j******9
发帖数: 73 | 1 My view is simple: why do we need a government? Because as a society we do
have public affairs.
Small government. Limited government. The key is to limit affairs as
private as possible.
So, what should be public affairs?
If you ask me, I would say it is not policing. It is not educating. It us
not even defence.
It is money. In practice, it is a public thing. In theory, it is as well.
I am not saying money has to be. No. You don't have to have any public
affairs.
I am saying Money is the No. 1... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
T*********I
发帖数: 10729 | 3 "tends to suggest purposeful discrimination"
这还不是想当然给检方定罪？
从你贴出的若干点，我看到的是鸡蛋里面挑骨头。看看高院碰到黑人种族就放大镜找裂
痕，一定要找到全方位各个角度都对黑人有利，实在让人难以服众。这不是人民的法院
，是黑人的法院。
Justice THOMAS的dissent
we do not know who wrote most of the notes that Foster now relies
upon as proof of the prosecutors’ ra
ce-based motivations. We do know, however, that both pr
osecutors averred that theydid not make any of the highlighted
marks on the jury venire list” and “did not instruct anyone to make the
green 。。... 阅读全帖 |
|
a*******1
发帖数: 1554 | 4 WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday rejected a challenge to a race-
conscious admissions program at the University of Texas at Austin, handing
supporters of affirmative action a major victory.
The decision, Fisher v. University of Texas, No. 14-981, concerned an
unusual program and contained a warning to other universities that not all
affirmative action programs will pass constitutional muster. But the ruling
’s basic message was that admissions officials may continue to consider
race as... 阅读全帖 |
|
发帖数: 1 | 5 在周四，最高法院以4:3的投票结果宣布了原告Fisher的败诉，为各大学在招生录取中
考虑种族因素也就是大搞种族歧视敞开了大门。消息传出，华人震惊失望，抗议声讨之
声不绝。笔者在前面有关文章中表示，这意味着我们华人追求平等的努力宣告遭遇大挫
败！所谓“多元化”，最高法院从投票上否认了是思想的多元化，而是种族肤色的多元
化。对最高法院有较深入研究的朋友叶帆更是写下了令人感叹的悲伤文字：我们输掉了
Fisher案，十三年来的诉讼，一代人的努力付诸东流。斯卡利亚的死导致了肯尼迪大法
官和自由派大法官在Bakke和Grutter之后第三次确认了这一扭曲的法学逻辑，如果斯卡
利亚没有死的话，至少4:4的结果不会确立一个全国性Binding的判例法，而这一次，保
守派的雄狮沉默了。我个人相当程度地参与了这个诉讼，寄予了如此多的希望，but
all lost in vain。斯卡利亚大法官的过世和Fisher的判决也是我个人情感的分水岭，
这个国家已经不是我十七年前来到的国家了；不再是那个“not be judged by the
color of their skin but by the con... 阅读全帖 |
|
f*****n
发帖数: 12752 | 6 显然，我们谈论控制堕胎是否违宪，要在以上框架上谈。胚胎成活与否的影响是很大的
。本案的关键，在于针对的人群和（如果针对pre-viability情况）是否牵涉到undue
burden。不是所有burden都undue，听老王转述dissent的意思，有相关前例判决，因此
，在充分分析现在这个规定有没有造成undue burden的基础上，要因循旧例。
一个基本原则：法院系统是解释法律，不应该追求把法律“变好” |
|
|
l********k
发帖数: 14844 | 8 因为除了巴马手里的国家机器和主流媒体，谁也不具有掌握全局信息的能力。正如戈培
尔所说：
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually
come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the
State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military
consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to
use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy
of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the
State.” |
|
g********2
发帖数: 6571 | 9 Trump's Colorful Campaign: A Solid, Granite Pathway to 270
Arthur Schaper
|
Posted: Sep 22, 2016 12:01 AM
Donald Trump-mentum is steam-rolling Hillary Clinton across the country.
The third-party candidates are dragging down her already bedraggled chances.
Her coughing fits, her unsure (or rather non-existent) relationship with
facts, truth, and anything else pertaining to reality have harmed her
already marred image.
Clinton could be heading to the Big House before she sets foot in the White
Hou... 阅读全帖 |
|
e****l
发帖数: 3319 | 10 哈哈，又一个看不懂英文的装逼饭。川粉啊，怎么说你们呢？黑的白的都能弄反。哈哈
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Johnson_Field
Early in his career, Field wrote opinions against California's laws
discriminating against the Chinese immigrants to that state.[10] Serving as
an individual jurist in district court, he notably struck down the so-called
'Pigtail Ordinance' in 1879, which was regarded as discriminating against
Chinese, making him unpopular with the Californian public. However, as a
member of the U.S. Supreme Court, he penn... 阅读全帖 |
|
发帖数: 1 | 11 发信人: entdel (Del), 信区: USANews
标 题: Re: 拉稀莉居然打算将奥巴马提名大法官
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Oct 12 03:11:36 2016, 美东)
哈哈，又一个看不懂英文的装逼饭。川粉啊，怎么说你们呢？黑的白的都能弄反。哈哈
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Johnson_Field
Early in his career, Field wrote opinions against California's laws
discriminating against the Chinese immigrants to that state.[10] Serving as
an individual jurist in district court, he notably struck down the so-called
'Pigtail Ordinance' in 1879, which was regarded as discriminating against
Chinese, m... 阅读全帖 |
|
z******7
发帖数: 772 | 12 哎呀妈妈这个厉害了
In this paradigm, I am "deplorable" because I dare to have a dissenting
opinion.
有理有据 |
|
f**********n
发帖数: 29853 | 13 【 以下文字转载自 USChineseRight 俱乐部 】
发信人: fishingarden (Edward Blum门下老王), 信区: USChineseRight
标 题: 立此存照，某id其实真看不懂英文的物证 (转载)
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Oct 12 07:01:54 2016, 美东)
【 以下文字转载自 USANews 讨论区 】
发信人: ZhongXiang (挺紧), 信区: USANews
标 题: 立此存照，某id其实真看不懂英文的物证
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Oct 12 03:18:39 2016, 美东)
发信人: entdel (Del), 信区: USANews
标 题: Re: 拉稀莉居然打算将奥巴马提名大法官
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Oct 12 03:11:36 2016, 美东)
哈哈，又一个看不懂英文的装逼饭。川粉啊，怎么说你们呢？黑的白的都能弄反。哈哈
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Johnson_Field
Early in hi... 阅读全帖 |
|
z****z
发帖数: 2054 | 14 对了解alt-right应该有帮助.
An Establishment Conservative’s Guide To The Alt-Right
by Allum Bokhari & Milo Yiannopoulos29 Mar 20164584
A specter is haunting the dinner parties, fundraisers and think-tanks of the
Establishment: the specter of the “alternative right.” Young, creative
and eager to commit secular heresies, they have become public enemy number
one to beltway conservatives — more hated, even, than Democrats or loopy
progressives.
The alternative right, more commonly known as the alt-right, is ... 阅读全帖 |
|
T**********e
发帖数: 29576 | 15
有说法真扣宪法文字，选举人怎么投是随意。
必须按州普选票投，是州法规定。
几十年前有官司打到高法，高法认同州法。
但按宪法，选举人如何投真没规定。
In 1952, the constitutionality of state pledge laws was brought before the
Supreme Court in Ray v. Blair, 343 U.S. 214 (1952). The Court ruled in favor
of state laws requiring electors to pledge to vote for the winning
candidate, as well as removing electors who refuse to pledge. As stated in
the ruling, electors are acting as a functionary of the state, not the
federal government. Therefore, states have the right to gove... 阅读全帖 |
|
l*****y
发帖数: 4887 | 16 首先，那些年保守不保守不是现在这么分的，republican都是激进的废奴者，所以才出
了林肯那样的总统。。。那个时候的民主党和共和党和现在的意识形态差别是巨大的。
。。所以直到JFK之前，南方都是民主党的票仓。。。
Dred Scott v. Sandford本身发生在1857年，Republican这个党基本还在草创期，
dissent的两个大法官，也是两三年前才加入的Republican，基本上那个时代，不能用
republican与否来看是否保守主义。
所谓的保守主义，本身是一种反对激进社会改变的意识形态，所以如果以现在的分法来
看，当时积极废奴，宁愿打仗也要激进改变社会组织形式的republican都不是保守主义
者。他们当时积极推进美国现代化，如果当年有bbs，这些就是左逼，他们支持者基本
也都在北方新英格兰等地区。（讲白了，按照当时人的观念，给黑人公民权，基本上和
现代的左派高喊要给变性人结婚权，领养娃权，上厕所权等各种权利一样，是没有道理
的傻叉行为）
其次，Scalia绝对算是保守的大法官，最保守的两人之一也是肯定的，他既然是
originalist，当然就是保守派。... 阅读全帖 |
|
f**********n
发帖数: 29853 | 17 你这篇连接主要是讲作者猜测斯加利亚的原旨主义方法和布朗案的判决有可能冲突。
这篇连接讲到报纸记者断章取义，欠斯佳丽一个道歉。
https://balkin.blogspot.com/2009/10/justice-scalia-comes-clean-on-brown-v.
html?m=1
As I suspected, Justice Scalia didnotsay he would have dissented in
Brown v. Board of Education in 1954. Thenewspaper accountis
incorrect and took his remarks out of context. The author of the article,
Howard Fischer of Capitol Media Services, owes Justice Scalia an apology.
我相信，从来不会有人怀疑四位保守派大法官罗伯特，阿里拖，托马斯和斯加利亚对待
AA的态度。 |
|
S******n
发帖数: 77 | 18 Beijing (AFP) – One of China’s most popular online communities for Muslims
has been shuttered after posting a petition asking Chinese President Xi
Jinping to stop his “brutal suppression” of activists, the letter’s
authors told AFP Wednesday.
Since 2003, the “Zhongmu Wang” website, or 2muslim.com, functioned as an
“online network of Muslims sharing Islam”, according to archived
descriptions.
But as of Wednesday the site was inaccessible, showing only a message
stating it was “under maintenance”... 阅读全帖 |
|
f**********n
发帖数: 29853 | 19 俺来贴一段逝世的大法官斯佳丽亚在判同性恋的反对观点吧。这里面提到了福音派没有
一个大法官，而福音派占四分之一美国人口。
Scalia noted that “the Federal Judiciary is hardly a cross-section of
America.”
“Take, for example, this Court,” he said, “which consists of only nine
men and women, all of them successful lawyers who studied at Harvard or Yale
Law School. Four of the nine are natives of New York City. Eight of them
grew up in east-and west-coast States. Only one hails from the vast expanse
in-between.”
Scalia then observed that not “a single evangelica... 阅读全帖 |
|
T**********e
发帖数: 29576 | 20 "Aware of" dissent from State Dept over immigration order, but "get with the
program or they can go," Spicer says. It's about US safety. |
|
b********n
发帖数: 38600 | 21 This is all terrifying. It's as if the United States is rapidly changing
into Argentina.
The White House wants no dissent? They want absolutely authority? In other
words they do not want democracy.
It's terrifying. |
|
发帖数: 1 | 22 这么烂的英语为啥要贴好几遍
: This is all terrifying. It's as if the United States is rapidly
changing
: into Argentina.
: The White House wants no dissent? They want absolutely authority? In
other
: words they do not want democracy.
: It's terrifying.
|
|
b********n
发帖数: 38600 | 23 Dissent is patriotic. This is a democracy. |
|
b********n
发帖数: 38600 | 24 This is all terrifying. It's as if the United States is rapidly changing
into Argentina.
The White House wants no dissent? They want absolutely authority? In other
words they do not want democracy.
It's terrifying. |
|
a*****1
发帖数: 3817 | 25 自己去看美国宪法
United States Constitution
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
United States Constitution
Constitution of the United States, page 1.jpg
Page one of the original copy of the Constitution
Created
September 17, 1787
Ratified
June 21, 1788
Date effective
March 4, 1789; 227 years ago
Location
National Archives,
Washington, D.C.
Author(s)
Philadelphia Convention
Signatories
39 of the 55 delegates
Purpose
To replace the Articles of Confederation (177... 阅读全帖 |
|
a*****1
发帖数: 3817 | 26 自己去看美国宪法
United States Constitution
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
United States Constitution
Constitution of the United States, page 1.jpg
Page one of the original copy of the Constitution
Created
September 17, 1787
Ratified
June 21, 1788
Date effective
March 4, 1789; 227 years ago
Location
National Archives,
Washington, D.C.
Author(s)
Philadelphia Convention
Signatories
39 of the 55 delegates
Purpose
To replace the Articles of Confederation (177... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
f********8
发帖数: 5601 | 28 希望是。另外，Scalia写dissent那是一绝。逻辑和思辨的缜密，连左逼都折服。 |
|
f**********n
发帖数: 29853 | 29 俺举俩例子。来强调一下美国宪政里的三权分立和联邦制度的重要性。民主要好，共和
也好，都是希望政权体现人民的意志。而大家都明白，简单多数不能保护少数人利益。
第一，高院同性恋结婚案，四位保守派大法官反对。罗伯特认为啥叫结婚应该由人民立
法决定。这是保守派对三权分立的维护
"Understand well what this dissent is about: It is not about whether, in my
judgment, the institution of marriage should be changed to include same-sex
couples. It is instead about whether, in our democratic republic, that
decision should rest with the people acting through their elected
representatives, or with five lawyers who happen to hold commissions
authori... 阅读全帖 |
|
f**********n
发帖数: 29853 | 30 TheWashington PostPublishes the Worst Analysis Yet of Neil Gorsuch’
s Confirmation Fight
byEdward BlumApril 5, 2017 3:30 PM
The prize for the worst analysis to date about the confirmation of Judge
Neil Gorsuch to the U.S. Supreme Court should be awarded to Professor
Richard Hasen of the University of California–Irvine Law School. Professor
Hasen’s evolution from a serious legal scholar to a partisan mudslinger is
now sadly complete.
That is the only conclusion to be drawn from his April 2Washing... 阅读全帖 |
|
f**********n
发帖数: 29853 | 31 同意，这个判例Graham v. Florida就是左派思想的典型。
左派大法官认为认为给没杀人的未成年人罪犯关到死违反宪法，听着似乎有道理，然而
托马斯大法官是这么说的
I am unwilling to assume that we, as members of this Court, are any more
capable of making such moral judgments than our fellow citizens. Nothing in
our training as judges qualifies us for that task, and nothing in Article
III gives us that authority.
I respectfully dissent. |
|
h****r
发帖数: 258 | 32 Inside the Left’s Plans to Occupy Trump
Veterans of Occupy Wall Street are dusting off an old protest tactic for a
new era.
NEW YORK — One week after Charlottesville, “the Resistance” is planning
its next move. Members of a group calling itself “Refuse Fascism” met in
five cities around the country on Saturday with the intent to plan and
organize nationwide demonstrations later this year. Their goal, according to
Eva Sahana, a 22 year-old organizer, is simply to “drive out the Trump and
Pence fa... 阅读全帖 |
|
d********f
发帖数: 43471 | 33 全仓solar了，去年花了几百万帮助好多州里的ag竞选
In July 2016, the Energy & Environment Legal Institute, a non-profit
watchdog group, released a report titled “Buying the Democrat Party Lock,
Stock and Barrel,” which details how Steyer “is seeking to protect his
solar energy investments by spending tens of millions of dollars on key 2016
races, buying a plank in the 2016 Democrat platform, and trying to silence
debate from those who challenge his view on ‘climate change’ by using
select attorneys general to prosecut... 阅读全帖 |
|
发帖数: 1 | 34 全球变暖是20世纪骗钱大骗局
链接：https://www.zhihu.com/question/19595131/answer/62798366
来源：知乎
著作权归作者所有。商业转载请联系作者获得授权，非商业转载请注明出处。
2014年止，已经有1000多名科学家联名反对全球气候变暖论，其中包括1998年诺贝尔物
理奖得主、斯坦福大学教授Robert Laughlin，Robert Laughlin认为:“气候变化不是
人力可以控制的，地球也不会在意政府有什么想法。根据目前的天气报告，找不到任何
全球气候变暖的证据。气候变化是地质时间尺度的现象，是地球运行的自然规律，不需
要任何人批准也不必向任何人解释”。NASA高级科学家Weinstein 说：“任何合理的科
学分析都会得出结论，（全球气候变暖依据的）基本理论是错的”。化学家 Mary
Mumper表示：“我也是环境保护主义者，但我必须反对Al Gore的观点”。巴西地质学
家Lino 批评说：“把数千亿的钱浪费在这个没有事实依据的人为杜撰的全球气候变暖
论上毫无价值”。 以下为《赛先生》原文。链接：为二氧化碳平反 -- 赛先生... 阅读全帖 |
|
f**********n
发帖数: 29853 | 35 俺看这个伯克利法学院教授的支持工会的帖子有点犯糊涂了。丫说，
if it violates the First Amendment right of a nonmember to be compelled to
pay fees to the union that is required by law to provide representation
services, it equally violates the rights of the union and its members to
require them to use their money to speak on behalf of the nonpayer. But
neither the dissenting fee payer nor the union should have a First Amendment
claim.
俺就不明白了，俺要求的正是你别收俺的钱，因为你说的话我不爱听。这教授居然能胡
搅为，我收你钱说话，也许我还不愿意呢，我没抱怨所以你也不要抱怨。
这孙子是流氓。
http://www.sc... 阅读全帖 |
|
f**********n
发帖数: 29853 | 36 先来背景介绍，Obergefell v.Hodges案合法化了同性恋婚姻，投票结果五比四，
伪保守派大法官肯尼迪投了关键的赞同票。而大法官斯佳丽亚当然是投了反对票。理由
我以前说过无数次了。他认为这个问题应该由人民说了算，而不是让九个混得不错的律
师，即大法官，来替人民做决定，否则这就不是民主制度。
好，回到“人身攻击“的部分，俺估计斯佳丽亚对假模假式自以为是极度自恋的肯尼迪
非常看不起，所以他在反对观点的正文和脚注里嘲讽了投下了关键第五票的肯尼迪。
肯尼迪的观点开头就是 “The Constitution promises liberty to all within its
reach, a liberty that includes certain specific rights that allow persons,
within a lawful realm, to define and express their identity,”
题外话，读者可以拿肯尼迪的这几句话来测试自己是不是保守派，你如果读了觉得热血
沸腾，觉得被说到心坎上，觉得你多年受到的委屈被人理解了... 阅读全帖 |
|
f**********n
发帖数: 29853 | 37 我尽力而为，翻译的不好的地方尽管拍砖。
肯尼迪的观点
“The Constitution promises liberty to all within its
reach, a liberty that includes certain specific rights that allow persons,&#
160;
within a lawful realm, to define and express their identity,”
宪法承诺了给管辖范围内所有人的自由，这个自由包含了允许某些特定的人群在法律允
许范围内定义和表达他们自己身份的权利。
斯佳丽亚的正文反驳，The opinion is couched in a style that is as pretentious
as its content is
egotistic. It is one thing for separate concurring or dissenting opinions to
contain extravagances, even silly extravaga... 阅读全帖 |
|
t**********r
发帖数: 882 | 38 Not necessarily the broadest meaning, though class action lawsuit or class
action arbitration are certainly consistent with the spirit of the NLRA. "
Linguistic and statutory context also matter."
另外，看看RBG的dissenting opinion，还是有些道理的。
还有，你还真当这个就是只对低级劳工有意义？美国这些年，实际的高级劳工越来越少
，实际的低级劳工越来越多。可是从劳工保护的角度，大家都被判为高级劳工。这种判
决不知道有什么好庆祝的？而且从法律的角度还很dubious。 |
|
S*******i
发帖数: 2018 | 39 问的问题是中国作为一个对手你怎么评价。
牛金贵除了对中国有些敌意以外，好像没有什么华裔特别值得警惕的地方呀。在中国南
海建岛是开玩笑吧。
他说的tradition of dissent is very violent, 提到太平天国，说明也读过几本中国
历史。他主要的意思是说中国的军事实力还差美国很远，中国人一旦有异议有反抗了从
历史上看很violent, 所以专制独裁的领导人对异议会坚决压制。现在回国的留学生，
已经尝到自由了，对专制的忍受力是很低的，到时候想走也走不掉了 （ride the
tiger）。 |
|
S*******i
发帖数: 2018 | 40 我觉得他作为中国历史的西方读者，说中国人tradition of dissent is extremely
violent， 所以中国领导人铁腕压制异议。这个看法没什么吧？
我可以理解你引申为他认为中国人很violent, 但我不认为这是他的意思。 |
|
i*****9
发帖数: 3157 | 41 Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote a dissenting opinion
：AA那个除了投票之外有什么拿得出手的判决意见吗？
：这次的反对意见谁持笔？ |
|
t**i
发帖数: 511 | 42 小哥的这段话直接打脸他的前任斯嘉丽了。
The second point I'd make is, it would a mistake to suggest that originalism
turns on the secret intentions of the drafters…The point of originalism...
what a good judge always strives to do, and I think we all do, is strive to
understand what the words on the page mean. Not to import words that come
from us, but apply what you, the people's representatives, the lawmakers,
have done.
And so when it comes to equal protection of the laws, for example, it
matters not a whit tha... 阅读全帖 |
|
T******g
发帖数: 21328 | 43 转：
“這個在加州極左的市長，道出了 Trump 成功的 “真正原因”：
The mayor of Livermore California explains Trump’s popularity and success.
This is perhaps the best explanation for Trump's popularity ....
Marshall Kamena is a registered Democrat and was elected mayor of Livermore,
CA.. He ran on the democratic ticket as he knew a Bay Area city would never
vote for a Republican. He is as conservative as they come. He wrote the
following:
Trump’s 'lack of decorum, dignity, and statesmanship' By Marshall Kamena,
Mayor of Li... 阅读全帖 |
|
e*9
发帖数: 2289 | 44 "semi-automatic rifles are also constitutionally
protected and that D.C.'s ban on them is unconstitutional."
Kavanaugh, who has served on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
since 2006, dissented from a 2011 decision in which a three-judge panel
upheld the District of Columbia's ban on so-called assault weapons and its
requirement that all guns be registered. Kavanaugh disagreed with the
majority's use of "intermediate scrutiny," saying an analysis "based on text
, history, and tradit... 阅读全帖 |
|
发帖数: 1 | 45 没错，他说了，他不认为法律有给予这位非移immediate abortion on demand的权利。
他在dissent中清楚的解释了为什么他这么认为。这些解释，我前面已经提供了，他考
虑了政府transfer非移，与当事人做abortion的权利的平衡。
这与您前面编的那结论可差的远了。
当然，您这种动不动就来句无赖话的主儿，估计也看不懂。。。 |
|
发帖数: 1 | 46 特朗普总统星期四在白宫会见国会议员与主管经济的内阁官员，讨论在国会终审议多年
终于通过的《外国投资风险审查更新法案》（ Foreign Investment Risk Review
Modernization Act， 简称FIRRMA）。国会议员以及政府资深官员都表示，这是为了因
应来自中国的威胁。
特朗普总统8月23号星期四上午会在白宫跟几位国会议员以及内阁官员，讨论已经通过
的《外国投资风险审查更新法案》。该法案要求美国外国投资委员会（CIFIUS）更加严
格审查外资收购美国公司，并对外国投资美国企业提供国家安全评估报告。参加会议的
内阁阁员包括白宫办公厅主任凯利（John Kelly）、财政部长姆努钦（Steven Munchin
）、白宫国家经济委员会主席库德罗（Larry Kudlow），副国家安全顾问里卡迪尔（
Mira Richardel ）等。与会的国会议员包括约翰科宁（John Cornyn）、汤姆卡顿（
Tom Cotton）、鲁比奥（Marco Rubio）等人。
法案主要目的为保护美国科技研发领域的知识和关键技术不会被其他国家借由收购或投
资美国公司而轻易获取... 阅读全帖 |
|
发帖数: 1 | 47 Is China Waiting Us Out?
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/is-china-waiting-us-out/
While the U.S. bombs, Xi Jinping is building—one power play at a time.
By MICHAEL HORTON • October 22, 2018
Michael Hogue
The one constant in recent U.S. foreign policy—regardless of which party
occupies the White House or controls Congress—is that it prioritizes
military intervention, both covert and overt, to advance its interests
overseas. While President Barack Obama vowed to move the U... 阅读全帖 |
|
m**********r
发帖数: 125 | 48 Plyler v. Doe已经判了, equal protection的 jurisdiction适用于非法移民。
而且在那个案子里面majority和dissent都是这个观点，现在再扯jurisdiction估计没
什么戏。
只有 |
|
d******a
发帖数: 32122 | 49 不过，粪坑国家实行出生即公民也挺合理的：一般人不会跑粪坑国家
Unrestricted jus soli
Antigua and Barbuda: Guaranteed by the Constitution.[11][12]
Argentina[11]
Barbados: Guaranteed by the Constitution.[11][13] However, the Barbados
Ministry of Labour & Immigration recently proposed ending automatic
birthright citizenship.[14]
Belize[11][15]
Bolivia[11]
Brazil[11][16] (requires that the foreign parents are not working for their
country's government in Brazil by the time the child is born).
Canada[11][17]
Chad [18][19] (The choi... 阅读全帖 |
|
g********0
发帖数: 6201 | 50 https://bit.ly/2yNUIjg
肯定性行动（Affirmative Action）的内在缺陷
原创： 戈壁老王 舍路新知 昨天
这篇文章是为了回应”低头弄鱼“同学几天前发表在<美国华人>公众号上的一片文章《
我家孩子也被哈佛拒了，但我仍然捍卫AA》。读完之后我提交了一段留言，但不知何故
始终没有出现在留言区。这给了我一些激励让我在留言的基础上详细扩展成这篇文章作
为回应。真理越辩越明，相信读者们自然有自己的判断。
1什么是肯定性行动（Affirmative Action)
Affirmative Action（以下简称AA）最早的使用是在1961年肯尼迪总统的第10925号总
统令，其内容主要包含两点，第一是要求政府不得以种族，信仰，肤色和起源国为由歧
视雇员和申请人，第二是采取肯定性行动以确保政府雇员和政府工作申请人在过程中不
受到以种族，信仰，肤色和起源国为由的歧视。1965年约翰逊总统发布了取代10925号
总统令的11246号总统令，并重申了上述内容。1967年的第11375号总统令把“性别”也
加入了受保护类别。
AA通常被翻译为平权法案，这实际上是不准确的... 阅读全帖 |
|
