G********t
发帖数: 430 | 1 这么小的车EPA居然只有233迈。model Y作为crossover都有315啊。。 |
G********t
发帖数: 430 | |
f******t
发帖数: 7283 | 3 Tesla利用EPA range里一些供车厂自由发挥的规则，故意编造出一个空想的、但又不违
法的里程。
https://www.caranddriver.com/features/a33824052/adjustment-factor-tesla-uses
-for-big-epa-range-numbers/
别家大厂脸皮没这么厚，显然不可能掉身价去钻这种空子。
official-
【在 G********t 的大作中提到】
: 这么小的车EPA居然只有233迈。model Y作为crossover都有315啊。。
|
g***n
发帖数: 14250 | 4 高速测试 205 vs 234 miles，考虑到风阻和车重，这算是意料之中，没有差太多 |
G********t
发帖数: 430 | 5 EPA是综合工况，最能反应能量管理和回收。高速续航基本就是电机效率和风阻，
polestar 2和3大小差不多吧，高速续航差15%已经相当多了。
【在 g***n 的大作中提到】
: 高速测试 205 vs 234 miles，考虑到风阻和车重，这算是意料之中，没有差太多
|
g***n
发帖数: 14250 | 6 EPA 规则已经被玩坏了
还能反应啥
以后只有同时跑同样路段对比测试才有用。
重量和风阻形状还是很不一样，重量都多了 10%
【在 G********t 的大作中提到】
: EPA是综合工况，最能反应能量管理和回收。高速续航基本就是电机效率和风阻，
: polestar 2和3大小差不多吧，高速续航差15%已经相当多了。
|
G********t
发帖数: 430 | 7 你是不是只看了标题？你给的这文章结尾专门写了Tesla没有利用规则，实测也非常接近
“
our test vehicles had no special preparation, our results were within a few
percent of Tesla's. That's solid evidence that the company isn't gaming
coastdown tests and that its ability to optimize efficiency really is ahead
of the rest of the pack.
”
uses
【在 f******t 的大作中提到】
: Tesla利用EPA range里一些供车厂自由发挥的规则，故意编造出一个空想的、但又不违
: 法的里程。
: https://www.caranddriver.com/features/a33824052/adjustment-factor-tesla-uses
: -for-big-epa-range-numbers/
: 别家大厂脸皮没这么厚，显然不可能掉身价去钻这种空子。
:
: official-
|
g***n
发帖数: 14250 | 8 那为啥人家开高速对比的，特斯拉只到 EPA 的 75%
接近
few
ahead
【在 G********t 的大作中提到】
: 你是不是只看了标题？你给的这文章结尾专门写了Tesla没有利用规则，实测也非常接近
: “
: our test vehicles had no special preparation, our results were within a few
: percent of Tesla's. That's solid evidence that the company isn't gaming
: coastdown tests and that its ability to optimize efficiency really is ahead
: of the rest of the pack.
: ”
:
: uses
|
f******t
发帖数: 7283 | 9 显然是你自己没仔细看文章：
“We were especially curious because our own 75-mph highway testing shows
Teslas, on average, miss their label range by 27 percent”
“If Tesla had used the standard adjustment factor of 30 percent, the Model
Y Performance's window-sticker range would drop to 292 miles. But because
Tesla takes advantage of the EPA's alternate methodology, the company can
instead claim a 315-mile range.”
接近
few
ahead
【在 G********t 的大作中提到】
: 你是不是只看了标题？你给的这文章结尾专门写了Tesla没有利用规则，实测也非常接近
: “
: our test vehicles had no special preparation, our results were within a few
: percent of Tesla's. That's solid evidence that the company isn't gaming
: coastdown tests and that its ability to optimize efficiency really is ahead
: of the rest of the pack.
: ”
:
: uses
|
G********t
发帖数: 430 | 10 呵呵 你看文章都不看conclusion的？
即使window sticker显示292也是大幅领先竞争对手了。当然，这是marketing不多评价。
另外前面也说了 75迈巡航并不能反应综合路况的能量管理和回收的效率。拿这个数值
和EPA续航硬比出一个percentage毫无意义。
除非，你买车就唯一目的就是在highway巡逻。即使这样，3的续航还是比对手强
Model
【在 f******t 的大作中提到】
: 显然是你自己没仔细看文章：
: “We were especially curious because our own 75-mph highway testing shows
: Teslas, on average, miss their label range by 27 percent”
: “If Tesla had used the standard adjustment factor of 30 percent, the Model
: Y Performance's window-sticker range would drop to 292 miles. But because
: Tesla takes advantage of the EPA's alternate methodology, the company can
: instead claim a 315-mile range.”
:
: 接近
: few
|
