由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Biology版 - 帮忙看看如何处理这两个reviewer的意见?
相关主题
Question about manuscriptClinical Cancer Research被reject求助
Review a manuscipt for the PIEditor这是啥意思?
投了pnas,有点紧张为啥不是双向匿名审稿?
Nueron 和nature neurosice,对稿件有什么倾向。请教署名问题
周末大牛们都来聊聊各自投C/N/S和高端子刊的经历吧?Review了两个月,还是没消息,这种情况怎么办?
投稿Hepatology,under review 快80天了,怎么回事?发过cell stem cell 或者cell子刊的请进入以及其他的 请进
请教:我该去争取吗?说说我的失败的投稿经历吧 Nature子刊 顺便听听大家建议,thanks!
关于review paperReview小郁闷了把,editor居然没等到审稿意见返回就决定文章发表与否?
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: reviewer话题: however话题: journal话题: novelty
进入Biology版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
m********r
发帖数: 124
1
国内读硕士期间的一些工作,整理了下投了一个杂志被拒了,又投了一个,也被拒了,
但是这次两个reviewer的意见似乎不一样啊:
1)The study appears to have been well performed and the work is suitable for
publication. However, the paper as it stands is quite difficult to follow
and lacks some necessary information. It would benefit from a substantial
restructuring to present the problems in such a way that a reader can easily
follow what was done...
2) They(我们) established a complex novel approach for … . They analyzed …
by sophisticated analytical methods resulting in a complex set of figures.
However, this reviewer is afraid that in the end there is not much new
information in this report. In summary, the manuscript in its present form
cannot be recommended for publication in .... There is no significant new
information in the paper.
像这种情况还有必要照着第一个的改再投一次这个Journal吗?我觉得再换个
journal吧,但是国内的老板让我照着第一个提的建议给改了,也回答了第二个提出的
疑问,再试着投这个。大家觉得有这个必要吗?谢谢大家!
h*******o
发帖数: 4884
2
My opinion,
the first one is a language issue. And the reviewer is quite positive.
The 2nd reviewer is killing the manuscript. Lack of novelty is usually
unsalvageable....
Good luck

for
easily
.

【在 m********r 的大作中提到】
: 国内读硕士期间的一些工作,整理了下投了一个杂志被拒了,又投了一个,也被拒了,
: 但是这次两个reviewer的意见似乎不一样啊:
: 1)The study appears to have been well performed and the work is suitable for
: publication. However, the paper as it stands is quite difficult to follow
: and lacks some necessary information. It would benefit from a substantial
: restructuring to present the problems in such a way that a reader can easily
: follow what was done...
: 2) They(我们) established a complex novel approach for … . They analyzed …
: by sophisticated analytical methods resulting in a complex set of figures.
: However, this reviewer is afraid that in the end there is not much new

h*******n
发帖数: 2052
3
Maybe the reviewer #2 just doesn't understand the novelty of the paper. In
the revision, you can stress the novelty.
C*****h
发帖数: 926
4
把你们的文章尽量简单明了化,同时要重点突出你们的新发现和贡献。

for
easily
.

【在 m********r 的大作中提到】
: 国内读硕士期间的一些工作,整理了下投了一个杂志被拒了,又投了一个,也被拒了,
: 但是这次两个reviewer的意见似乎不一样啊:
: 1)The study appears to have been well performed and the work is suitable for
: publication. However, the paper as it stands is quite difficult to follow
: and lacks some necessary information. It would benefit from a substantial
: restructuring to present the problems in such a way that a reader can easily
: follow what was done...
: 2) They(我们) established a complex novel approach for … . They analyzed …
: by sophisticated analytical methods resulting in a complex set of figures.
: However, this reviewer is afraid that in the end there is not much new

O******e
发帖数: 4845
5
第一个就是让你们把文章的写作提高一下;对于第二个,你们应该根据他的具体的意见
逐个解释或回应,看他第二轮反应如何。

for
easily
.

【在 m********r 的大作中提到】
: 国内读硕士期间的一些工作,整理了下投了一个杂志被拒了,又投了一个,也被拒了,
: 但是这次两个reviewer的意见似乎不一样啊:
: 1)The study appears to have been well performed and the work is suitable for
: publication. However, the paper as it stands is quite difficult to follow
: and lacks some necessary information. It would benefit from a substantial
: restructuring to present the problems in such a way that a reader can easily
: follow what was done...
: 2) They(我们) established a complex novel approach for … . They analyzed …
: by sophisticated analytical methods resulting in a complex set of figures.
: However, this reviewer is afraid that in the end there is not much new

F******p
发帖数: 2099
6
第一个认为你们晦涩难懂,但是过程和结果是可信的。第二个认为你们不仅晦涩难懂,
而且故弄玄虚,结果不过尔尔。
其实reviewer的main point是很positive的,都认为你们的数据支持结论,这是发表
paper的基本条件。但是story flow是horrible,连很nice的reviewer#1都不忍卒读,
reviewer#2费老半天劲才读通,大发牢骚。
1 (共1页)
进入Biology版参与讨论
相关主题
Review小郁闷了把,editor居然没等到审稿意见返回就决定文章发表与否?周末大牛们都来聊聊各自投C/N/S和高端子刊的经历吧?
Re: Please give me some suggestions投稿Hepatology,under review 快80天了,怎么回事?
Nature review以后被拒rebattle的希望大吗?请教:我该去争取吗?
回reviewer的信怎么写关于review paper
Question about manuscriptClinical Cancer Research被reject求助
Review a manuscipt for the PIEditor这是啥意思?
投了pnas,有点紧张为啥不是双向匿名审稿?
Nueron 和nature neurosice,对稿件有什么倾向。请教署名问题
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: reviewer话题: however话题: journal话题: novelty