由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
USANews版 - 我支持 second amendment!!!!拥抢
相关主题
Supreme Court: California Cannot Ban Sales of Violent Video Games to Kids民猪党提出要对firearm多征税
就我观察, 普通白人干活态度最好High School Textbook Edits Second Amendment
Supreme Court Rules That Individuals Have Gun RightsTrey Gowdy Grills DHS Official on Due Process, Gun Rights
芝加哥和华盛顿放松枪支管制后Second Amendment
共和党参院对Obama大法官提名立场开始松动今天肯塔基packed
NRA如何改变second amendment的解读我早说了,左臂就是要攻击宪法,和按提法一样目的
宪法并不关心枪造成的伤害,而这是件好事!Jury Finds Samsung Violated Apple Patents
都是公民权利,为什么拥枪要背景调查,投票连ID都不让看ITC judge says Samsung infringes key part of Apple patent
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: amendment话题: second话题: court话题: supreme话题: states
进入USANews版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
C*********X
发帖数: 10518
1
The Second Amendment (Amendment II) to the United States Constitution
protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms and was adopted on
December 15, 1791, as part of the first ten amendments contained in the Bill
of Rights.[1][2][3][4] The Supreme Court of the United States has ruled
that the right belongs to individuals,[5][6] while also ruling that the
right is not unlimited and does not prohibit all regulation of either
firearms or similar devices.[7] State and local governments are limited to
the same extent as the federal government from infringing this right per the
incorporation of the Bill of Rights.
The Second Amendment was based partially on the right to keep and bear arms
in English common law and was influenced by the English Bill of Rights of
1689. Sir William Blackstone described this right as an auxiliary right,
supporting the natural rights of self-defense, resistance to oppression, and
the civic duty to act in concert in defense of the state.[8]
In United States v. Cruikshank (1876), the Supreme Court of the United
States ruled that, "The right to bear arms is not granted by the
Constitution; neither is it in any manner dependent upon that instrument for
its existence" and limited the scope of the Second Amendment's protections
to the federal government.[9] In United States v. Miller (1939), the Supreme
Court ruled that the Second Amendment did not protect weapon types not
having a "reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a
well regulated militia."[10][11]
In the twenty-first century, the amendment has been subjected to renewed
academic inquiry and judicial interest.[11] In District of Columbia v.
Heller (2008), the Supreme Court handed down a landmark decision that held
the amendment protects an individual right to possess and carry firearms.[12
][13] In McDonald v. Chicago (2010), the Court clarified its earlier
decisions that limited the amendment's impact to a restriction on the
federal government, expressly holding that the Due Process Clause of the
Fourteenth Amendment incorporates the Second Amendment against state and
local governments.[14] In Caetano v. Massachusetts (2016), the Supreme Court
reiterated its earlier rulings that "the Second Amendment extends, prima
facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that
were not in existence at the time of the founding" and that its protection
is not limited to "only those weapons useful in warfare".[15]
Despite these decisions, the debate between various organizations regarding
gun control and gun rights continues.[16]
s********o
发帖数: 1237
2
你这种公开仇恨美国呵中国的,就该直接拉去改造
1 (共1页)
进入USANews版参与讨论
相关主题
ITC judge says Samsung infringes key part of Apple patent共和党参院对Obama大法官提名立场开始松动
Concealed Carry Group Sues Ohio State University for Infringing Gun RightsNRA如何改变second amendment的解读
支持trump,支持拥抢宪法并不关心枪造成的伤害,而这是件好事!
拥抢背后的逻辑谬误都是公民权利,为什么拥枪要背景调查,投票连ID都不让看
Supreme Court: California Cannot Ban Sales of Violent Video Games to Kids民猪党提出要对firearm多征税
就我观察, 普通白人干活态度最好High School Textbook Edits Second Amendment
Supreme Court Rules That Individuals Have Gun RightsTrey Gowdy Grills DHS Official on Due Process, Gun Rights
芝加哥和华盛顿放松枪支管制后Second Amendment
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: amendment话题: second话题: court话题: supreme话题: states