由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
USANews版 - Kavanaugh: Semi-automatic rifles are also constitutionally
相关主题
芝加哥和华盛顿放松枪支管制后我会拥有枪但是我支持禁枪
昨晚一个小细节继续贴public opinion
Scalia: Constitution does not protect women against discriminationCO Democratic lawmaker 的胡言乱语
宪法修正案过不过时,不是你说了算。Gingrich: Under Trump, China won't intimidate us
宪法并不关心枪造成的伤害,而这是件好事!Handguns for Self Defense - Better than Sharp Sticks
不能禁枪, 但必须禁攻击性武器对禁枪派的企图还看不清的,读读这一篇 (转载)
手枪 vs 步枪这个Adam Lanza的案情有不正常的地方 (转载)
from the owner of LavabitA gay judge overruled California anti-gay marriage prop 8
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: semi话题: automatic话题: rifles话题: kavanaugh
进入USANews版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
e*9
发帖数: 2289
1
"semi-automatic rifles are also constitutionally
protected and that D.C.'s ban on them is unconstitutional."
Kavanaugh, who has served on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
since 2006, dissented from a 2011 decision in which a three-judge panel
upheld the District of Columbia's ban on so-called assault weapons and its
requirement that all guns be registered. Kavanaugh disagreed with the
majority's use of "intermediate scrutiny," saying an analysis "based on text
, history, and tradition" is more consistent with the Supreme Court's Second
Amendment precedents.
The D.C. "assault weapon" ban covers a list of specific models as well as
guns that meet certain criteria. A semi-automatic rifle that accepts a
detachable magazine is illegal, for instance, if it has any of six
prohibited features, including an adjustable stock, a pistol grip, or a
flash suppressor. "The list appears to be haphazard," Kavanaugh noted. "It
bans certain semi-automatic rifles but not others—with no particular
explanation or rationale for why some made the list and some did not." In
any case, he concluded, the law is inconsistent with the landmark 2008 case
District of Columbia v. Heller.
"In Heller," Kavanaugh noted, "the Supreme Court held that handguns—the
vast majority of which today are semi-automatic—are constitutionally
protected because they have not traditionally been banned and are in common
use by law-abiding citizens. There is no meaningful or persuasive
constitutional distinction between semi-automatic handguns and semi-
automatic rifles. Semi-automatic rifles, like semi-automatic handguns, have
not traditionally been banned and are in common use by law-abiding citizens
for self-defense in the home, hunting, and other lawful uses. Moreover, semi
-automatic handguns are used in connection with violent crimes far more than
semi-automatic rifles are. It follows from Heller's protection of semi-
automatic handguns that semi-automatic rifles are also constitutionally
protected and that D.C.'s ban on them is unconstitutional."
f*******y
发帖数: 470
2
not bad

Circuit
text
Second

【在 e*9 的大作中提到】
: "semi-automatic rifles are also constitutionally
: protected and that D.C.'s ban on them is unconstitutional."
: Kavanaugh, who has served on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
: since 2006, dissented from a 2011 decision in which a three-judge panel
: upheld the District of Columbia's ban on so-called assault weapons and its
: requirement that all guns be registered. Kavanaugh disagreed with the
: majority's use of "intermediate scrutiny," saying an analysis "based on text
: , history, and tradition" is more consistent with the Supreme Court's Second
: Amendment precedents.
: The D.C. "assault weapon" ban covers a list of specific models as well as

1 (共1页)
进入USANews版参与讨论
相关主题
A gay judge overruled California anti-gay marriage prop 8宪法并不关心枪造成的伤害,而这是件好事!
八马大师到底有没有出生证明,哪位藕粉催催?不能禁枪, 但必须禁攻击性武器
LEGAL AUTHORITIES—CONSTITUTIONAL BASIS OF MANDATORY VACCINATIO手枪 vs 步枪
民猪党老黑众议员说美国宪法有400年了from the owner of Lavabit
芝加哥和华盛顿放松枪支管制后我会拥有枪但是我支持禁枪
昨晚一个小细节继续贴public opinion
Scalia: Constitution does not protect women against discriminationCO Democratic lawmaker 的胡言乱语
宪法修正案过不过时,不是你说了算。Gingrich: Under Trump, China won't intimidate us
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: semi话题: automatic话题: rifles话题: kavanaugh