r****z
发帖数: 12020 | 1 欣赏一下大师的战绩，呵呵。
http://www.mitbbs.com/article/Stock/35638175_0.html
发信人: XiuShi (中西合璧修士), 信区: Stock
标 题: Re: Tesla现在该买还是卖？一个字！
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Jun 16 16:47:42 2014, 美东)
gets
http://www.mitbbs.com/article/Stock/35638047_0.html
发信人: XiuShi (中西合璧修士), 信区: Stock
标 题: Re: tsla成功突破220！！！
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Jun 16 15:47:18 2014, 美东)
Pros like me LOVE short squeeze. ALWAYS
Even in situations where I am already short.
Because I always double up or triple up.
Right at or very close to the short-squeeze peak.
NOTHING MORE PROFITABLE & FUN THAN SUCH GAME.
http://www.mitbbs.com/article/Stock/35637755_0.html
发信人: XiuShi (中西合璧修士), 信区: Stock
标 题: Re: 有烧 TSLA 的吗？
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Jun 16 14:02:21 2014, 美东)
Day's Range: 206.27 - 219.96
我上面回复的时候是 219.61，所以今天基本已见顶。 | f******n
发帖数: 314 | 2 大师都是能精准的抓到每一个顶的, 220, 235，you name it. | w***n
发帖数: 1519 | 3 How dare you. haha
【在 r****z 的大作中提到】
: 欣赏一下大师的战绩，呵呵。
: http://www.mitbbs.com/article/Stock/35638175_0.html
: 发信人: XiuShi (中西合璧修士), 信区: Stock
: 标 题: Re: Tesla现在该买还是卖？一个字！
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Jun 16 16:47:42 2014, 美东)
: gets
: http://www.mitbbs.com/article/Stock/35638047_0.html
: 发信人: XiuShi (中西合璧修士), 信区: Stock
: 标 题: Re: tsla成功突破220！！！
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Jun 16 15:47:18 2014, 美东)
| X****i
发帖数: 1877 | 4 May as well check all my posts, and here is the link:
http://www.mitbbs.com/mitbbs_bbsbfind.php?board=Stock
They are numerous enough to be statistically significant.
So certainly not a matter of luck, and of course not perfect.
Perfection is impossible,and not necessary for profitability. | X****i
发帖数: 1877 | 5
Can you do better than being a jealous loser?
Can the original poster do better?
No, I'm not at all ashamed of my forecasts.
In fact, I am quite proud of them.
Not that I like to toot my own horn, but you guys are truly pathetic
The Original Poster, though, should be ashamed of being selective:
Here is the entire thread, with nothing omitted as the OP tried to hide:
http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/Stock/35639103.html
And there are many MORE, use this link:
http://www.mitbbs.com/mitbbs_bbsbfind.php?board=Stock
【在 w***n 的大作中提到】
: How dare you. haha
| w***n
发帖数: 1519 | 6 Rather than refer to all your "numerous enough to be statistically
significant posts", please give a straight answer to a straight question:
Was TSLA one of your "been right and consistent(ly) profitable" trades (
either physically or mentally) or was it one example of your bad luck and
non-perfection?
【在 X****i 的大作中提到】
: May as well check all my posts, and here is the link:
: http://www.mitbbs.com/mitbbs_bbsbfind.php?board=Stock
: They are numerous enough to be statistically significant.
: So certainly not a matter of luck, and of course not perfect.
: Perfection is impossible,and not necessary for profitability.
| X****i
发帖数: 1877 | 7
I respond for the benefit of other readers, NOT you. You're a pest that I
truly despise and a loser that no employer should hire but all should fire.
Now back to the topic for other readers' benefit:
My trading in TSLA is not perfect, and my TSLA forecasts were somewhat below
my expectation and my norm, but I do not consider it to be bad luck or too
serious a problem.
I typically double up at least (as I did at 234+) if not triple up, at the
end of a short-squeeze, so I would be breaking even at 227 and profitable
below that. I could day trade to get myself into the black rather quickly
but I am too lazy to bother especially since TSLA will get much lower anyway
. I can deal with up to 5 more consecutive short-squeezes in TSLA through
cash/risk management. The worst I have had to deal with was 3 times of
consecutive short squeezes and that was long ago in another high flyer, but
it was profitable in the end. I have and feel zero stress, as also verified
by my blood pressure kit.
As I do not have to write anything to tell others what I think or plan to do
, I typically perform somewhat better than my posts, as I can refine my last
minute assessments and adjustments and act immediately thereafter without
delay. I diversify well and hold cash reserves in anticipation of short
squeezes and bear raids which I welcome and love. I rarely use margin and
typically have sizable cash in reserve. That is my style. I am neither a
bear nor a bull, actually. I just love to pick tops and bottoms, and why
not. This is NOT risky at all for me especially if I diversify and allocate
cash very conservatively. Most of the time I am both long and short and I
typically scale in and out of my positions, whether long or short. I never
chase after prices, but wait for them to go to extremes before I put in my
trades.
【在 w***n 的大作中提到】
: Rather than refer to all your "numerous enough to be statistically
: significant posts", please give a straight answer to a straight question:
: Was TSLA one of your "been right and consistent(ly) profitable" trades (
: either physically or mentally) or was it one example of your bad luck and
: non-perfection?
| w***n
发帖数: 1519 | 8 I get it. You're very mad at me, but you're the one who keeps calling names.
I only asked some legit questions, at the most being on the sarcastic side.
Nevertheless, I'm now even more impressed with your quality wording skills.
It just gets better and better.
Here are a few of my favorite lines for other readers' benefit:
"I could day trade to get myself into the black rather quickly
but I am too lazy to bother..."
"I have and feel zero stress, as also verified
by my blood pressure kit."
"I typically perform somewhat better than my posts, as I can refine my last
minute assessments and adjustments and act immediately thereafter without
delay."
Those are hilarious. Any more of these coming? I had a lunch with a smile on
my face. Thank you.
below
too
anyway
【在 X****i 的大作中提到】
:
: I respond for the benefit of other readers, NOT you. You're a pest that I
: truly despise and a loser that no employer should hire but all should fire.
: Now back to the topic for other readers' benefit:
: My trading in TSLA is not perfect, and my TSLA forecasts were somewhat below
: my expectation and my norm, but I do not consider it to be bad luck or too
: serious a problem.
: I typically double up at least (as I did at 234+) if not triple up, at the
: end of a short-squeeze, so I would be breaking even at 227 and profitable
: below that. I could day trade to get myself into the black rather quickly
| X****i
发帖数: 1877 | 9
names.
side.
skills.
last
I am NOT responding to you, but writing for benefits of my friends here ONLY.
I have very high standards, not just for forecasting know-how, but for human
beings. I can be extremely nice and helpful to nice people, but can
unleash my contempt fully on jealous trouble makers, who have nothing
constructive to contribute but always try to sabotage those who are better
and doing good. Such people are typically very thick-skinned because they
have ingrained life-long malfeasance to match and is a cancer in any group,
organization or company and should never be tolerated.
Waterfall thinks what I wrote above was impossible and that's perfectly
understandable for someone who has low or no ability of significance to
contribute, but jealousy in abundance. Normally, you would not want to
bother to enlighten such people or help them in any way, but this of course
is not possible in a public forum. I do not hesitate to unmask and call
such people for what they are, and give them the adjectives that my high
standards would warrant. Waterfall is the typical infighter that we
complain about so much,and one should enjoy heaping scorn on such people, as
one would enjoy heaping friendship, help and praise on truly good people. I
do not treat people uniformly, but have an extreme spectrum. One thing is
for sure, I am not apathetic but proactive. Since Waterfall sprang up like
a mad dog to maliciously attack and disrupt me for no reason except
jealousy, and tenaciously, he deserved a big verbal stick, if not bigger,
for his tenacious nuisance. Of course, it would be far sweeter to short his
employer's stock, if it is publicly traded. If anyone knows, PM me, and I
will reward you well with baozi. I have done so a number of times in the
past, each time with exhilarating success. More importantly, in addition to
baozi, you will also be able to make truly serious money, as I will help you
profit from the short sales as well, all privately and in strict confidence
.
【在 w***n 的大作中提到】
: I get it. You're very mad at me, but you're the one who keeps calling names.
: I only asked some legit questions, at the most being on the sarcastic side.
: Nevertheless, I'm now even more impressed with your quality wording skills.
: It just gets better and better.
: Here are a few of my favorite lines for other readers' benefit:
: "I could day trade to get myself into the black rather quickly
: but I am too lazy to bother..."
: "I have and feel zero stress, as also verified
: by my blood pressure kit."
: "I typically perform somewhat better than my posts, as I can refine my last
| w***n
发帖数: 1519 | 10 Thanks for trying, but these most recent comments are slightly less funny. I
do have very high standards for jokes, especially considering your norm.
You want to short my company's stock? I'm not allowed to talk about it in
public. But if you short SPY/IVV, I'm sure it should go down with the index,
if that's what you are trying to accomplish, which is again very impressive
of you.
But it does bring up a question: if you truly trade like this with real
money and at such intellectual level, how long does it take to be able to
live under the bridge?
ONLY.
human
【在 X****i 的大作中提到】
:
: names.
: side.
: skills.
: last
: I am NOT responding to you, but writing for benefits of my friends here ONLY.
: I have very high standards, not just for forecasting know-how, but for human
: beings. I can be extremely nice and helpful to nice people, but can
: unleash my contempt fully on jealous trouble makers, who have nothing
: constructive to contribute but always try to sabotage those who are better
| | | X****i
发帖数: 1877 | 11
I
index,
impressive
Go see a psychiatrist ASAP.
As for your company and its ticker, I always verify independently via
different sources. Anyone in trading business knows that is standard and
basic.
【在 w***n 的大作中提到】
: Thanks for trying, but these most recent comments are slightly less funny. I
: do have very high standards for jokes, especially considering your norm.
: You want to short my company's stock? I'm not allowed to talk about it in
: public. But if you short SPY/IVV, I'm sure it should go down with the index,
: if that's what you are trying to accomplish, which is again very impressive
: of you.
: But it does bring up a question: if you truly trade like this with real
: money and at such intellectual level, how long does it take to be able to
: live under the bridge?
:
| w***n
发帖数: 1519 | 12 Ooh, "sources", plural. How do you know all these friends similar to you?
Somebody must have put a lot of efforts going beyond standard and basic to
host these group sessions. Glad to hear you are in good hands.
【在 X****i 的大作中提到】
:
: I
: index,
: impressive
: Go see a psychiatrist ASAP.
: As for your company and its ticker, I always verify independently via
: different sources. Anyone in trading business knows that is standard and
: basic.
| X****i
发帖数: 1877 | 13
Waterfall, you're getting incoherent and talking gibberish, what's the
matter? Can't afford a psychiatrist?
Since I am so poor in timing, and so inept as you claim, and you've been
harassing me with such tenacity, I expect you would openly and eagerly
declare your company's ticker, because I would be so totally wrong and
ridiculous as you claimed. If so, your stock will no doubt skyrocket and
you'll get rich enough to hire a psychiatrist at last, and your CEO will
likely promote you, and give you a big raise. So, you should jump with joy!
Hmm? Does your behavior contradicts your ridicules, fabrications and
attacks? And please, don't again insult your reader' intelligence with your
bullshit about not being allowed to say which public company you work for.
Not that I expect you to speak the truth but it's just ludicrous.
Anyway, don't worry, Waterfall, I will only short a stock that interests me
by exploiting its price down swings, nothing more, and cover and buy and go
long at its price bottoms, and REPEAT when it peaks again. Based on your
endless ridicule and harassment, I am sure you are confident your stock will
skyrocket rather than behaving like a waterfall, right? So, I will in
fact be doing you and your stock a huge favor by shorting it, isn't it so?
So, congratulations! LOL.
【在 w***n 的大作中提到】
: Ooh, "sources", plural. How do you know all these friends similar to you?
: Somebody must have put a lot of efforts going beyond standard and basic to
: host these group sessions. Glad to hear you are in good hands.
| m********o
发帖数: 2088 | 14 Hello, Mr. Popular. Are you saying that friendship contains within it an
inherent obligation to maintain confidences?
ONLY.
【在 X****i 的大作中提到】
:
: Waterfall, you're getting incoherent and talking gibberish, what's the
: matter? Can't afford a psychiatrist?
: Since I am so poor in timing, and so inept as you claim, and you've been
: harassing me with such tenacity, I expect you would openly and eagerly
: declare your company's ticker, because I would be so totally wrong and
: ridiculous as you claimed. If so, your stock will no doubt skyrocket and
: you'll get rich enough to hire a psychiatrist at last, and your CEO will
: likely promote you, and give you a big raise. So, you should jump with joy!
: Hmm? Does your behavior contradicts your ridicules, fabrications and
| w***n
发帖数: 1519 | 15 Hello again FatCat,
I'm not going to tell you the ticker or any other picks, so that you can
wait for one day, and claim a mental glory to yourself, like what you said:
"I have done so a number of times in the past, each time with exhilarating
success." It's just no good for your symptoms.
Try ask yourself this simple question first: are you seriously imagining
that you can move a big cap for more than 1 or 2 pennies?
That's a lot of mental power but just write the answer down and read it
together with a professional. You were just embarrassing yourself.
joy!
your
【在 X****i 的大作中提到】
:
: Waterfall, you're getting incoherent and talking gibberish, what's the
: matter? Can't afford a psychiatrist?
: Since I am so poor in timing, and so inept as you claim, and you've been
: harassing me with such tenacity, I expect you would openly and eagerly
: declare your company's ticker, because I would be so totally wrong and
: ridiculous as you claimed. If so, your stock will no doubt skyrocket and
: you'll get rich enough to hire a psychiatrist at last, and your CEO will
: likely promote you, and give you a big raise. So, you should jump with joy!
: Hmm? Does your behavior contradicts your ridicules, fabrications and
| X****i
发帖数: 1877 | 16
I do not know what others' or your standard is, but yes, I automatically
keep confidences if the information I receive from anyone (friend or not) is
of a private nature, even if no request for confidentiality is made.
This is particularly so if inadvertent exposure of such information could
potentially harm the information provider in any way, even if slight and
extremely unlikely.
Obviously, if I had stated in advance that certain information I receive
will be kept in confidence, that is exactly what I mean. In that case, you
can be absolutely sure that no one else will ever know about it or any
aspect of it, never from me anyway.
To my friends, I am well known as the most tight-lipped information locker.
People have confided in me things they would not ever tell their most
intimate or closest. In no instance have I ever allowed even an iota of a
hint of the existence of such information to be revealed. I have behaved in
this way since preteen, and over the years, it has become my ingrained
second nature. You can fairly say that I actually love keeping confidences,
almost to the point of obsession, and I do take pride in my having
maintained an impeccable record in this regard.
I hope the above answers your question.
【在 m********o 的大作中提到】
: Hello, Mr. Popular. Are you saying that friendship contains within it an
: inherent obligation to maintain confidences?
:
: ONLY.
| X****i
发帖数: 1877 | 17 I won't bother to reply to pathologically jealous, and mean-spirited trouble
makers such as Waterfall. I have been more than generous and patient in
responding previously.
So the following is for other readers:
It takes less than 5 minutes to set up an effective shorting plan on a
targeted stock, and if rushed, may be 2 minutes.
So it is much more effective, impactful and satisfying to short a nasty
person's stock, if I so choose, than to waste time typing arguments with him
/her. Even so, I rarely bother to do this, because most of the time, I have
more interesting opportunities and I am a rational person. Since Waterfall
believes that stock prices cannot be affected in any way by my shorting, he
should not ever be concerned, especially given, in his opinion, my gross
incompetence and extreme lack of ability. Obviously then, he must be far
superior in price forecasting and strategy, but somehow has jealously
guarded his great wisdom and not bothered to share any forecasts that I am
aware of, except to attack and harass me incessantly.
My forecasts speak for themselves. They are not my best, but just average,
even rushed, efforts, but plenty good enough for helping the frogs for a
brief while I think. But beware that I usually do not bother to update them
because I don't keep track of what I posted and I don't bother to remember
them, much less review them. But I am confident that the majority of them
are good, at least initially and for very short-term. So even if I don't
bother to update, as is usually the case, the forecasts should in most cases
save you some money by being able to avoid overpaying or under-selling from
a few nickels to several dollars. If anyone thinks that all these are pure
luck, he/she is entitled to his/her opinion and I could not care less.
Plus he/she should then just stop reading my posts. If he/she could do
better, or even much worse, I still welcome his/her posts. I believe in
free speech and free flow of information.
What Waterfall and his equally jealous lackeys are trying to do is to smear
me and to harass me, not for any specific errors of my forecasts, but just
so I will get upset and may be stop posting. But undoubtedly they continue
to read my forecasts and yet continue to attack and harass me. Isn't this
strange if my posts are "useless". Why do they still bother to read them,
especially since I have stopped responding to them? I fully realize there
are gangs and cliques on the stock board. But this relentless mischief by
rather old kids is quite ridiculous. We are clearly not dealing with grown
ups here. All my forecasts are on record for anyone to read, and they speak
for themselves. You can read them and judge for yourself. Here is the
link:
http://www.mitbbs.com/mitbbs_bbsbfind.php?board=Stock | r****z
发帖数: 12020 | 18 大师这么多战无不胜的预测，哪个预测算数呀？
咦，大师的TSLA还没出水呀？一定是我打开的方式不对。
anyway
http://www.mitbbs.com/article/Stock/35639103_0.html
发信人: XiuShi (中西合璧修士), 信区: Stock
标 题: TSLA Short Squeeze Peaked @ 234.89 Minutes Ago
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Jun 17 11:31:23 2014, 美东)
This means Extraordinarily Low Risk & High Profit To SELL SHORT & Trap MMs
at current Extreme & Artificial price levels
http://www.mitbbs.com/article/Stock/35648995_0.html
发信人: XiuShi (致力为花街散财，造福散户), 信区: Stock
标 题: Re: 这周末大概是最后一次提供预测，想问的就问吧。
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sun Jun 22 20:48:20 2014, 美东)
20140620, TSLA ,229.5900,208.6973,243.3654
【在 X****i 的大作中提到】
: I won't bother to reply to pathologically jealous, and mean-spirited trouble
: makers such as Waterfall. I have been more than generous and patient in
: responding previously.
: So the following is for other readers:
: It takes less than 5 minutes to set up an effective shorting plan on a
: targeted stock, and if rushed, may be 2 minutes.
: So it is much more effective, impactful and satisfying to short a nasty
: person's stock, if I so choose, than to waste time typing arguments with him
: /her. Even so, I rarely bother to do this, because most of the time, I have
: more interesting opportunities and I am a rational person. Since Waterfall
| X****i
发帖数: 1877 | 19 Markets are manipulated all the time, and daily.
If you can be ahead by 1 minute, theoretically, you'll be fine, just ask any
HFTer
But if you can see days ahead, you're actually very safe, with no surprises.
In financial markets, good traders DON'T want everyone to agree with them.
In fact, it would be VERY UNDESIRABLE if that is the case.
FORECASTS SLIGHTLY OLD, BUT OVERALLY STILL GOOD:
http://www.mitbbs.com/article/Stock/35648995_0.html |
|
