由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
USANews版 - 自由派法官v5:死刑可能违宪 (转载)
相关主题
自由派法官v5:死刑可能违宪 (转载)Texas好样的
右派還是跟國民黨像,裝屄犯多,看左派心多齐强烈推荐:大選決定未來大法官動向!
这次AA恐怕保不住了大选杂谈:没决定选谁的看看,已经决定的就算了 (转载)
这个大法官 Ruth Bader Ginsburg 是不是该催她走了?现在加州大学的录取原则 (转载)
非法移民当然可以投票 见Evenwel-AbbottSupreme Court will hear new challenge to affirmative action
Ginsburg不出席trump的国会演讲Jan 25,高院案子再一桩
Sotomayor和Ginsburg是两员大将共和党说大选后再任命大法官
高院对全国取消死刑的呼吁置之不理2010年法庭9名大法官当选的情况
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: penalty话题: death话题: justice话题: breyer话题: stephen
进入USANews版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
b*****d
发帖数: 61690
1
【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
发信人: brihand (brihand), 信区: Military
标 题: 自由派法官v5:死刑可能违宪
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Jun 29 15:16:34 2015, 美东)
Justice Stephen Breyer’s dissent: Death penalty may be unconstitutional
By Adam B. Lerner
The death penalty may be unconstitutional, two of the Supreme Court’s
liberal judges suggested on Monday.
In a dissent to the majority’s opinion in Glossip v. Gross, which upheld
Oklahoma’s use of a key drug used for lethal injections, Justice Stephen
Breyer, joined by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, called for a renewed legal
debate over the death penalty.
The court has not ruled on the constitutionality of the death penalty at-
large since Gregg v. Georgia in 1976 — though it has examined various
aspect of death penalty protocols, including applying the punishment to the
mentally handicapped, to minors, and via various methods — and Breyer wrote
that “[t]he circumstances and the evidence of the death penalty’s
application have changed radically since then.”
“Given these changes, I believe that it is now time to reopen the question,
” he wrote, adding that the last 40 years of the death penalty in America
have led him to believe “that the death penalty, in and of itself, now
likely constitutes a legally prohibited ‘cruel and unusual punishmen[t].’”
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/06/supreme-court-justice-stephen-breyer-death-penalty-may-be-unconstitutional-119547.html#ixzz3eTq7eNXv
b*****e
发帖数: 53215
2
我觉得很快条子抓人也要违宪了

【在 b*****d 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
: 发信人: brihand (brihand), 信区: Military
: 标 题: 自由派法官v5:死刑可能违宪
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Jun 29 15:16:34 2015, 美东)
: Justice Stephen Breyer’s dissent: Death penalty may be unconstitutional
: By Adam B. Lerner
: The death penalty may be unconstitutional, two of the Supreme Court’s
: liberal judges suggested on Monday.
: In a dissent to the majority’s opinion in Glossip v. Gross, which upheld
: Oklahoma’s use of a key drug used for lethal injections, Justice Stephen

1 (共1页)
进入USANews版参与讨论
相关主题
2010年法庭9名大法官当选的情况非法移民当然可以投票 见Evenwel-Abbott
研究了一下fisher vs. UT的argumentGinsburg不出席trump的国会演讲
创普在AA上是什么立场?Sotomayor和Ginsburg是两员大将
Boehner: SCOTUS is why I'm voting for Trump高院对全国取消死刑的呼吁置之不理
自由派法官v5:死刑可能违宪 (转载)Texas好样的
右派還是跟國民黨像,裝屄犯多,看左派心多齐强烈推荐:大選決定未來大法官動向!
这次AA恐怕保不住了大选杂谈:没决定选谁的看看,已经决定的就算了 (转载)
这个大法官 Ruth Bader Ginsburg 是不是该催她走了?现在加州大学的录取原则 (转载)
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: penalty话题: death话题: justice话题: breyer话题: stephen