由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Immigration版 - 我觉着引言里的引用也可以证明major significance
相关主题
请问citation是支持scholar article 还是 contribution综述类文章引用数多的话,真能算original contribution和significant impact吗?
Citation真的决定一切么被0002 rfe了,哭
什么是provoke widespread public commentary ?EB1A收到RFE了,contribution不承认
都是PP惹的祸? PP第9天RFE请问有人遇到过NSC 0041号IO吗
citation 要放在拿一条里面作为证据?没有claim critical leading role,officer为毛让我提供证据啊
USCIS 关于 outstanding 界定请问这两项有什么区别
Eb-1A approved after RFE-----outline posted被0214 rfe了
求解三者之不同:Evidence, Documentary Evidence and Objective Documentary EvidenceNSC EB1A RFE by 0125
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: 引用话题: 引言话题: field
进入Immigration版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
a******n
发帖数: 166
1
法律要求IO这么理解引用:
For example, peer-reviewed presentations at academic symposia or peer-
reviewed articles in scholarly journals that have provoked widespread
commentary or received notice from others working in the field, or entries (
particularly a goodly number) in a citation index which cite the alien's
work as authoritative in the field, may be probative of the significance of
the alien’s contributions to the field of endeavor.
所有的引用都算得上是:received notice from others working in the field吧?
引言里面的引用一般是典型的,影响力大的,或者或是优秀的成果,所以应该是可以用
来证明major significance的。
所以引言里的引用也许可以说是:cited as an typical example of XXX
不明白什么引用算作authoritative,有人赐教吗?
1 (共1页)
进入Immigration版参与讨论
相关主题
NSC EB1A RFE by 0125citation 要放在拿一条里面作为证据?
NSC RFE PP 追加, 0443USCIS 关于 outstanding 界定
1类 140 新趋势,经验总结,后来者请注意陷阱.Eb-1A approved after RFE-----outline posted
有没有被TSC 1136 RFE请进来求解三者之不同:Evidence, Documentary Evidence and Objective Documentary Evidence
请问citation是支持scholar article 还是 contribution综述类文章引用数多的话,真能算original contribution和significant impact吗?
Citation真的决定一切么被0002 rfe了,哭
什么是provoke widespread public commentary ?EB1A收到RFE了,contribution不承认
都是PP惹的祸? PP第9天RFE请问有人遇到过NSC 0041号IO吗
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: 引用话题: 引言话题: field