l******t
发帖数: 2243 | 1 thanks for sharing
发信人: shawjone (保持一个良好的心态), 信区: Immigration
标 题: totality回复大纲和一点EB1A DIY经验
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat Jul 23 12:37:24 2011, 美东)
timeline见 http://mitbbs.com/article1/Immigration/32008397_3_0.html
补充背景：
2011 PhD in bio field, now doing business related work.
10+ papers， including 5 papers published in 2011 with almost 0 citations（4
first author,2 pulished in 2011)
total citation 110+ (independent 90+), first author citation only ~20,
because most of them were published after 2010.(I d... 阅读全帖 |
|
e******r
发帖数: 9977 | 2 The petitioner must persuasively demonstrate that the national interest
would be adversely affected if a labor certification were required for the
alien.
At least according to NYDOT, the protection of U.S. workers inherently
benefits the national interest. The national interest resulting from the
alien's contribution must exceed this inherent national interest. In other
words, an alien seeking a national interest waiver must prove that he or she
will serve the national interest to a substantiall... 阅读全帖 |
|
R*********a
发帖数: 306 | 3 I have reviewed ~10 papers from 3 different journal, and have 1 supportive
letter from an editor, how can I address the question that REF mentioned:
"You have submitted evidence the beneficiary reviewed articles for various
peer-reviewed journals, The plain language of the regulation has been met,
as the beneficiary reviewed articles.
Although the beneficiary has served as a judge of others in the field by
reviewing articles for peer-reviewed journals, the reviewing the work of
others in the fie... 阅读全帖 |
|
d********n
发帖数: 132 | 4 很郁闷，递的时候已经竭尽全力了，需要再要推荐信吗？
希望大侠帮忙，感激中
Background: PhD in Mechanical Engineering, now postdoc 2nd year.
Publication: 12 （5 first-author，average internal journals in my field, 7
Chinese journals)+ 12 conference
Citation: 20 total, 12 independent
Review: 8 times for 4 journals
Recommendation letter: 5 (3 independent）
Claim: 1 contribution,2 authorship，3 judge, PL 16页，材料一共36多页
IO(TS): 1113
RFE:
核心是 2 authorship，3 judge 是satisfied,但是1 不满足，需要补充材料。
下面是详细内容：
*
(v) Evidence of the beneficiary's original... 阅读全帖 |
|
d********n
发帖数: 132 | 5 很郁闷，递的时候已经竭尽全力了，需要再要推荐信吗？
希望大侠帮忙，感激中
Background: PhD in Mechanical Engineering, now postdoc 2nd year.
Publication: 12 （5 first-author，average internal journals in my field, 7
Chinese journals)+ 12 conference
Citation: 20 total, 12 independent
Review: 8 times for 4 journals
Recommendation letter: 5 (3 independent）
Claim: 1 contribution,2 authorship，3 judge, PL 16页，材料一共36多页
IO(TS): 1111
RFE:
核心是 2 authorship，3 judge 是satisfied,但是1 不满足，需要补充材料。
下面是详细内容：
*
(v) Evidence of the beneficiary's original... 阅读全帖 |
|
H*********3
发帖数: 84 | 6 Case算是较弱的，专业EE，国内土博，现top60大学博后，博后三年了。
Publication：21 English journal papers (15 as the first-author, and 6 as a
co-author)，8 English proceeding papers (3 as the first-author, and 4 as a
co-author), 3 English conference abstracts, 12 Chinese journal papers (3 as
first author), and 3 Chinese proceeding papers (2 as the first author, and 1
as a co-author) in nationally renowned conferences, a co-authored book
chapter, , 4 chinese patent applications.
Citation: 150+，All are independent from English... 阅读全帖 |
|
m******c
发帖数: 2248 | 7 EB1A弱case, TSCnon-PP, RFE by #100.
Background：
国内硕士, 美国Top15 Univ. Ph.D in biomedical science, 现在post-doc一年半。
1st Author Publications 5: 4 in English (IF分别是 3, 5, 6, 9), 它引少了些，
共30次(今天查了一下, 新加的和以前没发现的共增加了12个它引, 此外还新发现2,3个
网站报道我的文章，比如newsrx), 1 in Chinese, 它引40次。
2nd或3rd Author Publications 8: 3 in English (IF分别是5, 9, 17), 文章比较新
它引共3次。5 in Chinese,这个基本是烂文章，它引也只有3次。
Reviews: 22 manuscripts for 6 journals (现增加为28篇for 8 journals).
Recommendation letters: 6 (4 independent）,5美国1加拿大，全是faculties,无业
界。
P... 阅读全帖 |
|
y******y
发帖数: 676 | 8 RFE letter:
A two-part analysis is used to determine whether the beneficiary is an
individual of extraordinary ability:
• First, we determine whether the petitioner has submitted evidence
to show that the beneficiary:
o Has received a one-time achievement … or
o Qualified under at least three of the ten criteria requested for this
classification
• Second, we determine whether the petitioner has submitted
evidence demonstrating that the beneficiary:
o Has sustained nati... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
y******y
发帖数: 676 | 9 RFE letter:
A two-part analysis is used to determine whether the beneficiary is an
individual of extraordinary ability:
• First, we determine whether the petitioner has submitted evidence
to show that the beneficiary:
o Has received a one-time achievement … or
o Qualified under at least three of the ten criteria requested for this
classification
• Second, we determine whether the petitioner has submitted
evidence demonstrating that the beneficiary:
o Has sustained nati... 阅读全帖 |
|
s*****o
发帖数: 1540 | 10 我求这个模板是有原因的。可惜只有EB1A，没有1B。
通过看模板和RFE的区别，模板同时强调significance and orignality。RFE基本上不
提major significance，却一直提orignal。我认为IO承认我贡献的重要性，但是对原
创新提出疑问。我回答要针对orignal来，而不是针对significant来，不知道对不对。
-------------------
谈到CONTRIBUTION，EB1A的模板上说This criterion has not been met because the
evidence submitted does not show that the beneficiary’s contributions are
considered to be of major significance in the field of endeavor. 。。。To
assist in determining whether the beneficiary’s contributions are original
and of maj... 阅读全帖 |
|
w****i
发帖数: 520 | 11 之前收到的denial notice里面说道：generally such honors are not considered to
be national or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence
in the field of endeavor because they are generally given to students or
early career professionals in the field. Experienced experts in the field
are not seeking acadmemic awards. As such, student awards like "best paper"
awards cannot be considered prizes or awards in your field of endeavor.
迷惑了，不是说best paper award 能算的吗？听律师说，如果推荐信里面强调best
paper award 是在众多... 阅读全帖 |
|
y******y
发帖数: 676 | 12 刚刚收到的消息。
timeline:
１４０PP RD: 10/6/2011
REF: 10/18/2011
REF response RD: 1/11/2012
AD by email: 1/18/2012
自己觉得三项都比较弱，在回复REF的时候也没有大的变化，唯一就是大概引用从９９
涨到１０３。我也看了一些其他网友的经验怎样把自己归到small percentage. 我觉得
太费劲，没有用。我很庆幸自己没有急着回复，让我有机会看到了以下这位网友的经验
铁，受益匪浅。
http://www.mitbbs.com/article/Immigration/32143339_3.html
我打印了那个ｍｅｍｏ以及两个判例（都是有大段讨论contribution的），认真读了一
遍，把能用得着的话highlight出来，用在了我的回复中。并按照ｍｅｍｏ的思路重新
组织了材料。 我以前的ＰＬ是按版上前人的模板，但人家的申请被批准的时候，那个
著名的案例Kazarian vs. USCIS还没有出来，所以现在看来我当初的ＰＬ写的并不好。
看了memo和案例以后，重新组织的contributi... 阅读全帖 |
|
y******y
发帖数: 676 | 13 刚刚收到的消息。
timeline:
１４０PP RD: 10/6/2011
REF: 10/18/2011
REF response RD: 1/11/2012
AD by email: 1/18/2012
自己觉得三项都比较弱，在回复REF的时候也没有大的变化，唯一就是大概引用从９９
涨到１０３。我也看了一些其他网友的经验怎样把自己归到small percentage. 我觉得
太费劲，没有用。我很庆幸自己没有急着回复，让我有机会看到了以下这位网友的经验
铁，受益匪浅。
http://www.mitbbs.com/article/Immigration/32143339_3.html
我打印了那个ｍｅｍｏ以及两个判例（都是有大段讨论contribution的），认真读了一
遍，把能用得着的话highlight出来，用在了我的回复中。并按照ｍｅｍｏ的思路重新
组织了材料。 我以前的ＰＬ是按版上前人的模板，但人家的申请被批准的时候，那个
著名的案例Kazarian vs. USCIS还没有出来，所以现在看来我当初的ＰＬ写的并不好。
看了memo和案例以后，重新组织的contributi... 阅读全帖 |
|
m******c
发帖数: 2248 | 14 EB1A 1月份approved after RFE。为了回报本版同胞，在这里把自己的思路，分析及应
付RFE的经历写出来，希望能对大家有所帮助。RFE letter和律师有协议不能分享。请
见谅！
I-485递上去2个多礼拜了，希望早点收到FP notice和EAD, PA approvals。请大家
Bless我啊。~~~~~~
本人TSC， case较弱：time line和background 见http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t0/Immigration/32203415.html
2011年10月时被堪称杀手的XM100号RFE了。查阅版上历史，既有disaimisong和
chestnut RFE对决#100失败的例子，也有faithlove的成功例子，但是置顶IO名单里100
号好像还是据的case多，批的少。0100: RFE (10), Denial (7+1*), Approval (5),
经验1
最重要的是要仔细阅读RFE letter，不管它是不是模板，一定要仔细读，然后有针对
性地应付。
经验2: 无数前辈指出过，自己的东西要... 阅读全帖 |
|
m********y
发帖数: 33 | 15 穷人一个，没有包子，首先对各位XDJM的热情帮助表示衷心感谢！！！
背景：生物， 国内PhD，副教授，作为PI曾有4个grant(1个国家基金1个部级基金2项市
级人才奖励性质项目），2个国家级横向合作项目负责人，得过一些市级奖励，有14个
国内专利(1项授权，其他pending），28篇论文，一作14篇，4篇通讯作者，7篇英文论
文（impact factor 2-4分），在美国的研究暂时还没有相关paper；citation 不到60
而且都没有牛杂志引用；给国内某专业杂志连续审稿10年。现在美Top 5的名校任RA。
claim 3项：contribution，authorship和judge，有律师，认为case不strong，所以没
有pp，苦等了6个月，结果收到RFE。承认authorship和judge，但是认为contribution
证据不
足，另要求补充employer letter和contract等，原文大致如下：
The petitioner asserts that has played a key role as an independent
princi... 阅读全帖 |
|
c***p
发帖数: 1042 | 16 RFE 就是给了个模板
A. Documentation to establish that the beneficiary will continue to work in
their claimed area of expertise
It must be shown how the beneficiary will continue working in the United
States in the claimed area of expertise. The petition does not indicate that
the beneficiary has prearranged commitments for working in this field.
Please submit evidence that the beneficiary is coming to the United States
to continue work in the field. The work must be in the field in which the
beneficiar... 阅读全帖 |
|
l***i
发帖数: 2542 | 17 这个只是一个判例,继续研读发现好多判例都是和推荐人比较,然后说"好像差别有点大
啊."
看这个:
http://www.uscis.gov/err/B2%20-%20Aliens%20with%20Extraordinary
Many of the petitioner's references' credentials are far more impressive than those of the petitioner
While the petitioner need not demonstrate that there is no one more accomplished than herself to
qualify for the classification sought, it appears that the very top of her field of endeavor is far above
the level she has attained. In this case, the petitioner has not established that ... 阅读全帖 |
|
l***i
发帖数: 2542 | 18 替你挖:
发信人: bigbigbee (大蜜蜂: Phase-Ot), 信区: Immigration
标 题: Re: 140 RFE推荐信问题
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Mar 7 00:07:15 2012, 美东)
我个人是这么认为的，但是RFE不需要太多封信，2封到4封均可。
发信人: bigbigbee (大蜜蜂: 心诚则灵), 信区: Immigration
标 题: Re: RFE 追加的推荐信可以使用原先提交的推荐信的修改版吗？
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sun May 6 12:43:52 2012, 美东)
新的推荐人不独立也没关系啊，我就要了3封信，2封非独立，1封独立。
非独立的包括 和我一起做过项目的一个faculty, 一封系主任。
elsevier (plug-in hybrid) 于 (Sat Sep 10 01:23:45 2011, 美东) 提到:
见过补2-4封的不等.看io需要补什么材料了
jim0212 (Jim) 于 (Sat Sep 10 09:07:07 2011, 美东) 提到:
两三封够了，个人认为RF... 阅读全帖 |
|
e******r
发帖数: 9977 | 19 替你查了查，看起来需要雇主支持。
你不如直接申请EB1A，反正难度差不多
A: The O-1 visa is a non-immigrant employment-based visa classification for
foreign nationals who can demonstrate the sustained national or
international acclaim and recognition for achievements in the sciences,
education, business, or athletics. It requires the employer file a petition
for a nonimmigrant worker, along with evidence of the individual’s
extraordinary ability. The extraordinary ability in the field of sciences,
education, business, or athletics... 阅读全帖 |
|
k******e
发帖数: 8870 | 20 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
SpicyCrab (香辣蟹) 于 (Mon Jul 9 15:25:22 2012, 美东) 提到:
june 27, pp nsc, eb1a , 今天收到 intends to deny in mail (30天答复) 求大家
出出主意
第一条是说没有offer letter, 这个应该好弄
关键是后边的,请大家指点一下 这是说不承认review么？ 该怎么应对呀 我的背景cs
, review了40篇(10个杂志 10个会议)的水平不等的paper 有一个推荐先是associate
editor的 还有一个 associate editor的证明信
请问在回复这个 intend of deny 的时候 还应该提供什么材料呢？之前已经提供的材
料还要重新交么，还是只需要交补充材料？ 之前已经用过的强调review的推荐信 还
能用在这个的答复吗？ 多谢大家
USCIS has determined that the petitioner has provided suf... 阅读全帖 |
|
z*****g
发帖数: 558 | 21 非常感谢大家的回复!
我现在的问题是"student award"这个概念，其实claim 这个前，我反复读过要求 "
Generally, such honors are not considered to be nationally or
internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence in the field of
endeavor. Reason being, they are generally given to students or early career
professionals in the field and inherently exclude established professionals
who have already risen to the top of the field of endeavor."
，就
是 1。只要这个奖 是national or international, 2。不是专门为学生发的，所有成
果人士也是compete的。 按这个分析说来，国家自然科学奖肯定... 阅读全帖 |
|
W*******e
发帖数: 817 | 22 请板上著名律师办的。
背景：
化学。 1月6号收到， 8月3号NOID。14篇paper （没有第一作者， 都是老板第一作）
， 16个review。求版内的xdjm帮忙看看还有救吗？还是取消申请？
以下是NOID的内容：
Although the beneficiary peer-reviewed 16 times for the ……(7 different
journal names), because peer review is routine in the field and, by itself,
is not indicative of or consistent with sustained national or international
acclaim, then USCIS cannot conclude that the beneficiary’s peer-review is
consistent with either a ‘level of expertise indicating that the individual
is one of that ... 阅读全帖 |
|
r*****y
发帖数: 28 | 23 3月份DIY file的EB1A, pp被RFE(Officer #144)了，请各位帮忙看看吧！
Background
Physics systems biology, 目前postdoc@Harvard
Publication: (first author) PNAS, Cell, MBC, (second Author)Nature MSB, PRE
Citation: ~500
Review: 5 journals, 5 review (没敢claim)
Award: 学生时代的一个international award, 和美国这边一个postdoc award
Media report: F1000, Science Daily, 和Cell 上的一篇preview
Claim 了4项 media report, award, contribution, publication
承认了contribution and publication
对于media report 的问题是
“the evidence does not indicate that ... 阅读全帖 |
|
a********e
发帖数: 221 | 24 不认可 media reports and contribution. 总体感觉是IO根本没看PL.
一篇2nd author有USA Today, BBC, CNN, US NEWS, Washington Post, Seattle time,
etc 的报道和其他几十个网络报道,但都是只提到1st author的名字,(A Full
Professor, MD, PhD.).和1个EditoralCommentary.
一篇1st author的有2,3个EditoralCommentary.
一篇2nd author有1个EditoralCommentary.
一篇Nnd author有1个NewsLetter.
夏花MM, 媒体报道如果是2nd author,被RFE了 怎么来对付.因为没有REVIEW,只能上媒
体报道了,怎么才呢满足"published material about the beneficiary", IO的"
Additional notes"又提到"The published material should be about the
beneficia... 阅读全帖 |
|
L***9
发帖数: 7 | 25 我是EB1A+PP， 10 天后RFE. IO 的意见如下。 我的背景在http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t0/Immigration/32520699.html
从comments 看，我的major significance 没有反映出来。 我在版上搜了很久， 没有
找到侧重说明怎莫突出major significance. 请大蜜，夏花还有其他高手帮忙点评一下
我怎莫去说明这一点。谢谢！！
(v) Evidence of the beneficiary's original scientific, artistic, athletic
, or business-related contributions of major significance in the field.
The petitioner has provided opinion letters by experts in the beneficiary's
field and evidence establishing moderated citation of the bene... 阅读全帖 |
|
l**n
发帖数: 908 | 26 是这个东东么？
××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××
Dr. XXX
Address
City, State xxxxx
Tel: xxx-xxx-xxxx
Email: x**[email protected]
USCIS Texas Service Center
Attn: E-Filed I-140
P. O. Box 851391
Mesquite, TX 75185-1391
Oct. 22rd, 2012
Re: I-140 Immigration Visa Petition f... 阅读全帖 |
|
b***e
发帖数: 1008 | 27 收到0002的RFE,看着信感到挺绝望，但还是想尽量描述详细点，希望大家能给点建议，
哪怕任何一点点小建议都万般感谢！
Timeline: 6.14 efile到NSC，隔天寄出申请材料；11.23得到RFE的online notice，11
.26收到RFE LETTER.
背景及提交的材料包括：
（1）4封独立推荐信，4封非独立推荐信，3封编辑证明/推荐信，1封公司老总专利应用
证明信。这些信总体来源于美国、加拿大、中国。
（2）11个杂志的37次review。
（3）14篇文章，3个中国专利，10个会议摘要。
（4）102个引用，没区分中文/英文、自引/他引。
（5）博后
claim了老三样：review，publication，contribution。
RFE letter的highlight如下：
(iv) Evidence of the beneficiary's participation, either individually or
on a panel, as a judge of the work of others in the same or an alli... 阅读全帖 |
|
s*********u
发帖数: 2535 | 28 Evidence does not Establish that the Original Scientific, Scholarly,
Artistic, Athletic, or Businessrelated Contributions are of Major
Significance
This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show
that the beneficiary’s
contributions are considered to be of major significance to the field of
endeavor. To assist in
determining whether the beneficiary’s contributions are original and of
major significance, you may
submit:
• Objective documentary evidence of the s... 阅读全帖 |
|
a********x
发帖数: 12 | 29 刚才收到RFE，说contribution没过，细节如下：希望版上的高手给支支招，看看怎么
一个思路来回复. 这个推荐信的他们说的不对；我五份只有一分不是independent的。
还有就是中文的引用原来在Google schloar查只有80,最近在知网查有230,不知道这个
怎么应用到RFE里面来。
本人做的比较基础，不知道怎么在短期内找到这种大量应用成果的例子。
还有就是不是说PP的RFE都是只有30天么？本人怎么给了84天？
谢谢大家先了。
You have submitted evidence of the following:
(1) several letters of support
(2) Your work has been cited ~300 times, according to Google scholar
(3) Your work has been published in notable journals, according to Google
scholar
(4) You invented an XXX technique to treat X... 阅读全帖 |
|
d*******n
发帖数: 4778 | 30 前面我删了，就是IO陈述EB1A标准，从这以下是IO的评价：
The petitioner has provided documentation under the following regulatory
areas:
Evidence of the alien’s participation, either individually or on a panel,
as a judge of the work of others in the same or an allied field of
specialization for which classification is sought.
---你claim的review
Evidence of the alien’s original scientific, scholarly, artistic, athletic,
or business-related contributions of major significance in the field;
---你claim的contribution
Evidence of... 阅读全帖 |
|
k****n
发帖数: 162 | 31 RFE IO questions:
(i) Documentation of the beneficiary’s receipt of lesser nationally or
internationally recognized prize or awards for excellence in the field of
endeavor:
You submitted the following evidence in support of the criterion:
• Research grant awarded from XXX University, $xxxx
• Research grant awarded from XXX University, $xxxx
• No evidence was submitted as to the criteria used in the
selection of either award. However, based on the title of the awards... 阅读全帖 |
|
l***c
发帖数: 199 | 32 朋友无影响因子的review 太多了，被NOID了。看来，无影响因子的review要慎重呀。
Review：
"The evidence does not show that the work the beneficiary judged is
recognized as distinguished within her field of endeavor. Evidence must in
addition to showing that the beneficiary has served as a reviewer, must show
that the reputation of the organizations that the beneficiary judged for
are recognized with a distinguished reputation within the filed of endeavor.
" |
|
s***n
发帖数: 678 | 33 请教一下有三个标准都被director接受，但是在Final Merits Determination 时候判
断申请人不够强所以拒绝的么。
我看了看判例里头Final Merits Determination 中扣得比较细（这个判例本身是3个标
准中通过两个，拒绝一个的，但是在Final Determination里头有很细节的描述），要
求也很高。比如“However, the accomplishments of the petitioner fall far
short
of establishing that he "is one of that small percentage who have risen to
the very top of the field of endeavor" and that he "has sustained national
or international acclaim and that his or her achievements have been
recognized in the field of expertise." 这... 阅读全帖 |
|
D****t
发帖数: 422 | 34 DIY EB1A 2月中旬寄出的申请，等到了9月中旬， 等来了RFE, IO 是EX0153 有人跟我
是同一个IO的么？
承认authorship和review，不认contribution，感觉IO需要推荐信提具体的贡献，给出
硬证据。原文在最下面。
背景：
化学和药理方面
15 paper , 3 first author paper
citation 58
review 16
reference: 老板一封 （美国），剩下的是独立推荐人，美国 1个，英国一个，日本一
个，加拿大一个。还有一个journal的editor，用来说review的。
有篇文章有报道，但没我名字，只有老板的名字，原始材料提供了，不知道IO 看了没
有怎么想。我再想能不能让老板写信说我是主要的contributor，虽然没提名字
有公司用我的实验方法，但只是email，不知道能不能用来当证据，实际上原始材料我
提供了，IO不知道看了没有
找引用我paper的人，让他具体写我的paper是怎么影响他的实验design的，不知道能不
能找到人愿意这么写
还要重新再论证我是top small percentag... 阅读全帖 |
|
D****t
发帖数: 422 | 35 DIY EB1A 2月中旬寄出的申请，等到了9月中旬， 等来了RFE, IO 是EX0153 有人跟我
是同一个IO的么？
承认authorship和review，不认contribution，感觉IO需要推荐信提具体的贡献，给出
硬证据。原文在最下面。
背景：
化学和药理方面
15 paper , 3 first author paper
citation 58
review 16
reference: 老板一封 （美国），剩下的是独立推荐人，美国 1个，英国一个，日本一
个，加拿大一个。还有一个journal的editor，用来说review的。
有篇文章有报道，但没我名字，只有老板的名字，原始材料提供了，不知道IO 看了没
有怎么想。我再想能不能让老板写信说我是主要的contributor，虽然没提名字
有公司用我的实验方法，但只是email，不知道能不能用来当证据，实际上原始材料我
提供了，IO不知道看了没有
找引用我paper的人，让他具体写我的paper是怎么影响他的实验design的，不知道能不
能找到人愿意这么写
还要重新再论证我是top small percentag... 阅读全帖 |
|
f*********m
发帖数: 732 | 36 utions没什么思路该怎么准备RFE,请帮忙看看，十分感谢！
背景：
机械工程领域，普通学校AP,学校不给办EB-1B,就自己上EB-1A. 一年多前让律师弄过，
不好，RFE后没过。刚DIY了EB-1A又收RFE. OFFICER: 0153
CLAIM 了老3样：
1) authorship: 12篇期刊+19会议; 1,2,3作各1/3左右；
2）reviewer: 63次， 有大概12个期刊，4个会议，1个小期刊associate editor, 3个
期刊editor证明信，另外有Department of Energy project reviewer, National
Science Foundation proposal reviewer;
3)contribution: 讲了5，6个较具体的contribution，配合着推荐信里的表述，165次
引用，2次领域知名会议最佳论文奖，1次该会议10佳论文，做过一些会议的session
chair, session organizor, panelist.5个研究项目。
推荐信7封：1韩国，1土耳其，5美国（1个工业项... 阅读全帖 |
|
f*********m
发帖数: 732 | 37 主要针对totality和贡献的significance提交了6个方面的新证据。再不过就真没辙了
。一个星期之内就知道了。
1. 期刊和会议文章的引用率大大高于平均该期刊/会议的引用率，并且总引用数在3个
月之内增加了20%；
2. 列出了以往10年的最佳论文的获奖人，除我以外都是名校的FULL PROFESSOR，并且
我在6年内获奖两次；
3. 列出了3年内期刊平均引用率和7个工程院士的对比，还要高于他们；
4. 找到了一个院士在一篇报告中用一整段谈我的一个方法在他的领域的用处；
5. 一个工业项目合作者的推荐信，谈对他们公司的具体贡献；
6. 一个期刊主编（NASA任职）的推荐信，谈和他相同的一个方向的我的具体贡献（正
好他邀请我关于我的一篇会议文章给他们期刊投稿，就要了这封信）；
＃＃＃＃＃＃＃ 之前的帖子 ＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃＃
utions没什么思路该怎么准备RFE,请帮忙看看，十分感谢！
背景：
机械工程领域，普通学校AP,学校不给办EB-1B,就自己上EB-1A. 一年多前让律师弄过，
不好，RFE后没过。刚DIY了EB-1A又收RFE. OFFICER: 01... 阅读全帖 |
|
h***8
发帖数: 398 | 38 版权所有 谢绝转载
RFE质疑贡献的重大意义，回函重新组织了原始材料，增加了若干客观材料和其它书面
支持材料，没有提供新的推荐信。此外新申报了媒体报道一项。
感谢本版所有无私奉献的人。
Month Day, Year
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
RE: Response to Request for Evidence
Petitioner: Dr. XXX
Beneficiary: Dr. XXX
Category: Alien of Extraordinary Ability
Dear Sir/Madam:
This package is respectfully submitted in response to the Request for
Evidence.
In your review comments, it is indicated that the following two criteria
... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
|
D******x
发帖数: 235 | 41 今年H1B不容乐观，想试试O1
我工程PHD去年毕业，虽然是top几的学校，但是文章一作只有两篇会议，还不是一个小
area的（但在一个大方向下吧），citation可能只有个位数，有方向的原因也有我的原
因。
我看O1签证要求10条中要占3条，不知道这几条我有没有可能？请有经验的给说一下，
谢谢！
3. Published material in professional or major trade publications or major
media about the alien and relating to the alien's work in the field of
endeavor;（这个是引用的意思吗？）
4. Evidence of participation, on a panel or individually, as a judge of the
work of others in the same field of specialization;（临时当个editor赶得上吗
？）
5. Evidence of original scientific,... 阅读全帖 |
|
t******f
发帖数: 349 | 42 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
补充下条件：
Mechanical Engineering, Phd
11 Papers, 提交时87 citations in total(没有区分自他引)，
6 RL(5 independent,只有2篇来自引用的人)
现在citation涨了点，一共正好100,不过几乎全是中国人引用的。
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
3月27号就被RFE了，无奈总是收不到RFE,Submit了2个service request都么有等到，终
于在congressman的帮助下今天搞到RFE了，一共耗时45天，估计人品都集中放在h1b抽
签去了，anyway，今天终于收到了，貌似承认了review, authorship,质疑了
contribution。
我把RFE贴在这里啊，麻烦大家帮忙看看，出出... 阅读全帖 |
|
l********8
发帖数: 668 | 43 我先前的credit risk modeling offer，EB1A律师说其职业code和I140中statistician
的code不一致。于是我叫公司把job title改成了Statistician。 同时job
description也做了相应的改变。但如今即使职业code一致了，我的EB1A律师说"
Unfortunately we still believe that taking this position may cause issues
for your green card application for a couple of reasons:
(1) In your I-140 petition letter, we stated that your specific field of
endeavor is psychometrics and that you are qualified for a green card under
the EB1A category based on your ‘research on a highly speciali... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
c*******9
发帖数: 11 | 45 拖着个娃走在变绿的路上真是酸爽！处女座强迫症患者准备的材料最终还是换来了RFE
！真的是需要向各位大神求求助了，看了各位前人的经验，也知道了牛人版主的大名，
但是完全联系不上，RFE俱乐部也无法加入，所以只能希望路过的神人及战友能给点意
见。多谢了！
RFE Officer：NSC 0153 （据我爬贴和QQQ、Tuboshu352、Findmydream、Dulcet、
AnswerAI等前辈是一样的判官，在此致敬！）
背景：
高分子材料
他引151
文章11篇（5篇一作）
没有媒体报道、patent、产品
有一个best poster award和两次国家实验室的fellowship
推荐信5封，1封supervisor的，其他是美国、德国、韩国、爱尔兰教授，美国的一个是
德州奥斯丁的老教授，获得过总统奖，德国的教授是德国界内名人，爱尔兰的也是界内
牛人，韩国的是年轻教授。这些教授的共同点就是学校没有特别出名，但是业内名声很
大。
review文章35篇
PL中给出的硬证据：
因为我被RFE的是contribution，所以这里就只说一下此部分的写法。因为我真的强迫
症的厉害，所以... 阅读全帖 |
|
y***k
发帖数: 31 | 46 背景：polymer chemistry
Journal publication: 12 ( 5 first-authored, IF: 4-20)
Citation: 275
Review: 22 (IF:1-5)
推荐信：
推荐信一共6封，全部独立。3美国、1法国、1英国、1中国。全部引用过我的文章。
claim，review, publication, contribution.
RFE肯定了publication和review, 质疑contribution.
Contribution: PL里提交了publication, journal rank, citation rank, 油灯图，引
用国家机构列表, citation from one Nobel Laureate and two National Academy of
Sciences, 推荐信里6人都引用了我的文章。Contribution里介绍了自己的研究成果，
结合citation rank 证明是top1% ，然后加上推荐信的大段内容证明contribution，同
时附上牛人的引用证明重要性。
RFE里基... 阅读全帖 |
|
发帖数: 1 | 47 背景：美国排名100的州立大学博士，政府研究机构的博后。
文章：4篇一作，6篇二作三作（IF=1篇8，其他2-5）
审稿：30
引用：Google Scholar提交的时候110，现在160
Claim老三样
因为case很弱，所以没有PP，等了10个月。Offier XM0100 承认了文章和审稿，不承认
Contribution。原话是:
Evidence of the beneficiary’s original scientific scholarly, artistic.
athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance in the
field.
You have provided;
• a) Letters of support.
• b) 112 citations.
• c) Original research as it relates to fungi and bacteria to soil, as
well as the other origi... 阅读全帖 |
|
r*********1
发帖数: 756 | 48 9/15刚收到的ref.单独开个贴出来大家给参考一下。
Evidence of the beneficiary's original scientific, scholarly, artistic,
athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance in the
field.
You have provided evidence of:
*your scholarly articles in the field;
*136 citations to these published works;
*citation averages from Web of knowledge;
*a listing of most accessed papers from the Journal of Chemical Physics;
*invitations to present at conferences and submit papers to journals; ans,
*six letters of rec... 阅读全帖 |
|
t******u
发帖数: 21 | 49 【 以下文字转载自 I140 讨论区 】
发信人: tinnywhu (Jamesyfl), 信区: I140
标 题: NSC EB1A PP RFE by 0242。弱case，求帮助！
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Oct 7 11:16:41 2016, 美东)
EB1A+Direct PP
律师：wegreen
文章：11
引用：92 (now is 97)
专业：计算材料
方向：玻璃
review：30+ in 14 journals (IF 1~8)
推荐性：6封(2 dependent, 4 independent)；美国5封，瑞典1封
无专利，无媒体报道
IO: 0242
Claim老三样，contribution没有通过
RD: 9/26/2016
PP: 9/28/2016
RFE:10/05/2016
具体的notice如下：
Evidence of the beneficiary's original scientific, scholarly, artistic,
athletic, or business-related contributi... 阅读全帖 |
|
t******u
发帖数: 21 | 50 【 以下文字转载自 I140 讨论区 】
发信人: tinnywhu (Jamesyfl), 信区: I140
标 题: NSC EB1A PP RFE by 0242。弱case，求帮助！
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Oct 7 11:16:41 2016, 美东)
EB1A+Direct PP
律师：wegreen
文章：11
引用：92 (now is 97)
专业：计算材料
方向：玻璃
review：30+ in 14 journals (IF 1~8)
推荐性：6封(2 dependent, 4 independent)；美国5封，瑞典1封
无专利，无媒体报道
IO: 0242
Claim老三样，contribution没有通过
RD: 9/26/2016
PP: 9/28/2016
RFE:10/05/2016
具体的notice如下：
Evidence of the beneficiary's original scientific, scholarly, artistic,
athletic, or business-related contributi... 阅读全帖 |
|
