w**5
发帖数: 316 | 1 对于我来说五个就比较多了。
看到昨天 （8/10/2015）华尔街日报的一篇文章 我被雷到了：
How Many Scientists Does It Take to Write a Paper? Apparently, Thousands
Scientific journals see a spike in number of contributors; 24 pages of
alphabetized co-authors
http://www.wsj.com/articles/how-many-scientists-does-it-take-to
In less than a decade, Dr. Aad, who lives in Marseilles, France, has
appeared as the lead author on 458 scientific papers. Nobody knows just how
many scientists it may take to screw in a light bulb, but it took 5,154
researchers to write one physics paper earlier this year—likely a record—
and Dr. Aad led the list.
Earlier this year, a paper on rare particle decay published in Nature listed
so many co-authors—about 2,700—that the journal announced it wouldn’t
have room for them all in its print editions. | w**5
发帖数: 316 | 2 Scientists who regularly share co-author credit on physics papers gathered
at the Large Hadron Collider in Switzerland in 2012. Photo: Claudia
Marcelloni/CERN | w**5
发帖数: 316 | 3 你们共同作者的文章一般都是几个人？什么专业？
我是 Business，一般2-3个作者。也有4-5个作者的。但独立作者和五个以上作者的文章
比较少。 | j**u
发帖数: 6059 | 4 姓以A打头比较划算
【在 w**5 的大作中提到】
: Scientists who regularly share co-author credit on physics papers gathered
: at the Large Hadron Collider in Switzerland in 2012. Photo: Claudia
: Marcelloni/CERN
| o****9
发帖数: 479 | 5 这要看谁有话语权了。如果一个姓z＊＊的作者最有话语权，那也可以说以姓氏的逆序
排序。我见过这样标注作者顺序的。
【在 j**u 的大作中提到】
: 姓以A打头比较划算
|
|
