h***n
发帖数: 59 | 1 承认了authorship和review，质疑contribution。总感觉像是简单的模板回复，上来问
问有过REF的版友，都这样么？考古了一下版上，有人说IO在REF里提到PL中的内容，逐
条质疑，可我这就这么一条，貌似简单，可就相当于全盘否定要我重写contribution。
In support of this criterion, the petitioner has provided letters from
various experts in her field, and a citation history to her published work.
This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show
that the beneficiary's contributions are considered to be of major
significance in the field of endeavor. While the authors of the petitioner's
letter of reference describe her as a very talented research scientist,
they do not describe her contribution as one of major significance. Her
citation history, while indicative of some interest in her work, does not
corroborate the assertion that her contribution has been of major
significance. To assist in determining whether the beneficiary's
contributions are original and of major significance in the field, the
petitioner may submit:
然后就举了一些例子，推荐信，媒体报导，专利应用或者公司的合同等等的。
我的case很弱，能弄得就只有重新找人写推荐信了，别的也不好找，引用实在不多。作
为回应，推荐信必然要狂吹significance and originality，就算这样，能行么？连我
少的可怜的citation history都提到了，怎么破解？求大神们给点建议吧。 | h****4
发帖数: 634 | | r*****n
发帖数: 753 | 3 Citation少不是问题，关键在于如何深挖，掘地三尺，找出每一个引用你的文章的人或
机构到底拿你的文章做了哪些对人类有用的事情，这才是contribution，而不是简单的
介绍有多少人引用。 | s**********e
发帖数: 723 | 4 pat
bless!
show
's
【在 h***n 的大作中提到】
: 承认了authorship和review，质疑contribution。总感觉像是简单的模板回复，上来问
: 问有过REF的版友，都这样么？考古了一下版上，有人说IO在REF里提到PL中的内容，逐
: 条质疑，可我这就这么一条，貌似简单，可就相当于全盘否定要我重写contribution。
: In support of this criterion, the petitioner has provided letters from
: various experts in her field, and a citation history to her published work.
: This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show
: that the beneficiary's contributions are considered to be of major
: significance in the field of endeavor. While the authors of the petitioner's
: letter of reference describe her as a very talented research scientist,
: they do not describe her contribution as one of major significance. Her
| t****x
发帖数: 1429 | 5 letter of reference describe her as a very talented research scientist,
they do not describe her contribution as one of major significance.
这句话估计是推荐信写的太多描述自己的工作，没有写别人怎么应用你的研究 |
|
