S**U
发帖数: 7025 | 1 The Authenticity of the Early Buddhist Texts by Bhikkhu Sujato & Bhikkhu
Brahmali, published in Volume 5 of the Journal of the Oxford Centre for
Buddhist Studies.
http://www.ocbs.org/lectures-a-articles-ocbsmain-121/online-pub
Abstract
This work articulates and defends a single thesis: that the Early Buddhist
Texts originated in the lifetime of the Buddha or a little later, because
they were, in the main, spoken by the Buddha and his contemporary disciples.
This is the most simple, natural, and reasonable explanation for the
evidence.
Our argument covers two main areas:
1. The grounds for distinguishing the Early Buddhist Texts
later Buddhist literature;
2. The evidence that the EBTs stem from close to the Buddha’s lifetime
and that they were generally spoken by the historical Buddha.
Most academic scholars of Early Buddhism cautiously affirm that it
is possible that the EBTs contain some authentic sayings of the Buddha.
We contend that this drastically understates the evidence. A sympathetic
assessment of relevant evidence shows that it is very likely
that the bulk that are attributed to the Buddha were actually spoken by him.
It is very unlikely that most of these sayings are inauthentic. |
S**U
发帖数: 7025 | 2 I'm still listening to the podcast by the author.
http://podcast.dhammaloka.org.au/podcast/the-authenticity-of-th
There is no definitive direct evidence to show that EBTs were all spoken by
the Buddha. A weaker thesis can be supported by many indirect evidence(see
abstract above).
One evidence is the mentioning of 16 major states in suttas. This is notable
because the situation lasted for only several decades around the time of
the Buddha and it drastically changed after that- India was united. |
W**N
发帖数: 1037 | 3 读了其中的一段（下面转贴）我放心了。 佛教有根，不是浮萍。
－－
南无阿弥陀佛！
南无观世音菩萨！
－－－－－－
The basic facts were discovered in the 19th century. In 1859 Samuel Beal
published side by side translations of the Pali pātimokkha and the
Dharmaguptaka prātimokṣa in Chinese, showing their virtually
identical content.
He noted that [11, 26] “… the identity of the code in both cases,
therefore seems to be established.” In 1882 Beal described detailed
correspondences between Suttas in Chinese and Pali [10, ch. 2]. He
accurately predicted that [10, ] “when
the Vinaya and Agama collections are thoroughly examined, I can have little
doubt we shall find most if not all the Pali Suttas in Chinese form.”
http://www.ocbs.org/images/stories/authenticity.pdf p.40
--------------以下注解来自 --------------------------
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C4%80gama_%28Buddhism%29
In Buddhism, an āgama (Sanskrit and Pāli for "sacred work"[1] or "
scripture"[2]) is a collection of Early Buddhist scriptures. The five ā
gamas together comprise the Suttapiṭaka of the early Buddhist schools,
which had different recensions of each āgama. In the Pali Canon of the
Theravada, the term nikāya is used in place of āgama. |
W**N
发帖数: 1037 | 4 您完全正确。SeeU师兄。
比如SeeU最近的帖子很多也不是SeeU说的；有些内容SeeU引用的也不是被引用人说的。
即使SeeU说这些帖子都是SeeU的，但别个师兄肯定会根本不相信SeeU和SeeU说的东西的
。
特别感谢您分享这些高质量的社会科学的研究成果。您觉得Popper认为这些社会科学如
何呢？ ：）
by
notable
【在 S**U 的大作中提到】
: I'm still listening to the podcast by the author.
: http://podcast.dhammaloka.org.au/podcast/the-authenticity-of-th
: There is no definitive direct evidence to show that EBTs were all spoken by
: the Buddha. A weaker thesis can be supported by many indirect evidence(see
: abstract above).
: One evidence is the mentioning of 16 major states in suttas. This is notable
: because the situation lasted for only several decades around the time of
: the Buddha and it drastically changed after that- India was united.
|
W**N
发帖数: 1037 | 5 SeeU师兄，您得改帖子标题。您推荐的不是‘书’。该是研究报告，或journal
article, 不是 Book.
If one has published peer-reviewed papers in the US, one may/should
distinguish those two types of reference.
What format (APA or Chicago?) do you use in your field? |
W**N
发帖数: 1037 | 6 咱们中国人说，不信假大空。假的绝对不能信。空空才是如也！’大‘的东西唬人容易
让人相信。大的东西，大，漏洞也明显些。
－－
南无阿弥陀佛！
佛.看见你
头上一顶大帽子，
手里一面小镜子。
显我大而照彼小，
弥勒佛有大肚子？！ |
W**N
发帖数: 1037 | 7 索达吉堪布
轮回中的众生，没有认识自心的本来面目，无我执著为我，无常执著为常有，颠颠
倒倒犯了很多错。所以，我们都可以叫愚人。每逢愚人节，应当以此来提醒自己：不要
再愚下去了！
http://bbs.tianya.cn/post-16-650792-262.shtml ［26147 楼］ |
S**U
发帖数: 7025 | 8 I've changed the title.
It's also available as a book
http://www.wisdom-books.com/ProductDetail.asp?PID=27807
【在 W**N 的大作中提到】
: SeeU师兄，您得改帖子标题。您推荐的不是‘书’。该是研究报告，或journal
: article, 不是 Book.
: If one has published peer-reviewed papers in the US, one may/should
: distinguish those two types of reference.
: What format (APA or Chicago?) do you use in your field?
|
