e***h
发帖数: 2791 | 1 I just read this.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5j3lUqrOIBDRLW
其中
The court asked lawyer Vicki C. Jackson of Cambridge to join the gay
marriage arguments this spring, but she won't be arguing whether it's legal
for governments to treat gay Americans differently in issues of marriage.
Instead, at the court's invitation, Jackson will be arguing that it's
improper for the Supreme Court to even consider making a ruling on a federal
law that treats gay married couples differently from heterosexual married
couples.
什么意思， 所以SCUS 有可能说， IMPROPER FOR THEM TO DECIDE 所以就LET IT
HANGING. WHAT?? | g********d
发帖数: 4174 | 2 说的是应该是OBAMA政府而不是SC说了算，这个不太可能。不管怎样，有钱出点钱，没
钱放心睡一觉，然后就准备为你的LD办婚姻绿卡吧。 | e***h
发帖数: 2791 | 3 我感觉他们就是属于都不知道该怎么ARGUE了。 所以找个什么莫名其妙的理由来
DEFENSE. |
|
