v****e 发帖数: 19471 | 1 标准:
1. That the daily number of NYSE new 52 Week Highs and the daily number
of new 52 Week Lows must both be greater than 2.2 percent of total NYSE
issues traded that day.
2. That the smaller of these numbers is greater than or equal to 69 (68.
772 is 2.2% of 3126). This is not a rule but more like a checksum. This
condition is a function of the 2.2% of the total issues.
3. That the NYSE 10 Week moving average is rising.
4. That the McClellan Oscillator is negative on that same day. |
l******n 发帖数: 507 | |
v****e 发帖数: 19471 | 3 不知道,我也是头一次听说。但是wiki上找的那几个历史数据还挺吓人的,不是吗?
【在 l******n 的大作中提到】 : 靠谱吗?大侠?
|
l******n 发帖数: 507 | |
r*****t 发帖数: 7278 | 5 我的英文不好,看不懂
the probability of a move greater than 5%
to the downside after a confirmed Hindenburg Omen was 77%
这是说77%的可能是往上走吗?(比向下多5%?是什么东东?) |
l******n 发帖数: 507 | |
v****e 发帖数: 19471 | 7 就是说一旦有个确立的HO, 有77%的概率市场会发生一个大于5%的下跌。中文也够绕嘴
的。。。
【在 r*****t 的大作中提到】 : 我的英文不好,看不懂 : the probability of a move greater than 5% : to the downside after a confirmed Hindenburg Omen was 77% : 这是说77%的可能是往上走吗?(比向下多5%?是什么东东?)
|
r*****t 发帖数: 7278 | 8 哦,谢谢
看来历史真的和我感觉相符啊。
我觉得还会大瀑布的真的是历史上有过很多次啊。
看来买put还不晚 |
v****e 发帖数: 19471 | 9 “确认”指的好象是说一个月时间里出现两个以上这种TA combination. 今天好象是第
一个,而昨天只差一点点。
【在 r*****t 的大作中提到】 : 哦,谢谢 : 看来历史真的和我感觉相符啊。 : 我觉得还会大瀑布的真的是历史上有过很多次啊。 : 看来买put还不晚
|
b*******e 发帖数: 6389 | 10 好东西!
Lows
【在 v****e 的大作中提到】 : 标准: : 1. That the daily number of NYSE new 52 Week Highs and the daily number : of new 52 Week Lows must both be greater than 2.2 percent of total NYSE : issues traded that day. : 2. That the smaller of these numbers is greater than or equal to 69 (68. : 772 is 2.2% of 3126). This is not a rule but more like a checksum. This : condition is a function of the 2.2% of the total issues. : 3. That the NYSE 10 Week moving average is rising. : 4. That the McClellan Oscillator is negative on that same day.
|
b*******e 发帖数: 6389 | 11 说出来渐渐就不准了。
【在 v****e 的大作中提到】 : “确认”指的好象是说一个月时间里出现两个以上这种TA combination. 今天好象是第 : 一个,而昨天只差一点点。
|