t**x
发帖数: 20965 | 1 这些人生活很多都不算有钱, 甚至很苦, 没有钱和精力养育后代。
如果这些人没有活路了, 美国不会比中国好的。
墨西哥人工作态度大多数不行, 好的都让中餐馆找去了 |
K********y
发帖数: 5068 | 2 赞实话实说
我在现实生活众，也是这种体会
【在 t**x 的大作中提到】
: 这些人生活很多都不算有钱, 甚至很苦, 没有钱和精力养育后代。
: 如果这些人没有活路了, 美国不会比中国好的。
: 墨西哥人工作态度大多数不行, 好的都让中餐馆找去了
|
h**z
发帖数: 9751 | 3 工作态度最好的普通白人都不刷厕所，不在酒店收拾房间 |
l*******g
发帖数: 27064 | 4 少见多怪
另外你们左逼要搞aa，就像苹果招进来的黑人劳模大都在苹果店里工作
找白人来打扫卫生？写代码的也是白人亚裔，劳模黑人比例低还不被左逼们拍死
【在 h**z 的大作中提到】
: 工作态度最好的普通白人都不刷厕所，不在酒店收拾房间
|
K********y
发帖数: 5068 | 5 以后没有福利， 鼓励劳动
白人也都会从高到低干各种活的‘
我们家以前用老莫割草， 就敷衍了事， 而且也是漫天要价
后来换了几家， 找到个靠谱的白人服务， 就非常好
【在 h**z 的大作中提到】
: 工作态度最好的普通白人都不刷厕所，不在酒店收拾房间
|
h**z
发帖数: 9751 | 6 右逼反aa了？德州大学是AA，德州是右逼州。加州大学不是AA，加州是左逼州。
【在 l*******g 的大作中提到】
: 少见多怪
: 另外你们左逼要搞aa，就像苹果招进来的黑人劳模大都在苹果店里工作
: 找白人来打扫卫生？写代码的也是白人亚裔，劳模黑人比例低还不被左逼们拍死
|
a**********2
发帖数: 3726 | 7 It's true that their work ethics is much better than people of other
ethnicities, including Chinese, blacks and Hispanics. |
h**z
发帖数: 9751 | 8 老色狼爬出来解释一下搞AA的右逼的德州大学，而不是左逼的加州大学 |
K********y
发帖数: 5068 | 9 赞实话实说
【在 a**********2 的大作中提到】
: It's true that their work ethics is much better than people of other
: ethnicities, including Chinese, blacks and Hispanics.
|
l*******g
发帖数: 27064 | 10 sb左逼又来秀下限
德州有aa法案么？
那是校内部左逼私底下搞的，就像疼校一样，属于不完全的aa，不是完全按照种族人口
划分录取比例，只是要搞所谓diversity，必须录取点黑皮
加州aa是被共和党法案废止的，左逼一直想搞的sca5就是想废除这个法案，然后重新搞
aa法案，完全按照种族分配
【在 h**z 的大作中提到】
: 老色狼爬出来解释一下搞AA的右逼的德州大学，而不是左逼的加州大学
|
h**z
发帖数: 9751 | 11 你个翻墙过来的当然不知道德州aa早实行了。
fisher对德州大学的官司的aa打到最高法院，德大有法律依据的，官司赢了，aa录取合
法。
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirmative_action_in_the_United_States#Legal_
history
Texas[edit]
Hopwood v. University of Texas Law School, 1996
In 1992, Cheryl Hopwood and three other white law school applicants
challenged the University of Texas Law School's affirmative action program
and claimed that they were rejected for the 1992-1993 academic year based
upon their unfair preferences toward less qualified minority applicants.[55]
Hopwood rejected the legitimacy of diversity as a goal for the University
of Texas education system since educational diversity was not recognized as
a state goal.[55] On March 19, 1996, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth
Circuit suspended the University of Texas Law School's affirmative action
admissions program and the university's subsequent appeal to the Supreme
Court in July was declined. Race-sensitive admissions would no longer be
permitted at the state's public colleges and universities and had extended
effects into universities in Mississippi and Louisiana.[55] In the year
after the Hopwood case, only 4 black students were admitted into the law
school whereas previous years had averages of above 31 admittances.[56] To
ameliorate the effects of the Hopwood case, the University of Texas
legislature passed the Top 10 Percent Rule, which requires public
universities to automatically accept students who graduated within the top
10 percent of their high school classes. In 2003, the Supreme Court
overturned the ruling of Hopwood v. Texas.[57]
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, 2013
On October 10, 2012, Abigail Fisher challenged The University of Texas at
Austin' consideration of race in the undergraduate admissions process.[58]
After being denied admission at the University of Texas at Austin for the
Fall of 2008 term, Fisher argued that UT Austin's use of race in admissions
decisions violated her right to equal protection under the Fourteenth
Amendment.[58] The United States District Court ruled in favor of the
university that race can be considered as a factor in admissions, but must
be able to prove that "available, workable race-neutral alternatives do not
suffice."[59] The Fifth Circuit also ruled in favor of the university and
the case was ultimately brought to the Supreme Court. In a vote of 7-1, the
Supreme Court ruled to send the case back down to the Fifth Circuit for
further review under the strict scrutiny standard which is the highest
standard of judicial review. On July 15, 2014, the Fifth Circuit voted 2-1
to again uphold UT Austin's consideration of race in admissions.[59] Fisher
petitioned the Supreme Court to hear her case once again. In June 2015, the
Court agreed to do so. The case will be heard in the 2015-16 term and likely
decided by late June 2016.
【在 l*******g 的大作中提到】
: sb左逼又来秀下限
: 德州有aa法案么？
: 那是校内部左逼私底下搞的，就像疼校一样，属于不完全的aa，不是完全按照种族人口
: 划分录取比例，只是要搞所谓diversity，必须录取点黑皮
: 加州aa是被共和党法案废止的，左逼一直想搞的sca5就是想废除这个法案，然后重新搞
: aa法案，完全按照种族分配
|
i*****9
发帖数: 3157 | 12 新id? 这个版上的关于AA的资料够你不吃不喝看三天的？要不是AA，这个版多半还在支
持希拉里呢。
Legal_
【在 h**z 的大作中提到】
: 你个翻墙过来的当然不知道德州aa早实行了。
: fisher对德州大学的官司的aa打到最高法院，德大有法律依据的，官司赢了，aa录取合
: 法。
: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirmative_action_in_the_United_States#Legal_
: history
: Texas[edit]
: Hopwood v. University of Texas Law School, 1996
: In 1992, Cheryl Hopwood and three other white law school applicants
: challenged the University of Texas Law School's affirmative action program
: and claimed that they were rejected for the 1992-1993 academic year based
|
M*****0
发帖数: 850 | 13 不觉得，我经历过的老莫服务最好，不光是价钱，一般也好说话，老黑最差，白人一般
。 |
D**D
发帖数: 1832 | 14 这其实是族群文化传承的好，和人种没屌关系。
吊儿郎当的白人和兢兢业业的黑人我都接触过。
总体来说，郊区的和中南部的黑人都比较诚恳一些。大城市的白左特么的矫情，作的很。
大城市的黑人，特别是HOOD里面长大出来的，个个都是时刻准备进监狱的感觉。大农村
的白人实在一些，比较淳朴，但不少对华人有天然的优越感，毕竟见的世面少还以为中
国和柬埔寨一样穷。 |
