l**n
发帖数: 908 | 1 模板一般是有几类：
1. Objective documentary evidence of the signigicance of the beneficiary's
contribution to the field
2. Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently consider
the beneficiary's work important
3. Testmony and/or support letters from experts which discuss the
beneficiary's contributions of major significance
4. Evidence that the beneficiary's magjor significant contribution(s) has
provoked widespread public commentary in the field or has been widely cited
5. Evidence of the beneficiary's work being implemented by others. Possible
evidence may include but is not limited to
Contracts with companies using the beneficiary's products;
Licensed technology being used by others;
Patents currently being utilized and shown to be significant to the
field
我对材料具体属于上面哪一类有一些疑问。尤其是对第一项的objective documentary
evidence，感觉具体citation的讨论（大段引用和good words）似乎放这里面也不是很
合适，因为这里面也有该作者的主观意愿在里面。另外，邀请报告，Editors'
suggestion这些也不能算是objective。引用很多（top1%之类）也应该算在第4项里面
，放在1里面不太合适吧？
当然，引用多，引用里面的highlight之类的东西应该可以不止在上面一类里面出现。
不过对objective documentary evidence来讲，我确实还是不太清楚哪里材料可以往里
面放。
多谢指点！ |
s******4
发帖数: 1322 | 2 你RFE了？？
consider
cited
Possible
【在 l**n 的大作中提到】
: 模板一般是有几类：
: 1. Objective documentary evidence of the signigicance of the beneficiary's
: contribution to the field
: 2. Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently consider
: the beneficiary's work important
: 3. Testmony and/or support letters from experts which discuss the
: beneficiary's contributions of major significance
: 4. Evidence that the beneficiary's magjor significant contribution(s) has
: provoked widespread public commentary in the field or has been widely cited
: 5. Evidence of the beneficiary's work being implemented by others. Possible
|
l**n
发帖数: 908 | 3 是啊。
自己决定pp，没想到timing不是很好。13号开始clock，如果IO想度个假什么的，周五
21号就成了最后一天了。
感觉IO没读推荐信和很多具体引用的亮点，包括其他一些证据。反复提10篇文章似乎比
较少，引用次数不算多，只有两次international conference invited talk，而且还
都是在一年内，表明没有sustained acclaim。
【在 s******4 的大作中提到】
: 你RFE了？？
:
: consider
: cited
: Possible
|
s******4
发帖数: 1322 | 4 I sent something to your email. check~
【在 l**n 的大作中提到】
: 是啊。
: 自己决定pp，没想到timing不是很好。13号开始clock，如果IO想度个假什么的，周五
: 21号就成了最后一天了。
: 感觉IO没读推荐信和很多具体引用的亮点，包括其他一些证据。反复提10篇文章似乎比
: 较少，引用次数不算多，只有两次international conference invited talk，而且还
: 都是在一年内，表明没有sustained acclaim。
|
l**n
发帖数: 908 | |
