
发帖数: 518 | 4 太谢谢您了！看了会议审稿分量还是不行，呵呵。
【在 T*******y 的大作中提到】
: I would think that journal reviews are weighted more, but there is never a
: number requirement. As long as you have enough journal reviews, more
: proceeding reviews would only make your case look stronger.
: No problem. That's often what a TPC member does. Also, being in a TPC is
: better than being a regular reviewer. You can even get a letter from the
: General Chair to say something nice for you. Such a letter is not a full-
: blown reference letter, but it can be used to strengthen your review part.
|
|
