a***r
发帖数: 146 | 1 受到contribution 的RFE。 authorship and Review 通过了。 是不是回复RFE的时候
只回答contribution 就可以了。
谢谢大家！ | e******r
发帖数: 241 | 2 一般都是,除非你是pp,而且开始审你的IO又度假,生病等原因15天内审不了你的案子. | I********r
发帖数: 747 | | b*******e
发帖数: 24532 | 4 对contribution 的否定就是对整个申请的否定,因此回复的时候就当作重新申请一次来
对待.
【在 a***r 的大作中提到】
: 受到contribution 的RFE。 authorship and Review 通过了。 是不是回复RFE的时候
: 只回答contribution 就可以了。
: 谢谢大家！
| a***r
发帖数: 146 | 5 Here is the contents of the RFE:
Evidence of the petitioner's original scientific, scholarly, artistic, or
business_related contributions of major significance in the field:
Counsel has submitted several letters of testimony from others in the
petitoner's field. while the writers describe the field and its importance,
they offer no detail about how the petitioner's own work as been of major
significance of the field beyond the institutions who have employed him.
In addition, the record includes several research articles that have cited
the petitioner's collaborative research, showing a moderate citation level,
however it is not apparent that these represent the total number of
citations the petitioner's work has received. The petitioner's own list of
citations is in sufficient as it is not primary evidence such as an online
citation index..
我的Case 的背景是这样的：
Physics PHD, 6 paper, 5 first author, 63 (around 60 are independent citation
) citation according to google scholar.
我该着中那些恢复？
我现在能想到的：两份independent letter, 油灯图， journal rank. 别人多paper
的评价。
很感谢任何建议。
谢谢 |
|
