由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
SanFrancisco版 - Prop. 8: Supreme Court clears way for gay marriage in California
相关主题
在联邦一级,选民主党;在加州,选共和党Gay couple 作为(领养小孩)的父母有啥不同
California's affirmative action ban bolstered by Supreme Court rulingprop 13是不是这个Brown 任上搞的?
现在加州大学的录取原则至少god的不是state religion
美最高法院取消政治捐款总额上限Calif. lawmakers pass homeowners bill of rights (ZZ)
SVCA Foundation活动: 反大学录取歧视Ed Blum讲座笑话:女儿说沙拉是她做的
上WSJ了:California's Asian Spring关于‘族裔优先’招生政策的八个常见误区 (转载)
最高法院将重新审理高校录取Affirmative Action案件AA Supreme Court的讨论结果是不是已经定了?
California Supreme Court upholds Prop. 209 affirmative action ban高法对AA案子的判决及其对华裔学生的影响
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: court话题: prop话题: california话题: state话题: supreme
进入SanFrancisco版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
v**a
发帖数: 2062
1
from LA time
By David G. Savage
June 26, 2013, 7:32 a.m.
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court cleared the way Wednesday for same-sex
marriages to resume in California as the justices, in a procedural ruling,
turned away the defenders of Proposition 8.
Chief Justice John Roberts, speaking for the 5-4 majority, said the private
sponsors of Prop. 8 did not have legal standing to appeal after the ballot
measure was struck down by a federal judge in San Francisco.
"We have never before upheld the standing of a private party to defend the
constitutionality of a state statute when state officials have chosen not to
," he said. "We decline to do so for the first time here."
Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Antonin Scalia and Elena Kagan
joined to form the majority.
The court’s action, while not a sweeping ruling, sends the case back to
California, where state and federal judges and the state’s top officials
have said same-sex marriage is a matter of equal rights.
Last fall, the high court agreed to hear a last-chance appeal from the
sponsors of the 2008 ballot measure that limited marriage to the union of a
man and a woman.
Federal courts in San Francisco had struck down the measure on the grounds
that it unfairly discriminated against gays and lesbians who wished to marry.
Usually, the governor and state’s lawyers defend state laws in federal
court, but both Gov. Jerry Brown and Atty. Gen. Kamala Harris refused to
defend Prop. 8.
Several sponsors of the ballot measure stepped in to defend the law, but
there were questions about whether they had legal standing to represent the
state in court.
1 (共1页)
进入SanFrancisco版参与讨论
相关主题
高法对AA案子的判决及其对华裔学生的影响SVCA Foundation活动: 反大学录取歧视Ed Blum讲座
刚在网上看到的一个白人对SCA 5的看法 (ZZ HUAREN)上WSJ了:California's Asian Spring
SCA5 准备走法律途径吧最高法院将重新审理高校录取Affirmative Action案件
我看最高法对密歇根AA ban的判决California Supreme Court upholds Prop. 209 affirmative action ban
在联邦一级,选民主党;在加州,选共和党Gay couple 作为(领养小孩)的父母有啥不同
California's affirmative action ban bolstered by Supreme Court rulingprop 13是不是这个Brown 任上搞的?
现在加州大学的录取原则至少god的不是state religion
美最高法院取消政治捐款总额上限Calif. lawmakers pass homeowners bill of rights (ZZ)
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: court话题: prop话题: california话题: state话题: supreme