B*Z
发帖数: 7062 | |
l***n
发帖数: 1270 | |
d******e
发帖数: 7844 | |
d******e
发帖数: 7844 | 4 http://www.epa.gov/fueleconomy/guzzler/420b13036a.pdf
有意思，这个表信息不太全。
不知道具体交多少税。
【在 B*Z 的大作中提到】
: 就知道R8有3000块的税，比较好奇。
|
d******e
发帖数: 7844 | |
t********i
发帖数: 7856 | 6 Manufacturers of new cars that fail to meet the minimum fuel economy level
of 22.5 mpg have to pay a “Gas Guzzler Tax”.
The combined mpg value is based on 55% city driving and 45% highway driving.
Note that only new cars (including station wagon) are subject to "Gas
Guzzler Tax" if they fail to meet 22.5 mpg. SUVs, crossovers, trucks,
minivans are NOT. |
B*Z
发帖数: 7062 | 7 this is really stupid/political. trucks and suv should be subject to the sam
e rules.
driving.
【在 t********i 的大作中提到】
: Manufacturers of new cars that fail to meet the minimum fuel economy level
: of 22.5 mpg have to pay a “Gas Guzzler Tax”.
: The combined mpg value is based on 55% city driving and 45% highway driving.
: Note that only new cars (including station wagon) are subject to "Gas
: Guzzler Tax" if they fail to meet 22.5 mpg. SUVs, crossovers, trucks,
: minivans are NOT.
|
c*********r
发帖数: 19468 | 8 嗯
sam
【在 B*Z 的大作中提到】
: this is really stupid/political. trucks and suv should be subject to the sam
: e rules.
:
: driving.
|
T******g
发帖数: 21328 | 9 很多大车都有省油发动机选项，R8估计没办法满足
sam
【在 B*Z 的大作中提到】
: this is really stupid/political. trucks and suv should be subject to the sam
: e rules.
:
: driving.
|
t********i
发帖数: 7856 | 10 这个税就是个装逼货。完全起不到遏制高油耗车的目的。
sam
【在 B*Z 的大作中提到】
: this is really stupid/political. trucks and suv should be subject to the sam
: e rules.
:
: driving.
|
t********i
发帖数: 7856 | 11 我也觉得truck和SUV也应该收这个税。但标准应该适当放宽。综合22.5mpg这个标准，
估计连一般的midsize SUV都很少有能达到的。
sam
【在 B*Z 的大作中提到】
: this is really stupid/political. trucks and suv should be subject to the sam
: e rules.
:
: driving.
|
a********2
发帖数: 2561 | 12 EPA的文档说的很清楚啊，当时制定这个油老虎税的时候，truck、suv、van都是主要做
商业用途，个人用户很少，市场份额也很少，所以没有被包括进来。只能说这个东东没
有与时俱进罢了。算是历史遗留问题吧。同样的还有那个chicken tax，否则三大的
full size pickup也不会那么滋润。 |
