I**n 发帖数: 839 | 1 No wonder everybody hates it. (PLO)
A few observation so far:
1) It's so easy to be mathematically correct. Less stressful,just let the
cards play itself.
2) Good player will fold to your "pot committed" bluff a lot after you
already put in half of stack
3) It's easy to stack off bad players.
4) Regulars tends not to steal your blinds.
缺点是没有gigantic pot, total grinding, but overall results is much much
better. Need more volume to test. | B*********s 发帖数: 4158 | 2 除非是打职业short stack,还是正常buy-in好玩
【在 I**n 的大作中提到】 : No wonder everybody hates it. (PLO) : A few observation so far: : 1) It's so easy to be mathematically correct. Less stressful,just let the : cards play itself. : 2) Good player will fold to your "pot committed" bluff a lot after you : already put in half of stack : 3) It's easy to stack off bad players. : 4) Regulars tends not to steal your blinds. : 缺点是没有gigantic pot, total grinding, but overall results is much much : better. Need more volume to test.
| s*********k 发帖数: 1989 | 3 r u playing RUSH PLO?
I play it with mini buy-in and log-off/reload whenever doubled up.
At PLO, combination is too many. It is very touch to play deep-stack, TO ME.
I sometime push allin with two pairs if no SD/FD.
See quite a few players with deep stack. They fold a lot to pot-commit bet,
but stick with SD/FD a lot.
One tricky thing is, at/aft turn, many times it is math correct to allin/call pot
for stock stack. Call/Bet on flop is more important. But at multiway, it is
very tricky. Set with Full re-draw, higher OESD etc impose alot of variations.
【在 I**n 的大作中提到】 : No wonder everybody hates it. (PLO) : A few observation so far: : 1) It's so easy to be mathematically correct. Less stressful,just let the : cards play itself. : 2) Good player will fold to your "pot committed" bluff a lot after you : already put in half of stack : 3) It's easy to stack off bad players. : 4) Regulars tends not to steal your blinds. : 缺点是没有gigantic pot, total grinding, but overall results is much much : better. Need more volume to test.
|
|