由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Biology版 - Scientifc Reports Really Sucks!
相关主题
有没有人听说过新杂志PeerJ?原来加洲大学两年前就开始号召Boycotting NPG (转载)
eLife, Cell Reports, Nature Comm哪个感觉以后会更好?请教一个问题,关于低水平杂志找contributor
Cell reports 这个杂志咋样?How to empty water bath
最新的SCI 影响因子预测Ncomms, SciRep, SciTM,等等我怀疑实验室里的印度博后作假
这几个杂志的定位是不是差不多?老板想开人了何去何从
Scientific Reports ------ a new Plos One?问广大PI和过来人一个事
Nature这事很严重,必须有点行动 (转载)RSC的Integrative Biology这个杂志怎么样?
postdoc vs research scientistHHMI的新杂志看来没啥希望了。。。
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: really话题: reports话题: sucks话题: scientifc话题: cannot
进入Biology版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
w******e
发帖数: 83
1
The entire publishing procedure is terrible and cumbersome. The in-house
editors are lazy, irresponsible,...The initial quality screening is absurd.
One reference formality error could delay the next step by a few weeks.
After a few times, I cannot tolerate any more.
I strongly suggest not submitting manuscripts to this journal, if you cannot
wait for at least 3-4 months.
w******e
发帖数: 83
2
以前从没试过open access, 上当后悔极了。发现钱收得多的,编辑和杂志的职业素养
越差。还是喜欢ACS和RSC的杂志。

.
cannot

【在 w******e 的大作中提到】
: The entire publishing procedure is terrible and cumbersome. The in-house
: editors are lazy, irresponsible,...The initial quality screening is absurd.
: One reference formality error could delay the next step by a few weeks.
: After a few times, I cannot tolerate any more.
: I strongly suggest not submitting manuscripts to this journal, if you cannot
: wait for at least 3-4 months.

s******y
发帖数: 28562
3
一直好奇Nature Publish Group 为什么要抢注这个杂志名字,简直就是故意给
Science 下眼药。

.
cannot

【在 w******e 的大作中提到】
: The entire publishing procedure is terrible and cumbersome. The in-house
: editors are lazy, irresponsible,...The initial quality screening is absurd.
: One reference formality error could delay the next step by a few weeks.
: After a few times, I cannot tolerate any more.
: I strongly suggest not submitting manuscripts to this journal, if you cannot
: wait for at least 3-4 months.

t*******w
发帖数: 107
4
又回到原来的话题上来了,eLife真是一个好杂志
至少投稿系统好
w******e
发帖数: 83
5
没有用过!用过中scholar one最棒!Nature那个系统真TMD的差。

【在 t*******w 的大作中提到】
: 又回到原来的话题上来了,eLife真是一个好杂志
: 至少投稿系统好

F*Q
发帖数: 3259
6
我的经历是该杂志编辑部让作者要求回避的审稿人审稿,审稿意见和在其它两个不同杂
志拒稿的审稿人的意见相似度达到90%,很明显在那三个杂志拒稿的是同一个人。一方
面,那个人就是具有剽窃嫌疑的人。另一方面,那个人又是所有三个杂志的审稿编辑或
编委。
[在 wuyanzhe (唔言) 的大作中提到:]
:The entire publishing procedure is terrible and cumbersome. The in-house
:editors are lazy, irresponsible,...The initial quality screening is absurd
. One reference formality error could delay the next step by a few weeks.
:...........
1 (共1页)
进入Biology版参与讨论
相关主题
HHMI的新杂志看来没啥希望了。。。这几个杂志的定位是不是差不多?
Nature CommunicationsScientific Reports ------ a new Plos One?
生物的一个很大问题就是周期太长了Nature这事很严重,必须有点行动 (转载)
有没有什么基金能够支持博后独立发文章?postdoc vs research scientist
有没有人听说过新杂志PeerJ?原来加洲大学两年前就开始号召Boycotting NPG (转载)
eLife, Cell Reports, Nature Comm哪个感觉以后会更好?请教一个问题,关于低水平杂志找contributor
Cell reports 这个杂志咋样?How to empty water bath
最新的SCI 影响因子预测Ncomms, SciRep, SciTM,等等我怀疑实验室里的印度博后作假
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: really话题: reports话题: sucks话题: scientifc话题: cannot