w******n
发帖数: 13172 | 1 貌似几乎所有的跟帖都认可tg可以实现，都在讨论如何从政治上反制或用激光自卫。
http://www.usni.org/news-and-features/chinese-kill-weapon
Report: Chinese Develop Special "Kill Weapon" to Destroy U.S. Aircraft
Carriers
Advanced missile poses substantial new threat for U.S. Navy
U. S. Naval Institute
March 31, 2009
With tensions already rising due to the Chinese navy becoming more
aggressive in asserting its territorial claims in the South China Sea, the U
.S. Navy seems to have yet another reason to be deeply concerned.
After years of conjecture, details have begun to emerge of a "kill weapon"
developed by the Chinese to target and destroy U.S. aircraft carriers.
First posted on a Chinese blog viewed as credible by military analysts and
then translated by the naval affairs blog Information Dissemination, a
recent report provides a description of an anti-ship ballistic missile (ASBM
) that can strike carriers and other U.S. vessels at a range of 2000km.
The range of the modified Dong Feng 21 missile is significant in that it
covers the areas that are likely hot zones for future confrontations between
U.S. and Chinese surface forces.
The size of the missile enables it to carry a warhead big enough to inflict
significant damage on a large vessel, providing the Chinese the capability
of destroying a U.S. supercarrier in one strike.
Because the missile employs a complex guidance system, low radar signature
and a maneuverability that makes its flight path unpredictable, the odds
that it can evade tracking systems to reach its target are increased. It is
estimated that the missile can travel at mach 10 and reach its maximum range
of 2000km in less than 12 minutes.
Supporting the missile is a network of satellites, radar and unmanned aerial
vehicles that can locate U.S. ships and then guide the weapon, enabling it
to hit moving targets.
ASBM is said to be a modified DF-21
The ASBM is said to be a modified DF-21
While the ASBM has been a topic of discussion within national defense
circles for quite some time, the fact that information is now coming from
Chinese sources indicates that the weapon system is operational. The Chinese
rarely mention weapons projects unless they are well beyond the test stages.
If operational as is believed, the system marks the first time a ballistic
missile has been successfully developed to attack vessels at sea. Ships
currently have no defense against a ballistic missile attack.
Along with the Chinese naval build-up, U.S. Navy officials appear to view
the development of the anti-ship ballistic missile as a tangible threat.
After spending the last decade placing an emphasis on building a fleet that
could operate in shallow waters near coastlines, the U.S. Navy seems to have
quickly changed its strategy over the past several months to focus on
improving the capabilities of its deep sea fleet and developing anti-
ballistic defenses.
As analyst Raymond Pritchett notes in a post on the U.S. Naval Institute
blog:
"The Navy's reaction is telling, because it essentially equals a radical
change in direction based on information that has created a panic inside the
bubble. For a major military service to panic due to a new weapon system,
clearly a mission kill weapon system, either suggests the threat is
legitimate or the leadership of the Navy is legitimately unqualified. There
really aren't many gray spaces in evaluating the reaction by the Navy…the
data tends to support the legitimacy of the threat."
In recent years, China has been expanding its navy to presumably better
exert itself in disputed maritime regions. A recent show of strength in
early March led to a confrontation with an unarmed U.S. ship in
international waters. | t*******r
发帖数: 22634 | 2 搞到预算保住位子的途径之一
U
【在 w******n 的大作中提到】
: 貌似几乎所有的跟帖都认可tg可以实现，都在讨论如何从政治上反制或用激光自卫。
: http://www.usni.org/news-and-features/chinese-kill-weapon
: Report: Chinese Develop Special "Kill Weapon" to Destroy U.S. Aircraft
: Carriers
: Advanced missile poses substantial new threat for U.S. Navy
: U. S. Naval Institute
: March 31, 2009
: With tensions already rising due to the Chinese navy becoming more
: aggressive in asserting its territorial claims in the South China Sea, the U
: .S. Navy seems to have yet another reason to be deeply concerned.
|
|
