由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
USANews版 - 關於 Dominion,好歹要聽聽兩邊說法吧?
相关主题
联邦法官又判了Same Old Idea: Thomas Jefferson Pushed Balanced Budget, Too
万达在美国打造最大连锁电影院线Americans’ Incomes Have Dropped 6.7 Percent During the ‘Recovery’
没人关心床铺的爱抚逼爱的头的提名?Real federal deficit dwarfs official tally
新任FBI局長提名人 悄悄刪除俄羅斯官司委任律師簡介支持禁枪的怎么看拥枪自卫成功的案例?
Christopher Wray快上任了Woman hiding with kids shoots intruder (转载)
孟晚舟事件,会不会让中美贸易战再生变?84-Year-Old Obama Supporter Pulls Gun on Conservatives Protesting
Food-stamp tally nears 40 million, sets record美国一高中生拥抱女教师 被控性骚扰遭停学
毒!墨西哥贩毒集团谋杀人数超过1万德州人民还是有种的
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: dominion话题: software话题: county话题: michigan话题: georgia
进入USANews版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
a****1
发帖数: 634
1
跟「川宗」的 fanatics 說理是枉然。
http://www.nytimes.com/live/2020/11/11/technology/election-results-trump-biden
Dominion Voting Systems, which makes software that local governments around
the nation use to help run their elections, is now at the center of baseless
claims that “software glitches” led to mistakes in vote tallies in
Michigan and Georgia last week.
The Dominion software was used in only two of the five counties that had
problems in Michigan and Georgia, and in every instance there was a detailed
explanation for what had happened. In all of the cases, software did not
affect the vote counts.
In the two Michigan counties that had mistakes, the inaccuracies were
because of human errors, not software problems, according to the Michigan
Department of State, county officials and election-security experts. Only
one of the two Michigan counties used Dominion software.
Issues in three Georgia counties had other explanations. In one county, an
apparent problem with Dominion software delayed officials’ reporting of the
vote tallies, but did not affect the actual vote count. In two other
counties, a separate company’s software slowed poll workers’ ability to
check-in voters.
“Many of the claims being asserted about Dominion and questionable voting
technology is misinformation at best and, in many cases, they’re outright
disinformation,” said Edward Perez, an election-technology expert at the
OSET Institute, a nonprofit that studies voting infrastructure. “I’m not
aware of any evidence of specific things or defects in Dominion software
that would lead one to believe that votes had been recorded or counted
incorrectly.”
Right-wing voices across the internet this week have claimed incorrectly
that Dominion was responsible for mistakes in vote counts, and President
Trump shared a Breitbart article on Twitter that incorrectly tied the
Michigan issues to separate problems in Georgia.
Many of those people have said, contrary to evidence, that Dominion software
was used to switch votes. Some people even suggested that the company was
doing the bidding of the Clintons, a conspiracy theory that was shared on
Twitter by President Trump. On Wednesday, Rudolph W. Giuliani, the president
’s lawyer, said he was in contact with “whistle-blowers” from Dominion,
though he did not provide evidence.
Dominion, originally a Canadian company that now has its effective
headquarters in Denver, makes machines for voters to cast ballots and for
poll workers to count them, as well as software that helps government
officials organize and keep track of election results.
Georgia spent $107 million on 30,000 of the company’s machines last year.
In some cases, they proved to be headaches in the state’s primary elections
in June, though officials largely attributed the problems to a lack of
training for election workers.
Dominion did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
In Antrim County, Mich., unofficial results initially showed President-elect
Joseph R. Biden Jr. beating Mr. Trump by roughly 3,000 votes. But that didn
’t seem right in the Republican stronghold, so election workers checked
again.
It turned out that they had configured the Dominion ballot scanners and
reporting software with slightly different versions of the ballot, which
meant that the votes were counted correctly but that they were reported
incorrectly, state officials said. The correct tallies showed Mr. Trump beat
Mr. Biden by roughly 2,500 votes in the county.
In Oakland County, Mich., election officials also spotted an error after
they first reported the unofficial counts. They realized they had mistakenly
counted votes from the city of Rochester Hills, Mich., twice, according to
the Michigan Department of State.
The revised tallies showed that an incumbent Republican county commissioner
had kept his seat, not lost it. Oakland County used software from a company
called Hart InterCivic, not Dominion, though the software was not at fault.
Both errors, which appeared to go against Republicans, spurred conspiracy
theories in conservative corners of the internet. That drew a response from
Tina Barton, the Republican clerk in Rochester Hills, Mich., the city that
had its votes briefly counted twice.
“As a Republican, I am disturbed that this is intentionally being
mischaracterized to undermine the election process,” she said in a video
she posted online. “This was an isolated mistake that was quickly rectified
.”
Michigan officials added that the errors came in the counties’ unofficial
tallies and that they were fixed before another layer of checks meant to
catch such mistakes. In that review, two Republican and two Democratic “
canvassers” certify the vote counts in each county, checking poll books,
ballot summaries and tabulator tapes.
In Georgia’s Gwinnett County, the vote count was delayed because of an
apparent problem with the Dominion software, according to a detailed
explanation from county officials. The software properly counted the votes,
the county said, but it would not send some tallies to the state’s central
database. Joe Sorenson, a Gwinnett County spokesman, said that the county
has since been able to report the accurate totals to the state, but that it
remains unclear what exactly happened with the software.
Spalding and Morgan counties in Georgia had separate problems with systems
that check-in voters at the polls. Those so-called Poll Pads were made by a
company called KnowInk, not Dominion, said Harri Hursti, an election
security expert on the ground in Georgia.
“People are comparing apples to oranges in the name of Dominion,” Mr.
Hursti said.
Mr. Perez, the election-technology researcher, said it was fair to ask for
more transparency and accountability from the companies that make the
technology that underpins elections, but there is no evidence of any fraud
or widespread errors in the 2020 race.
“It’s reasonable for citizens and politicians to look at the role of
private vendors in the machinery of democracy and to ask questions,” he
said. “Now that doesn’t mean elections are rigged.”
Nicole Perlroth contributed reporting.
1 (共1页)
进入USANews版参与讨论
相关主题
势头已经开始转到 Cruz 那一边了,床铺最近对于 establishment 的攻击表现Christopher Wray快上任了
民调显示希拉里胜率95%孟晚舟事件,会不会让中美贸易战再生变?
Hillary没有病也没有藏,她在做最重要的事Food-stamp tally nears 40 million, sets record
Breaking: Trump campaign raises $90 million in August毒!墨西哥贩毒集团谋杀人数超过1万
联邦法官又判了Same Old Idea: Thomas Jefferson Pushed Balanced Budget, Too
万达在美国打造最大连锁电影院线Americans’ Incomes Have Dropped 6.7 Percent During the ‘Recovery’
没人关心床铺的爱抚逼爱的头的提名?Real federal deficit dwarfs official tally
新任FBI局長提名人 悄悄刪除俄羅斯官司委任律師簡介支持禁枪的怎么看拥枪自卫成功的案例?
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: dominion话题: software话题: county话题: michigan话题: georgia