B*********r
发帖数: 918 | 1 【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
发信人: BrainWasher (美宣部指导员), 信区: Military
标 题: 老中都错了，SCA5的问题根本就不是造成不公平竞争！！！
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat Mar 8 22:58:20 2014, 美东)
老中反对SCA5,所用的主要理由是这个法案造成了不公平。
其实用这个理由反对SCA5是站不住脚的，或者说用这个理由反对SCA5的人根本就没有搞
懂美国社会资源分配的基本原则。
老中因为自己的文化背景，总是下意识的以为现代社会的大学入学就是古代的科举考试。
其实这两者是非常不同的。
科举是为国家取材，当然公平竞争是第一原则，因为要选拔最优秀的人才。
而公立大学不同。
公立大学是社会的公共资源，公共资源是为社会成员提供公共服务的。
所以，公共资源的分配原则不仅仅是公平竞争，还有一个重要原则是平均分配，因为要
照顾弱势群体，弥合阶层差距，稳定社会结果，这个即是价值观（帮助弱者）也是现实
考虑（维稳）。
具体问题上，应该是更注重公平竞争还是更注重平均分配，在美国就是要通过民主的方
法投票决
定的 （中国当然是共产党说了算）。
老中为了自己的利益反对SCA5没有任何问题，但老中毕竟是少数，要玩美国的民主政治
，说服其他人投反对票，就不能只谈利益，只谈公平竞争，因为很多其他族裔的人可能
认为，在教育资源分配这个问题上，平均分配来照顾弱势群体比公平竞争更重要。如果
老中只谈利益、公平，则不能团结这部分人主张平均的人。
老中应该站在更高的道德高地上反对SCA5,而这个高地就是SCA5打出来的牌“平均分配
”“照顾弱势群体”，所以老中反对的理由应该是按种族分配名额不能很好的体现“照
顾弱势群体”这个社会资源分配的重要原则，因为不同族裔里有穷、有富，按族裔分名
额结果必然是各族裔中的富人占便宜，从而达不到照顾弱势群体的目的。
所以，为了照顾弱势群体，应该反对SCA5按族裔分名额，而是应该给弱势群体更多的帮
助让他们能获得入学的机会。
这个才是更理直气壮的反对理由。 | C***a
发帖数: 1228 | 2 很多中国来的不太懂这些，
现在有点进步，知道要捐款去砸，不过那么点钱，没什么用的啦。
试。
【在 B*********r 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
: 发信人: BrainWasher (美宣部指导员), 信区: Military
: 标 题: 老中都错了，SCA5的问题根本就不是造成不公平竞争！！！
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat Mar 8 22:58:20 2014, 美东)
: 老中反对SCA5,所用的主要理由是这个法案造成了不公平。
: 其实用这个理由反对SCA5是站不住脚的，或者说用这个理由反对SCA5的人根本就没有搞
: 懂美国社会资源分配的基本原则。
: 老中因为自己的文化背景，总是下意识的以为现代社会的大学入学就是古代的科举考试。
: 其实这两者是非常不同的。
: 科举是为国家取材，当然公平竞争是第一原则，因为要选拔最优秀的人才。
| s*******s
发帖数: 9926 | 3 政客：“SCA5不会影响亚裔” 自欺欺人
记者张越
March 02, 2014 06:08 AM
在经历华裔民众2月28日针对SCA5提案的强烈抗议后，部分民选官员、加州大学官员表
示：SCA5不会对亚裔入学造成影响、大家不要人云亦云、网路上的传言都是错误、不要
被骗等等，企图安抚民众，让民众转而支持该法案。
但在现代文明社会中，还按照族裔画分受特别照顾对象，将肤色作为评判一个人的标准
，这本身就是历史的倒退；而且将“少数族裔”（minorities）与弱势群体画上等号，
是对包括华人在内的所有少数族裔的羞辱，而且也是对弱势群体的不负责。
需要帮助的是弱势群体，而不是特定族裔，部分政客们将两者搅和在一起，企图浑水摸
鱼，不但造成族裔分裂和紧张，而且真正的弱势群体也不能平等及时地获得帮助。难道
仅仅因为加州大学的华人学生已经够多，所以一个寒门出身刻苦努力的华裔孩子，就活
该进不了加大吗？
包括提案的发起人贺南德兹、华裔州众议员周本立、亚美公义中心，甚至加州大学的官
员都表示，SCA5并没有规定学校招生要实行族裔配额制(Racial Quota)，所以不会影响
到亚裔学生进入加大。但问题就在于，没有规定，恰恰为今后实施配额制留下了巨大可
操作的空间，且为族裔配额制实施留下了法理基础，在“依法有据”的支持下，难保不
实施配额制。
不要忘了，1960年代平权法案（affirmtaive action）最盛行时，该措施实施的最重要
手段，就是联邦以行政命令进行强制的种族和性别配额制。而且贺南德兹表示，各大学
可以自行制定政策，实现SCA5所提倡的更多元化的目标，更为“如何多元化”留下了巨
大的想像空间。虽然目前贺氏和加大都保证不会实族裔配额，但空口许诺、没有立法、
没有白纸黑字，到时候该升官的升官，该退休的退休，华人要找谁讨回公道？
其次，大学招生总人数是有限的，学校必须在申请者之间做出取舍。在此前提下，政客
所谓的“会按照族裔照顾，但不会影响亚裔”的说辞在逻辑上完全站不住脚。在总人数
有限条件下，如果有人因为族裔而被照顾，则一定会有人因族裔而被淘汰，至于谁会被
照顾和淘汰，不言自明。就连贺南德兹也表示，该法案“最多会造成亚裔学生数量降低
1%”，但亚裔人口在成长，在人口成长过程中招生降低1%，亚裔子弟无书可读的人会增
加多少？况且贺南德兹所谓的1%，又有何科学根据？
政客们虽然打着“保护少数族裔”的旗号，但华裔人口数量上来讲，从来都属于“统计
学意义上的少数族裔”，但几乎没有被当作“政治意义上的少数族裔”被保护过，也几
乎没有因为平权法案族裔配额制而受到特别优待。
1970年代平权措施兴盛时，受惠的族裔包括拉丁裔、非裔以及太平洋岛族裔和印地安人
，华裔从来没有登上过政客们的保护名单，此次SCA5的备注解释上也直接明说，是因为
拉丁裔和非裔的学生数量不足以代表人口数量，所以才有此提案。因此说SCA5不会对亚
裔入学造成影响，根本是自欺欺人。
Read more: 世界新闻网-北美华文新闻、华商资讯 - 政客 不会影响亚裔 自欺欺人
康纳利：SCA5变相族裔配额
记者张越／洛杉矶—沙加缅度电话采访
March 08, 2014 06:34 AM
加州于1996年通过第209号提案，修正加州宪法，禁止公立机构因族裔、性别、移民来
源国等歧视或偏好。209提案最重要的推动者，是非洲裔社会运动家康纳利（Ward
Connerly）。1995年，康纳利是加州大学系统理事会主席，他率先在加大通过招生中，
禁止将族裔和性别纳入考量的措施，使亚裔学生在柏克莱加大和洛杉矶加大的入学率快
速增长。身为一名有色人种，他反对平权法案（affirmtive action）、反对任何形式
的种族偏好，打破了族裔配额的藩篱。本报7日电话专访康纳利，发表他对SCA5提案的
观点，康纳利发言非常直截了当，本报原文照登。
康纳利说，虽然“族裔配额”（racial quota）被明令禁止，但SCA5的目的就是要搞变
相的族裔配额，只不过以其它名称，实施族裔配额，改个名字很容易。现在SCA5提案称
，大学里的学生结构不能反映加州的族裔比例，那么该如何“反映”？只能实施族裔配
额，而这是倒退。
SCA5的提案人州参议员贺南德兹表示，SCA5会增加其他族裔学生的入学率，但不会影响
亚裔。康纳利质问：这怎么可能？某族裔学生入学率增加，其它族裔名额一定会减少，
这是常识问题。除非大学无限制扩大招生，或兴建新大学，但目前加州濒临破产，财政
上不可能无限制地收学生。康纳利说，即使多建大学，也不能解决好大学的竞争性；比
如，当年加大为了多招生，新建了UC Merced，但有人愿意去Merced读书吗？大家还不
是都争相申请洛杉矶加大(UCLA)和柏克莱加大吗？但这两所大学不会无限招生，只要有
竞争，就会有淘汰。
康纳利说，既然要扩大拉丁裔学生比例，那么该淘汰谁呢？“过去他们抢白人的位置，
现在白人已经没得抢了，那么就抢亚裔的位子。”
康纳利说，1996加州通过209号宪法修正案以后，亚裔在加大，尤其是洛加大和柏克莱
加大入学率显著升高。曾为加大理事会成员，他愿意看到更多优秀亚裔青年接受高品质
大学教育，但一些人却认为“亚裔太多了”，所以他们总是要想办法来阻止亚裔入学。
加大拉丁裔理事有私心
对于现任UCLA校长Gene Block在公开信中表明，该校因受209提案阻挠而不够“多元化
”，康纳利指出，209提案通过后，加大不但没有失去多元化，反而更加多元化，任何
数据都可以表明这一点。现在加大理事会里的拉丁裔理事变多，也是造成他们加大希望
多招拉丁裔的愿望。但大学必须要招收最努力的学生，而不是按族裔来招生。
增拉丁裔学生比例 就会淘汰亚裔
身有四分之一黑人血统的社会运动家，康纳利说，黑人和亚裔一样聪明，区别只在于文
化上。亚裔喜欢读书，黑人则喜欢体育，两者都在各自领域有非常大的成就，这是很好
的事情，为什么非要逼非裔去读书？而且加州的非裔仅占人口6.5%，但已占加大学生的
4%，难道还不够吗？美国是个自由的国家，只要能在专注的领域有成就，都是成功，都
会受到认可。
康纳利说，虽然他是有色人种，但他反对任何形式的种族偏好。他说，平权法案确实在
1970年代帮助黑人和其他少数族裔获得工作机会，但也造成现在黑人不愿进取的习惯。
如果要在加州恢复这种按种族来录取的方式，难免不会造成拉丁裔步黑人的后尘，变得
安于伸手，不思进取；而亚裔则因为努力得不到认可也会变得慵懒，到时候美国怎么办
？他说：“我当年反对招生考量族裔，也是为了避免我的孙子在招生时受到歧视。”他
当年从社区学院读起，并非因为是有色人种才入学，后来转学州大读书，一路都是自己
奋斗的结果。
康纳利说，美国之所以成功，就是因为美国给予每个人平等的机会，让人们发扬各自的
优势，刻苦努力即可达到人生的目标。美国是一个自由的国家，我们是以个体而组成的
国家，每个人有多努力，就能得到多少回报，无关族裔，这就是美国的立国之本。
Read more: 世界新闻网-北美华文新闻、华商资讯 - 康纳利 SCA5变相族裔配额
SCA5提案 数据偏颇矛盾
记者张越／洛杉矶报导
March 05, 2014 06:29 AM
SCA5提案发起人，参议员贺南德兹表示，自加州宪法209修正案提出后，少数族裔在加
州的公立大学系统（包括UC，CSU以及社区学院）的录取率显著下降，但贺南德兹所列
的数据，完全相互无关，根本无法得出他所说的结论。在他网站中，干脆没有提任何数
据证据，直接下了“多元化在减弱”的结论，甚至用部分数据描述全局状况，可谓用心
良苦。
根据加州法律，任何提案都必须要有提案分析报告（bill analysis），来提供更多的
相关信息，以便议员了解状况后投票。在贺氏的提案分析中，通篇只有一处提供了具体
的数据来支持他的观点。该数据为：1995年，加州的高中毕业生（high school
graduates）有38%是少数族裔，加大系统大一新生中少数族裔占21%，其中的差额为17%
。到了2009年，虽然少数族裔已经占加州高中毕业生的52%，但入学加大的新生中只有
28%是少数族裔，两者的差额“高达”24%。
明眼的人可以发现，导致贺氏得出“差距惊人”结论的，是两组风马牛不相关的数据，
也就是说，贺氏非要拿西瓜和苹果做对比，然后得出“苹果正在惊人地变小”的结论。
首先，根据加州教育厅的规定，高中毕业、加大录取、州大录取三者的要求是不一样的
。比如，学生只需学习三年的英语和数学即可拿到高中毕业证，但想要被加大和州大录
取，则必须学四年。也就是说，一个学生即使可以拿到毕业证，但也可能根本不符合大
学的录取条件，没有资格申请大学，何谈能否被录取？ 这就好比一边说多少人拿到了
护士资格，但得出的结论却是，“护士中拿到医师资格的人太少了，这不公平”。用如
此混淆的数据误导民众，贺氏心态令人难以苟同。
其次，虽然贺氏提案要求包括UC，CSU和社区学院在内的所有公立大学招生都考虑族裔
和性别，但他却通篇都在批评UC，而丝毫不提CSU和社区学院的学生族裔构成。他所提
供的唯一数据，也是UC的状况，而没有其他公立大学。但数据表明，CSU里拉美裔学生
已经占34%，高于其他任何族裔，但贺氏为何只字不提？用不完整的数据形容全局状况
，本报记者电话联系贺南德兹办公室查证，未获回应。但就是这样一份漏洞百出的分析
，在参议会表决时居然没有人提出异议，参议员们到底有没有用脑子在投票，选民们不
禁要质疑了。
Read more: 世界新闻网-北美华文新闻、华商资讯 - SCA5提案 数据偏颇矛盾
夏乐柏批贺南德兹不够严谨
记者张越／洛杉矶报导
March 05, 2014 06:40 AM
加州SCA5提案在华裔社区引发争议和反弹，加州参议会共和党主席夏乐柏（Bob Huff）
4日表示，SCA5提案的发起者在数据来源不明的情况下，就直接说“公立大学不能代表
加州的多元化现实”，有误导之嫌。其实加州大学（UC）以及州立大学（CSU）学生现
状已呈现多元化。，尤其是加州大学系统，被列为全国最为多元化的大学校园之一，贺
南德兹的观点没有可信的数据支持，态度不够严谨。夏乐柏还表示，虽然目前加大系统
表示不会使用族裔配额制（racial quota），但难保换一种说法，而行族裔配额之实。
贺南德兹在该提案的说明中表示，自从加州禁止在公立机构将族裔纳入考量后“加大和
州大的少数族裔学生显著下降”，但夏乐柏表示，根据位于洛杉矶的智库Community
Advocates Incorporated的数据，加州禁止在公立机构中考量族裔后，加州大学招生的
族裔完全反映了加州的族裔结构，且更加多元化。
他说，如1996年西裔在加州大学学生中仅占14.3%，但2006高达25.8%，几乎翻倍。这已
经完全反映了加州族裔结构变化，并没有出现贺南德兹所谓的少数族裔学生显著下降。
该智库是中立不分党派的智库，董事会成员既有共和党又有民主党。
夏乐柏表示，作为第二梯队的加州州立大学系统，虽然亚裔学生增长并不显著，但拉美
裔学生从21.49%上升至33.9%，如果将加大和州大的拉美裔学生加起来，甚至超过了拉
美裔在整个加州的比例，还不能说明加州公立大学有多么的多元化？
一旦SCA5不幸通过，加大录取是否会实行族裔配额制？夏乐柏表示，目前加州拜第209
号宪法修正案所赐，族裔配额非法，但一旦该修正案因为SCA5而在大学招生中失去作用
，再加上联邦法律认为招聘或录取可以将族裔或性别纳入考量，那么很可能会变相实行
族裔配额。他说，加大当然不会明确实行族裔配额，但也许会通过其他名称，而达到族
裔配额的目的。夏乐柏说，按照加大目前的招生方法，按照学生的成就录取，已经实现
了多元化的目标，不用再搞出按族裔录取的招数。而且在目前的录取规则下，加州大学
目前是最有活动的公立大学，更证明了不用搞按族裔录取。
Read more: 世界新闻网-北美华文新闻、华商资讯 - 夏乐柏批贺南德兹不够严谨 | s*******s
发帖数: 9926 | 4 本文的网路版本在这里: http://nosca5.blogspot.com/2014/02/sca5.html
反对SCA-5具体有效的步骤, 请转发
从我做起, 从现在做起! 我们还来得及反对SCA5. 目前, 加州众议院的80席中, 有55席
民主党, 25席共和党. 对这个法案SCA5的支持是党派分票, 所以我们只需要保证 2个以
上民主党议员勇敢地站出来, 投票反对, 我们就可以让法案胎死腹中. 现在我们可以做
的是写信给代表我们选区的加州众议员, 去他们的网站给他们写.
Step 1: 下面网站里选Act Now有两个请愿投票, 有时间先去投票, 这两个网站都需要
注册, 但是Change.org和Whitehouse.gov是最常见的请愿网站, 将来一定该还有用到的
机会, 花点时间注册并不吃亏. 不過必須強調這兩個投票實際效果是零, 並不能解決問
題, 其主要功能就僅僅是壮大声势.
http://www.saynosca5.com/
美亚团结促进会的United Against SCA5 - Please click here to sign letter to
contact your elected representatives选项在收集反对SCA-5的加州民众资料, 可以
很快去填一下.
http://www.uaafa.org/
Step 2: http://findyourrep.legislature.ca.gov/
住在加州的朋友先寻找自己选区的州众议员
Step 3:
可能被影响的民主党州众议员列表, 这一份名单有被精心筛选过, 确定是机率比较高,
不会让大家浪费子弹, 集中火力攻击, 先写好篇文章, 这篇下面有很多范例, 不想写直
接找一篇贴上发给对方也没关系, 最重要是让对方了解有这么多人重视这个问题, 内容
其实不重要, 简单表达意思就够. 但最好是自己能添加一些自己的意见, 能够写一篇自
己的文章是最好, 反正能够发那么多遍, 多花点时间在这里也是值得. 然后将这封信用
Email再加上Facebook用Message发给下面列表所有的人, 我自己试过发一遍, 全部发完
应该不会超过15分钟.
其中中间这种https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/地址的要发比较特别, 一定必须要
是填该选区地址, 才能写电子邮件给他们, 不然不会让你发, 所以如果不是自己选区或
是有可用地址的就不用了.
另外除了最简单的发电子邮件外, 也可以打电话, Fax传真, 登门拜访都可以视情况运
用联络.
Wesley Chesbro (North Coast)
710 E Street, Suite 150, Eureka, CA 95501
Tel: (707) 445-7014 Fax: (707) 445-6607
Email: a********************[email protected]
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD02
Richard Pan (潘君达) (Sacramento)
2251 Florin Road, Suite 156, Sacramento CA 95822
Phone: (916)-262-0999 Fax: (916)262-0995
Email: a****************[email protected]
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD09
http://www.drrichardpan.com/contact
https://www.facebook.com/RichardPanMD
Ken Cooley (Sacramento)
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 130, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
Tel: (916) 464-1910 Fax: (916) 464-1915
Email: a*******************[email protected] & k*[email protected]
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD08
http://www.kencooley.com/contact
https://www.facebook.com/ken.cooley
Mariko Yamada (Southern Sacramento Valley, Wine Country, & North Bay)
725 Main Street Suite 206, Woodland, CA 95695
Tel: (530) 662-7867 Fax: (530) 662-6370
Email: a*******************[email protected]
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD04
http://www.marikoyamada.net/contact
https://www.facebook.com/assemblymember.yamada
Marc Levine (North Bay)
3501 Civic Center Drive, Room 412, San Rafael, CA 94903
Tel: (415) 479-4920 Fax: (415) 479-2123
Email: a*******************[email protected] & l***************[email protected]
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD10
https://www.facebook.com/joinmarc
Rob Bonta (Central East Bay of the Bay Area)
1515 Clay Street, Ste. 2204, Oakland, CA 94612
Phone: (510) 286-1670 Fax: (510) 286-1888
Email: a******************[email protected]
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD18
http://www.robbonta.com/contact/
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Assemblymember-Rob-Bonta/160502927367568
Joan Buchanan (East Bay)
2694 Bishop Dr., Ste. 275, San Ramon, CA 94583
Tel: (925) 328-1515 Fax: (925) 328-1514
Email: a*********************[email protected]
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD16
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Assemblymember-Joan-Buchanan/220573791429818
Tom Ammiano (San Francisco)
455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 14300, San Francisco, CA 94102
Phone (415) 557-3013 Fax (415) 557-3015
Email: a********************[email protected] & t*********[email protected]
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD17
https://www.facebook.com/AssemblymemberTomAmmiano
Phil Ting (丁右立) (San Francisco & San Mateo County)
455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 14600, San Francisco, CA 94102
Tel: (415) 557-2312 Fax: (415) 557-1178
Email: a*****************[email protected] & p**[email protected]
i**[email protected]
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD19
https://www.facebook.com/philtingsf
Kevin Mullin (San Francisco Peninsula)
1528 South El Camino Real, Suite 302, San Mateo, CA 94402
Tel: (650) 349-2200 Fax: (650) 341-4676
Email: a*******************[email protected] & k***[email protected]
i**[email protected]
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD22
https://www.facebook.com/AssemblymemberKevinMullin
Rich Gordon (San Francisco Peninsula suburbia into Silicon Valley)
5050 El Camino Real, Suite 117, Los Altos, CA 94022
Tel: (650) 691-2121 Fax: (650) 691-2120
Email: a*******************[email protected]
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD24
https://www.facebook.com/RichGordon24
Paul Fong (方文忠) (Silicon Valley)
2105 South Bascom Avenue, Suite 160, Campbell, CA 95008
Tel: (408) 371-2802 Fax: (408) 371-2809
Email: a*****************[email protected]
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD28
http://www.paulfongforcouncil.com/#!contact/c1zdo
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Paul-Fong/12907543117
Bob Wieckowski (East Bay and Silicon Valley)
39510 Paseo Padre Parkway, Suite 280, Fremont, CA 94538
Tel: (510) 440-9030 Fax: (510) 440-9035
Email: a***********************[email protected]
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD25
https://www.facebook.com/bobwieckowski
https://www.facebook.com/Wieckowski4Senate
Mark Stone (Monterey Bay)
701 Ocean Street, 318-B, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
Tel: (831) 425-1503 Fax: (831) 425-2570
Email: a******************[email protected] & i**[email protected]
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD29
http://friendsofmarkstone.org/contact
https://www.facebook.com/AssemblymemberMarkStone
Adam Gray (Fresno)
690 West 16th St, Merced, CA 95340
Tel: (209) 726-5465 Fax: (209) 726-5469
Email: a*****************[email protected] & a**[email protected]
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD21
http://www.adamgrayforassembly.com/contact-us
https://www.facebook.com/AdamGrayForAssembly
Rudy Salas (Bakersfield)
1430 Truxtun Ave, #803, Bakersfield, CA 93301
Email: A******************[email protected] & i**[email protected]
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD32
https://www.facebook.com/rudysalas
https://www.facebook.com/rudysalasjr
Das Williams (Santa Barbara and Ventura)
101 W. Anapamu Street, Suite A, Santa Barbara, CA 93101
Tel: (805) 564-1649 Fax: (805) 564-1651
Email: a*********************[email protected] & das.williams2014@gmail.
com
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD37
https://www.facebook.com/DasWilliamsPage
Steve Fox (Antelope Valley)
41319 12th St West, #105, Palmdale, CA 93551
Tel: (661) 267-7636 Fax: (661) 267-7736
Email: a****************[email protected]
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD36
https://www.facebook.com/pages/I-Support-Steve-Fox-2014/183712445136345
John A. Pérez (Los Angeles & Koreatown)
320 West 4th St, #1050, Los Angeles, CA 90013
Tel: (213) 620-4646 Fax: (213) 620-6319
Email: A***********************[email protected] & HQ@perezforcontroller.
com
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD53
https://www.facebook.com/SpeakerPerez
Chris Holden (Pasadena & Rancho Cucamonga)
600 N. Rosemead Blvd, #117, Pasadena, CA 91107
Tel: (626) 351-1917 Fax: (626) 351-6176
Email: a*******************[email protected] & i**[email protected]
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD41
https://www.facebook.com/Assemblymember
Ed Chau (周本立) (San Gabriel Valley)
1255 Corporate Center Dr. Ste 306, Monterey Park, CA 91754
Tel: (323) 264-4949 Fax: (323) 264-4916
Tel: (626) 403-3033 Fax: (626) 403-3022
Email: a*****************[email protected] & e*************[email protected]
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD49
https://www.facebook.com/edwin.chau.98
Roger Hernandez (Hacienda Heights & Whittier)
100 North Barranca St, #895, West Covina, CA 91791
Tel: (626) 960-4457 Fax: (626) 960-1310
Email: a**********************[email protected]
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD48
https://www.facebook.com/Vote.Roger.Hernandez
Mike Gatto (Eastern end of the San Fernando Valley)
300 East Magnolia Boulevard, Suite 504, Burbank, CA 91502
Tel: (818) 558-3043 Fax: (818) 558-3042
Email: a******************[email protected] & [email protected]
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD43
http://mikegatto.com/volunteers/
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Assemblyman-Mike-Gatto/248355458520271
Richard Bloom (West Los Angeles)
2800 28th Street, Suite 150, Santa Monica, CA 90405
Tel: (310) 450-0041 Fax: (310) 450-6090
Email: a******************[email protected] & r*****[email protected]
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD50
http://www.richardbloom.com/contact
https://www.facebook.com/RichardBloomCampaign
Al Muratsuchi (South Bay, Beach Cities and the Palos Verdes Peninsula)
3460 Torrance Blvd., Suite 306, Torrance, CA 90503
Tel: (310) 316-2164 Fax: (310) 316-2480
Email: a***********************[email protected] & i**[email protected]
m*****[email protected]
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD66
https://www.facebook.com/almuratsuchi
Sharon Quirk-Silva (North Orange County)
1400 North Harbor Blvd., Suite 601, Fullerton, CA 92835
Tel: (714) 526-7272 Fax: (714) 526-7278
Email: a************************[email protected] & campaign@
sharonquirksilva.com
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD65
https://www.facebook.com/AssemblywomanSharonQuirkSilva
Toni Atkins (San Deigo)
1350 Front St., Room 6054, San Diego, CA 92101
Tel: (619) 645-3090 Fax: (619) 645-3094
Email: a*******************[email protected] & toniatkinsforassembly2012@
gmail.com
https://lcmspubcontact.lc.ca.gov/PublicLCMS/ContactPopup.php?district=AD78
https://www.facebook.com/SDToni
https://www.facebook.com/toni.atkins.52
下面是请愿文章的范例, 电子邮件标题要清楚简洁表达文章内容, 例如Please vote "
NO" on SCA-5!, 发文章时称呼对方用First Name就可以, 写自己的名字的时候最好是
First Name+Last Name, 这样看起来比较正式有力.
写这些请愿信重要的是文章内容尽量不要有族裔色彩, 这样效果反而适得其反, 也就是
文章内容尽量避免有亚裔, 华裔, 韩裔, 西语裔, 非洲裔, 白人这样的字眼出现, 能够
避免尽量避免. 不然收到文章的对象认为你是从族裔立场出发, 而不是从公益立场出发
来写这封请愿信, 效果因此大减, 读完因为本身所属族裔不同, 就很没有说服力. 所以
如果真的有需要用到任何族裔名称的字眼, 也请用在客观的事实资料上, 尽量不要加上
个人主观的判断.
要说服对方第一种方法可以从道德制高点出发, 也就是强调使用种族来决定入学资格的
荒谬, 这里可以引些名人的话或是过去的历史来增加说服力, 例如马丁路德, 曼德拉,
林肯, 独立宣言等, 另外还有当然最好用的我有一个梦演说或是美国梦等, 说明种族歧
视的错误, 来谴责对方. 并强调人人平等的重要性. 最近也出现使用二战期间日裔美国
人被关进集中营, 或是排华法案历史来说服对方的文章.
而第二种方法要从对方的立场出发, 陈述对方反对SCA-5能获得的益处, 这样对方才会
真的被说服, 不过这些写法都是比较高难度的技巧, 不一定要使用, 如果要写可以参考
我写的范例. 首先是平等才能促进竞争, 科学进步, 使得加州在经济上有竞争力, 大家
未来的生活才能更好, 工作机会增加. 其次是加州大学才能继续保持竞争力, 如果加州
大学的排名下降, 这对住在加州的人都是损害. 再来就是所谓的Mismatch问题, 从客观
的历史资料来验证, 若使用种族来录取学生, 会使得学生整体毕业率下降. 因为这些因
为族裔因素而入学的学生, 实际上本身能力并不足以周遭同学竞争, 他们自己也知道自
己是因为族裔因素被录取的, 而不是因为自己的能力, 因此也产生自卑. 研究显示这些
Underprepared准备不足的学生常在班上都是垫底, 很高比例因此被退学或是自己申请
停学, 这对他们自身来说, 反而是场灾难, 已经丧失制定这个政策当初的用意, 因为当
初如果按照自己本身能力申请, 进入适合自己的学校, 和自己差不多水准的人竞争, 反
而能顺利毕业, 人生会更顺利.
第三种方法是分享自己的人生经验, 还有周遭友人小孩的感想, 这部份我就没有办法写
范例, 因为每个人的遭遇不同, 这也很容易说服对方, 特别是要用低姿态来博取对方同
情. 例如写自己移民的背景, 还有对美国梦的向往, 这种写法就可能会写到自己的族裔
, 这时候用较广泛的Asian American亚裔比用较狭隘的Chinese American容易获得对方
共鸣, 不要对别的族裔有任何的批评, 可以尽量试着从小孩的观点语言出发, 或是朋友
间对于自己小孩的未来的忧虑来着手, 较容易说服对方.
最后当然是强调对方支持SCA-5的坏处来说服对方, 第一个最简单的我不会投票支持你,
可以说我本来支持你或是不投票, 但是我现在因为SCA-5一定要投票反对, 而且将来会
一直投票反对, 这样对方感觉到是个损失. 第二个就是强调会去说服亲人朋友投票反对
, 或是我们整个社区都很关心这个教育或平等问题, 不过尽量也不要出现族裔名称的字
眼较好, 稍微暗示对方就够了, 就算要用也要向前面一样, 使用亚裔也不要使用华裔.
第三个当然就是金钱, 可以强调不会再捐献, 如果曾经捐献那是更好, 能够提出捐献的
历史就非常有说服力, 对方钱如果因此可能减少, 当然是非常痛苦.
我写的这些范例都是从公益的观点出发, 如果觉得自己写的不好请尽量引用, 常自己写
些文章英文能力就会进步, 这也是很好的锻炼. 有时间我会尽量再写些请愿信范本, 新
写的我通常是把文章放在http://nosca5.blogspot.com/文章范本部分最上面, 看Blog的一定是最新的, 因为我一定是最先更改Blog的部份, 其他不一定会改.
Dear XXX,
I am writing to express my unreserved opposition to SCA-5 on the grounds
that it will lead to state-sponsored discrimination. In the development of
modern American history, our state and nation have participated in
discrimination against some of our own citizens. During World War II, the
internment of Japanese-American citizens in prison camps represented a low
point in the history of our civil rights. The federal government detained U.
S. citizens just because they are a member of a minority race.
SCA-5 will remove the portion of our State Constitution which prohibits
discrimination in the area of public education. By doing this, SCA-5 is
weakening the laws against discrimination that protect California today. An
applicant's race, color, religion, national origin, or sex will make the
difference in whether or not a student is admitted. Well, that's just Un-
American! If you worked hard, you should not be denied your dream and others
should not reap the rewards. Discrimination is the opposite of who we are
as a state and as a nation.
In additoin accoring to many studies, preferences hurt underrepresented
minorities far more than they help them. At the heart of affirmative action
’s failure is a simple phenomenon called mismatch. The students would be
better served if California offered them the choice of which school best
suits their needs. Moreover, while certainly we want all to get an education
, we must also maintain the competitive edge of our University of California
system schools. By regulating admission on anything other than merit would
cause great harm to the level of excellence we enjoy from our universities.
Therefore I urge a "No" vote on SCA-5. The people of California deserve a
government that supports their hard work and shares their hopes for the
future. Otherwise I will vote against and encourage others to vote against
Democrats who support this bill.
Yours very truly,
XXX
Dear XXX,
I urge you to vote against SCA 5. This bill, the consequence is that it
actually allows our public schools to use race and gender to discriminate
against students. Is that really where we want to go? We teach children the
importance of fairness. We teach children about the evils of injustice
about racism and discrimination. We inspire children with the stories of
people like Martin Luther King, Jr. and Nelson Mandela who worked for
justice. Now truth has become lies and lies have become truth. What words
are we using to teach our children that they should be treated differently
because of their race, instead of their efforts and qualifications?
At the core of making American better is the fundamental question of whether
every American has an equal chance. Not a preferential chance, but an equal
chance. The emphasis on fairness leads to continuous improvement and a high
level of competitiveness. In the United States, fundamental principles
ought to matter. And, there is not more basic than the right to equal
treatment under the law. We judge students only on the basis of their merit
and character, not on the basis of their race or skin color.
Therefore I am writing to urge your immediate action to rescind SCA 5.
Please stop racial discrimination! If SCA 5 receives approval in the State
Assembly, I will vote just to vote against the Democrats no matter what
happens. In addition, I will ask my family and friends to do the same.
Yours most sincerely,
XXX
Dear XXX,
I urge you to take immediate steps against SCA-5. SCA-5 is schemed to change
the California educational system. SCA-5 will eliminate the right to be
protected against all kinds of discrimination in education. Making things
even worse is the fact that SCA-5 is merely the first step towards a
terrible path. SCA-5 would result in mandated discrimination against certain
students applying to UC campuses.
From a purely practical standpoint, a policy of rejecting high-performing
students based on their ethnicity is a self-defeating idea. It goes against
everything our supposedly enlightened state stands for. Fairness is a key
principle upon which our educational system should be based. When students
work hard so they can get into a good school, they should have equal
opportunity at admission regardless of ethnicity or gender. SCA-5 will
undermine this basic principle of fairness.
In addition, according to numerous studies, minority students might feel
stigmatized by affirmative action, believing they were admitted on the basis
of their group status, not individual achievement or ability. These
students often consider themselves second-class students, and feel other
students see them in the same light. They are more likely to fail in school
and drop out. Many of our K-12 schools are failing our students, leaving
them unprepared for college. No student should suffer a huge fall in life
because the school the government has chosen for them is not a good fit.
Everyone loses when students drop out.
I hope that our legislators will have courage to reject SCA-5. You will win
my vote if you vote no to SAC-5. Otherwise I will vote against Democrats
from now on and will advise all friends and family to do the same.
Cordially yours,
XXX
Dear XXX,
I sincerely urge you to vote against SCA-5. President Obama said recently “
Billions of people in India and China are striving hard to out-educate
Americans in mathematics and technology. And every year brings more research
showing them pulling ahead. We live in a 21st century global economy. And
in a global economy, jobs can go anywhere." The United States is facing
unprecedented economic and intellectual competition from countries around
the world. This competition will not be decided on the basis of product
price and assortment but in our classrooms and universities. Technology is
shaping the future of the United States and changing our world dramatically.
According to American Civil Rights Coalition, "In the 17 years Prop 209 has
been in effect, California has led the way towards color-blind government
and increased graduation rates in higher education by using race and gender
neutral policies." Prop 209 results in a significant increase in graduation
rates in higher education. This is exactly what California needs to do.
Qualified college graduates ensure an educated workforce for tomorrow's
economy. If we grant preferential treatment based on race in college
admission, history tells us that fewer students will graduate from colleges.
Employers will not be able to find workers with the qualified skills to
fill an increasingly technical job market. This will affect the quality of
the workforce and the state's economic health. Companies will have to spend
more hire skilled workers, potentially from foreign countries, invest more
heavily in workforce development or even outsource jobs overseas. Therefore
SCA-5 is not in America's best interest.
I, therefore, am writing to urge you to vote against SCA-5. SCA-5 will hurt
our economy in the long run. Everyone in California will suffer from short-
sighted policy-making which holds back our growth. If Democrats pass SCA-5
in the Assembly, I'm sure a lot of people who have knowledge will be
enormously upset.
Yours truly,
XXX
Dear XXX,
I write today to urge you to take immediate action against SCA-5. No one has
the right to discriminate against any individuals based on their race. Just
as Abraham Lincoln declared in his Gettysburg Address, years ago our
fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in liberty,
and dedicated to the proposition that “all men are created equal.”
You cannot change facts simply by repeating a lie over and over again. The
color of someone’s skin doesn’t tell you anything about the traits that
qualify them for college. The color of someone’s skin also does not tell
you anything about that individual’s socioeconomic background. Students
from impoverished backgrounds need special consideration to succeed, no
matter their race.
Say no to racism! Say no to SCA-5. Fight for what generations before us have
fought for. SCA-5 is wrapped up in a claim of racial equality and diversity
, but it is pure evil and a fundamental violation of what true racial
equality means. If Democrats pass SCA-5 in the Assembly, tons of people in
California who have morals will hold this against the entire Democrat Party.
Everyone in our community take this matter seriously.
Sincerely yours,
XXX
Dear XXX,
I strongly urge you to vote NO on SCA-5. Martin Luther King Jr. passed away
46 years ago. What happened to "I have a dream that my four little children
will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of
their skin but by the content of their character."? Judging students by
their skin colors is itself inherently discriminatory. We are living
individuals! We represent only ourselves. No one is over represented here.
We got admitted into universities after working our asses off for years. No
one has the right to discriminate against any individuals based on their
race. The only way to create a society with true racial equality is to stop
considering race in the admission process.
Science and higher education should be "color-blind". Decisions based on
race are not the road to prosperity, equality, or stronger feelings of self
esteem in individuals. Selections based on one's color, not one's
achievements and skills, is only working to separate our society further. It
is ill-advised to set different standards for students based on the color
of their skin. Separating kids only makes them feel inferior and that should
’nt be acceptable to anyone. We ought not say that for some ethnic students
the goal is below some other ethnic students.
Therefore I'm asking you to vote NO on SCA5! Otherwise, I think the Democrat
Party has gone over the edge and need to be voted out. Who will demand
equality and justice for all? We are a nation that was built upon the very
principles that all men, and I emphasize all are created equal. Everyone in
our community will pay particular attention to this matter.
Yours Faithfully,
XXX
Dear XXX,
Please figth against SCA-5! Equality has clearly played an important role in
American history. When the founders of the United States of America wrote
in the Declaration of Independence the most sacred notions that "all men are
created equal". They were not ignoring the obvious differences that make
people individuals. Their differences in appearance, personality, aptitude,
skills and character. This essential equality means that no one is born with
a natural right to rule over others without their consent, and that
governments are obligated to apply the law equally to everyone.
The American Dream has always stood for the ideals of freedom, equality, and
opportunity available to every American from the time it entered the
national lexicon. Is the American Dream attainable by all Americans? Most
Americans perceive a college education as the ticket to the American Dream.
However with the passing of SCA-5, this fundamental principle of equality is
violated. It is racial discrimination at its finest. It's racial
discrimination in its purest form. Is this your American Dream? Why has our
state become so lame? The granting of preferential treatment based on race
is not the American way. Education should be color-blind. If you work hard
you get what you deserve.
Please!!! Say No to SCA-5. We need to protect the equal education rights of
our youth. Lawmakers should draft bills to improve education for poor
children regardless of their race. If Democrats pass the proposed SCA5 in
the Assembly, I will vote against any and all Democrats as Democrats are out
of touch with the American People and American Dream.
Best Regards,
XXX
Dear XXX,
Please vote No on SCA-5. What the SCA-5 acutually does is sheer idiocy and
doesn't make the slightest bit of sense. It's amazing that we still judge
people by their race. Is this really how we want to educate our future
generations? Is there ever going to be an end to racism?
It is in fact a no win situation. Children go to schools and have their GPAs
raised due to race. They later go to colleges based on fictitious GPAs.
Unfortunately professors won't be on board with this plan. Most likely they
won't be able to keep up, rank toward the bottom of the class, and quit or
drop out from schools. What a disaster it would be? This is the problem that
we call "mismatch". It is a problem verified by research.
Say No to SCA-5! Preferential treatment based on race in college admission
is not the right practice. California should not enrolled students based on
race rather than qualifications. Lawmakers need to work on bills which
applies to everyone regardless of their race for improvements in the quality
of education for poor communities or for closing the gap where students
have underachieved.
Yours truly,
XXX
Dear XXX,
I strongly urge you to vote NO on SCA-5. This bill against our
constitutional belief that all men are created equal. In addition it against
the "American Dream". That dream of a land in which life should be better
and richer and fuller for everyone, with opportunity for each according to
ability or achievement.
The fundamental flaw in SCA-5 is racial preferences in college admissions
harm their intended beneficiaries. We refer to this problem as "mismatch".
It is a problem documented by a vast and growing array of research. It will
place students in environments where they can neither learn nor compete
effectively. As a result, students quit or drop out from schools. These same
students would thrive had they gone to less competitive schools. As such
racial preferences lead to devastated outcomes.
In addition, having underprepared students entering colleges would greatly
diminish the quality of education. This is a lose-lose scenario. No one
should be allowed to damage our elite University of California system. Once
it is damaged it is really difficult to rebuild. Going to college is a
privilege, not a right. You would have to work hard to earn a spot.
Therefore I'm asking you to vote NO on SCA5! It is the right thing to do.
Preferential treatment based on race in college admission is not the right
practice. The state shall not discriminate against, or grant preferential
treatment on the basis of race.
Yours truly,
XXX
Dear XXX,
I hereby urge you to vote NO to SCA-5! As SCA-5 will roll back the clock to
the days when students were discriminated against based on their race. SCA-5
hide under the disguise of equal opportunity. However SCA-5 is in fact the
antithesis of equal opportunity as it demands equal outcomes. But true
equity demands fair outcomes for all. The injustice of disparities in any
population is when equity is diminished. It is communism in essence since
resources are to be divided equally. It will destroy the incentive to excel
and compete and drag down U.S. competitiveness in the long run.
Lawmakers need to work on bills which applies to everyone regardless of
their race for improvements in the quality of education for poor communities
or for closing the gap where students have underachieved. What messages are
we sending to our children that they should be treated differently because
of their race, instead of their efforts and qualifications?
Therefore I strongly urge you to fight against SCA-5. I have a dream, do you
? Everyone in our community will pay close attention to this matter.
Thank you,
XXX
Dear XXX:
Please vote "NO" on SCA-5. This bill is to include race as a factor to
provide preference in college admissions. I firmly believe that this is
against the fundamental principles of U.S. law and the American legal system
. All men are equal regardless of race.
Therefore, I strongly urge you to vote NO on this matter. Your vote is very
important to everyone in our community.
Thank you,
XXX
Dear XXX,
Please vote "NO" on SCA-5. SCA-5 proposed using race as a factor in college
admissions. I urge you to fight against SCA-5. Just as Martin Luther King,
Jr. said 41 years ago, no children should be judged by the color of their
skin, but by the content of their character. Your child(ren) deserve this
dream. Every American child deserves this dream. Don't you agree? It is
about right or wrong. This is where the difference comes between a
politician and a statesman/woman.
It's your choice which side you're on. I have a dream, do you? The people
who shares the same dream as Martin Luther King, Jr. will remember your
choice. They will decide who they vote for, who they send money to, and who
they canvass for.
Best regards,
XXX
Dear XXX,
Please vote "NO" on SCA-5. It is pure racism! My kids future is as important
as anyone's kids. Why two individuals at the same level of education might
differ in their college admissions? What century do we live in? This is
supposedly a country that believes in equality.
I strongly urge you to fight against SCA-5. Otherwise, no more votes and
donations from me and all my relatives and friends for you or any Democrats.
Everyone in our community will pay close attention to this issue.
Respectfully,
XXX
Dear XXX,
Please vote "NO" on SCA-5. Objection to any law that allow any
discrimination against, or granting preferential treatment to, any
individual or group on the basis of race in the operation of public
education. Racial discrimination is wrong, whichever way it goes, in
whatever name. If diversity is the point of preferences, why only in college
admissions? Why not in the recruitment process of government agencies? in
entertainment, in sports...
I strongly urge you to fight against SCA-5. All men are equal regardless of
race. Otherwise, no more votes and donations from me and all my relatives
and friends for you or any Democrats. Everyone in our community will pay
close attention to this issue.
Best regards,
XXX
Dear XXX,
Please vote "NO" on SCA-5. I am impressed that this clear violation of
constitutional law could even pass the senate! What are senators doing? How
do we explain to our children that what they've been taught on equal
opportunity is no longer true. It has been amended. Martin Luther King, Jr.
said I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a
nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the
content of their character. But it is no longer in accord with reality. Why
don't we amend the employment standards after college admissions? So those
who are entitled to privileges in admission could automatically get
government jobs?
I strongly urge you to fight against SCA-5. All men are equal regardless of
race. Otherwise, no more votes and donations from me and all my relatives
and friends for you or any Democrats. Everyone in our community will pay
close attention to this issue.
Respectfully,
XXX
Dear XXX,
Please vote "NO" on SCA-5. This bill is total racism. What a degradation! It
's a waste of public money for those senators working on this nonsense. The
rational behind the bill is totally ridiculous. We believe in the right of
education for all Californians. California should not enrolled students
based on race rather than qualifications.
I strongly urge you to fight against SCA-5. Otherwise, no more votes and
donations from me and all my relatives and friends for you or any Democrats.
Everyone in our community will pay close attention to this issue.
Sincerely yours,
XXX
Dear XXX,
Please vote "NO" on SCA-5. "I have a dream that my four little children will
one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of
their skin, but by the content of their character."---Martin Luther King, Jr
. Do we helping Martin Luther King's dream(which is my dream too)? Do we
punish hard working students by racial preferences? Is this the right way to
promote better education for California?
I strongly urge you to fight against SCA-5. Otherwise, no more votes and
donations from me and all my relatives and friends for you or any Democrats.
Everyone in our community will pay close attention to this issue.
Yours truly,
XXX
Dear XXX,
Please vote "NO" on SCA-5. The only barrier for student of any colors for
higher education is their work enthusiasm. How about we do the same thing
for the State Assembly? Candidate must collect certain amount of votes (
scores in S.A.T.) to be qualified, then by using qualified candidates’ race
and ethnic background to decide if he/she can become a member of the
California State Assembly. Because "We need to ensure that the State
Assembly reflects our changing population".
I strongly urge you to fight against SCA-5. Students should be admitted
based on merits, not race! Otherwise, no more votes and donations from me
and all my relatives and friends for you or any Democrats. Everyone in our
community will pay close attention to this issue.
Sincerely yours,
XXX
Dear XXX,
Please vote NO on SCA 5 as it is a racist bill. It promotes discrimination
by judging people based on their race. Admission to any school among other
things, should solely based on their own merit and not on their color, race,
and etc. I believe preferential treatment based on race in college
admission is not the right practice. In addition it violates the Equal
Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
I strongly urge you to vote "No" on SCA 5. Students deserve have an equal
opportunity in the college admission process regardless of their race. Thank
you for listening to the voice of your people.
Respectfully,
XXX
Dear XXX,
Please vote "NO" on SCA-5. This is ridiculous and is so wrong! This is a
reverse discrimination. This proposition limits the opportunity of certain
kids to attend the University of California because of their races. Higher
education should be offered to those who can do it.
I strongly urge you to fight against SCA-5. Students deserve have an equal
opportunity in the college admission process regardless of their race. I
always support Democrats. But if Democrats pass SCA-5 in the Assembly, I
will immediately switch my support to Republicans in future elections. Most
people in my community rank education as the most important policy issue.
Best regards,
XXX
最后可以再加上下面这些, 有些文章和一个影像是相当好的.
For more information on this topic, please refer to articles and a video
below.
The Painful Truth About Affirmative Action
http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/10/the-painful
Elder vs. State Senator Ed Hernandez (D-CA) on Racial Preferences, Jan. 31,
2014
http://vimeo.com/86149155
In U.S., Most Reject Considering Race in College Admissions
http://www.gallup.com/poll/163655/reject-considering-race-colle
UC proves Prop. 209's point
http://articles.latimes.com/2010/jul/12/opinion/la-oe-lehrer-af
Viewpoints: A step backward on higher education enrollment
http://www.sacbee.com/2014/02/08/6138480/viewpoints-a-step-back
Careful, California voters, your wishes are under attack
http://articles.latimes.com/2014/feb/07/opinion/la-oe-gratz-cal
如果要加文章连结可能要再修整一下, 如果在讨论区用copy & paste有可能贴成不完整
连结, 用nosca5.blogspot.com上的文章就没这个问题, 请注意一下这一点. 要确认一
下是完整的网址.
这里有些反SCA-5的海报, 也可以考虑加在电子邮件中或传真都可以运用.
http://nosca5.blogspot.com/2014/02/sca-5.html
Step 4:
使用下面这个网站邮寄信件给你选区的加州众议员表达意见, 这个网站已经全部帮忙设
定好, 花不到几分钟就可以产生一篇非常完整详细的请愿信.
http://www.no2sca5.org/
http://www.no2sca5.org/#Why-A-Snail-Mail-to-Your-Representative
Step 5:
下面这些是其他加州民主党众议员的联络方式, 我觉得他们改变立场的机率低, 如果要
尝试的话用email再加上facebook的message扫一遍就好了, 应该也花不了太多时间.
Isadore Hall, III
Tel: (310) 223-1201 Fax: (310) 223-1202
Email: a*****************[email protected] & i*****[email protected]
i**[email protected]
http://www.isadorehall.com/ (选Contact Us)
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Isadore-Hall-for-Assembly/209986370129
Reggie Jones-Sawyer
Tel: (213) 744-2111 Fax: (213) 744-2122
Email: a*************************[email protected]
https://www.facebook.com/reggiejonessawyersr
Bonnie Lowenthal
Tel: (562) 495-2915 Fax: (562) 495-2983
Email: a**********************[email protected] & Bonnie@
BonnieforLongBeach.com
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Bonnie-Lowenthal/25127873810
Steve Bradford
Tel: (310) 412-6400 Fax: (310) 412-6354
Email: a*********************[email protected]
https://www.facebook.com/stevenbradford62
Cheryl Brown
Tel: (909) 381-3238 Fax: (909) 885-8589
Email: a******************[email protected]
https://www.facebook.com/cheryl.brown.988711
Adrin Nazarian
Tel: (818) 376-4246 Fax: (818) 376-4252
Email: a*********************[email protected] & adrinforassembly@gmail.
com
https://www.facebook.com/AdrinNazarian
Bill Quirk
Tel: (510) 583-8818 Fax: (510) 583-8800
Email: a******************[email protected]
http://www.electbillquirk.com/contact
https://www.facebook.com/BillQuirkAD20
Matthew Dababneh
Tel: (818) 904-3840
Email: a*********************[email protected] & m**[email protected]
https://www.facebook.com/MattDababnehForAssembly
Tom Daly
Tel: (714) 939-8469 Fax: (714) 939-8986
Email: a*****************[email protected] & [email protected]
Roger Dickinson
(916) 324-4676 Fax: (916) 327-3338
Email: a**********************[email protected] & r***[email protected]
https://www.facebook.com/assemblymemberdickinson
Sebastian Ridley-Thomas
Tel: (310) 342-1070 Fax: (310) 342-1078
Email: a**************************[email protected]
https://www.facebook.com/SRTforAssembly
Nancy Skinner
Tel: (510) 286-1400 Fax: (510) 286-1406
Email: a********************[email protected] & c*****[email protected]
https://www.facebook.com/asm.nancy.skinner
Jim Frazier
Tel: (707) 399-3011 Fax: (707) 399-3030
Email: a********************[email protected]
http://jimfrazierforassembly.com/contact-jim-frazier/
https://www.facebook.com/ASMJimFrazier
Shirley Weber
Tel: (619) 531-7913 Fax: (619) 531-7924
Email: a******************[email protected] & i**[email protected]
https://www.facebook.com/ShirleyWeberCalliforniaStateAssembly
Susan Bonilla
Tel: (925) 521-1511 Fax: (925) 602-1536
Email: a********************[email protected] & s***[email protected]
https://www.facebook.com/JoinSusanBonilla
Luis Alejo
(831) 759-8676 Fax: (831) 759-2961
Email: a******************[email protected] & V***********[email protected]
https://www.facebook.com/lalejo
Raul Bocanegra
Tel: (818) 504-3911 Fax: (818) 504-3912
Email: a**********************[email protected] & r**[email protected]
c*****[email protected]
https://www.facebook.com/RaulJBocanegra
Ian Calderon
Tel: (562) 692-5858 Fax: (562) 695-5852
Email: a*********************[email protected]
http://ianccalderon.com/#contact
https://www.facebook.com/AssemblymemberIanCalderon
Nora Campos
Tel: (408) 277-1220 Fax: (408) 277-1036
Email: a*******************[email protected]
Susan Eggman
Tel: (209) 948-7479 Fax: (209) 465-5058
Email: a*******************[email protected] & i**[email protected]
https://www.facebook.com/susan.eggman
Cristina Garcia
Tel: (562) 861-5803 Fax: (562) 861-5158
Email: a*******************[email protected]
https://www.facebook.com/cristinagarciaad58
Jimmy Gomez
Tel: (213) 483-5151 Fax: (213) 483-5166
Email: a******************[email protected]
https://www.facebook.com/assemblymemberjimmygomez
Lorena Gonzalez
Tel: 619-338-8090 Fax: 619-338-8099
Email: a*********************[email protected] & V********[email protected]
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Lorena-Gonzalez-for-State-Assembly/
398973036849751
Jose Medina
Tel: (951) 369-6644 Fax: (951) 369-0366
Email: a*******************[email protected]
https://www.facebook.com/AsmJoseMedina
Henry Perea
Tel: (559) 445-5532 Fax: (559) 445-6006
Email: a******************[email protected]
https://www.facebook.com/AssemblymemberPerea
V. Manuel Perez
Tel: (760) 342-8047 Fax: (760) 347-8704
Email: A*************************[email protected]
https://www.facebook.com/pages/V-Manuel-Perez-CA-State-Assemblymember/
382172440154
Anthony Rendon
Tel: (562) 529-3250 Fax: (562) 529-3255
Email: a*******************[email protected] & assemblyman.arendon@gmail.
com
https://www.facebook.com/AssemblyMemberAnthonyRendon
https://www.facebook.com/anthonyrendonforassembly
Freddie Rodriguez
Email: a**********************[email protected] & e**********[email protected]
r*****[email protected]
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Freddie-Rodriguez-for-Assembly/
519771921405293
下面这个人是SCA-5提案人, 请大家让他知道种族歧视是不好的, 不要再继续提出这样
的法案.
Ed Hernandez
Phone: (626) 430-2499 or (323) 981-3320 Fax: (916) 651-4924
West Covina District Office
100 S. Vincent Ave, #401, West Covina, CA 91790
East Los Angeles District Office
4716 E. Cesar E. Chavez Ave, East Los Angeles, CA 90022
Email: s***************[email protected]
http://sd24.senate.ca.gov/contact/email
http://www.edhernandez4senate.com/ (选Contact)
https://www.facebook.com/DrEdHernandez | j*****v
发帖数: 7717 | 5 监狱也是公共社会资源，你先进去，替亚裔平均分配一下
试。
【在 B*********r 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
: 发信人: BrainWasher (美宣部指导员), 信区: Military
: 标 题: 老中都错了，SCA5的问题根本就不是造成不公平竞争！！！
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat Mar 8 22:58:20 2014, 美东)
: 老中反对SCA5,所用的主要理由是这个法案造成了不公平。
: 其实用这个理由反对SCA5是站不住脚的，或者说用这个理由反对SCA5的人根本就没有搞
: 懂美国社会资源分配的基本原则。
: 老中因为自己的文化背景，总是下意识的以为现代社会的大学入学就是古代的科举考试。
: 其实这两者是非常不同的。
: 科举是为国家取材，当然公平竞争是第一原则，因为要选拔最优秀的人才。
| C****t
发帖数: 3813 | 6 it is not as good as putting your mother in there...
【在 j*****v 的大作中提到】
: 监狱也是公共社会资源，你先进去，替亚裔平均分配一下
:
: 试。
| j*****v
发帖数: 7717 | 7 Jail still sounds better than graveyard. Can you bring her back to me? If
not, put your mother to work.
【在 C****t 的大作中提到】
: it is not as good as putting your mother in there...
| w****j
发帖数: 6262 | 8 逻辑太复杂，老美听不懂。
试。
【在 B*********r 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
: 发信人: BrainWasher (美宣部指导员), 信区: Military
: 标 题: 老中都错了，SCA5的问题根本就不是造成不公平竞争！！！
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat Mar 8 22:58:20 2014, 美东)
: 老中反对SCA5,所用的主要理由是这个法案造成了不公平。
: 其实用这个理由反对SCA5是站不住脚的，或者说用这个理由反对SCA5的人根本就没有搞
: 懂美国社会资源分配的基本原则。
: 老中因为自己的文化背景，总是下意识的以为现代社会的大学入学就是古代的科举考试。
: 其实这两者是非常不同的。
: 科举是为国家取材，当然公平竞争是第一原则，因为要选拔最优秀的人才。
| a***o
发帖数: 3734 | 9 扯淡到无边无际。
如果是公共资源，那还考个屁的SAT，直接划区就近入学才叫公共资源。你见过公园要
考试才能进的？图书馆？消防队要先看你的SAT成绩才救火？
试。
【在 B*********r 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
: 发信人: BrainWasher (美宣部指导员), 信区: Military
: 标 题: 老中都错了，SCA5的问题根本就不是造成不公平竞争！！！
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat Mar 8 22:58:20 2014, 美东)
: 老中反对SCA5,所用的主要理由是这个法案造成了不公平。
: 其实用这个理由反对SCA5是站不住脚的，或者说用这个理由反对SCA5的人根本就没有搞
: 懂美国社会资源分配的基本原则。
: 老中因为自己的文化背景，总是下意识的以为现代社会的大学入学就是古代的科举考试。
: 其实这两者是非常不同的。
: 科举是为国家取材，当然公平竞争是第一原则，因为要选拔最优秀的人才。
| T*********I
发帖数: 10729 | 10 总统，议员，消防队员，警察，法官，FBI，NASA, 国家实验室，以后都因为是公共资
源，不靠选举，不靠考试，不靠面试，靠抓阄。
【在 a***o 的大作中提到】
: 扯淡到无边无际。
: 如果是公共资源，那还考个屁的SAT，直接划区就近入学才叫公共资源。你见过公园要
: 考试才能进的？图书馆？消防队要先看你的SAT成绩才救火？
:
: 试。
| d*******p
发帖数: 2525 | 11 好吧，楼主你是说公共服务全部该aa是吧？那么总统已经40多位了，亚裔占的比例怎么
也高过2%了，那么下次总统该轮到亚裔了吧？
还有NFL,这可是享受了税钱补贴的，那么也请实行aa,nba要不要也来个aa?
反sca5，不需要任何其他理由，只要抓死一点就行：racial discrimination,这可是法
律规定的，种族不能在这类决定中出现，种族不应该成为决定入学的其中一项条件，只
能白人入学是种族歧视，规定必须有黑墨占多少入学比例，亚裔比黑墨测试分高很多也
不能入学，这同样也是种族歧视 |
|
