l**********n
发帖数: 72 | 1 From your discussion above, it seems that most of you like English books
better than Chinese books and strong dislike towards Zeng's book. Could any of
you give me a reason why you don't like Zeng's QM book?
Any comments on Merzbacher's or Schwinger's QM books?
Lake | f*******d
发帖数: 339 | 2 I did not join the previous discussion but I'd like to offer my two cents.
I think first of all, it is very unfair to compare Zeng Jinyan's book to
Dirac's book.
They are of completely different types. Dirac's book is one of the most
elegant books I have ever
read on any physics subjects, not just QM. He developed a very beautiful
formalism to do QM.
Even later books, such as Messiah or Sakurai, can not surpass it in presenting
this formalism, this
is like later generation of elementary geometr
【在 l**********n 的大作中提到】
: From your discussion above, it seems that most of you like English books
: better than Chinese books and strong dislike towards Zeng's book. Could any of
: you give me a reason why you don't like Zeng's QM book?
: Any comments on Merzbacher's or Schwinger's QM books?
: Lake
|
|
