r******8 发帖数: 204 | 1
是不是不同的section啊?既然没戏传上去有什么意义啊? |
|
H***N 发帖数: 79 | 2 不同地域分配 还是有可能的
FUNDING是按地域分配 |
|
|
f*******7 发帖数: 1019 | 4 This is automated JIT request. Meaning nothing.. |
|
l********n 发帖数: 62 | 5 What do you mean by less than 40? If your score is between 30% and 39%, the
chance to be funded is very slim. There are two scenarios here:
If you applied for an RFA, you may have a chance as the selection is made by
the rank of impact scores among all the applications to the particular RFA
(瘸子里面选将军).
If you applied for a PA, it is almost out as the decision is made by payline
. The payline is determined by a percentile. If the percentile of an
application is larger than 10%, the application cou... 阅读全帖 |
|
A******y 发帖数: 2041 | 6 Read the instruction for R01. It is an automatic process for grants below
certain percentile (30-40%). If it is your first submission, congratulation
. Read the criticism carefully and respond to everyone of them by evidences
and new experiments, you should get a better score next time and hopefully
get funded. |
|
r******8 发帖数: 204 | 7 RT,据说可以hold一段时间,想启动的时候再启动。如果这样是不是晚一点启动更好一
些呢? |
|
l********n 发帖数: 62 | 8 If I were you, I would not hold it unless you have strong reasons. Otherwise
, you will have a bad image at the NIH, especially, your grant officer. |
|
A******y 发帖数: 2041 | 9 Never do that. You only answer to PO is YES and YES...No can mean that you
won't get the grant because NIH doesn't have to fund you regardless your
score and that's why counsel meeting exist. |
|
|
r******8 发帖数: 204 | 11 THANKS FOR Your SuggestionS. Never say no to NIH...:)
you |
|
d*********g 发帖数: 286 | 12 兄弟有一个类似的问题,现在有一个R21得分不错,有很大希望能拿得下来,2月的
council meeting。同时又准备申请另一个TRANING grant(非NIH,完全不同的AIM和病
人,明年7月启动),但是那个FOUNDATION规定在得到他们家的grant时其他FUNDING不
能超过10万/年。
现在问题是能否请求PO宽限几个月?等我拿到那个foundation的项目后再启动R21?否则
损失几十万多可惜啊,这年头搞点钱多不容易啊。 |
|
l********n 发帖数: 62 | 13 If you are quite sure that there is no scientific link between the two, you'
d better talk to your NIH grant officer first and get advice from her (
better to call her/him first). Based on my experience, the NIH grant
officers are very nice and considerate.
Good luck, |
|
d*********g 发帖数: 286 | 14 谢谢!FOUNDATION的结果5月底会知道。NIH的PO是位慈祥的大妈,希望能说得通,呵呵。
you' |
|
|
|
F*********m 发帖数: 123 | 17 比如说如果新的AP在博后期间拿过NIH training grant (包括K01或者K99),在成为
独立AP之后,申请RO1时候是否还能够享受优惠打分松一点以及payline高一点的优惠政
策? |
|
|
s*******2 发帖数: 598 | 19 发信人: s19990602 (s19990602), 信区: Returnee
标 题: 老友47岁,美国公民,海归成为学院常务副院长
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat Jan 4 22:37:14 2014, 美东)
这位老朋友在美国带11年,现在一个人海归,太太和孩子留在美国。孩子读大学了。
问为何海归,申请课题太累。唯一的RO1 马上到期,研究所可能让他下岗。
正好回去找了学院常务副院长的岗位。
人生无常啊。 |
|
T**********y 发帖数: 559 | 20 尼玛这老板当的也太双了,RO1都手下写,而且10天交货。考,,,那要这个老板干蛤
呢 |
|
w***o 发帖数: 151 | 21 is it more like verbal version of NIH RO1?
Thanks a lot. |
|
h*****w 发帖数: 8561 | 22 RO1还是比CAREER有说服力得多,钱也多得多. |
|
a********a 发帖数: 440 | 23 也没花多少还不到一半,顶多也就60%,后面就不会花这么多了,这学校生怕他们那几
个钱被糟蹋了
这才刚开始没几天,就一个劲儿的催着拿grant,靠,不就个RO1么,有个两三年混也混
到了,急个鸟
系里这帮货,催催催,我要一年一两个米,以后不得骑在他们头上拉屎啊 |
|
q******g 发帖数: 390 | 24 据说第一次拿ro1的平均年龄是43还是多少。
这哥们应该远超平均值。 |
|
h*****w 发帖数: 8561 | 25 老兄取笑了,你在牛校,学生好带,做的东西出来了总能申到钱的,而且说不定学生自己带
钱都可以,我手下目前就一个学生管用,其他我得替他们干活还得哄着,生源太差没办法啊
看你的签名目标是RO1,这个我都不敢投的... |
|
h*****w 发帖数: 8561 | 26 我主要是输不起了,毕业8年才找到目前的位置,T不了就没机会从头再来了.
另外版上大牛太多,老李虎肉等偶像就不用说了,胖老师和我同时开始,人家已经有RO1了
,而且他还很着急在搞第二个么. |
|
A******y 发帖数: 2041 | 27 My question: If they don't give you tenure, why do you want to move? If it
is not possible, just ask to have the expedited tenure written in the offer
. Paper means little, what are your two grants? RO1s? |
|
l********g 发帖数: 400 | 28 If you are new investigators, you apply for R21 that is not
an RFA stating for new investigators, you are likely an idiot.
我不是 new investigator,尽管我也申请 R21,我没资格被你称为 idiot.
R21s are for establish investigators and are harder to get.
请教一下, 既然 R21 更难拿, 为何establish investigator 就应该申请 R21?
Does your institute hired retired NIH POs to teach you on grantsmanship, you
should go ask him/her.
并不是每个学校都有 retired NIH PO,他们不是照样拿 RO1,R21, 也不一定比你们拿得
少. 有问题我们都是去问还没有 retired NIH PO.
not |
|
T**********y 发帖数: 559 | 29 我发几句言,最近刚中了个R21, 应该具有借鉴意义:
1. University scientist能否申请R21, to my understanding, NIH does not care
much, as long as your institution likes to define you as an Principal
Investigator Role or Status (PI), which will allow you to create an account
in eRA. This is the first of all. Certainly, your background and experience
will be judged by study section, which will impact your final score.
2. 就R01和R21那个难;我在申请的时候听到了太多这样的argue, 搞得我当时都晕了。
个人总结:这个问题很难统一回答,取决于申请人的职位/状态。
If you are already independent and... 阅读全帖 |
|
l********g 发帖数: 400 | 30 赞!
个人总结:这个问题很难统一回答,取决于申请人的职位/状态。
If you are already independent and have your own lab, then for sure, go with
RO1, definitely not R21; but if you are not totally independent yet, for
example, research scientist/staff scientist/RAP in a big lab, I would think
R21 could be a good choice. 当然前提还是你的proposal要一样的competitive. 原
因有:1) R21 applicant pool is different; 虽然说是R21面对established PI, 但
实际上大部分PI还是不申请R21的,起码我们领域是这样;2)for current funding
climate, study section和说过,很难想象把一个5年的>1 million grant给一个还没
完全独... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
f*******h 发帖数: 1269 | 32 eRA Commons可以看到panel date. Panel date过后很快就可以看到了。 |
|
e**********m 发帖数: 397 | 33 我这边20-21号的study section,21号分数就在commons了 |
|
s******y 发帖数: 28562 | 34 去年因为有那个政府关门的闹剧,很多工作都被推迟了,我的猜测应该是在下个月出成
绩。 |
|
|
h****u 发帖数: 618 | 36 请问政府关门的时候应该review的proposal会和11月交的proposal一起在2月review吗
? 如果是这样, payline 会变化吗?多谢! |
|
|
h*****w 发帖数: 8561 | 38 %是多少?
99%没问题了,NIGMS相当NICE的.
恭喜并沾喜气. |
|
f*******7 发帖数: 1019 | 39 impact score 21, percentile至少是lower teen了,又是NI/ESI,应该没有问题了 |
|
|
|
l********u 发帖数: 82 | 42 percentile 5-6.0%.
what is the fundable range for NIGMS in last year? |
|
|
|
|
f*******7 发帖数: 1019 | 46 1年半就拿到R01, 版上的记录了吧, 至少和sunnyday有一拼了 |
|
|
l********u 发帖数: 82 | 48 谢谢大家的鼓励了!从这个版还是学到了很多,特别是sunnyday以及其他的牛人, 很庆
幸第一次投有positive的回馈!至少可以喘口气了,否则实
验室钱到明年就入不敷出了。 |
|
P******3 发帖数: 244 | 49 percentile 6.0%
这是冉冉升起的牛牛啊 |
|
e**********m 发帖数: 397 | 50 谁能给解释下impact score也是21,为啥percentile比6大2-3倍,也是在NIGMS。怎么
回事儿啊? |
|