g********2
发帖数: 6571 | 1 September 6, 2016
Could California’s illegal voter registration drive torpedo Hillary’s
carefully laid plans for victory?
By Andrew Grant White
In February 2016, the California Governor and legislature did something
rather outlandish. They made a law (2015 Motor Voter Law) that allows all
CA illegals to apply for a driver’s license. This law combined with 2013
Assembly Bill 60 (automatic voter registration when getting a driver's
license) effectively results in allowing illegals to vote because having a
license now automatically registers "eligible" voters to vote in California.
Well, perhaps. Therein lies the rub.
California created a set of laws that effectively allow illegals to vote (
Oregon and others too, but let's stick with CA). We can quibble over how
DMV workers will handle whether to voter-register a license of an illegal or
how mail-in registration would be handled since cross-referencing illegals
databases is discouraged. Bottom line, though, is the loophole is now there
and may cost Clinton the election. Even one illegal vote (let alone 30
million) is enough to disqualify a state's vote...perhaps.
There are those who throw up the 15th Amendment to prove that California's
laws are unconstitutional. Put another way, a more straightforward approach
is common sense. Not a citizen = no vote (unless you'd like 7 billion
taxpayer-dollar-hungry voters involved in the US election). Why is this
important? California is a reliably blue state, but what would happen if
each and every Californian vote (including its 55 Electoral College votes)
were declared null and void by the courts (Trump would be the obvious
plaintiff)? After all, post facto, there's no way to untangle citizen from
illegal non-citizen voting.
What are the ramifications? If -- and it's still a big if -- all California
votes were declared null and void by a court, that leaves 489 Electoral
College votes (i.e. half or revised 245 votes to win the US Presidency).
Using the current flawed polls within the incomplete RCP 2-way average poll
weighting, Hillary Clinton is currently holding an "insurmountable" yet
diminishing lead in projected electoral votes: 229 (with no toss up states).
However, that is not enough to clinch the deal in a non-Californian world.
Her current "229" Electoral College votes based on dubious sources would
then be 174. Whoops. That scenario might even place her in 2nd place
behind Trump (who himself may or may not have votes to reach 245).
For sake of argument then, to the Republican House of Representatives we go.
How are Representatives in the House -- even those who dislike Trump --
going to vote for President? Clinton, the 2nd place finisher, or Trump the
1st place finisher? It would be the ultimate ratings boost for CSPAN. My
betting would go for Trump. The only question remaining is will Trump,
trailing by a little bit in electoral votes, himself sue to remove reliably
blue Californian Electoral College votes, post election? Question asked and
answered. California has done a potentially material disservice to Hillary.
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/09/could_californias_illegal_voter_registration_drive_torpedo_hillarys_carefully_laid_plans_for_victory.html#ixzz4JTyFswHx
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook | g********2
发帖数: 6571 | 2 “Even one illegal vote (let alone 30 million) is enough to disqualify a
state's vote...perhaps.”
如果有一个非法移民参与投票，那个州的选举结果就作废？
懂选举法的人来说说是不是这样？ |
|
