a*******z
发帖数: 65 | 1 Dev Cell vs Plos Biology,
which one has higher reputation ?
which one is easier to accept a manuscript ? |
w********r
发帖数: 1431 | 2 Dev Cell吧。
个人感觉Plos Biology是PNAS，Blood这一档的 |
a*******z
发帖数: 65 | 3 Plos biolgy 去年的impact factor是13. 五年的impact factor 都14.5了.
尽管是open access journal, 好像也狠好啊. pnas, blood 好像没到那个level
【在 w********r 的大作中提到】
: Dev Cell吧。
: 个人感觉Plos Biology是PNAS，Blood这一档的
|
j*****d
发帖数: 787 | 4 different taste. DC is developmental cell biology, specifically. the
reputation of DC actually is hard to define. I am afraid it is difficult to
survive between Cell Stem cell and Development. By the way, its publicaiton
is not as active as Neuron/Stem cell.
【在 a*******z 的大作中提到】
: Dev Cell vs Plos Biology,
: which one has higher reputation ?
: which one is easier to accept a manuscript ?
|
s******y
发帖数: 28562 | 5 两个都很难。但是dev cell上经常有投了cell被拒后转到那边去的文章。
总体而言，Plos Bio声誉更高一些。
【在 a*******z 的大作中提到】
: Dev Cell vs Plos Biology,
: which one has higher reputation ?
: which one is easier to accept a manuscript ?
|
s**e
发帖数: 1523 | 6 在developmental biology方向DC应该是排第一的。感觉Plos Biology和DC的侧重点不
同啊？ |
l**********n
发帖数: 201 | 7 PLoS Biol 自己的标准是 CNS 级的，虽然很多时候也是 CNS 不中的文章转投过来。
Dev Cell 投稿也可以同时再投一个 Mol Cell 之类的 cell sister journal，也许中
奖率会高一点？至少他们的 policy 是允许怎么做的，不算 misconducts. |
C***Y
发帖数: 61 | 8 My personal feeling is that Dev Cell is more recognized. |
d*****r
发帖数: 2583 | 9 Dev Cell.
【在 a*******z 的大作中提到】
: Dev Cell vs Plos Biology,
: which one has higher reputation ?
: which one is easier to accept a manuscript ?
|
f***4
发帖数: 886 | 10 Dev Cell 在领域内的地位比Plos Biology高多了吧。不过比较难接受，是月刊
【在 a*******z 的大作中提到】
: Dev Cell vs Plos Biology,
: which one has higher reputation ?
: which one is easier to accept a manuscript ?
|
