由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
QueerNews版 - Plaintiffs Ask Supreme Court Not to Hear Prop. 8,
相关主题
最高法院可能不受理prop 8官司When Will The Supreme Court Rule On DOMA, Prop 8?
The Supreme Court’s Middle Option: A Nine-State SolutionAn LGBT Law Expert's Take on Tuesday's Prop. 8 Decision
Op-ed: Prop. 8 Hearing Puts Hate (and Incompetence) on TrialPrediction: DOMA, Prop 8 Will Fall
Judges Seem Skeptical of Bias by Walker in Prop. 8 HearingBreaking news: marriage on hold in CA
Supreme Court Pushes Date of Prop. 8 AnnouncementAnother Prop. 8 Delay
Prop 8的支持者们要求最高法院维护公投结果加州同志婚姻依然暂缓执行。
Obama Asks Supreme Court to Invalidate Prop. 8Facing Deadline, Prop. 8 Backers Seek Full Review by Appeals Court
第九巡回法庭说话了Big Announcement Coming on Prop 8
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: court话题: supreme话题: prop话题: hear话题: plaintiffs
进入QueerNews版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
m******1
发帖数: 19713
1
Plaintiffs Ask Supreme Court Not to Hear Prop. 8, Restore California
Marriage Equality
Lawyers for the gay and lesbian plaintiffs in Hollingsworth v. Perry (
formerly Perry v. Brown and Perry v. Schwarzenegger), the federal case
challenging the constitutionality of California's Proposition 8, today filed
a brief asking the nation's highest court not to hear the case. If the U.S.
Supreme Court declines to hear the case, lower court rulings that found
Prop. 8 unconstitutional will stand and marriage equality will be restored
in California, possibly by the end of this year.
"The Ninth Circuit found that eliminating the ability of gay and lesbian
couples to have their relationships designated as marriages — and
relegating them to separate and unequal domestic partnerships — achieves
nothing except the marginalization of gay and lesbian individuals and their
relationships, and therefore cannot withstand constitutional scrutiny,"
plaintiffs' attorneys Theodore B. Olson and David Boies wrote in today's
brief.
Last month, proponents of the 2008 ballot initiative filed a petition for a
writ of certiorari, asking the Supreme Court to reverse the rulings by the
Ninth Circuit and the U.S. District Court. In both earlier hearings, the
courts found that Prop. 8 was based in animus against gays and lesbians, and
was therefore unconstitutional.
In February, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that Prop. 8
violates the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution. Today's brief cites that ruling, saying it "reflects a
correct and straightforward application of settled Supreme Court precedent."
It is unclear when the Supreme Court will decide whether or not it will hear
the case. Speculation abounds regarding the scope of a potential decision,
which could be limited to California or theoretically invalidate same-sex
marriage bans across the country. The American Foundation for Equal Rights,
the sole sponsor of the legal challenge, has more in-depth information on
the case, including a timeline charting the case's progress thus far.
1 (共1页)
进入QueerNews版参与讨论
相关主题
Big Announcement Coming on Prop 8Supreme Court Pushes Date of Prop. 8 Announcement
pro8 笔记翻译Prop 8的支持者们要求最高法院维护公投结果
PROP 8法官判决前的最后问题Obama Asks Supreme Court to Invalidate Prop. 8
律师再谈PROP 8第九巡回法庭说话了
最高法院可能不受理prop 8官司When Will The Supreme Court Rule On DOMA, Prop 8?
The Supreme Court’s Middle Option: A Nine-State SolutionAn LGBT Law Expert's Take on Tuesday's Prop. 8 Decision
Op-ed: Prop. 8 Hearing Puts Hate (and Incompetence) on TrialPrediction: DOMA, Prop 8 Will Fall
Judges Seem Skeptical of Bias by Walker in Prop. 8 HearingBreaking news: marriage on hold in CA
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: court话题: supreme话题: prop话题: hear话题: plaintiffs