由买买提看人间百态

topics

全部话题 - 话题: arguement
首页 上页 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 下页 末页 (共7页)
h*******e
发帖数: 3857
1
来自主题: Living版 - 想问问最近rate开始涨的问题
这里argue着几千的credit,利率一涨,都觉得这几千的arguement都付进去了
g********u
发帖数: 8891
2
来自主题: Medicine版 - 求推荐好的脑肿瘤医生/医院
OK, finger pointing after failure of arguement, what do I lie about? if I
did, so did US NEWS?
Get a sense of reality and quit being a granduer of achievement, I donot
care whom you are, I BUY THE RATING OF US NEWS.

You
f**g
发帖数: 2452
3
是的,这就是常说的strawman arguement
e*******e
发帖数: 9616
4
insurance号应该可以给他们吧?又不是ssn,ssn千万不能给
另外,我老已经养成习惯这些重要的bill都scan一份做个digital备份,以后如果有
arguement翻出来一show就清楚了。
good luck
z****l
发帖数: 5282
5
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
flag (为了饿一只苍蝇我把自己饿得够呛) 于 (Sun Mar 10 16:21:28 2013, 美东) 提到:
昨天发了一篇吐槽文后
(《我又要吐槽了!》 http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/Money/32002041.html
今天见到xmfdrspeech网友的反吐槽文
(《新手也来吐槽》,http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/Money/32002577.html
读后颇有几句话不吐不快
如果xmfdrspeech此文针对的是我的吐槽,那么下文可作为我对他的回应
如果他的文章针对的不是我,那么下文就当做是我对前文的一点展开说明吧
首先,我在最初发帖时也大概预想到这样一种逻辑
即但凡有人批评新手中某些人的现象,总会有人反过来指责“你自己也是新手过来的!”
xmfdrspeech的文章里正是采取了这样一种逻辑
是的,我也是新手过来的,但我从来不是我批评的那种新手
xmfdrspeech在文章里批评老手动辄把新手一棒子打死
犯了普... 阅读全帖
B****D
发帖数: 1124
6
来自主题: NextGeneration版 - 舍不下宝宝!
I think educate your husband will be more helpful. Have him volunteer to
come and help you. For his parents, in which not willing to help, MM be
strong, do everything by yourself and just ignore them as much as you can,
avoid having any direct arguement. I just think the way you described it,
pretty much means your husband is more on his parent's side, and won't do
what you ask him to do, which is to send his parents back. Imagine what his
parents will think if you or your husband ask them to go... 阅读全帖
s******e
发帖数: 3910
7
来自主题: NextGeneration版 - 【转帖】今后可能有用
这比GRE的arguement短文还逻辑混乱……
W*******g
发帖数: 458
8
Oh I am done with that one, but did not expect to see you everywhere
BTW only 9th graders or lower would say things like you did when they can't
seem to win an arguement by talking sense themselves
Simply immature
And I do have better things to do with my time. So good night
q****i
发帖数: 6923
9
来自主题: NextGeneration版 - 婴儿有不出生的权利——毕淑敏
excellent arguement!
s*******t
发帖数: 148
10
来自主题: Overseas版 - 说说这里的流浪汉
"如果他们生活在一个好的社区,我想黑人不会比白人差。"
This is politically right, but, as we all know, just BS.
Black people's IQ is in average lower than that of Asian and White. The
material base of this arguement is that the size/weight of the black people'
s brain in average is smaller/lighter than others'. To deny this is just as
naive as to deny black people's genetic dominance in phisical competition
like basketball. Different races have different evolution history which
leads to differences in many aspects. Politi
h**********0
发帖数: 1453
11
凡事过犹不及

arguement.
attempt
world
G**i
发帖数: 99
12
No clinical or research evidence prove the silver material (amalgam) had
mercury toxicity. This material is much better than white material (
composite). There are also some arguement about composite material release
some toxic monomer, but still no clinical or research evidence. Since the
primary molar will be replaced till 11-12 years old. It is better to use
silver material.
h*********e
发帖数: 6997
13
来自主题: Parenting版 - 这个辩论的艺术到底是啥?
你也搬出个the beauty of arguement啥的不就得了,以其人之道还至其人之身。

是有
c******r
发帖数: 3778
14
来自主题: Parenting版 - 法律角度分析一下AA
是纽约的一个华裔议员提案禁止鱼翅交易。
http://news.sina.com.cn/o/2012-02-22/150123974021.shtml
这个其实从动物保护角度而言,俺也一直坚决反对吃鱼翅。吃鱼翅这东西基本就是文化
陋习,改了没啥不好。俺一直这么认为,现在也这么认为。
反对者这个立法的主要arguement就是这是对亚裔的歧视。特别是喜欢吃鱼翅的人更是
这么认为的。俺倒是没这么看,这要是食人部落喜欢吃人,难道还得咱们每天准备人肉
奉上,否则就是歧视不成?
俺最终反对这个立法的主要原因是:
因为过去俺一直混淆了三件事:
一件是吃鱼翅是文化陋习,一件是shark finning很残忍。第三件事是保护鲨鱼为了保
护生物多样性。分清这两件事。
解决第一件事的办法是广为宣传,制造舆论,提高大家的认识,普及科学知识。禁止
shark finning并不能阻止大家吃鱼翅,即使真的严格执行,也不过是减少鱼翅产量,
太高鱼翅价格,让吃鱼翅所联系的social identity发生点儿变化。仅此而已。
第二件事shark finning确实很残忍,那么这是可以禁止的,而且确实已经在克林顿时
... 阅读全帖
w**w
发帖数: 5391
15
女儿六岁,突然问这个问题。是校车上听上一级的小朋友说的,车上看来还有过
ARGUEMENT,还有小朋友声称抓过SANTA的胡子。
我是真不知道怎么解释,女儿现在准备半夜起床等SANTA。一般应该怎么处理这个问题
比较好?
l*****n
发帖数: 1763
16
cute arguement!
c****t
发帖数: 156
17
Yes. We obviously both know what is right or not.
If it is not working, to keep hitting and threatening only hurts, and will
never help.
But you would not tell the truth that you choose 我不打孩子, when you "
justify" how useful hitting is, simply because you just want to argue with
those who said 不能打孩子.
You show no interest to lz's case and intentionaly ignore the fact of the
routine useless hitting and only care about your arguement.
Only when others pointed out that kids would learn hitting from ... 阅读全帖
G**T
发帖数: 2610
18
来自主题: Parenting版 - common core
你也没懂 -- 我观察common core很久了 (with serious self interests). common
core的特点,是“common” -- 大部分傻X反对or赞成都没搞懂这个。
美帝的数学教学落后于天朝,不是自common core开始的。 所以把美帝数学落后归于
common core的,是超级傻X arguement。
大部分反common core的,其实是反美帝数学教育的--但他们智商太低,分不清这里
边有区别 :)
(正在适应灌水方式,以骂为主比较是主流 :)
参考文献:
http://rationalmathed.blogspot.com/2007/06/what-does-liping-ma-
http://www.ams.org/notices/201310/fea-ma.pdf
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/18/opinion/q-a-with-liping-ma.ht
m********t
发帖数: 13072
19
来自主题: Parenting版 - 纯属好玩
忙乎了半天,你只是议论一下啊,我还以为你要对薄公堂了, 你说了这么些个日子,
到底想干啥,你自己清楚了么?
别总是为了arguement每次都能占上风,而不懈地钻人家给你设下的套,还嘲讽我被人
卖了数钞票。
有你垫底,人家都不来卖我了, 容易么我?
c****i
发帖数: 788
20
来自主题: Stock版 - UBS Lowers AMR price target to $12
http://www.streetinsider.com/Analyst+Comments/UBS+Lowers+Price+Target+on+AMR+Corp.+%28AMR%29+to+$12+from+$14%3B+Management+Arguement+Not+Strong+Enough/5554283.html
w********s
发帖数: 343
21
love to see the arguement, great post!!
though concer over lang is totally irrelevant, IMHO.
h****n
发帖数: 3447
22
GOP的arguement主要就是要cut spending, balance budget。仿佛美国未来要靠这次了
。因此死活不想提高debt ceiling.
可是debt ceiling与cut spending 和 balance budget啥关系都没有。而且难道
spending和budget不需要国会批准?如果不满意政府预算,否决就是了。转移矛盾,混
淆视听的厉害。

州通过。
月就push宪法的修正案。看样子美国的政客们都退步了。
g********4
发帖数: 4959
23
来自主题: Stock版 - 再说说价值投资和被套牢
这是最好的arguement。PF!
发信人: wltsn (waterfall), 信区: Stock
标 题: Re: 再说说价值投资和被套牢
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Nov 22 20:33:21 2011, 美东)
套牢就是套牢,哪有那么多不同种类。在花街把你怀里的丫头领去整容之前,你一直抱
着的就是人见人嫌的凤姐。怎么会有天生丽质却没人欣赏的事情。
c*******o
发帖数: 1722
24
来自主题: Stock版 - CNBC又在忽悠
the problem of the value arguement is that things could alwyas
be even cheaper.

are
Z***e
发帖数: 2983
25
来自主题: Stock版 - BBRY bb10最大的问题就是App了
"可是开发者增加一个新平台是很大的开销"
have some doubt on this arguement...
Z***e
发帖数: 2983
26
来自主题: Stock版 - BBRY bb10最大的问题就是App了
"可是开发者增加一个新平台是很大的开销"
have some doubt on this arguement...
h*********r
发帖数: 2844
27
来自主题: Stock版 - GRPN要变成AMZN
同样arguement 适用fb, yelp 等等。brand recognition is way more important to
technology.
h*********r
发帖数: 2844
28
来自主题: Stock版 - GRPN要变成AMZN
同样arguement 适用fb, yelp 等等。brand recognition is way more important to
technology.
W*******g
发帖数: 458
29
来自主题: Working版 - 被老板write up,怎么办,求建议
Yes and No...I had similiar situation before, I almost feel that you were
telling my stories...But believe me, if they don't like you they will kick
you out. It has nothing to do with your capacity. THere is always double
standard to those people. Try not to compare yourself to them because that
will only get you more upset: why they are accusing me of something that
they do all the time? Well the answer is that there is no justice in the
work place. I agree that we should stand up for ourselves... 阅读全帖
K*****y
发帖数: 501
30
To wuchang (wuchang):
Your boss is too soft.
Stay away from B and his project.
-------------------------
will do , thanks for your suggestion
Boss had few arguement with B before... as far as I knew, it went nowhere...
then finally boss realized that fighting with B, he himself is the one to
take the abusement... so now I guess him can do whatever B like to make both
of them happy...B's job's security is same important as boss's...
Anything I can do from HR side or boss's boss side ??
----------... 阅读全帖
z****r
发帖数: 124
31
来自主题: Working版 - 怎么对付老板这一招啊 [BSSD]
我不是老板,我改过别人信,当下面两个条件同时满足时
1。信里说完问题解决或者arguement后,background 或者责任归属说太多,容易后面
纠缠。
2。没时间跟原主来回邮件确认改动。
建议你找老板聊聊,男的带啤酒,女的倒咖啡。不用太正式。
供参考
j***n
发帖数: 1471
32
来自主题: Working版 - 频繁跳槽会有什么后果?

这样的arguement不能说错,理论上O8也在某种程度上被大银行大财团指挥,回家了也
被要被他老婆指挥。CEO还要被board指挥。你总要向某个上级report,但是你工作上的
自主权越多,就越舒服。
h***d
发帖数: 53
33
来自主题: Immigration版 - 请教关于citation的问题,thx
understand that the intention of USCIS is to see evidence of your being "
outstanding" or "well recognized" among other researchers.
Can you organize your 1, 2, and 3 into solid arguement for the above purpose
?
s****f
发帖数: 6
34
来自主题: Immigration版 - EB1A-140 PP TSC Approved 非学术 金融类
RD 12/08/2014
AD 12/11/2014
金融业在职打工者一枚 工作三年半 master 无学术发表 但有金融方面的研究报告(但
不是发表在任何刊物上的那种)
本来觉得肯定只能eb2 结果听到有两个同行eb1a/b过了的例子 受到鼓舞
由于几乎没有模版而且讨厌写作 所以决定请律师 被律师们拒了个遍 最后找了一个老
美律师 死缠烂打 终于答应(pitch自己了很久)
Claim了contribution, high salary, judge of others work, critical role,
awards
我个人觉得contribution,high salary和critical role是比较站得住脚的 所以看到
claim了五项有点儿无语 后来问律师 会不会只claim三项过了但是claim五项反而招来
rfe?他的回答是不会并且这样是against policy(具体什么policy我也不懂)关于
high salary 大家可以尝试把自己的工资去统计局网站上test一下 可能会有惊喜
关于pp的问题 律师说追加和直接pp和不pp都没区别
感谢一下ann... 阅读全帖

发帖数: 1
35
来自主题: Immigration版 - EB1A 如何与同行比较
这些IO也太狠了,可以去指导GRE的arguement写作了。。那么看来需要找到看上去牛逼
,IO还没有办法去证伪的evidence才行。
s*****3
发帖数: 477
36
Can someone with knowledge input to this draft? When complete, this can be
used as a template for future purpose.
We need a smooth logic line and strong arguement.
Please contribute and help!
t**********2
发帖数: 71
37
The way Mr. O to assign SO totally make sense to me, unless we can find the
law to support our arguement. From what I read so far, there is no clear law
on this. JWE poinited out something like there is no law indicating on
assignning SO based on PD, then which rule should Mr. O follow on assigning
SO ? based on percentage of Indian and Chinese ?
If Mr. O follows what some of us suggestion to assign SO by percentage, then
how should he assign SO inside of our EB2C group ? Still based on PD then
... 阅读全帖
M*******t
发帖数: 513
38
There might have nothing existed so far which supports our arguement;
however, there is not any existing law that supports Mr. O's policy in using
the SO.
Why does he always do like that? it should be his responsibility to provide
evidence to support his way of doing things.

the
law
assigning
then
n**********s
发帖数: 236
39
来自主题: EB23版 - Mr.O's wording last summer
From Q's blog:
Last year Mr.O used the following words to explain the big jump of FB PD in
August 2010.
"There continues to be extremely rapid forward movement of most Family
preference cut-off dates. This is a direct result of the lack of demand by
potential applicants who have chosen not to pursue final action on their
cases, or who may no longer be eligible for status. The rapid movement
provides the best opportunity to maximize number use under the FY-2010
annual numerical limitations. Shoul... 阅读全帖
w********r
发帖数: 1397
40
You didn't state your arguement clearly, then make some of them here thought
you were against HR3012, not pro it. LOL.
a******e
发帖数: 36306
41
toooootally flawed arguements ah.....sigh

the
m*******l
发帖数: 12782
42
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
molebleeze (molebleeze) 于 (Wed Oct 12 15:12:52 2011, 美东) 提到:
这么多帖子反对3012的,这么多帖子支持的
都不知道3021的本质
其实每年的ROW是数量巨大的,看起来,经济不好的情况下每年ROW只给中印留了2万的
SO,那么可以推断出,经济不好的情况下,ROW大约每年有两万人,如果经济好的话,3
+万也是有可能的。
我们来分析一下,在目前的demand情况下,假设2012.1.1开始HR3012
Demand
PD prior 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
ROW 0 0 0 0 20000 40000 60000 80000
C 5000 10000 15000 20000 25... 阅读全帖
t******o
发帖数: 5314
43
如果你的business需要engineering为背景,那应该可以make an arguement吧。
z******a
发帖数: 582
44
仔细看了一遍,原文写得很好,是篇很好的 GRE issue.
原文后面有很多 comment,感觉像是 GRE arguement
t*******y
发帖数: 21396
45
来自主题: EB23版 - 关于H4可以工作的
哈哈 这个arguement太赞了
t****o
发帖数: 17
46
一个美国朋友与我辩论,看看他们的观点,
I"m things are getting better in China, and sure your "new China" is young.
Your civilization is over 5000 years old, and in the last 50 years some major
cultural aspects of your society have been systematicaly destroyed by the
Communist Party. I return to my original arguement. If the Chinese system is
so great, and things are getting so much better, why do so many CHinese
citizens, when given the choice, choose to come and live in the US? Will you
go back to China and s
s******f
发帖数: 27
47
omg, he said "safer"...was he kidding?

一个美国朋友与我辩论,看看他们的观点,
I"m things are getting better in China, and sure your "new China" is young.
Your civilization is over 5000 years old, and in the last 50 years some major
cultural aspects of your society have been systematicaly destroyed by the
Communist Party. I return to my original arguement. If the Chinese system is
so great, and things are getting so much better, why do so many CHinese
citizens, when given the choice, choose to come and live in
w********9
发帖数: 8613
48
来自主题: NewZealand版 - 动手打了他,我很后悔
People shouldn't blame LZ's husband. The husband may have his own reasons
for how he responded.
I am more than 5 years older than my wife is. When we were getting married,
my father-in-law told me:"She is younger than you are. She doesn't
understand many things. Bear with her." It is always hard to win any
arguement against the person forever more than 5 years younger.
t*********e
发帖数: 9
49
来自主题: Boston版 - Re: Harvard mm

appearance , but also comes from intelligence, confidence, and the way
of talking and etc.
Granted, what you have said has some degree of trueth, yet I am not
saying that
all the "other" aspects that you are trying to stress is entirely
irrelavent to
this abstract concept of "beauty" you are talking about. My comment
is purely
devoted to the observation that Harvard MM are somehow more pretty
than others.
BTW, thanks for using my sentence pattern for starting the arguement.
It feels like
when
l****o
发帖数: 5435
50
来自主题: Boston版 - cambridge的parking ticket咋回事?
我吃了ticket后,在他们的规定时间内他们的on-line dispute form 里提交了我
的arguement后几个月了也没收到他们的hearing decision. 而且依然收到mail通知我
交late费,虽然上面也说了我如果已经提交了hearing request, 可以disregard 这个
信。但是我怎么知道他们看了我的argument 后是怎么决定的?
somervelle 的online ticket 系统就好的多,我提交argument后,可以看到他们
把我的ticket 取消了。那个系统很好,一切都在网上解决,还可以提交照片,attach
文档。
cambridge 的有网上系统还要给你寄信,而且这两个都互相不协调,难道说我要一
直收到他们的late fee 的notice mail 吗? 而且不能网上提交照片证明。太落后了。
首页 上页 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 下页 末页 (共7页)