j****u
发帖数: 1413 | 1 新闻与照片请见：http://marathon.ustc.edu.cn
传奇女生，发明治疗肺癌新药，被誉智慧与创造力的化身
2012年10月，中国科大803校友、辉瑞公司科学家崔景荣博士荣获Profiles in
Diversity Journal 颁发的2013年度最值得瞩目女性奖（11th WomenWorthWatching
Awards）。10月1日上午（美国太平洋时间9月30日晚即中秋节之夜），新创基金会致电
崔景荣博士祝贺中秋佳节，并介绍“再战北马，捐赠海外交流”行动的情况。崔景荣欣
然捐赠，表达她对中国科大的支持。
最值得瞩目女性奖的获奖者多为大公司高管，而崔景荣作为制药公司华裔女科学家入选
显得卓尔不群。在当期杂志的采访中，崔景荣回顾了她在中美接受教育经历。在被问及
对年轻女性有何建议时，崔景荣提到：应尽快找到兴趣和热情之所在，努力完成学业—
为事业成功奠定坚实的基础。而崔景荣的人生信条则是“努力工作必将有所突破。(
Hard work will make a difference.)
上图为Profiles in Diversity Journal杂志对崔景荣的报道
... 阅读全帖 |
|
e******e
发帖数: 266 | 2 您老够激动的。
何必呢？苹果又不是你们家的。大家就事论事，各抒己见嘛。
其实我们是同一时代的人，当年本人在 Apple II 上的程序还卖了钱呢。国内刚引进
Mac 的时候，我还下海做过代理呢。那时您果粉了么？大家比这个没什么意思。
不是语言本身有多大意义，而是语言背后的思想有意义。我觉得您对苹果的形容很恰当
，它的确就是计算机界的法拉利；它是女人包包世界的 Hermes。它是个 fashion，但
它目前仅仅是个 fashion，而不是 inventor。真正改变世界的是 inventor， 而不是
fashion studio。就像真正改变世界的是发动机的发明者而不是法拉利一样。粉不粉法
拉利那是法粉的事情，我开我的 Hybrid。 |
|
t****g
发帖数: 35582 | 3 都一样。Auto CAD Inventor 2011也就是用Open GL，随便一个显卡都支持。
渲染目前还不支持CUDA或者Stream计算。
我以前用4670 256M 跑AutoCAD Inventor，一点问题没有。
3Ds MAX也许支持CUDA，你查一下。
总之，看你公款私款，多少预算。AutoCAD操作那点3D跟玩游戏根本不一个量级的，一
个5670 512M就足够了。你要往高了配那也行，顺便还可以打打游戏：） |
|
t****g
发帖数: 35582 | 4 2D的autocad好久不用了。
Inventor的话很吃硬盘。4G内存基本上够用了，除非你的装配有几百个零件。
Inventor load是我见过的最慢的，在没有SSD之前我都是要去打杯水回来喝it才load好。 |
|
t****g
发帖数: 35582 | 5 好一些，还是慢。Inventor 2011启动至少要20秒。
他们软件绝对做的有问题，臃肿的一塌糊涂，solidworks效率高多了。不过Inventor我
用熟了，懒得转了。 |
|
g**********1
发帖数: 197 | 6 如果你指的是卖出货物时的freight expense,其实这应该是non-inventorable expense
，不能归于COGS，类似于selling expense
Dr Freight Expense
Cr.AP or Cash
如果是买入时的freight expense，是属于inventorable expense，
Dr.Inventory $100
Cr.AP or Cash $100
当你卖掉货物的时候，Freight Expense就是成为COGS
Dr.COGS $100
Cr. Inventory $100 |
|
发帖数: 1 | 7 The international language Ido - a general description
It would be very useful if we could talk with people in other countries, or
correspond with them, as we can with people in our own country. However, the
language barrier often makes this difficult if not impossible.
The answer to this problem given by many people is: let them (that is,
everyone else) learn English! Certainly English is the most widely spoken
language in the world, but it requires a lot of time and some skill to learn
it at a... 阅读全帖 |
|
s*****o
发帖数: 1540 | 8 http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/11/science/11DOCT.html
Doctor Disputes Winners of Nobel in Medicine
By NICHOLAS WADE
Published: October 11, 2003
n inventor who feels he was unfairly excluded has mounted an unusual and
vigorous protest against the award this year of the Nobel Prize in Medicine.
The inventor, Dr. Raymond V. Damadian, president of the Fonar Corporation in
Melville, N.Y., took a first step toward the development of M.R.I., or
magnetic resonance imaging, a now widespread medical techn |
|
i****y
发帖数: 5184 | 9 【 以下文字转载自 Law 讨论区 】
发信人: ironny (静水流深), 信区: Law
标 题: 浅谈入行专利法(二)
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sun Oct 26 23:57:02 2008)
continued
&& 关于理工科转行专利法
1. 关于转行
首先插一点我对所谓“转行”的想法。转行是一个很大的决定，所以最好不要轻率的做
决定，要有理由justify自己的决定，只有这样的决定才能够以后不后悔，也能在遇到
困难的时候撑下去。转行不要看人家转，你也转，你转了也不知道为什么转。同时，最
好不要只为了“钱”途转行，做不喜欢做的事情，拿再高工资也会失落的。记住一句话
，DO WHAT MAKES YOU HAPPY。
其实理工科背景去做法律，严格讲也不能叫转行，因为美国学法律的本科也是学什么都
有的。尤其是专利法，本身就要求技术背景加法律背景，所以理工科的背景仍然是有用
的，都不能说叫转。只不过做法律，对于大多数中国的理工科学生来说，不是一个
typical career path而已。That said，虽然不算怎么“转”，你的生活道路从此还是
很不同了，因为之... 阅读全帖 |
|
s**********y
发帖数: 1 | 10 Qingming Luo one relative or possible relative US Patent first publicated
even two year later than TX team' application?!
>Inventors:
>Chance, Britton (Marathon, FL, US)
>Nioka, Shoko (Philadelphia, PA, US)
>Luo, Qingming (Philadelphia, PA, US)
>Application Number:
>10/675597
>Publication Date:
>04/01/2004
>Filing Date:
>09/27/2003
>Export Citation:
>Click for automatic bibliography generation
>Primary Class:
>600/476
>International Classes:
A61B5/00; A61B5/00; (IPC1-7): A61B6/00
View P... 阅读全帖 |
|
f***8
发帖数: 571 | 11 不对, 远远没有5-10%那么高
99.8% fail. Only 3,000 patents out of 1.5 million patents are commercially
viable. “In truth, odds are stacked astronomically against inventors, and
no marketing outfit can change them. ‘There are around 1.5 million patents
in effect and in force in this country, and of those, maybe 3,000 are
commercially viable,’ [Richard Maulsby, director of the Office of Public
Affairs for the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office], says. ‘It's a very small
percentage of patents that actually turn ... 阅读全帖 |
|
g***j
发帖数: 40861 | 12 Tough Lessons From Golden Rice
Martin Enserink
It was supposed to prevent blindness and death from vitamin A deficiency
in millions of children. But almost a decade after its invention, golden
rice is still stuck in the lab
It's easy to recognize Ingo Potrykus at the train station in Basel,
Switzerland. Quietly waiting while hurried travelers zip by, he is holding,
as he promised, the framed and slightly yellowed cover of the 31 July 2000
issue of Time magazine. It features Potrykus's bearde... 阅读全帖 |
|
h****u
发帖数: 480 | 13
I should have made it more clear. The PI of the research and publication
files the patent application which lists co-inventors. The PI often
includes the significant contributors among the co-authors of the paper,
but that's not always the case. Not all co-inventors are equal and the
school/institute also takes pretty big cut. Check your school's IP
office. |
|
M*****n
发帖数: 16729 | 14 学校这头是50-70%，俺已经查过了。
现在问题是万一要申patent, paper上面列几个人的问题。
俺是这么想的，俺老板以前paper 几十号人，他把所有人都列到patent上面了。如果必
须这样，俺打算发paper就老板和俺两个人了。如果这个不是必须的，那么多列几个co-
author也没啥。其他人的data其实可放可不放，或者俺可以另外写一paper放几个
coauthor.
如果PI和co-inventor是有区别的，那么申patent就自己当PI， 老板算是co-inventor,
反正是俺设计的project, 俺做的实验，俺写的paper. 如果patent上面人人平等，那
么让老板当PI俺也无所谓了。 |
|
i****g
发帖数: 3896 | 15 老外也开始关注青蒿素发现的争议了。
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/17/health/for-intrigue-malaria-d
The Chinese drug artemisinin has been hailed as one of the greatest advances
in fighting malaria, the scourge of the tropics, since the discovery of
quinine centuries ago.
Luigi Rignanese
Artemisinin’s discovery is being talked about as a candidate for a Nobel
Prize in Medicine. Millions of American taxpayer dollars are spent on it for
Africa every year.
But few people realize that in one of the paradoxes of histor... 阅读全帖 |
|
c******n
发帖数: 16403 | 16 【 以下文字转载自 ECUST 讨论区 】
发信人: asymmetric (rockfish), 信区: ECUST
标 题: 怎样帮JSWang secure 诺贝尔化学奖提名？
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Sep 15 12:59:02 2009, 美东)
据WallStreetJournal(see the attached link)由王锦山校友发明的ATRP赫然列为2009
年化学诺奖的5个夺标热门之一。问题是CMU的老马一手遮天，使得大部分报道只提他一
人。事实是王因该是inventor而马只不过是co-inventor。If we let the matter go,
it is possible Wang will not be mentioned let alone a share of this grand
prize. Unfortunately, there is no such a thing as "review" in Nobel Prize as
in NFL so I urge you to share your idea as how |
|
n****8
发帖数: 1716 | 17 A patent is recognition for an accomplishment. Now days most cases are just
for legal protection. Even in a lawsuit, as people trying to survive the
legal battles, it challenges the inventors to design something different
from existing ones. As long as the law rules in a society, we do need
patents, inventors, attorneys, and judges. I could also be wrong, if
someone who has the power to change the future. |
|
a******l
发帖数: 97 | 18 Tell your ****ing boss(es) that a patent can be invalidated by the USPTO if
one "inventor" has no claims at all. There is no requirment for inventor
name order though. |
|
o****e
发帖数: 195 | 19 is
I haven't studied Chinese patent law, so I can only make some basic
assumptions. Please educate and correct me if I am wrong.
he/she plans to steal someone else's ideas and patent them in China. he/she
is not the original inventor -- this suggests that there is a great chance
that the Chinese patent could be invalidated if caught in litigation, assuming
that SIPO requires one to be the actual inventor to apply for that patent.
he/she doesn't lose much up to this point, maybe just the filing |
|
i****y
发帖数: 5184 | 20 patent名字先后是没有区别的，很多时候是按last name顺序排列，所以你争一作没有
意义。
另外，楼上两位说得对，无论是没有贡献的人写成inventor，还是有重要贡献的人没有
列成inventor，专利即使申请到也是invalid的。贡献是指对claim subject matter的
贡献。 |
|
i****y
发帖数: 5184 | 21 如果你指的“保护力度”是说利益分配，那么这是有专门合同规定的，你们inventor之
间的事情，如果你还在学校，那么学校也要分成的。专利本身由所有inventor共同拥有。
文章大家的确很注重第一作者，但专利一般无所谓。
“先发文章的话是不是在第一年内是有和专利同样的保护力度呢？”不太清楚你要问什
么。 |
|
t****g
发帖数: 35582 | 22 发文章对知识产权没有任何保护意义，相反有破坏意义。发文章表示你愿意把你的idea
给无偿publish了。美国的专利法为了保障大家
发paper的积极性，规定作者在发文章的一年内还可以申请专利。绝大多数其他国家都
是你发了文章，就不能再申请专利了。
另外，你在学校读博时候申请的专利和老板争inventor得顺序从经济角度来说意义也不
大。只要你这个专利设计的研究利用了学校的资源
，学校就是专利持有人。以后你这个专利无论是卖还是license，你和老板两个
inventor一块估计也就分个15%。 |
|
t****g
发帖数: 35582 | 23 专利的owner和inventor是不一致的吧。比如prof.在学校，或者员工在公司申请的专利
，一般来说owner都是学校和公司，inventor通过和学校/公司之间的协议能分个15%-20
%的好处吧，以资奖励:)
有。 |
|
i****y
发帖数: 5184 | 24 可以不一致，缺省inventor是owner，但inventor可以把权利转让。
一般比如你给公司工作，你上班之前就会让你签相关转让协议。学校也确实基本大多数
是专利的owner。
20 |
|
n***e
发帖数: 461 | 25 whether there's $$ incentives for inventors is a contract problem. it
depends on the university's patent policy. some universities do give
inventors a share of any royalties generated by licensing their patents.
e.g
., Yale. See http://yale.edu/ocr/pfg/policies/patents.html
In addition, it can be emotionally satisfying to defend one's honor and
stop
the wrongdoer from misappropriating one's labor of love. |
|
a***o
发帖数: 709 | 26 是啊，一般美国的学校是inventor像学校发一封正式的request，说你要学校release
不过从你们的policy看来，学校要以15%的股份补偿失去owner的损失，我还真是第一次
看到这样的policy。而且它是说15%equity，我不知道你能不能稀释
其实我觉得你们的revenue opt-in inventor 的比重那么高，90%，就让学校保持所有
权也没什么不好的，不过你要通过学校在中国申请专利的话，专利费可能扣得比较高，
所以90%可能也没多少了。
btw,你这个专利以前发表过吗？paper, presentation之类的？我不知道中国的专利法
，不过在大多数国家，公开发表过后就不能申请了 |
|
o****e
发帖数: 195 | 27 (1) Take ownership of the case, do everything you can think of in the
interest of the client. If adding one more figure or paragraph makes the
specification stronger, do it. If there are things you don't quite
understand, spend a couple more hours to learn it.
(2) Fully understand the technical details of the invention. Make sure you
are clear about what is the main value/inventive idea of the case. Do not
confuse main inventive idea with technical details. Discuss your
understanding with t... 阅读全帖 |
|
f*****n
发帖数: 12752 | 28 你如果不是专利上写明的inventor的话（大部分这种情况inventor都是老板）没有分钱
的理由 |
|
z******n
发帖数: 336 | 29 It is quite common these days.
In 103 and OTDP, we often see "unpatentable over A in view of B"
For 103
A must be any 102 pior art
B must be any 102 prior art
For OTDP
A is a Patent or pat application with one common inventor, assignee or
research agreement. This is the difference: A is not a 102 prior art.
B must be a 102 prior art, when B is an article not pat or pat app
I am asking "can Article B be used if Article B is NOT a 102 prior art?".
I think Article B cannot be used if Arcitle B is N... 阅读全帖 |
|
k*********r
发帖数: 362 | 30 【 以下文字转载自 Biology 讨论区 】
发信人: ironny (静水流深), 信区: Biology
标 题: 浅谈入行专利法(二) (转载)
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Oct 27 00:07:54 2008)
发信人: ironny (静水流深), 信区: Law
标 题: 浅谈入行专利法(二)
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sun Oct 26 23:57:02 2008)
continued
&& 关于理工科转行专利法
1. 关于转行
首先插一点我对所谓“转行”的想法。转行是一个很大的决定，所以最好不要轻率的做
决定，要有理由justify自己的决定，只有这样的决定才能够以后不后悔，也能在遇到
困难的时候撑下去。转行不要看人家转，你也转，你转了也不知道为什么转。同时，最
好不要只为了“钱”途转行，做不喜欢做的事情，拿再高工资也会失落的。记住一句话
，DO WHAT MAKES YOU HAPPY。
其实理工科背景去做法律，严格讲也不能叫转行，因为美国学法律的本科也是学什么都
有的。尤其是专利法，本身就要求技术背景加法律背景，所以理工科的背景仍然是有... 阅读全帖 |
|
L**P
发帖数: 3792 | 31 以上各位给你说了答案
keep it very simple and kick the ball to the patent attorney/agent. Just
say that you heard that the patent might be invalidated if the inventorship
is
not correct, especially intentional misreprestention, and the company's
patent attorney or agent has to sort this
issue out to make sure that every TURE inventor is listed. The patent
attorney or agent would better talk to everyone invovled in this
invention, and every TRUE inventor can talk about their real contribution.
利益怎么分是你和公司之间... 阅读全帖 |
|
h***h
发帖数: 102 | 32 我肿么觉得有些invention很难看懂呢，有的inventor写的disclosure真心好烂，语法
都不通，图上的数字都标错，数学推导部分都省略，专业名词都不解释。。。
大家是通过跟inventor反复交流，还是自己疯狂自学才搞定的？
我刚开始intern，怕partner嫌我笨，不知道自己该研究到什么程度啊。。。 |
|
R******e
发帖数: 52 | 33 first "inventor" to file, not really first to file
if you are not the inventor, you will not get it regardless you file it
first or not. |
|
k*********r
发帖数: 362 | 34 continuation/CIP/divisional of original application需要same applicant吗？
MPEP上好像没特殊说阿，inventorship overlap是要有的，inventor和applicant还是
有些概念上的差别吧，pre-aia 37 CFR1.41好像在说不加特殊说明applicant就是指
inventor(s)，是吗？aia的定义是不是有变化呢?thx |
|
d********e
发帖数: 2221 | 35 The patentee may go for reissue. I'm not sure whether the patentee can sue
the uncooperative inventor.
An omitted inventor may sue under 35 U.S.C. § 256.
Usually each party pays its own costs and attorney fees.
Why bother changing the inventorship if the patent is assigned? |
|
k*********r
发帖数: 362 | 36 119(a)
An application for patent for an invention filed in this country by any
person who has, or whose legal representatives or assigns have, previously
regularly filed an application for a patent for the same invention in a
foreign country which affords similar privileges in the case of applications
filed in the United States or to citizens of the United States, or in a WTO
member country, shall have the same effect as the same application would
have if filed in this country on the date on whi... 阅读全帖 |
|
d********e
发帖数: 2221 | 37 If it has another inventor, yes, provided that the exception in 35 U.S.C. §
102 (b)(2) does not apply.
35 U.S.C. §102 (a)(2)
the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151,
or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section
122 (b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names
another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date
of the claimed invention. |
|
d********e
发帖数: 2221 | 38 if you are not an inventor of any claim in that application, you cannot be
listed as an inventor. Otherwise the patent matured from the application is
invalid. |
|
a*****e
发帖数: 1717 | 39 小公司，最近一年从几个人扩张到十几人，老板是律师出身，说是要像律师事务所看齐。
明天起每天下班之前都要填写工作日记，写清楚每小时干了什么，真是stupid。
我主要画图，autoCAD，inventor都用，活不算多，加上我干活很快，很多时候都是闲
着（闲着的时候，静的下心就学学Inventor，因为自己才工作不久，用的也不熟，大部
分时候是静不下心的，就上mitbbs，嘿嘿），特别忙的时候比较少，闲着的那些小时，
该怎么填呢？我这个担心阿。
老板说要计算项目成本，想知道大家每个活儿都花多久时间，所以我也不想乱填，被人
看穿，惹来麻烦。
望高手指教，多谢！
working版发了，再跑来这里问问，主要是想知道ME的人，都相对比较闲么，还是我们
老板太mean了？ |
|
k******t
发帖数: 1498 | 40 试用了半天inventor，上手倒是比较快。但是从PCB到外壳设计的各种开口的相对位置不
太好转换。可能是不太会用，目前只能用铅笔和计算器计算好了，手工输入到inventor
里面。这方面viacad比较好，可惜不稳定。
我有学校的邮箱，但是好像没有免费的学生版本。
Edit:autodesk真的是很慷慨啊。在网上注册，当场通过，直接下载。 |
|
L******r
发帖数: 522 | 41 There are several general concepts might be helpful to understand the
situation:
1. A lot of later filed patent applications try to include very broad claims
which would cover prior art disclosed/claimed information. Even such
claims are included in the later filed applications, unlikely these claims
will be supported and granted by patent office during examination. Patent
application is not equal to patent.
2. To file a PCT (WO applications) doesn't mean the innovation will
automatically be p... 阅读全帖 |
|
l*********g
发帖数: 1899 | 42 s不start up和有没有合同有什么关系呢？甚至就算我爸爸雇用我帮他干活，都可以拟
定雇佣合同。雇佣合同是保护双方利益而不仅仅是保护老板的利益。不要说你是在美国
，在中国，没有雇佣合同的事情在我在大陆工作过的公司都从来没有见过。还有个大脑
的老板都不愿意这么干的。你还以为没有雇佣合同是对你多么有利的事情，唉，真是少
见。
不过你说的IP的事情倒是和你有没有合同是无关的。在你在美国的知识产权局去登记注
册你的IP（产生这些IP的法律权利）的时候，例如copyright，patent，法律文件会注
明谁是IP的owner。例如patent，inventor是一（些）人，patent owner往往是
inventor所在的公司。你也可以和你所在的公司协商，让你成为owner或者共同成为
owner，但是这些必须是在形成法律文件前协商好。在IP所属上的鉴别一看这些法律文
件一清二楚，根本不需要另立合同。打起官司来，上到法庭就看这些法律文件。 |
|
|
g*********r
发帖数: 542 | 44 这篇文章透露着无知
比如这一段：
核心提示： 方舟子自称他把博士后研究时做的东西（克隆了一个基因）申请了专利，
得到一笔钱，可以维持基本生活费用。方舟子虽然作为四人之一参与了这个专利的发明
工作，但是他和其他三位索尔克研究院的工作人员一样，根本不是也不可能是这个专利
的申请者和拥有者，他不可能从这个专利获取任何合法利益，所谓“把博士后研究时做
的东西（克隆了一个基因）申请了专利，得到一笔钱，可以维持基本生活费用”，如果
不是彻头彻尾的无耻谎言，就是彻头彻尾的刑事犯罪。本文陈示有关这一专利真相的全
部证据。
这明显是无知： 在美国学校的发明，确实是IP属于学校，但是学校是给inventor 钱的
，本站就有不少这么拿钱的。
这个作者明显是狗屁不懂，但是就急于下结论的主
反肘子不是这么反的，这种白痴文章，肘子真是没有必要回应 |
|
g*********r
发帖数: 9366 | 45 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
grasshopper (大肚子哥哥 (singing crickets)) 于 (Mon Jan 2 14:26:47 2012, 美东) 提到:
就是 “ 你一个美国大学的生物化学博士， 不好好做科研....."
靠， 为啥美国大学的博士就得去做科研？
为啥你们这些学这个那个的就可以去开公司办企业，写书走穴当领导？ 莫非你们大学
专业是CEO管理和精英管理？
还不是看方舟子打假出了名，羡慕嫉妒恨呗
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
bibicat (bibicat) 于 (Mon Jan 2 15:01:35 2012, 美东) 提到:
国内人吗，觉得出国读博士的都是科学家
肘子在美国估计还真混得不怎么样，主要靠给国内报刊杂志写写文章和写中文科普书籍
拿稿酬为生
不过现在成为名人了，随便一个讲座的出场费就不少，书出了20多本来，土豆上都有视
频专栏了，估计年收入怎么也超过$20w了吧
肘子回国还是对的，多年逃税在美国被IRS查到不得了... 阅读全帖 |
|
M*V
发帖数: 3205 | 46 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat Oct 27 10:00:17 2012, 美东)
Joke: Presidential Debate 2012, Act III
10/22/2012
By Limin Wang
In the evening of October 16, 2012, at the Smack Complex of Hofstra
University on Long Island, New York, President Obama and former governor
Romney had the second finger-to-finger presidential debate. Candy Growly
tried her hardest to moderate them.
Outside the debate building, large swarms of people had decided on their own
to join the show. Some said that they wanted to bring their ow... 阅读全帖 |
|
z**********e
发帖数: 22064 | 47 David Greenglass, the Brother Who Doomed Ethel Rosenberg, Dies at 92
By ROBERT D. McFADDEN October 15, 2014
“叛徒”格林格拉斯，一场尘封的苏联间谍案
ROBERT D. McFADDEN 2014年10月15日
It was the most notorious spy case of the Cold War — the conviction and
execution of
Julius and Ethel Rosenberg for passing atomic secrets to the Soviet Union —
and it rested
largely on the testimony of Ms. Rosenberg’s brother David Greenglass, whose
name to
many became synonymous with betrayal.
那是冷战中最为臭名昭著的一桩间谍案—— 朱利叶斯与埃塞尔·罗森伯格夫妇(Julius
... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
m******g
发帖数: 3924 | 49 看来很可信，专利可以查的到：
https://www.google.com/patents/CN1146092A?cl=un
Publication number CN1146092 A
Publication type Application
Application number CN 95115186
Publication date Mar 26, 1997
Filing date Sep 19, 1995
Priority date Sep 19, 1995
Inventors 杨红俊
Applicant 昆明市公安局看守所
Export Citation BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan |
|
发帖数: 1 | 50 诺贝尔奖暴最大丑闻
诺贝尔医学奖项暴最大丑闻，把奖项给了残害无数生灵，残害人类的日本骗子科学家。
这是人类历史上最悲哀的时刻。我所有的研究都揭示癌症，老年痴呆，糖尿病现阶段广
泛地流行，是日本人几十年孜孜不倦刻意造成的，是一种人造的疾病。他们给亿万的生
灵造成了终生的痛苦，他们应该被送上反人类的法庭去审判，而不是被奖赏。他应该被
逮捕，交代日本人是用什么样的手段伤害全世界无辜的人群的，如何制造癌症，老年痴
呆，糖尿病患者的。如何通过这些人体实验，给医药公司攫取了大量的财富。
世界需要从新洗牌，正义得到伸张。我代表亿万无辜的生灵向世界控诉你们。滚出我的
家！在派人来害我，折磨我，会让你们付出代价的！
Yoshinori Ohsumi, a professor in Tokyo Institute of Technology .
Japan's Yoshinori Ohsumi won the 2016 Nobel prize for medicine or physiology
for his discovery of how cells break down and recycle t... 阅读全帖 |
|
