b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 1 The reason why 4NT is designed as RKC for H, is because you could have set
up diamond as trump by bidding 4D first, but you don't have room to set up
hearts as trump (4H will not be forcing).
For me, the first principle is, if you have a chance to set up trump before
using 4NT, then 4NT is not RKC for that suit. For example 1H-4NT, that is
not RKC for me, since I could have made a forcing raise first, followed by
4NT. Similarly, 1H-1S-2D-4NT is quantitative (balanced 19-ish). I think 1H-
1S-3D-4... 阅读全帖 |
|
c******y
发帖数: 26 | 2 Yesterday, I played 1 hand.
I opened 1h, my partner answered with 2nt,
because my d is void, I bid 3d, he bid 4nt, I answered with 5d, he bid
5h, and I stopped. Finally, we found we had 6h.
Do you think 4nt is a good bid? I think, he should have shown his control
instead of bid 4nt. Because my d was possible to be void or singleton. 4nt
can't give us enough information.
Or maybe I just can go to 6h with my void d after his 5h? |
|
c******l
发帖数: 51 | 3 三、BLACKWOOD and variations BW和变化
BW是用4NT问A的约定，此时它不可能是自然
意义的4NT，是问同伴有几个A。
答法：5C=0／4个A；5D=1个A；5H=2个A；5S=3个A。
再用5NT问有几个K。
答法：6C=0／4个K；6D=1个K；6H=2个K；6S=3个K。
Roman BW(罗马BW)也是用4NT问A，答法也相似。Key
Card BLACKWOOD关键张BW约定，是以王牌K作为1个A，
还可以答出有无主牌Q，4NT后：
5C=0/3个A；5D=1/4个A；5H=2个A，没有Q；5=2S个A和有Q。 |
|
x***e
发帖数: 2449 | 4 I think it is.
Well, first it is not force to grand.
And you didn't show any thing about yourself yet.
If you have spade, then why not just 5NT or 4NT instead of 2NT?
So I guess, After all 2NT and the following blah blah,
if you bid higher than 4NT now, it is unlikely to reach GRAND.
However, it is easy to stop at 4NT which you don't like.
A 31-35 range with solid heart is good enough for slam, I think.
That is why I prefer 5NT than 4NT, you need to give you PD a little more
energy.
I learn brid |
|
d***a
发帖数: 57 | 5 option 1: >50%
2nt 3nt
option 2: >30%
2nt 4nt
option 3: >10%
2nt 4nt 6nt
option 4: >5%
2nt 4nt 5nt 6nt
option 5: >0%
2nt 4nt 5nt 7nt |
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 6 如果左手方没有PASS过，那肯定是不逼叫。但是对方PASS，后面第三家弱开叫，是不是
应该不同处理呢？
同样地，如果同伴没有PASS过，叫牌从右手开始，(2S) 4H (4S) 4NT，似乎应该是关键
张问叫。虽然有些牌可能会4NT是最佳定约，但是综合来说满贯试探的情形更多，4NT用
作问叫更合理。
但是如果同伴PASS过，也许4NT作为实叫最合理。一方面来说，同伴没有开叫牌力，满
贯的可能大大减少；另一方面，同伴任何５阶新花都是对红心定约的扣叫（不可能是独
立套前面却PASS），所以可以有别的手段探寻满贯。
不过，除非是很熟的搭档，弄得这么细大概意义不大，有一个笼统的约定就行了，已经
好过没有任何约定。
突然想到，叫牌的另一个可能是2S之后直接争叫3NT。但我担心的是，如果对方4S过来
，我还是不知道怎么办。 |
|
w****b
发帖数: 623 | 7 Psyching is explicitly allowed by ACBL rules and you cannot do anything with
it. (their agreement of 3C was 2nd suit)
I did call the director after opener made another move after the slow 4NT. But
the opponents probably know that they'll lose the appeal so they did not admit
that there was a break in temp with 4NT. Since we cannot establish that fact,
the director ruled in their favor.
was
bidding
anyway.
4NT
6H |
|
x***e
发帖数: 2449 | 8 agree, 3NT is not good.
But he is not that strong for 4NT either, I think.
I will choose 3S if it is me.
4NT is not good too.
he could bid 6D directly after your 4C, hehe
But I also think your fault is same as your PD.
Think you have at least 55 Ds, you should change to 5D after 4NT
then you probably have no fault. if you PD stoped, it is his fault. |
|
p*********6
发帖数: 679 | 9 Playing on BBO with a stranger
Noth:
Q8
T32
KQ32
KQ72
South:
AKJT9765
K8
A5
A
S/N Vul, S dealer (me)
E S W N
2c / 2d* (waiting)
/ 2s / 4nt (1430)
/ 5c / 6s
/ 7s?
Questions:
1) was it ok to bid 7 ? since I have already anwsered 0-4 kc and p still
went to 6. shouldn't p have at least 1 kc for this sequence?
2) was 4nt from North too early ? 2nt and 3s to start cuebid ? cue bids
might not be enough to find the missing A (A or K for cuebid), but 4nt from
South will do.
(Needless to say, op |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 10 Let me make it clear, the whole bidding sequence doesn't make much sense.
After 2C, suppose 2C p 2D 2H 2S p 3C is nonforcing. 3H can be the only gf
bid.
So 3NT is to play, not serious or nonserious slam try, because if 3H shows a
gf spade raise, then you bid 3NT to show some serious slam interest,
partner bids 4S to sign off, there is no way for you to bid 4NT, because you
should just bid 4NT right away in that case.
Now after a natural 3NT, 4S shows mild slam interest in S. 4NT is RKC, 5D
shows... 阅读全帖 |
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 11 这副牌正常RKC没问题，但是很多其它的牌，4NT作为RKC太高，所以我们低花上从不用
4NT作为RKC，要么在特定的序列我们约定使用kickback，要么就不使用RKC，把4NT作为
别的用途。其实我们真正需要的是一个将牌问叫。 |
|
g****o
发帖数: 1284 | 12 人工体系我最爱哈哈。试试海盗梅花吧！
北
S JXXX
H AKxx
D KQxx
C Q
南
S AKT9X
H 9
D ATxx
C AKX
1D - 1H
2S - 2NT
3C - 3D
3H - 3S
4D - 4NT
5S - 5NT
6D - 7D
叫牌解释：
1D: 11-15, 2+D
1H: 自然叫或持强牌的接力叫
2S: 4张H的4441牌型，高限
2NT：接力
3C：4-4-4-1
3D：CRASH问A
3H：1个A
3S：CRASH问K
4D：加三级答叫，显示两个同色的K。南现在知道同伴是HK+DK。AK齐全，同伴还是13-
15高限，现在只露出1A2K，还应有至少1个Q，小满贯应该没有问题，可以继续询问Q探
询大满贯。
4NT：CRASH问Q。H和S都是同伴保证4张的花色，在4阶水平上叫这两个花色都是止叫，
所以必须越过去，用4NT作为询问叫。
5S：加四级答叫显示同级别两个Q，可能是SQ+HQ，也可能是DQ+CQ。现在南家有点犯难
了，因为自己一个Q都没有，同伴到底是高花2个Q还是低花两个Q呢？如果是高花2Q，我
要打7S；低花2Q的话，我要打7D。不要紧... 阅读全帖 |
|
i****e
发帖数: 642 | 13 LHO pd RHO me
1C P 1S P
3S P 4S 4NT
P P 5S AP
We were white vs red. I held
x
J9xxxx
KJxxx
x
My pd passed my 4NT! Finally ops play 5S down 1.
I was kicked out by LHO, who said I was a cheater, and had no right bid 4NT.
I want to cry .... |
|
l****a
发帖数: 272 | 14 至于对手的一些不友好行为, 其他人讲了不少了.
我提几点牌本身的问题,
1, 局况有利, 1S 之后, 要是叫 unusual 1NT 或者 2NT 如何?
2，假设pd 明白你4NT 是双套, 但是没有好配合, 局况好, pass 又怎么不行?
谁也没说4NT 是逼叫的. 对方怎么叫是他们自己的问题. 4NT如果对方不X,
那就打呗, 随便他们打下几个. 如果对方选择继续叫牌, 或者X, 你们再考虑怎么继续. |
|
i****e
发帖数: 642 | 15
That is perfectly fine in my opinion. But as you can see, both pd and opps
don't understand 4NT, so 1NT or 2NT would be even disastrous :)
My thought was that, if opps stayed at 3 level, I would let them play.
续.
Passing 4NT won't be a disaster. I remember the blue team played un-doubled
1-1 5C, and won the hand :)
For serious partnership, I guess passing 4NT (only at this color) may mean
no preference for known two suits, and ask partner to bid his better suit
after double. |
|
i****e
发帖数: 642 | 16 Without special agreement, 4H and 4NT may be explained differently.
If 4H shows limit raise by agreement, then 3H doesn't have to set up trump.
But apparently, this 4H consumes room for slam bidding. But at least this
design uses 4H bid, otherwise there is no meaningful 4H bid with this
sequence.
4NT RKC, without explicit trump, should assume the last bid suit as trump,
in this case it is D. The same principle is for 4C cue bid, which is for D,
rather than H. It seems confusing to treat 4C and 4... 阅读全帖 |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 17 这个牌的关键需要明确对4H加倍的含义。这个加倍不可能既是指示首攻，又是建议加倍
。通常在专家级别的搭档中，由于前面缺乏低阶加入叫牌的可能性，并且是无局对有局
，这种情况的加倍都是建议牺牲的。而别的局况下加倍是显示首攻。
所以这里面就产生了逻辑上的漏洞。如果他认为4H后面不能直接来4S，他的牌型只能
加倍一下建议牺牲，那么只好加倍，这样，最后的4NT就是把这手不足的牌叫了两次
。这是一个非常低级的错误，而不是搏输赢。牌桌上搏输赢并不意味着做出逻辑上错误
的叫牌。比如在4H后面直接叫4S, 希望同伴没有S赢墩，并且有某一花色的极配，这可
以算是搏输赢，虽然从牌理上是不对的，因为他不能真期待同伴有极配和没有S赢墩。
但是一旦叫了加倍，来建议牺牲，他就失去了后面自己裸搞4NT的权利。这是基本叫
牌逻辑和叫牌纪律。
这类逻辑的违反和纪律的违背是比蓄意冒叫，低叫，不够格的阻击叫牺牲叫之类的错误
严重得多的错误，因为后者是可能得利的，而这类错误显示的是头脑混乱和不自恰，并
且这类错误会导致一些更严重的后果。比如这手牌，假设直接来4S, 同伴可以叫4NT,
表示没有倾向性，这样至少可以找到8张将牌配合... 阅读全帖 |
|
p*y
发帖数: 61 | 18
5H
4S 在我的体系里应该叫4NT
5NT
4nt 有缺门也照样用，呵呵,加脚过的S如果不是3张就一定有Q
不会出现答叫以后不知道是哪个A的尴尬问题
只要有DA，叫到7不算过分（CD不可能都没长度)
3NT 和陌生搭档的话4C |
|
b***n
发帖数: 13455 | 19
~~~4NT. 5D guarranted. If North responsed with 5H/S, then 6D.
~~~Absolutely 4NT. Since North has shown strong in S with
no less than 15pts. no reason to reject 6-2 trump for a slam.
~~~~ If satisfied with a small slam, 6H. Otherwise
6C or 5NT. I use direct 5NT as a full slam invitation. If pard has
top controllers of the suit he has bid, and strong trump support(any
2 of AKQ), he should bid to 7. Of course trump should be agreed before. |
|
z***y
发帖数: 198 | 20 当然我赞成在叫4NT前先扣叫
不过, 如果你用Roman Key card Black wood, 你也可以把你的缺门显示出来
5NT= 2 Key cards and 1 void
6阶花色，1 or 3 Key cards , 这们花色是缺门
6阶将牌花色，1 or 3 key cards, 有一门级别高过将牌的花色是缺门
然后事情就容易了
另外就算用Black wood在这种情形下，可能依然应考虑叫6个，因为你搭档的牌肯定相当好,
否则他没资格叫4NT |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 21 1d - 1s
3h - 4c ( 3h splinter, 4c cue)
4d - 4s
4nt - 5c ( 4nt asks RKC, 5c 1 or 4 key card )
5d - 5s ( 5d asks Sq, no sq)
6d - 6h ( 6d asks dia support, no support)
6s - pass |
|
y****e
发帖数: 71 | 22 自然制是有点问题，对于这副牌。
2NT固然好于2C。2NT-3C-3S-4S后，是不是4NT问A还是有些把持
不定。南可以只有3-5点，照样支持4S。
1D开叫的毛病是非逼叫，可能被Pass。
2C毛病更大，2C-2NT后，简直没法办。出套要有5张，3NT肯定完
蛋。
精确1C开叫，1C-1NT后，还可以2NT，然后南如3C(巴朗或斯台曼)，
找到S配合后，因为以知道南8-10点，可以放心4NT问A。
所以，我猜测实战，如果你能叫到4S并打成13墩，肯定得分超过
平均分。 |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 23 double.
if pd bid 4C/D/H, you can ask for key cards by 4NT.
if pd bid 3NT, you can try 4NT if pd's opening style isn't very sound
or 6NT if he's a sound opener.
If pd passes, you really don't mind defending. hehe |
|
a*******s
发帖数: 295 | 24
I guess a diamond lead works.
Pd could hardly be club void. coz that means opps have
9 clubs, i.e. LHO has 4 clubs at least. In this case,
he would have passed 5C or 6C most of the time.
It seems that RHO didn't take 4C as Ace asking, otherwise,
he should have passed 4NT. Therefore, 4S was a cuebid and he
took 4NT as Ace asking.
I guess the reason of LHO's hesitation is one Ace missing,
and he was thinking of taking chances that the missing ace was
not the crucial one.
4S cuebid indicated that |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 25 "wimptb (一失足成千古wimp),
IMP.
3C was supposed to be 2nd suit, natural. 4C is ace asking, 4S shows 2A; 4NT
was to play. "
read the series of article carefully please.
4C: RKC, 4S showing 2Aces. 4NT sign off.
why opp sign off when his pd shows 2 aces?
if your pd has an ace and a void in club, how can't he double the final 6H
as a lightner double? |
|
a*******s
发帖数: 295 | 26 In a team game, all play precision.
1. red vs white. You hold
S KQ1098
H KQ3
D Qxx
C K9
PD RHO YOU LHO
1C* - 1S 3C
3D - ?
* precision, 16+
if you raise 4D and pd rebid 4S, what's your plan next?
2. both vunlerable, You hold
S Q
H AJ109
D 9
C AKQ109xxx
you opens a precision 1C, and the auction went on:
1C - 2D -
3C - 3S -
3NT - 4NT -
?
4NT was natural, I presume. What's your call?
3. you hold
S 87
H A10954
D 763
C QJ5
The auction of opps: (precision)
LHO RHO
1C 1NT
2C* 2S
3N |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 27
4H here is still forward going, showing mild slam interest.
Partner should never pass 4H with 3 H or less. I think partner can pass 4H
only with something like this:
SAQx Hxxxx DAKJxx Cx,you need a magic hand to make 6H, so 4H should be ok.
I would bid 2H with this hand. This hand isn't strong enough to comit to 5
level. So I just treat it as 5-5 to avoid reverse at high level.
if you bid 2C,
1D 1S 2C 4S
p p ?
I don't think 4NT is clear here. if partner bid 5D over 4NT, do you still
want to b |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 28 double. 4NT isn't clear here.
double is card showing and take out oriented.
I usually bid 4NT with 6-5 two suiters. |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 29 the point is that
with 5-5 two suiters you can seldom commit to 5 level.
Because for 5-5 two suiters, the offensive value usually isn't enough,
unless it's very pure:
I'd bid 4NT with this hand: Sx HAKQxx DKQJxx CKx, because it's pure.
for 6-5 two suiters, it's usually pure:)
sometimes, I belive you can bid 4NT with 5-4 two suiters when white:
Sx HKQJTx DAKJx Cxxx, this hand looks very pure, I don't mind
to five level with such a hand when white.
The basic idea is the ODR, if ODR is very high, |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 30 你可以用3S作为低花stayman, 如果同伴叫出4C, 你就问一下A, 如果A齐就叫6C.
如果同伴叫4D, 你就叫4NT邀请6NT.
当然这都需要搭档间的约定.
没有约定的话你也可以简单跳4NT, 邀请6NT, 这时候同伴有C套, 依然可以叫5C,
你就加叫到6C. 这么叫的坏处是偶尔同伴只有低限牌力, 但C套配合,
你还是有6C. 比如SAKxx HAK DQxx CAxxx, 这牌只有20点, 但6C依然是铁牌.
而6NT一则缺一墩 |
|
c****u
发帖数: 3277 | 31 well, the score format is IMP, so there is no top or bottom here,
+500 should be a reasonable score. Tops and bottoms are for Match point,
not IMP. Anyway, I wouldn't pull the double if your partner's double is
for penalty. if it's take out, it would be a tough hand to bid,
that's why some players play good bad 4NT here.
4S x p 4NT: shows slam interest in H or D, or sign off in C.
4S x p 5C: slam interest in C.
4S x p 5D/H: to play. |
|
c********n
发帖数: 17 | 32 i would prefer 4D over 4NT as well. With vul and not knowing strength of LHO
and pd, i would only bid 4NT with at least 5-5 and similar or better high
cards.
Double could mislead pd to think S fit, so could 4H.
Gamble 3NT only when H is Kx or Ax. |
|
w*****n
发帖数: 155 | 33 SAYC/JQ?
both you must alert if openning with 1D...
JQ... open 2d, 2nt...4...4nt....6s
sayc... 1h 1s 2d(forcing bidding) 3c (strong 4th l forcing bidding)
4nt ---6s... |
|
o*******n
发帖数: 6500 | 34 这个4nt不好
尤其很多约定在4nt以下的扣叫不保证第一轮控制的情况下 |
|
a***e
发帖数: 829 | 35 在BBO玩，4NT时对家pass！最后打成4NT超3，郁闷吐血。。。当然，对家是新手，俺也
是，不过还是很郁闷 :( |
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 36 要看你的叫牌序列是怎么样的。很多时候4NT都是自然实叫，对家当然可以PASS。基本
原则是，除非是很明显的问A（比方将牌已经确定），不然default的4NT都是自然邀叫
。 |
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 37 这个序列下面，4NT当然是问A，绝对不应该PASS。不过要记住，你是在BBO上打牌，更
离谱的事多了去了，大部分自称“专家”级别的牌手都数不清１３张牌。
你的系统有些过时，看的大概是N年前的”桥牌入门”之类的书吧？现代叫牌体系一般
不把3H作为逼叫。标准体系中，1H-3H是“限制性加叫”(limit raise)，表示邀局牌力
，同伴持低限时可以pass。还有一种“伯根约定叫”，把1H-3H作为0-6点的弱牌。这也
许也是同伴PASS你4NT的原因吧，他可能觉得你只有邀叫实力的话，不可能有满贯，既
然搞不清楚了，不如早点放手，呵呵~~ |
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 38 直接1H-4NT是只询问A的张数，也就是原始的黑木。如果想知道HK和HQ的情况，则应该
先确定将牌再叫4NT，即罗马关键张问叫。所以这两个序列是有区别的。 |
|
l****d
发帖数: 228 | 39 感觉上pass 4S应该不逼叫，和其他进局序列不同，4H盖叫没有承诺防守实力。比较有
趣的是如果2S 4H 4S 4NT是什么含义，有没有可能是要打？
这个牌还有一个好玩的地方是靠着坚固的红桃套，有可能3NT或者4NT盖掉4S是最佳定约
，不过我不太能看出怎么合理的达到。 |
|
v**********e
发帖数: 1295 | 40 5C;5C算是正招吧
4NT;如果局势被动，也可以考虑更激进些，4NT或是6C都可以接受 |
|
l****a
发帖数: 272 | 41 西家的解释是, 一旦2D 逼局, 在S没有配合的情况下, 想不上局都不成了.
1NT 虽然没逼局, 但是仍然逼叫. 以后还可以见机行事.
如果是 1S-1NT; 2C
在东家是低限的牌力(11-12)时, 有可能停在部分定约上.
但是在2NT 以后, 西家的4NT 仔细分析分析, 是不是有问题?
还有, 4NT 以后, 东家是不是该pass ? |
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 42 It's quite difficult to discuss system issues with you as it appears.
As I said again and again, the 4NT bidder doesn't say he holds SQ or not. So
we can only assume that he holds SQ about 50% of times. Then you just know
how bad your structure is for grand slam purpose. For example, suppose you
hold no SQ and two side kings, you still have to jump to 6S, which is simply
a very very bad bridge design, because if your partner holds trump queen,
he wouldn't bid 7 usually, because he misses two sid... 阅读全帖 |
|
g****o
发帖数: 1284 | 43 我不用kickback rkc。就这副牌而言，简单的RKC应该也work吧？
1D - 1S
2D - 3H
3S - 4C
4NT - 5H
5NT - 6H
7D
3H = Splinter, 4张方块支持。而且我绝对不会拿单张HK去做splinter。
3S = 扣叫。应该没有疑问，不会是想打S定约。否则前一轮绝对不应该叫2D。
4C = 扣叫。
4NT = RKC
5H = 2 Key Cards （DK + CA)
5NT = 问K。
6H = 2个K，但绝对不会有HK。有人可能不会同意我，但这就是我的风格。
7D没问题。 |
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 44 北美桥牌大赛本周进入白热化。考虑到一些牌友仍在费城战斗，这次的题目以娱乐为主
，主要议题是首攻。
时间回到30多年前的奥林匹克桥牌赛。IMP双有，你坐东家拿到下面一副充满刺激的牌：
AKJ876 / AT7632 / -- / 2
同伴发牌，叫牌过程：
W N E S
P 1D 2D 2H
4S 4NT 5S 6C
P 6D 6S 7D
P P X AP
2D = 双高花
2H = 方块加叫，limit raise or better
4NT = 黑木问叫
6C = 梅花长套，给同伴满贯花色的选择
问题来了：你首攻什么？ |
|
g****o
发帖数: 1284 | 45 那用我最心爱的人工系统海盗梅花试试：
北开叫：
1S - 1NT
2D - 2H
2NT - 3C
3S - 4C
4NT - 7H
1S = 11-15，5+S
1NT = GF
2D = 11-13, with 4+minor
2H = relay
2NT = 4D
3C = relay
3S = 5-3-4-1 shape
4C = RKC with S as trump
4NT = 2 key cards with SQ
7H = This is all I need. Even partner has no other side K, we can still
make 7 since dummy can ruff two clubs.
南开叫：
1C - 1S
1NT - 3D
3H - 4C
4H - 5D
7H
1C = 16+
1S = 5+S, 8+HP
1NT = relay
3D = 5S + 4D, 12+HCP
3H = relay
4C = 5-3-4-1 shape... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 47 BBO上特别经常地看到以下两个序列被滥用，觉得有必要讨论一下。
假定叫牌如下，对手没有插叫：
（1）1NT - 2D - 2H - 4H
（2）1NT - 2D - 2H - 4NT
你认为应叫方大致是什么牌，最后叫品（4H或4NT）是什么含意？
希望大家踊跃勇敢地发表自己的想法，我们这个版面不能仅限于中高级以上牌手发言。
尤其是这类问题，我很想了解一下爱好者中的普遍认识。 |
|
p*********6
发帖数: 679 | 48 The opp might get mad because you took his fun of 'declaring' away in the
pickup games (in Main?). I am sure he understood your 4nt bid, but got mad
when your pd passed (- now the 4nt bid was just for disrupting). I saw hosts
routinely kick out the psychic bidders. |
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 49 一般说来是早叫为好，避免后期猜测。也许这是一把失配的牌，同伴手持4-1-2-6。就
算是4-1-3-5或4-2-2-5，也未必是个划算的牺牲。
另：unusual 1NT意义不大，在轻开叫和轻应叫盛行的今天，1NT有必要作为自然叫品。
又：理论上说，此时的4NT应该保证两个低花套。只有这种情况下你前期没法叫2NT（因
为那将是显示红心和方块），只能通过延迟的4NT来显示。 |
|
b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 50 IMP 有对无。右手方开叫2H，你最终做庄6C。左手首攻H7:
AQ42
Q
AKQ2
AT92
K53
K543
6
KJ765
叫牌过程：
W S E N
2H P P X
P 3C P 4NT
P 5D P 6C
AP
3C 显示8-11点和梅花套
4NT ＝ 关键张问叫
5D ＝ 1 或 4 个关键张
叫牌有些粗糙，叫到缺HA和将牌Q的满贯。当然远不是hopeless，你只需要把将牌打对
就可以了。右手HA拿到第一墩，回HJ，你准备怎么做？ |
|
