g********r
发帖数: 4248 | 1 居然查不到。
网上查了一下。
1. 申请LCA， 证明美国人的工作不影响，找不到合适的美国人。
2. 要付得起同学的工资和福利
3，还得参与每年的H1B的抽签 | g********r
发帖数: 4248 | 2 I have submitted a fair number of H-1B petitions for small companies and
there is usually a large RFE (Request for Evidence) asking for lots of proof
that the company exists and has work for the beneficiary. They want to see
the lease for the office space, a copy of the floor plan showing where
employee workstations are, photographs of the premises, contracts for work,
payroll records, federal income tax returns and quarterly returns, etc.
【在 g********r 的大作中提到】
: 居然查不到。
: 网上查了一下。
: 1. 申请LCA， 证明美国人的工作不影响，找不到合适的美国人。
: 2. 要付得起同学的工资和福利
: 3，还得参与每年的H1B的抽签
| g********r
发帖数: 4248 | 3 First, there must be a valid employer-employee relationship. The ability to
hire, fire and control the employee is a factor. So in a 2 person startup -
- this may be an issue depending on the equity split.
Second, the position must be considered a speciality occupation --
typically most startups are in tech and the positions they tend to hire for
are H1B caliber, but you still have to go through the analysis.
Third, the startup should reasonably need a full-time X (developer,
engineer, etc) at the stage they are in. USCIS may argue that you should
have just hired a contractor or a part-timer. Ultimately, this may depend on
the company's current plan for growth. A business plan with projections for
hiring, cash flow and growth is useful.
Fourth, the company must pay at least the prevailing wage. This is
determined by county, position and level. If part-time, this will be an
hourly rate.
On the note of part-time versus full-time, sometimes, it may make more
sense for a startup to hire a part-time H1B rather than go straight to full
time based on reasons discussed above.
Finally, money helps. While technically, for H1Bs the company's "
ability to pay" is not a requirement-- in practice and when applied to
startups, it does matter. Funded startups have better luck getting approved
and overcoming nasty RFEs. It helps to have well-known VCs or accelerators
on your side. Having Y Combinator or 500 Startups back you is a major plus,
as far as I'm concerned. The track records of the accelerators, VCs and
startup founders are often taken into account.
【在 g********r 的大作中提到】
: 居然查不到。
: 网上查了一下。
: 1. 申请LCA， 证明美国人的工作不影响，找不到合适的美国人。
: 2. 要付得起同学的工资和福利
: 3，还得参与每年的H1B的抽签
| g********r
发帖数: 4248 | 4 https://www.quora.com/Can-a-startup-realistically-sponsor-an-H1B-or-is-that-
just-for-the-big-companies
【在 g********r 的大作中提到】
: 居然查不到。
: 网上查了一下。
: 1. 申请LCA， 证明美国人的工作不影响，找不到合适的美国人。
: 2. 要付得起同学的工资和福利
: 3，还得参与每年的H1B的抽签
| g********r
发帖数: 4248 | | a*****g
发帖数: 19398 | 6 USCIS 和 IRS 一对活宝
一个希望你招临时雇工（免得招海外的人）
另外一个希望你不要临时工而是全职员工（这样好收税）
to
-
for
on
for
【在 g********r 的大作中提到】
: 有人申请过吗？
:
: that-
| g********r
发帖数: 4248 | 7 IRS不重要啊。
重要是要先过这个USCIS
【在 a*****g 的大作中提到】
: USCIS 和 IRS 一对活宝
: 一个希望你招临时雇工（免得招海外的人）
: 另外一个希望你不要临时工而是全职员工（这样好收税）
:
: to
: -
: for
: on
: for
| a*****h
发帖数: 2182 | 8 A lot of good information here. | T***y
发帖数: 458 | 9 跟公司大小没关系，只要是正常的雇佣，材料都是真实可靠的。不管大公司小公司，移
民局都会派人来核实，只要材料对的上，没什么好担心的。
【在 g********r 的大作中提到】
: 居然查不到。
: 网上查了一下。
: 1. 申请LCA， 证明美国人的工作不影响，找不到合适的美国人。
: 2. 要付得起同学的工资和福利
: 3，还得参与每年的H1B的抽签
|
|
