a*********a
发帖数: 3656 | 1 有几个搞得清
什么是AR-15，什么是自动，什么是半自动，什么是Assualt Rifle, 什么是军方定义的
assault weapon，什么是liberal政客嘴里的assault weapon? | f**********n
发帖数: 29853 | 2 期待梦姑来谈谈她对这些名词的理解。
梦姑曾经批评我们密州手枪必须登记长枪不需登记的法律不合理，俺也还等着梦姑的的
解释呢。 | a*********a
发帖数: 3656 | 3
【在 f**********n 的大作中提到】
: 期待梦姑来谈谈她对这些名词的理解。
: 梦姑曾经批评我们密州手枪必须登记长枪不需登记的法律不合理，俺也还等着梦姑的的
: 解释呢。
| a*********a
发帖数: 3656 | 4 禁这个我不反对：Short Range Assault Weapon | a*********a
发帖数: 3656 | 5 还是要禁这个？Shoulder Fired Multipurpose Assault Weapon.
【在 a*********a 的大作中提到】
: 禁这个我不反对：Short Range Assault Weapon
| f**********n
发帖数: 29853 | 6 讲到这个，加州不是回收武器吗？有人交了个这个，新闻立刻报道，觉得这是大政绩，
买到了这么大的杀人宝贝，救了几百人的命。
结果退伍兵在论坛上说，这武器是一次性的，射完后，外壳一点用没有了。加州政府回
收的就是这么个外壳。
【在 a*********a 的大作中提到】
: 禁这个我不反对：Short Range Assault Weapon
| T******g
发帖数: 21328 | 7 转：
有关枪控-数据来说话
There are 30,000 gun related deaths per year by firearms, and this number is
not disputed. U.S. population 324,059,091 as of Wednesday, June 22, 2016.
Do the math: 0.000000925% of the population dies from gun related actions
each year. Statistically speaking, this is insignificant! What is never told
, however, is a breakdown of those 30,000 deaths, to put them in perspective
as compared to other causes of death:
? 65% of those deaths are by suicide which would never be prevented by gun
laws
? 15% are by law enforcement in the line of duty and justified
? 17% are through criminal activity, gang and drug related or mentally ill
persons ? gun violence
? 3% are accidental discharge deaths
So technically, "gun violence" is not 30,000 annually, but drops to 5,100.
Still too many? Well, first, how are those deaths spanned across the nation?
? 480 homicides (9.4%) were in Chicago
? 344 homicides (6.7%) were in Baltimore
? 333 homicides (6.5%) were in Detroit
? 119 homicides (2.3%) were in Washington D.C. (a 54% increase over prior
years)
So basically, 25% of all gun crime happens in just 4 cities. All 4 of those
cities have strict gun laws, so it is not the lack of law that is the root
cause.
This basically leaves 3,825 for the entire rest of the nation, or about 75
deaths per state. That is an average because some States have much higher
rates than others. For example, California had 1,169 and Alabama had 1.
Now, who has the strictest gun laws by far? California, of course, but
understand, so it is not guns causing this. It is a crime rate spawned by
the number of criminal persons residing in those cities and states. So if
all cities and states are not created equally, then there must be something
other than the tool causing the gun deaths.
Are 5,100 deaths per year horrific? How about in comparison to other deaths?
All death is sad and especially so when it is in the commission of a crime
but that is the nature of crime. Robbery, death, rape, assault all is done
by criminals and thinking that criminals will obey laws is ludicrous. That's
why they are criminals.
But what about other deaths each year?
? 40,000+ die from a drug overdose?THERE IS NO EXCUSE FOR THAT!
? 36,000 people die per year from the flu, far exceeding the criminal gun
deaths
? 34,000 people die per year in traffic fatalities(exceeding gun deaths even
if you include suicide)
Now it gets good:
? 200,000+ people die each year (and growing) from preventable medical
errors. You are safer in Chicago than when you are in a hospital!
? 710,000 people die per year from heart disease. It?s time to stop the
double cheeseburgers! So what is the point? If Obama and the anti-gun
movement focused their attention on heart disease, even a 10% decrease in
cardiac deaths would save twice the number of lives annually of all gun-
related deaths (including suicide, law enforcement, etc.). A 10% reduction
in medical errors would be 66% of the total gun deaths or 4 times the number
of criminal homicides......Simple, easily preventable 10% reductions!
So you have to ask yourself, in the grand scheme of things, why the focus on
guns? It's pretty simple.:
Taking away guns gives control to governments.
The founders of this nation knew that regardless of the form of government,
those in power may become corrupt and seek to rule as the British did by
trying to disarm the populace of the colonies. It is not difficult to
understand that a disarmed populace is a controlled populace.
Thus, the second amendment was proudly and boldly included in the U.S.
Constitution. It must be preserved at all costs.
So the next time someone tries to tell you that gun control is about saving
lives, look at these facts and remember these words from Noah Webster: "
Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in
almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce
unjust laws by the sword, because the whole body of the people are armed
and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be,
on any pretense, raised in the United States. A military force at the
command of Congress can execute no laws, but such as the people perceive to
be just and constitutional; for they will possess the power."
Remember, when it comes to "gun control," the important word is ?control,"
not ?gun." |
|
