M*****k
发帖数: 1556 | 1 投了一个LOI
然后邀请full proposal. 中奖率低于10%。
Dear LOI Applicant,
Letters of Intent are used to ensure mission relevance of proposals
submitted to the program. Funding in the AFRI programs is extremely limited
. Historically, we have had success rates as low as 10% percent that
resulted in many proposals being written without a real chance of being
funded. This year, we received over 180 letters of intent for a program
that is unlikely to exceed a 10% funding rate. Letters of Intent save
applicants from taking time to prepare full proposals that will not be a
good fit for the program or have little chance of success. Due to the large
number of letters received and the rapid turnaround time for response, we
are unable to provide detailed feedback on individual letters. |
a**********y
发帖数: 2367 | 2 last year a program I submitted to was 3% |
M*****k
发帖数: 1556 | 3 无语啊。大学真是供过于求。能拿到啥grant都是幸运
【在 a**********y 的大作中提到】
: last year a program I submitted to was 3%
|
M*****k
发帖数: 1556 | 4 LOI能淘汰多少proposal?
【在 a**********y 的大作中提到】
: last year a program I submitted to was 3%
|
s**********e
发帖数: 33562 | 5 10％左右不是挺正常吗？
NSF的CPS和EARS好像连年都是3％左右？ |
a**********y
发帖数: 2367 | 6 哦呵呵，3％是LOI淘汰后的，淘汰前是2%
【在 M*****k 的大作中提到】
: LOI能淘汰多少proposal?
|
e**********m
发帖数: 397 | |
h*****w
发帖数: 8561 | 8 是啊,10%很好了.
我去年投了一个NIH的,70个PROPOSAL总共,PO说给1-2个,我还进了前10名(最后被讨论的
10个),期盼半天最后出来分居然是49,真是晕倒.
【在 s**********e 的大作中提到】
: 10％左右不是挺正常吗？
: NSF的CPS和EARS好像连年都是3％左右？
|
d***y
发帖数: 8536 | 9 感谢同修们的评价。。被同事忽悠了。。。以为高的很。
不过估计投了也会挂。。 |
O*********r
发帖数: 1835 | 10 这些 top down 的 agency的命中率不是这么算的，有connection的申请人命中率是50%
以上，没connection的是 0%，平均可能10%左右。这跟 bottom up 的 agency 比如
NSF 不同，NSF 的命中率才有实际参考意义。
以前也讨论过这个问题，这种不公平不能怨人家，top down 的 agency 本来就有自己
的 strategic plan，你跟人家没关联没合作基础就很难 support 他们的 strategic
plan，hence no funding. |
