w*****e 发帖数: 226 | 1 In this sense religion is the age-old endeavour of mankind to become clearly
and
completely conscious of these values and goals, and constantly to
strengthen th
eir effects." He argued that conflicts between science and religion "have
all sp
rung from fatal errors". |
a******e 发帖数: 982 | 2 你相信這段說的對的話, 要不要也相信他說的別的, 比方說
I have repeatedly said that in my opinion the idea of a personal God is a
childlike one
還是pick and choose 就好了?
clearly
【在 w*****e 的大作中提到】 : In this sense religion is the age-old endeavour of mankind to become clearly : and : completely conscious of these values and goals, and constantly to : strengthen th : eir effects." He argued that conflicts between science and religion "have : all sp : rung from fatal errors".
|
G******e 发帖数: 9567 | 3 老爱是说宗教就是由于各种原因(三种)人为而成的。宗教和科学应该各司其职,科学
专注于物理世界,宗教独守精神层次,这样就能平安相处。如果任何一方越界,就会引
起这样那样的冲突,就像神创论和进化论一样。
这就是为什么天主教开始后退妥协,因为知道自己是错的:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article574768.ece |
q**********5 发帖数: 2181 | 4 一般来说,宗教和科学是不同范畴的东西,不见得会矛盾,可以共存。
但是,基督教和科学是矛盾的。原因是基督教和科学对一些__相同的问题__给出了矛盾
的答案。
例如:
“圣经”:人类的历史和地球的历史只差几天。(“六日创世”)
科学:人类的历史大约三百万年,而地球的历史大约四十六亿年。
“圣经”:人和恐龙在同一天被造。(地上的动物都在第六日创造)
科学:恐龙几千万年前就灭绝了,人类的历史却只有大约三百万年。
对这些矛盾,我知道的基督徒们的回应有以下五个:
1)把“六日创世”解释成“六阶段创世”。
2)捏造出一个“二次创世”。
3)科学可能错了。
4)“神”造的东西可以是有年龄的
5)“create”和“made”的狡辩
我认真仔细地思考了基督徒们的这些“解释”,结论是这些“解释”都是站不住脚的。
详细的分析请参考:
http://truth-truth.blog.sohu.com/36105265.html |
D*****r 发帖数: 6791 | 5 爱因斯坦长篇讨论宗教的意义,你这段节选没有包含他之前的表述。他的宗教观很近似
斯宾诺莎的自然神论。他是反对人格化的、刻板的看待神,如果这样看的话宗教和科学
就冲突了。
"It is this mythical, or rather this symbolic, content of the religious
traditions which is likely to come into conflict with science. This occurs
whenever this religious stock of ideas contains dogmatically fixed
statements on subjects which belong in the domain of science. Thus, it is of
vital importance for the preservation of true religion that such conflicts
be avoided when they arise from subjects which, in fact, are not really
essential for the pursuance of the religious aims." |