y*********n
发帖数: 1059 | 1 【 以下文字转载自 Olympics 讨论区 】
发信人: aylayl (我脚疼), 信区: Olympics
标 题: 热烈祝贺Nature就叶诗文事件道歉！！
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Aug 6 11:51:35 2012, 美东)
这是一个重大的胜利。在我眼里，不亚于一块金牌。
总结：
1）感谢所有在网上留言还击的同胞，特别是那些用英文且能注意技巧的人。感谢饶毅
老师和他所引用的那几位华人的努力。他们的做法是榜样。他们告诉我们，还击不是为
了宣泄，而是为了在道义上打败对方，并争取在舆论上打败对方（这点目前很难，因为
我们没有话语权）
2）思考：为什么nature能出来反省？WSJ，CNN等就没这个压力呢？
http://www.nature.com/news/why-great-olympic-feats-raise-suspic
The story’s intention as an Explainer was to examine how science can help
resolve debates over extraordinary performances, not to examine those
performance statistics in detail. Several analyses done by others convinced
us that it was fair to characterize Ye’s performance as ‘anomalous’ — in
the sense that it was statistically unusual. But we acknowledge that the
combination of errors discussed above and the absence of a more detailed
discussion of the statistics (which with hindsight we regret) gave the
impression that we were supporting accusations against her, even though this
was emphatically not our intention. For that, we apologize to our readers
and to Ye Shiwen.
Tim Appenzeller Chief Magazine Editor, Nature
Philip Campbell Editor-in-Chief, Nature |
|
