g****e
发帖数: 137 | 1 I'm curious about Plos One's impact factor |
I*****y
发帖数: 6402 | 2 Plos One能赶超Nature吗
【在 g****e 的大作中提到】
: I'm curious about Plos One's impact factor
|
O******e
发帖数: 4845 | 3 这谁也说不准吧。或许几十年后就火了
【在 I*****y 的大作中提到】
: Plos One能赶超Nature吗
|
d***y
发帖数: 8536 | 4 赶超的话nature可以宣布退出地球了。
【在 I*****y 的大作中提到】
: Plos One能赶超Nature吗
|
n******d
发帖数: 680 | 5 哪里能看到？Plos one多少了，关心啊
【在 g****e 的大作中提到】
: I'm curious about Plos One's impact factor
|
q****x
发帖数: 38 | |
a****o
发帖数: 1786 | 7 还没出来，估计3左右
【在 q****x 的大作中提到】
: about 5 points.
|
g****e
发帖数: 137 | 8 Somebody who has published paper in Plos One told me that this journal is as
good as PNAS, but I doubt about it... |
a****o
发帖数: 1786 | 9 in my opinion PLoS Biology is about PNAS level, in term of IF.
PLoS One is about BBRC level.
as
【在 g****e 的大作中提到】
: Somebody who has published paper in Plos One told me that this journal is as
: good as PNAS, but I doubt about it...
|
g****e
发帖数: 137 | 10 Sadly, they published PNAS quality data in Plos One because they believe
Plos One is a PNAS level journal.
【在 a****o 的大作中提到】
: in my opinion PLoS Biology is about PNAS level, in term of IF.
: PLoS One is about BBRC level.
:
: as
|
|
|
E**********y
发帖数: 991 | 11 plos biology is way beyond pnas
plos one is def not bbrc, do some serious research
【在 a****o 的大作中提到】
: in my opinion PLoS Biology is about PNAS level, in term of IF.
: PLoS One is about BBRC level.
:
: as
|
O******e
发帖数: 4845 | 12 PLoS Biology is higher than PNAS.
【在 a****o 的大作中提到】
: in my opinion PLoS Biology is about PNAS level, in term of IF.
: PLoS One is about BBRC level.
:
: as
|
p*****m
发帖数: 7030 | 13 可能也就plos自己把自己当CNS 我觉得伊也就是pnas的水平 呵呵
【在 E**********y 的大作中提到】
: plos biology is way beyond pnas
: plos one is def not bbrc, do some serious research
|
e****a
发帖数: 449 | 14 说实话 plos上后门文章太多了........ |
y**y
发帖数: 36 | 15 plos one will never have if, as long as it's not included in SCI. forget it.
as
【在 g****e 的大作中提到】
: Somebody who has published paper in Plos One told me that this journal is as
: good as PNAS, but I doubt about it...
|
O******e
发帖数: 4845 | 16 现在他们IF最高的也就是PLoS Biology吧？照着CNS都差老鼻子了。但总还是比PNAS强
些。
【在 p*****m 的大作中提到】
: 可能也就plos自己把自己当CNS 我觉得伊也就是pnas的水平 呵呵
|
m*******y
发帖数: 268 | 17 plos one is indexed by SCI
it.
【在 y**y 的大作中提到】
: plos one will never have if, as long as it's not included in SCI. forget it.
:
: as
|
m******o
发帖数: 571 | 18 PLoS ONE is way better than BBRC
A lot of good papers have been published there
And a decent amount of papers have more than 10 figures, the data in general
is more concrete than BBRC
【在 a****o 的大作中提到】
: in my opinion PLoS Biology is about PNAS level, in term of IF.
: PLoS One is about BBRC level.
:
: as
|
m******o
发帖数: 571 | 19 PLoS ONE has been indexed by Web of Science, do some study, please ...
http://wokinfo.com/news/plosone/
it.
【在 y**y 的大作中提到】
: plos one will never have if, as long as it's not included in SCI. forget it.
:
: as
|
