w*********r
发帖数: 2095 | 1 Ford F-150 frontal crash rating只有3个星。差不多最差的了。 |
|
w*********r
发帖数: 2095 | 2 Ford F-150 frontal crash rating只有3个星。差不多最差的了。 |
|
e******g
发帖数: 5344 | 3 唯一的问题是frontal impact只有三颗星，对撞基本死定了。这车的windows sticker
上就有。 |
|
q**j
发帖数: 10612 | 4 麻烦推荐A4, passat，cc的安全高手给解释一下，这个德国车门是不是太厚重了，所以
容易飞出去？Accord是日本车又怎么样，总要让中国人活下去才是最重要的吧？留得青
山在，不怕没柴烧？
When the Volkswagen CC was put to the test, the driver door was sheared off
its hinges. The CC is the first vehicle the Institute has ever evaluated to
completely lose its door. An open door results in an automatic downgrade to
poor for restraints and kinematics, as also was the case with the Audi A4, w
hose door opened but remained attached to the car. Doors should stay closed
in a crash to keep peo... 阅读全帖 |
|
g*********r
发帖数: 403 | 5 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration1
Overall Rating ****
Frontal Crash *****
Side Crash *****
Rollover *** |
|
w******2
发帖数: 56 | 6 参考来源： http://www.iihs.org/iihs/ratings/vehicle/v/toyota/camry/2014?print-view#inline
The Toyota Camry was redesigned for the 2012 model year. Beginning with 2014
models built after December 2013, the front structure was modified to
improve occupant protection in small overlap frontal crashes (note:
information about when a specific vehicle was manufactured is on the
certification label typically affixed to the car on or near the driver door)
. For new car buyers, the 2014 cars with the modificat... 阅读全帖 |
|
h*d
发帖数: 19309 | 7 By Santanu Choudhury
NEW DELHI — Several of the most popular cars sold in India — including the
Tata Motors Ltd. Nano and the Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. Alto — failed to
protect passengers during collisions in independent crash tests on India-
made automobiles by an international safety watchdog.
The London-based Global NCAP said Friday that crash tests on five models,
which together made up about a fifth of the new cars sold in India last year
, showed that passengers risked death or serious inju... 阅读全帖 |
|
g********d
发帖数: 19244 | 8 2014.5 是前车体结构加强后的camry, small overlap得分为acceptable
其余的2014是得分为poor的camry
买camry,还请认准2014.5
Beginning with 2014 models built after December 2013, the front structure
was modified to improve occupant protection in small overlap frontal crash.
For new car buyers, the 2014 cars with the modifications are listed as "2014
.5" models on the window sticker. |
|
c*****e
发帖数: 1106 | 9 "The small overlap test replicates a scenario that occurs in a quarter of
frontal collisions involving serious or fatal injury to front-seat occupants
...
In the latest test group, the Honda Pilot was judged to be the worst
performer. IIHS notes that the drivers space was seriously compromised by
intruding structure, and the parking brake pedal moved more than 16 inches.
Further, the crash-test dummy’s head barely contacted the front air bag, as
the steering wheel was shoved several inches inboa... 阅读全帖 |
|
m*****3
发帖数: 13701 | 10 看来我是想当然了，其实你引用的那句话还有下一句，另外第二排的 sample size
3537, 第三排才 165， 似乎有点儿太 biased 了。
Overall, children have a 43.4% lower fatality risk in second-row-seats than
front seats and a 58.5% lower risk in third-row-seats.
This is associated with a relatively high involvement in frontal impacts
where fatality risks are lower in the second-row (0.17% vs. 0.65%) and in
right-side impacts (0.47% vs. 1.90%) where children are generally better
protected in the back seat. These crash directions involved 49.6% of seco... 阅读全帖 |
|
r*z
发帖数: 1679 | 11 最后买了个ML350. 开了1周了。很喜欢。驾驶感很好，没有RX350加速贴后背的感觉了
，反应很灵敏。我不懂车不知道怎么形容，最不同的是一种SOLID的感觉，抓地，过
BUMP相对温柔。DEALER服务不比LEXUS差。还有各种味道的ICE CREAM,嘻嘻。
宝马X3看了也开了，里面外面都不太喜欢。X5看了没开（因为我不要第3排，但不要第3
排的话，第2排空间并没有变大）。Q5试开了2.0版，加速也有贴背，转弯有点飘，样子
中庸，后来发现FRONTAL CRASH是4星，就PASS了。
购车之旅结束啦，REVIEW都在这两帖里了。
I3. |
|
g*********r
发帖数: 403 | 12 SUV may have more marked change than sedan when frontal tire is flat. |
|
p******3
发帖数: 318 | 13 这车跟MDX的ultra high strength steel frame 比那个更结实呢？
The Safety of Steel
When it comes to producing cost-effective structures that can resist
intrusion, steel provides the competitive edge.
Article From: Automotive Design & Production Gary S. Vasilash , Editor-in-
Chief
Share on stumbleupon Share on twitter Share on gmail Share on favorites More
Sharing Services 4
Posted on: 5/30/2014
The 2014 Acura MDX has something that no other vehicle did when it was
launched. It has the world’s first ultra- hi... 阅读全帖 |
|
A***n
发帖数: 8859 | 14 一切都是有原因的
Mazda5 and Nissan Leaf lose their Consumer Reports recommendation
Four small cars earn the lowest rating in latest insurance industry crash
test
Published: July 30, 2014 12:01 AM
Mazda5
Photo: IIHS
Only one among a dozen small cars earned a Good score in the latest crash
tests conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS): the
Mini Cooper Countryman. Four others—Fiat 500L, Mazda5, Nissan Juke, and
Nissan Leaf— earned the lowest score of Poor.
As a result, Consumer Repor... 阅读全帖 |
|
D***0
发帖数: 5214 | 15 应该是Moderate overlap frontal 视频51秒暂停看 |
|
|
m****s
发帖数: 8992 | 17 搭车卖车
2006.奥迪 A8. 125,000 highway miles
Noted, this is an old car,
But has full suite of lux and tech features. Shines like new. Special
frontal 保护膜still intact.
Leather steering and seats, and heated all around.
All 4 side windows tinted black.
Solar top panel for A/C cooling in summer when the car is parked in sun.
电动后窗帘。 Shines like new
Air suspension, full aluminum body
Audi Parking assistant. Keyless entry. Push button start.
Adaptive headlights. The beam turns to where the car is turn... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
b****g
发帖数: 625 | 19 2015 GMC Acadia SLT2
OTD $44,681.17.
大家觉得如何？
193-Ebony, Perforated Leather Seating Surfaces4SB-SLT-2 Pkg58U-Carbon Black
MetallicA45-2-position memory for driver seat & OS mirrorABB-Seating, 7-
Passenger, 2,2,3AG3-Seat Adjuster, Driver, 8-Way PowerAH8-Seat Adjuster,
Front Passenger, 8-Way PowerAQ4-Seat, 2nd Row Captains ChairsAR9-Seats,
front deluxe bucketARN-Seat, Rear, 3rd Row, 60/40 Bench, ManualAXE-Window,
Pwr. Express Up/Dwn DriverAYQ-Air Bags, Frontal & Side Impact Driver &
PassB37-Floor... 阅读全帖 |
|
D***0
发帖数: 5214 | 20 iihs的报告里面，对于某些测试，写得很清楚，只能相似重量相似车型比较。有些人选
择性忽略而已。具体:
Small/moderate overlap front标明了"Important: Frontal crash test ratings
should be compared only among vehicles of similar weight."
side/roof标明了:"Side crash test ratings can be compared across vehicle
categories."和“Roof strength test ratings can be compared across vehicle
categories.”
head标明了:"Important: Ratings for head restraints & seats should be
compared only among vehicles of similar weight." |
|
t*******y
发帖数: 1289 | 21 安全气囊上的红印子挺大一片的啊，应该起作用了。
仔细看了看介绍：
The dummy’s head barely contacted the frontal airbag before sliding off the
left side, leaving the head vulnerable to contact with forward structure.
The side curtain airbag deployed and had sufficient forward coverage to
protect the head from contact with side structure and outside objects. The
side torso airbag also deployed.
主要是气囊跑了。 |
|
|
|
R**0
发帖数: 51 | 24 你大概不知道你在说什么，同平台又怎样不同平台又怎样？
>>
In Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) crash tests the Highlander
was rated "Good" overall in the frontal offset crash test.[9] The IIHS
reported the Highlander had one of the lowest driver fatality rates among
all vehicles, and amongst SUVs, only the Toyota 4Runner had a lower driver
fatality rate. This report looked at 2001–05 model year vehicles in the USA
.[10]
>> |
|
g********d
发帖数: 19244 | 25 EDGE 安全性很差
windows sticker上的frontal crash 只有3颗星
driver死亡率也是倒数第一 |
|
|
|
r***i
发帖数: 9780 | 28 lol
我造谣？
确实啊，给说少了，原来尼玛丰田有这么多重复召回，我都给算成一次了，这回好好数
了下
上一代rav4 一共召回过如下问题，累积召回次数21次之多
SEATS:FRONT ASSEMBLY:SEAT HEATER/COOLER
AIR BAGS:DRIVER SIDE INFLATOR MODULE
SUSPENSION:REAR 08/28/2013
VISIBILITY:POWER WINDOW DEVICES AND CONTROLS
SUSPENSION:REAR 08/02/2012
AIR BAGS:SIDE/WINDOW
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL:ACCELERATOR PEDAL 02/24/2011
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL:ACCELERATOR PEDAL 01/21/2010
EQUIPMENT:OTHER:LABELS 02/03/2010
EQUIPMENT:OTHER:LABELS 06/15/2009
POWER TRAIN:AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION:GEAR POSITION ... 阅读全帖 |
|
X***9
发帖数: 7385 | 29 这里不细述本田具体有些什么安全技术，只说几个事实来表明一下本田的态度
日本这么一个寸土是金的地方，本田在并不是那么有钱的情况下2000年就在日本栃木
縣Tochigi兴建了当时世界第一个市内全天候多角度全方位的真实车对车的碰撞试验场
这个场地的大小相当于一个职业联盟棒球场，可以实现多角度，多状况实车碰撞实验
角度从每15度可变，而且重叠测试可以是100%，50%和10%
03年，本田又在美国ohio投资3千万美元新建了“Automotive Safety Research
Facility”
拥有可移动的100吨的crash barrier block，速度可以从2.5mph到60mph,侧撞角度可以
从90度调整到27度
同时拥有2家世界上最先进和复杂的室内碰撞实验场，目前还没有其他厂家能有本田这
么用心。
本田花了3年的时间开发了世界第一个"pitching sled test" 有效的模拟了前撞时候车
后部惯性抬起的状态可能。
“The crash-test simulator with pitching capabilities provides accurate
simula... 阅读全帖 |
|
X***9
发帖数: 7385 | 30 On select models, the next-generation Advanced Compatibility Engineering (
ACE), sometimes called ACE II, body structure features our highest-grade
steel yet. ACE is a Honda-exclusive body design that utilizes a network of
connected structural elements to distribute frontal crash energy more evenly
throughout the front of the vehicle. This helps reduce the force
transferred to the cabin and more evenly disperse the forces transferred to
other vehicles involved. |
|
J********o
发帖数: 17447 | 31 没人说ES350不好, 拉皮林肯很烂也是事实, 但是你这种捧的手段太低劣, 也就喷喷
laoselang
你家ES
Beginning with 2016 models, the front structure, A-pillar/roof rail, hinge
pillar, and door sill were modified to improve occupant protection in small
overlap frontal crashes. Small overlap ratings apply to both the ES 350 and
ES 300h.
Lower leg/foot A跟纸糊的MKS一样的.. |
|
|
t********i
发帖数: 7856 | 33 从上代的-16.0缩水到-12.5。如果你再看看侧撞的其他measurements 和 moderate
overlap frontal test 的 measurements 就会发现，所有的参数都变差了。追尾测试
除外，由原来P改进为G。
这代Camry确实是丰田拧毛巾的典型，良心大大的坏。 |
|
l*******g
发帖数: 27064 | 34 你个撒谎成性的玩意儿，全家死了多少回了？
上次就是回复你的帖子
转眼就不认识了？
作者： rihei 发帖分布 关注TA 屏蔽TA
发表于 2015-07-05 19:02:04
lol
我造谣？
确实啊，给说少了，原来尼玛丰田有这么多重复召回，我都给算成一次了，这回好好数
了下
上一代rav4 一共召回过如下问题，累积召回次数21次之多
SEATS:FRONT ASSEMBLY:SEAT HEATER/COOLER
AIR BAGS:DRIVER SIDE INFLATOR MODULE
SUSPENSION:REAR 08/28/2013
VISIBILITY:POWER WINDOW DEVICES AND CONTROLS
SUSPENSION:REAR 08/02/2012
AIR BAGS:SIDE/WINDOW
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL:ACCELERATOR PEDAL 02/24/2011
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL:ACCELERATOR PEDAL 01/21/2010
EQUIPMENT:OTHER:LABELS 02/0... 阅读全帖 |
|
r******o
发帖数: 1530 | 35 Benz好像是第一次small overlap就不过关的，C class似乎连side airbag都没打开（
或者是没有）。
roll over自从有ESC普及以后，现在已经不是对SUV最大的威胁了
非要说rollover比frontal更重要，太钻牛角尖。 |
|
k*********s
发帖数: 4474 | 36 【 以下文字转载自 Auto_Fans 俱乐部 】
发信人: felixcat (Cirrus Logic), 信区: Auto_Fans
标 题: 电子功能多还是不太靠谱
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Jan 11 15:06:55 2016, 美东)
上个星期车子的前测距雷达坏了。这个测距雷达是长距离类型的，并不是泊车用的那一
类。车子的动态巡航、拥挤交通时自动走停、frontal collision warning等一大堆功
能都要用到它。
是怎样坏的呢？动态巡航，当雷达探测到前面有车的时候仪表板上会亮起一个红色小车
的图标。那天在高速上跑，打开了巡航功能。那时前面有车，红色小图标亮起来了，一
切正常。过了一阵子前面的车还在，但红色小图标突然熄灭了，接着车子就开始往上提
速。紧接着前面堵车，前车已经逐渐停下来，我的车还使劲加速往前冲（正常情况下它
会自动慢慢停下来），幸亏我一脚急刹车override了系统。
接下来的十几分钟，我重新打开了动态巡航。在前面有车的情况下，那盏小红灯时亮时
灭，当然车子也一会儿暴冲一会儿刹车。我脚放在刹车上一直提防着，就想看它最后想
怎样。... 阅读全帖 |
|
C***O
发帖数: 156 | 37 一辆有frontal collision的Honda Odyssey。修理换了air bag，bumper beam和cover
。想看看report上怎么说。先谢过！
VIN 5fnrl5h90cb010242 |
|
h*********8
发帖数: 404 | 38 frontal crush should raise the speed from 40 to 80 miles/hour... |
|
h*********8
发帖数: 404 | 39 frontal crush should raise the speed from 40 to 80 miles/hour... |
|
t********i
发帖数: 7856 | 40 http://www.mitbbs.com/article/Automobile/35432951_3.html
你是SB么？为什么明知故问？
发信人: rihei (嘿嘿), 信区: Automobile
标 题: Re: 我觉得iihs的碰撞测试应该用可移动混凝土块
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Jul 27 22:27:29 2016, 美东)
其实连iihs自己都认识到正面碰撞测试有问题，不知道为什么不改进
Unlike frontal crash test ratings, side ratings can be compared across
vehicle type and weight categories. |
|
t********i
发帖数: 7856 | 41 http://www.mitbbs.com/article/Automobile/35432951_3.html
你是SB么？为什么明知故问？
发信人: rihei (嘿嘿), 信区: Automobile
标 题: Re: 我觉得iihs的碰撞测试应该用可移动混凝土块
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Jul 27 22:27:29 2016, 美东)
其实连iihs自己都认识到正面碰撞测试有问题，不知道为什么不改进
Unlike frontal crash test ratings, side ratings can be compared across
vehicle type and weight categories. |
|
r***i
发帖数: 9780 | 42 其实连iihs自己都认识到正面碰撞测试有问题，不知道为什么不改进
Unlike frontal crash test ratings, side ratings can be compared across
vehicle type and weight categories. |
|
t********i
发帖数: 7856 | 43 The small overlap frontal impact and side impact results were really bad.
This generation of 300C/Charger were designed in 2011. It's a shame that FCA
made such a tincan. |
|
x****u
发帖数: 12955 | 44
That doesn't say much. Cars are designed to not deform on side impact, but
crumple on frontal impact. So you could say both are doing what it is
designed to do. We need another incident where the Volvo hits the Toyota on
the side to properly determine which is better. |
|
x****u
发帖数: 12955 | 45
That doesn't say much. Cars are designed to not deform on side impact, but
crumple on frontal impact. So you could say both are doing what it is
designed to do. We need another incident where the Volvo hits the Toyota on
the side to properly determine which is better. |
|
D***0
发帖数: 5214 | 46 http://www.iihs.org/iihs/ratings/vehicle/v/acura/tlx-4-door-sedan
原因是一场弄巧成拙的修改，“加强”了却更差了。
The Acura TLX was introduced in the 2015 model year as a replacement for the
discontinued Acura TL and TSX models. Beginning with 2016 models, the front
door hinge pillar was reinforced with the intent of improving occupant
protection in small overlap frontal crashes. The change, however, wasn't
enough to improve the TSX's performance in the small overlap test.
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 13 |
|
C*****z
发帖数: 2050 | 47 我哪句话说撞18轮的不是ILX而是TLX？
贴TLX的报告是对“新本田的确比旧本田安全”的结论做个注释。既然你对TLX的测试结
果有“研究”，那就来捋一捋。你认为2016的TLX在IIHS small overlap front的结果
不如2015的原因是测试标准更严了，那实际是这样的吗？
IIHS的small overlap crash test protocol到目前为止一共出过四版，第三版是2014
年5月发布的，第四版是2016年7月发布的，而2015和2016款的TLX都是在2014年5月之后
、2016年7月之前测试的，所以这两款车都是依据第三版test protocol进行测试的，在
测试环节并无差异。而rating protocol目前最新的一版是第三版，也是2014年5月发布
的，所以意味着两款车的评价程序也没有差异。测试环节和评价程序都没有变化的情况
下，两车的结果不同，那只能归结为车的问题。
具体看看IIHS是怎么总结这两款车的：
2015：The Acura TLX was introduced in the 2015 model year. It is a
r... 阅读全帖 |
|
D***0
发帖数: 5214 | 48 http://www.iihs.org/iihs/ratings/vehicle/v/acura/tlx-4-door-sedan
原因是一场弄巧成拙的修改，“加强”了却更差了。
The Acura TLX was introduced in the 2015 model year as a replacement for the
discontinued Acura TL and TSX models. Beginning with 2016 models, the front
door hinge pillar was reinforced with the intent of improving occupant
protection in small overlap frontal crashes. The change, however, wasn't
enough to improve the TSX's performance in the small overlap test.
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 13 |
|
C*****z
发帖数: 2050 | 49 我哪句话说撞18轮的不是ILX而是TLX？
贴TLX的报告是对“新本田的确比旧本田安全”的结论做个注释。既然你对TLX的测试结
果有“研究”，那就来捋一捋。你认为2016的TLX在IIHS small overlap front的结果
不如2015的原因是测试标准更严了，那实际是这样的吗？
IIHS的small overlap crash test protocol到目前为止一共出过四版，第三版是2014
年5月发布的，第四版是2016年7月发布的，而2015和2016款的TLX都是在2014年5月之后
、2016年7月之前测试的，所以这两款车都是依据第三版test protocol进行测试的，在
测试环节并无差异。而rating protocol目前最新的一版是第三版，也是2014年5月发布
的，所以意味着两款车的评价程序也没有差异。测试环节和评价程序都没有变化的情况
下，两车的结果不同，那只能归结为车的问题。
具体看看IIHS是怎么总结这两款车的：
2015：The Acura TLX was introduced in the 2015 model year. It is a
r... 阅读全帖 |
|
m*********r
发帖数: 607 | 50 才在附近dealer试驾了2017 GT, engine noise不大, 油门踩着很松.整体还可以, 但报
价并不低. touring才有frontal collision mitigation. 从外州调入, 需要自己付运
输费$1000.dealer本人没有rebate, 只有车厂$2000. Quoted OTD price (6% tax) is
$35583. 这价格, 更愿意考虑RDX了. 另外, 这车看着不是很舒服. 车身不小, 但车轮
却不大, 看着有点单薄.
相比之下, 更喜欢家里的2010CRV, 但现在的CRV的车尾象RX的车头,真有点难看. |
|
