由买买提看人间百态

topics

全部话题 - 话题: scientifc
(共0页)
f****e
发帖数: 24964
1
印度也是精英里面老将多啊,很悲愤
Prof Sharma (IIT Kharagpur)
6 hrs ago (06:53 PM)
China ahead of India in scientific research, says PM Manmohan Singh - this
is totally not true and utterly nonsense. India's premier institutions IIM's
, IIT's etc. are ranked higher than Harvard, Oxford, Cambridge, and are the
best in the world. Our research are the best except that they were never
published so that other nations can copy and gain knowledge of our
discoveries. Indians are the best in the world in terms of knowled... 阅读全帖

发帖数: 1
2
来自主题: Military版 - 我昨晚做噩梦发了篇子刊
以为发了science主刊。到处炫耀。结果被另一个博后指出你这是scientifc report,不
是science。
然后被吓醒了。
醒后摸了下裆,幸好没尿(sui)。
a******9
发帖数: 20431
3
来自主题: Military版 - 我昨晚做噩梦发了篇子刊
看清楚点 你发的是潍坊师范学报·自然科学子刊

:以为发了science主刊。到处炫耀。结果被另一个博后指出你这是scientifc report,
不是science。
G***G
发帖数: 16778
4
let us not gossip.
focu on scientifc and important questions.
first one: how to improve our listening skill in short time?
for example, understanding NBC program.
m**c
发帖数: 7349
5
看美剧。。。。。。。。。。


: let us not gossip.

: focu on scientifc and important questions.

: first one: how to improve our listening skill in short time?

: for example, understanding NBC program.

s********d
发帖数: 103
6
来自主题: NextGeneration版 - 从我在国内临床看到的谈谈肝炎
Very good points ! But unfortunately, people get emotional with this type of
scientifc questions. Even for the infectious MDs, they have different
opinions on this issue. Among these so-called professionals, i am in the
group who shares the same views as you.
c*******u
发帖数: 12899
7
来自主题: NextGeneration版 - [合集] 从我在国内临床看到的谈谈肝炎
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
lancy1982 (lancy) 于 (Wed Mar 23 16:51:32 2011, 美东) 提到:
没想到这个帖子引起大家这么热烈的讨论,
原本我发帖的目的只是想说说我在有限的临床中看到的例子,我不想给大家带来误导。
我只说我见过的,从流行病学意义上来讲,这个样本量是太小太小了。
首先我要声明,我不是专家。我只是之前因为专业的关系接触过一些肝炎患者而已。
有网友回帖说我学的专业就是忽悠专业,呵呵
其实你说的也有道理,中西医结合治疗肝病如何结合,哪里才是好的切合点一直不清楚
更何况我专业学的不精,知道的确实有限。
但我的目的并不想忽悠你,我只是说说我见过的,这些我见过的例子我没有骗你
至于分子生物学,这个是必修的,只是我学的不好,对于版上很多牛人来说,
我完全是外行。
乙肝传染病流行病学的研究也在不断的修正中,科学也在不断发展。
只是人们对于它认识越清楚,误解也会越来越少。
疫苗的发明更是人类的福音。
肝炎涉及的知识太多了,发展也非常快。我知道的太少太少了。
针对大家提到的一些问题,我简要... 阅读全帖
m****r
发帖数: 1904
8
来自主题: Parenting版 - 豆制品,3岁以内儿童不能吃??
Toddler411 3rd Edition page197 said these are just theories at this point.
No scientifc proof to show soy milk dangerous for adults or kids.
B*******n
发帖数: 20645
9
来自主题: Stock版 - NOK爆跌的原因找到鸟
Largest NYSE Short Interest Positions as of Feb. 15
Ticker Avg. Daily
Symbol Company Feb. 15 Jan. 31 Volume

=============================================================================
SPY SPDR S&P 500 ETF 313,917,094 289,628,960 146,913,689
NOK NOKIA CORP-ADR 215,707,954 195,140,945 25,880,627
IWM ISHARES-RUS 2000 208,862,217 197,574,989... 阅读全帖
a***e
发帖数: 188
10
I like it but I don't think they will understand "Go back to your trees":-)
That is too scientifc Maybe we just tell him:
Excuse me, sir. Please mind your manners. I am not going anywhere. This is
my home and my country.
L***n
发帖数: 6727
11
来自主题: Linux版 - Google go 还挺不错的
I think java can do scientifc computations, there were some benchmarks that
I can't find now but I remember java did perform decently, comparable
sometimes
even better than C++ and Fortran(albelit rarely). I'm playing with a
language
called scala that is running on the JVM. I'm quite safisfied with its
performance(my work mainly invloves manipulating small matrices), but I
didn't do any benchmark so can't compare it with C++.
O******e
发帖数: 4845
12
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
yuuli (听,...听) 于 (Thu Nov 16 23:23:06 2006) 提到:
http://www.cell.com/content/article/fulltext?uid=PIIS0092867406012256&highlight=polymerase
Cell, Vol 127, 317-327, 20 October 2006
Role of the Sigma Factor in Transcription Initiation in the Absence of Core
RNA Polymerase
Hsin-Hsien蔋su,1 Kuei-Min蔆hung,1 Tsung-Ching蔆hen,1 and Ban-Yang蔆hang1,*
1 Institute of Biochemistry, National Chung-Hsing University, Taichung 40227
, Taiwan, Republic of China
从第二个图... 阅读全帖
w***e
发帖数: 269
13
It is important to think about education or science training in terms of
career goals, because ultimately, one has to find a job and survive.
Especially in this economy, a career outlook is more important than
scientifc significance. I just heard that one tenured faculty in our
deparment is going to move somewhere else because he is doing computational
biology in an experimental biology deparment. He has only got one R01 in his
entire career (which i think for computational people is remarkable)... 阅读全帖
s*******e
发帖数: 1002
14
来自主题: Biology版 - 简单update下我们的抗议活动吧
挺长的。赞
建议把要求再明确点。倒数第二段,我是花了一点精力才找到的,而且他们肯定上来就
看这个。贯穿全文的那些appropriate actions就别说了,没用。删除网页和公开道歉
,能不能放在显眼位置?
他们会认真看的就两处:要求与威胁。其他那些东西,表达气愤和文章分析,有道理就
行,不要太钻牛角尖
威胁可以补充:
As we know by far, some research groups in China are already considering
submitting their recent articles to other publications such as Science
instead of Nature, since their group leaders feel "disappointment" about
this article, which may reflect the scientifc character of Nature group was
not as high as they expected...

文章
w******e
发帖数: 83
15
来自主题: Biology版 - Scientifc Reports Really Sucks!
The entire publishing procedure is terrible and cumbersome. The in-house
editors are lazy, irresponsible,...The initial quality screening is absurd.
One reference formality error could delay the next step by a few weeks.
After a few times, I cannot tolerate any more.
I strongly suggest not submitting manuscripts to this journal, if you cannot
wait for at least 3-4 months.
w******e
发帖数: 83
16
来自主题: Biology版 - Scientifc Reports Really Sucks!
以前从没试过open access, 上当后悔极了。发现钱收得多的,编辑和杂志的职业素养
越差。还是喜欢ACS和RSC的杂志。

.
cannot
s******y
发帖数: 28562
17
来自主题: Biology版 - Scientifc Reports Really Sucks!
一直好奇Nature Publish Group 为什么要抢注这个杂志名字,简直就是故意给
Science 下眼药。

.
cannot
t*******w
发帖数: 107
18
来自主题: Biology版 - Scientifc Reports Really Sucks!
又回到原来的话题上来了,eLife真是一个好杂志
至少投稿系统好
w******e
发帖数: 83
19
来自主题: Biology版 - Scientifc Reports Really Sucks!
没有用过!用过中scholar one最棒!Nature那个系统真TMD的差。
F*Q
发帖数: 3259
20
来自主题: Biology版 - Scientifc Reports Really Sucks!
我的经历是该杂志编辑部让作者要求回避的审稿人审稿,审稿意见和在其它两个不同杂
志拒稿的审稿人的意见相似度达到90%,很明显在那三个杂志拒稿的是同一个人。一方
面,那个人就是具有剽窃嫌疑的人。另一方面,那个人又是所有三个杂志的审稿编辑或
编委。
[在 wuyanzhe (唔言) 的大作中提到:]
:The entire publishing procedure is terrible and cumbersome. The in-house
:editors are lazy, irresponsible,...The initial quality screening is absurd
. One reference formality error could delay the next step by a few weeks.
:...........
(共0页)