i**p
发帖数: 902 | 1 So far no arguement that B得是A的子类或孙子类....
But can "the part" be interpreted as inherence? |
|
h****r
发帖数: 2056 | 2 其实你老也不用多想，实际上相当一部分老江湖思想里还是受过时的ATM的影响，未得
TCP/IP的精髓，这不是我的理解有问题。你老开始先说平均1k，看完我说的后再提不小
于10M，这个属于有点揣摩robert的原意了，更可能的事他自己都没想清楚，我们在这
里arguing for the sake of arguement没有意义。
Robert做没做过没有问题，这个我相信，看得出来他显然碰到了一些瓶颈，不得不用一
些bypass，但做到啥程度是个问题。做到发文章的程度不难，做到通用实用的程度就是
另一回事了。 |
|
h****r
发帖数: 2056 | 3 其实你老也不用多想，实际上相当一部分老江湖思想里还是受过时的ATM的影响，未得
TCP/IP的精髓，这不是我的理解有问题。你老开始先说平均1k，看完我说的后再提不小
于10M，这个属于有点揣摩robert的原意了，更可能的事他自己都没想清楚，我们在这
里arguing for the sake of arguement没有意义。
Robert做没做过没有问题，这个我相信，看得出来他显然碰到了一些瓶颈，不得不用一
些bypass，但做到啥程度是个问题。做到发文章的程度不难，做到通用实用的程度就是
另一回事了。 |
|
l******7
发帖数: 317 | 4 math background is mandatory. but your paper doesn't require to be publish
on the top journal or newspaper(I believe some Universities in China has
this requirement. BTW they published you paper doesn't mean you have a good
point/arguement, it because you pay them) Of course, if your paper could be
publish, it helps you to find a faculty position. |
|
p**z
发帖数: 1311 | 5 来自主题: Accounting版 - 大家的顺序 FAR>REG>AUD>BEC hardest to easiest
get the hardest out of the way cause you only have 18 months to pass the
whole thing once you passed one
reverse of the above.obviously easiest to hardest
the counter arguement is you start with easier so that you are familiar with
the exam system, the type of questions. |
|
p**z
发帖数: 1311 | 6 you will soon find auditing has a lot of gray areas and require a lot of
judgement. Your judgement will be different from the client's judgement and
your partner's judgement. That's why they keep talking about professional
judgement in your training.
Your senior and even partner will not know every single question you ask.
They may just want to ignore you by telling you to ask the client but if you
look at the bright side, you can develop your communication skills and
develop relationship with t... 阅读全帖 |
|
H******t
发帖数: 687 | 7 Not really, I know plenty of people who find internship in this field.
I think the main arguement here is that in today's economy, actuarial
science is a little bit too narrow so that it may not be as worthwhile as
someother majors for people who needs sponsorship. Afterall, the number of
firms that sponsor is quite small and these firms only hire a very small
number every year. |
|
d********r
发帖数: 303 | 8 Finally, Mackinon reveals two configuration of the potassium channel at high
and low potassium concentration. This actually corresponds to the native
configuration of the channel when it is closed or open.
Sorry I cannot find a free figure for this arguement.
One lesson is, how little conformation changes actually take place! Just some
side chain rotations. but it produces two different configuration. This let us
speculate how the Na/K ATPase might work. We know it has different
configurations, |
|
l*******k
发帖数: 361 | 9 Most of the time, one nonrepaetable experiment would be good enough to trash
the whole paper because all the arguements made in one paper are
interlinked! |
|
m**z
发帖数: 787 | 10 Don't know if anybody agrees with me...
I don't see any direct data showing a molecule with covalently As instead of
P, such as mass spec data showing a DNA molecule with As not P. Most of the
arguement in the paper appear to say: if our model is right, xxxx will
happen. We observed xxxx, it is consistent with our model... |
|
m*******e
发帖数: 1280 | 11 Two other points, after finally took a look at her research description as
pasted below:
1) She AIN't doing GWAS (Genome Wide Association Study). The array-based
GWAS has been concluded and announced as a big failure,she would have been
dumb for focusing on that.Sequencing is the way and it IS her approach.
2) Neurologic/psychatric disease is a great direction. Latest data on US
School Age Children says the Autism rate is 10 times higher over 10 years
ago to a stunning 1%. Sure, there are arguem... 阅读全帖 |
|
i*****g
发帖数: 11893 | 12 这个挺好的，肯定要看过
只是，在TG国看资料不易，我都是七里八拐的到处找人要pdf
另外，transdifferentiation，有一派人看法是，没有什么transdifferentiation or
iPS. it is from the adult stem cell in the primary culture.
I have no idea about the arguement.. |
|
H*****e
发帖数: 120 | 13 Yes, Power is the key. But the reality is that the confirmation of key
pathway such as p53 validates the method. Then, the left is often the ones
with little biological information. They maybe the right ones. But we (or
me) have not much clue. Check the recent Nature sequenced human colon
cancer, yet it re-proved wnt, Akt, and p53 roles; there are so many targets.
Besides the fashion way to analyze and present it, what else is new?
Indeed, this was a reviewer's comments when we had a man... 阅读全帖 |
|
o*******a
发帖数: 242 | 14 Then, Please tell me from what clinical presentations you can draw
conclusion that
"保护性中和抗体是机体清除病毒后的结果（而不是因）".
Frankly, this arguement is nonesenes and has nothing to do with clinical
presentations or pathology. It is pointless to continue argue on this.
Can "Hepatitis B" penetrate the barrier to infect fetus ? Obviously, the
answer is yes. So, the clinical presentation or observation is shaky too.
--------
是我的错误，来参与此话题。
t
be |
|
o*******a
发帖数: 242 | 15 1), 在抗体产生之前，清除病毒不都是T cell 和 innate immunity 引起的。肝细胞自
己会死(apoptosis)，也会被病毒杀死(virus-induced cell apoptosis or necrosis)。
你说“HBV是一种标准的non-cytopathic virus，本身复制对肝细胞不造成病理伤害，
更不会杀死肝细胞，实际上肝细胞损伤主要是由机体自身免疫系统造成的”
这是错误的。我知道上面有人上了文献。 我就很懒得跟你比拼上文献了。你们自己就
会很容易找到很多很多文献证明病毒可以杀死细胞。病毒在肝细胞复制时会杀死肝细胞
这个描述一点问题都没有。我没有必要一个一个的给你列出细胞死亡的机制。you are
out of your mind,才会攻击我这个观点。更合况你的观点并不正确。
2), 还有不知道你从哪儿看到说乙肝病毒不能跨过胎盘屏障，事实上它们可以。所以我
说的没错。你的错了。这也是基本知识而已。
***你强调T cell在抗体产生之前的清除病毒的作用。事实上靠这条路来清除病毒不通
。inteferon等的临床证明他们不会起关键作用。就是说不管你... 阅读全帖 |
|
o*******a
发帖数: 242 | 16 Then, Please tell me from what clinical presentations you can draw
conclusion that
"保护性中和抗体是机体清除病毒后的结果（而不是因）".
Frankly, this arguement is nonesenes and has nothing to do with clinical
presentations or pathology. It is pointless to continue argue on this.
Can "Hepatitis B" penetrate the barrier to infect fetus ? Obviously, the
answer is yes. So, the clinical presentation or observation is shaky too.
--------
是我的错误，来参与此话题。
t
be |
|
o*******a
发帖数: 242 | 17 1), 在抗体产生之前，清除病毒不都是T cell 和 innate immunity 引起的。肝细胞自
己会死(apoptosis)，也会被病毒杀死(virus-induced cell apoptosis or necrosis)。
你说“HBV是一种标准的non-cytopathic virus，本身复制对肝细胞不造成病理伤害，
更不会杀死肝细胞，实际上肝细胞损伤主要是由机体自身免疫系统造成的”
这是错误的。我知道上面有人上了文献。 我就很懒得跟你比拼上文献了。你们自己就
会很容易找到很多很多文献证明病毒可以杀死细胞。病毒在肝细胞复制时会杀死肝细胞
这个描述一点问题都没有。我没有必要一个一个的给你列出细胞死亡的机制。you are
out of your mind,才会攻击我这个观点。更合况你的观点并不正确。
2), 还有不知道你从哪儿看到说乙肝病毒不能跨过胎盘屏障，事实上它们可以。所以我
说的没错。你的错了。这也是基本知识而已。
***你强调T cell在抗体产生之前的清除病毒的作用。事实上靠这条路来清除病毒不通
。inteferon等的临床证明他们不会起关键作用。就是说不管你... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
l*****n
发帖数: 1274 | 19 你需要弄明白几个基本问题：
GMAT的ESSAY分两种：issue and arguement,两种文章的题目和样本都可以从GMAT的复习
材料中找到，你可以对这些题目进行分类联系，大概有business,environment等等；模板
也很管用，开头结尾结构什么的都可以参照着来
申请MBA另外还要写essay，这些essay的题目都是各个学校自己要求的，比较常见的就是
你为什么选择MBA，为什么选择这所学校，你能为这个MBA contribute什么，等等。
如果你还没有考GMAT的话，申请essay是你下一步才考虑的问题
interview的时候问的问题也大概就是你essay里的内容
祝你好运！
录
我 |
|
|
q****i
发帖数: 6923 | 21 interesting, i like this arguement
但是不一定对。。。我只想讨论什么病怎么治疗，有什么副作用。。。。【 在
PaiLiangBian (两边都拍) 的大作中提到: 】 |
|
L*****e
发帖数: 169 | 22 i am not from RIT.
Different people have different views, no offense, no arguement.
To believe or not to believe, it's up to you. |
|
z*****n
发帖数: 7639 | 23 1. turn all the classes to be structs/unions by kicking out
member functions
2. trun all the kicked member functions into standard C
functions and treat those default data members as arguements.
3. if there is any function overloading, redeclare them.
C. |
|
M*******c
发帖数: 4371 | 24 use Maxwell's theory for this one. or change your mindset and follow the
following arguement.
Assuming everything is ideal. As soon as you cut the trace, capacitor
forms. Energy could be stored in the capacitor! Or you could say that the
circuit starts oscillating. |
|
B*G
发帖数: 13438 | 25 我觉得arguement是既然博后办不了绿卡，还是趁早找工作吧。不过Boulder是个好地方。 |
|
B*G
发帖数: 13438 | 26 我觉得arguement是既然博后办不了绿卡，还是趁早找工作吧。不过Boulder是个好地方。 |
|
l********u
发帖数: 823 | 27 There are about a dozen replies, including a few back and forth arguements
between three people. If you are interested in reading them all, let me know
. :) |
|
o****e
发帖数: 195 | 28 California definately has the most applications, also I feel it is the state
that's the most tolerant to Asians.
Congratulations on your legal writing grade! I still feel that I can't write
well. Being able to "write well" has so many different meanings, and usually
it depends on who you talk to. I think I write OK when it comes down to the
guts of technical disclosures, but I feel inediquate when it comes to bluffing
(or "policy arguement" as they call it in law school). I still can't pict |
|
i*******p
发帖数: 297 | 29 try to be cool and easy going, yet when the right opportunities come up, 显
示出他们 arguementive/self righteous/condescending nature~~~
some gunners are actually nice, lol |
|
L**P
发帖数: 3792 | 30 行
但是最好再进一步argue你的dependent claims 4－6的limitations也unobvious
这样即使第一个arguement失败，claim 1不成，claims 4－6不至于立刻没戏
..
not |
|
m******t
发帖数: 1694 | 31 more specifically, if an Independent Claim is not anticipated, can I say
THEREFORE the subsequent dependent claims are not anticipated as well.
there is legal precedent to support such arguement to the USPTO, would such
argument stand in a response to the Chinese PTO?
thanks! |
|
m*****9
发帖数: 152 | 32 I don't want any money. I'm just very upset and want her to stop this. This
is not the first time she's done this kind of things. I'm just hoping to get
her to make a public apology.
I know it's confusing, even after I forward my mother-in-law's (American)
message to a co-worker (American) of mine, she didn't understand what was
going on.
Keep it simple. My husband's family are Americans. My husband was
asking me whether I filed a divorce on him or not because his mom told him
this on the phone.... 阅读全帖 |
|
a***n
发帖数: 578 | 33 hehe. good arguement.
Since no money, I won't spend more time on it. But I can tell what a general
simulation goes. For example, if you want to simulate this system, you have to
consider what parameters are your input parameters, what data you want from
simulation. Then you set up kinetic equation based on those parameters. Then
you figure out a numerical way to solve this kinetic equation.
For your case, viscosity of polymer molecules in solution, the friction
between solvent and surface, tempe |
|
c*******n
发帖数: 1648 | 34 来自主题: Macromolecules版 - 几个弱智问题 Free volume concept is still in debate. Hard-core quantum mechanics people
tend to consider substances as a continuous electron cloud landscape and
refuse every arguement of free volume. This can explain the measurements of
free volume heavily depend on probes. However, free volume concept was so
sucessful (partially because of WLF, Wisconsin school used to dominate polymer
dynamics), sometimes you have to say they are sth real, but not vaccum:)
packing
the
的
子
其
单
晶
外 |
|
w********9
发帖数: 8613 | 35 I don't want you to get confused by all those arguements.
I am going back to my own starting statements:
"You are asking a wrong question that few can answer, and perhaps on a wrong
board. :-) I am not a 牛牛. But I am trying to help."
This is much more a CS topic than a mathematical one. RSA was first
publicized by ACM. The three guys got Turing awards instead of Wolf prizes
in math, Fields medals, or things like those. Standards. Protocols.
Algorithms and complexities. Defenses and attacks. Enha |
|
J*****n
发帖数: 4859 | 36
well, I didn't see any arguement from math side. Only bio guys play
themselves. |
|
V**y
发帖数: 788 | 37 no arguement against people with no class.TRUE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I
with
makes |
|
l*********o
发帖数: 3091 | 38 The NRMP has recently released a document that discusses the possibility of
stoping prematches (outside the match offers) for International Medical
Graduates (IMGs), here's the link http://www.nrmp.org/all-in.pdf
The arguement is that there's no need to give outside the match offers as
IMGs are able to get the visa processing with the normal NRMP matching
process.
The document also details the prematch offers that were given in the year
2008 with some interesting statistics.
Prematch offers have... 阅读全帖 |
|
e****0
发帖数: 678 | 39 I would like to form a research-oriented journal club focued on Cardiology.
Goal: follow up the new trends on cardiology research area.
Materials: the New England Journal of Medicine
Meeting location: Skype
Meeting date/time: 8-9pm once a week on weekends either Saturday or
Sunday. One of them will be the meeting time, and another one will be the
back-up in case.
Meeting Requirements:
1. Straight-forward journal discussion during the one hour meeting time.
Any clinical experience, problems, d... 阅读全帖 |
|
m*******r
发帖数: 481 | 40 This German group had another APL paper questioning ZL Wang's ZnO
nanogenerator's result. I think the German's arguement is very good, hehe. |
|
t*****0
发帖数: 264 | 41 book gave 1 and 3, but I have some arguement on the 3 for 48.
I remember that type 1 is the insulin dependent which means pt don't secret
insulin at all. Since the question was talking about not enough insulin
secretion. I think it should be Type 2 and it won't cause ketone acidosis.
How you guy/gals think about the ans to 48? |
|
C********r
发帖数: 145 | 42 Today, had an arguement with a CNA for a patient we have togther. The CNA
has worker here for many years and thinks herself mighty and knows
everything. We change the pt together and because she was not very gentle,
pt became aggitated and start kicking and screaming. (pt is confused). After
we finally finished change the pt, the CNA starts to c/o the pt is not
getting what he is supporsed to get( She means narcotics to knock the pt out
), I told her that the pt has been drowsy/lethargic all mon |
|
a****a
发帖数: 5763 | 43 这个只是个充分条件，不是必须的
f可能是其他形式的，只不过 f= F(H(x)) 能符合等式而已
这个notes写的不是很严谨
实际上
由{f,H}==0
写成possion括号展开，然后把对H 的项用hamilton 方程替换，最后会得到 (1)
\sum_{i} (\frac{\partial f}{\partial p_{i}}*\dot{p_{i}} +
\frac{\partial f}{\partial q_{i}}* \dot{q_{i}}) =0
或者写成 grad(f) \cdot v=0
这里grad 是对相空间所有坐标的梯度算符， 也就是说 f在相空间的梯度必然与相空间
点的运动方向垂直， 因此相空间的点的运动必然只能沿f = constant的曲面
notes那句话只能作为arguement,类似的说法好几本统计物理上都有，都不是很严谨
同样的问题廊道的统计1上也有解释，在得到(1)式之后，因为f 不显含t,实际上
(1)式就是 f对 t的 total derivative. (1)式为零，也就是说 f是 constant over
time
统计物理无好书，... 阅读全帖 |
|
a****a
发帖数: 5763 | 44 weinberg的书的确是比较难懂
但他有个最大的好处，就是不哄你，不会什么东西糊弄过去
场论书瞎糊弄的太多了，弄一些似是而非的arguement,让你刚开始觉得挺有道理，真想
follow detail的时候问题一大把
所以虽然weinberg的书不好读，我还是最喜欢他的 |
|
k****h
发帖数: 944 | 45 Basically, I agreee with you on this arguement.
BTW, the book "getting to yes" Restless recommended is a practice-oriented
book.It is a good book.But dont expect that you can get something for your
theory building. It is generally used in the organizational behavior course of
an MBA or maybe MPA program.
main
judgement).
general
just
WARP).
will
people's
challange
be
the |
|
w*********d
发帖数: 999 | 46 近四个月来，
工作之余平均每天至少码1000个字，
况且又是平生第一次灌水，
还是有些个感受的。
记得刚来的时候，
最大的愿望就是自己的坑能上学科类十大，
因为听说十行以上的帖子被关注的概率比较大，
便每每摆出一幅一本正经的样子，
默默耕耘，
可惜迟迟不能如愿，
实在是幼稚的可以。
后偶然看到先帝的帖子：
发信人: kzeng (寱语), 信区: PoliticalScience
标 题: Re: IR(PS)的出路在哪里呢？
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Feb 8 01:47:58 2006), 转信
ft，那些都是在灌水，切莫当真，切莫当真，为了灌水的需要，所有的arguement都是力
求simple & brutal，让同行见笑了,//blush
当时很震惊
觉得灌水是门很高的学问
紧接着又惊闻kkk说
“十行以上的俺基本看不懂”
便彻底晕倒在买卖提中了
现在回想起来
四个月的经历
其实就是一次次被震惊的过程
记得第一次看到饭米粒的大水
和置底禁止灌水的警告
我那迷惑的眼神
似乎还带着愤怒
还记得第一次看到篮球版一篇”让我们re上十大吧”的醒目标题
然后所有的回 |
|
v*******e
发帖数: 3714 | 47 这下好了,以数学来说,任何不能用逻辑符号通篇表述的arguement都不能
叫数学,所以任何对"科学"有点兴趣的人,什么都别想了,去学逻辑符号先. |
|
a***r
发帖数: 594 | 48 core belongs to revenue generating part of the firm because strats as a
group belongs to the revenue generating part of the firm.
devel and maintain of SLANG may not appear to be revenue generating. But one
needs to realize that every single strat, except the MDs and Partner MDs,
have at least one SLANG session open pretty much all day long working on his
/her projects.
When SLANG falls apart, it shuts off business activities. There s no
arguement that without core, there would be no strat group |
|
r******m
发帖数: 369 | 49 well, you might be a quant, but you can't make a valid arguement against lz.
..... |
|
l**n
发帖数: 67 | 50
If i remember correctly, there's arguement that rule out the
possibility
of an electron to be a black hole. Of course this does not
mean e has
a finite size, but just another piece of information. |
|
