g**s 发帖数: 1114 | 1 In the first hand, the donk called my squeeze(about 25BB) with KQs and then all in me first after flop, I have to call....
Other two hands just go all in before flop... FTP likes to set up the AA/KK and enjoys the rake... |
s*********k 发帖数: 1989 | 2 I only play RUSH 100NL once and got lucky in allin. And never tried again.
BTW, how your HM show so many information(variables)?
Mine only show 8. |
W********m 发帖数: 7793 | 3 bad luck.. but fat money in NL 100 for sure.. i am moving there soon. My
bankroll should be enough. But i want to grind out a buffer first.. I am
definitely a bankroll nit.. |
g**s 发帖数: 1114 | 4 In HM-->HUD option-->player preference, you can add as many data/variables
as you want...
【在 s*********k 的大作中提到】 : I only play RUSH 100NL once and got lucky in allin. And never tried again. : BTW, how your HM show so many information(variables)? : Mine only show 8.
|
g**s 发帖数: 1114 | 5 Although I have bad luck in some NL 100 games, I am still a winning player
in NL100 as there are lots of easy money. I attached one hand I played
ysterday. I 3 bet this donk and he 4 bet me huge, I realized he has big hand
, could have KK or QQ or AK maybe?, I dont want the A or K or low cards on
the flop to stop him or scare him. So I donk all in and he called... and he
just had JJ...
I just dont fell I am 100% ready in NL100 yet, so I test water, won some
money and go back to NL50. I am thinki
【在 W********m 的大作中提到】 : bad luck.. but fat money in NL 100 for sure.. i am moving there soon. My : bankroll should be enough. But i want to grind out a buffer first.. I am : definitely a bankroll nit..
|
W********m 发帖数: 7793 | 6 The overall impression i got is that NL100 is much more loose and aggressive than NL50
, which is great for us to play TAG against them. NL 50 is becoming too
nitty where I can't often win stacks from them anymore.
Everyone wants to be a LAG and thinks that's how you become a true pro. but to me poorly played LAGs are the easiest to
win money from. |
s*********k 发帖数: 1989 | 7 The higher, the more aggressive since the BB is more meaningful. I felt that
way. It is even true at MTT. The higher buy-in, the higher
aggressive and bluffing. |
W********m 发帖数: 7793 | 8 This is not true. BB is only meaningful vesus your stack size. You should
always look at your stack as the number of blinds instead of its true money
value.
【在 s*********k 的大作中提到】 : The higher, the more aggressive since the BB is more meaningful. I felt that : way. It is even true at MTT. The higher buy-in, the higher : aggressive and bluffing.
|
s*********k 发帖数: 1989 | 9 lmao
should
money
【在 W********m 的大作中提到】 : This is not true. BB is only meaningful vesus your stack size. You should : always look at your stack as the number of blinds instead of its true money : value.
|
W********m 发帖数: 7793 | 10 You really have a special way to show your ignorance to the world.
【在 s*********k 的大作中提到】 : lmao : : should : money
|
n******1 发帖数: 4742 | 11 第一手很奇怪,怎么整了25bb 这么多?
then all in me first after flop, I have to call....
KK and enjoys the rake...
【在 g**s 的大作中提到】 : In the first hand, the donk called my squeeze(about 25BB) with KQs and then all in me first after flop, I have to call.... : Other two hands just go all in before flop... FTP likes to set up the AA/KK and enjoys the rake...
|
L****n 发帖数: 490 | 12
QK must 3 bet already. LZ 4 bet behind
【在 n******1 的大作中提到】 : 第一手很奇怪,怎么整了25bb 这么多? : : then all in me first after flop, I have to call.... : KK and enjoys the rake...
|
g**s 发帖数: 1114 | 13 One MP opens pot size 3.5BB bet and there is 1 caller in LP and this QKs
calls as well. I squeeze to 25BB, other 2 just fold and this guy called...
no 4 bet here.
【在 L****n 的大作中提到】 : : QK must 3 bet already. LZ 4 bet behind
|
g********r 发帖数: 1458 | 14 Bankroll management is king. It doesn't matter if someone is lucky agaisnt
you once a while, in the long run, you'd rather have them getting lucky on
you every time, that's the beauty of poker I guess. |