由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Military2版 - China Deploys World’s First Long-Range, Land-Based ‘Carrier Killer’: DF-21D Anti-Ship Ballistic Miss
相关主题
F-35的IOC日期定了ZT美国里根号航母逼近朝鲜半岛,双航母演习已蓄势待发!
美国海军学院网站关于导弹打航母的report真的? 军事专家评出三大明星武器
Iran successfully tests radar-guided anti-ship ballistic missile转: 中国反舰弹道导弹作战过程
三哥在水下也射了ZTASBM究竟靠不靠谱,主要看这一段
F22高速滑跑是在哪年?鳖的白云如果能把航母定位在一个5-10平方公里的区域内
解放军执意武力统一台湾怎么办?美专家答复震动台湾 zz为啥弹道导弹最后要拉攻角做机动啊?
薩德可攔截東風3 中國導彈戰略破功关于打航母的一篇blog
S Korea Deployed Cruise Missiles反舰弹道导弹会不会引发核报复?
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: china话题: anti话题: ballistic话题: capability话题: missile
进入Military2版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
e*c
发帖数: 395
1
土共井喷进行中!美帝太平洋司令Robert F. Willard官泻土共航母杀手DF-21D已经具
备“Initial Operational Capability” (IOC)
http://www.chinasignpost.com/2010/12/china-deploys-world%E2%80%99s-first-long-range-land-based-%E2%80%98carrier-killer%E2%80%99-df-21d-anti-ship-ballistic-missile-asbm-reaches-%E2%80%9Cinitial-operational-capability%E2%80%9D-ioc/
China Deploys World’s First Long-Range, Land-Based ‘Carrier Killer’: DF-
21D Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile (ASBM) Reaches “Initial Operational
Capability” (IOC)
Posted: 26. Dec, 2010 Last update: 27. Dec, 2010
“Deep Dive”—Special In-Depth Report I
Andrew Erickson and Gabe Collins, “China Deploys World’s First Long-Range,
Land-Based ‘Carrier Killer’: DF-21D Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile (ASBM)
Reaches ‘Initial Operational Capability’ (IOC),” China SignPost™ (
洞察中国), No. 14 (26 December 2010).
China SignPost™ 洞察中国–“Clear, high-impact China analysis.”©
As we enter the Year of the Hare, China has achieved a major military
milestone far faster than many foreign observers thought possible.[1] In a
December 2010 interview with veteran national security journalist Yoichi
Kato of the Asahi Shimbun, Admiral Robert F. Willard, Commander, U.S.
Pacific Command, offered significant new revelations:
Kato: Let me go into China’s anti-access area denial (A2AD) capabilities.
What is the current status of China’s anti-ship ballistic missile (ASBM)
development, and how close is it to actual operational deployment?
Willard: The anti-ship ballistic missile system in China has undergone
extensive testing. An analogy using a Western term would be “initial
operational capability (IOC),” whereby it has—I think China would perceive
that it has—an operational capability now, but they continue to develop it
. It will continue to undergo testing, I would imagine, for several more
years.
Q: China has IOC?
A: You would have to ask China that, but as we see the development of the
system, their acknowledging the system in open press reporting and the
continued testing of the system, I would gauge it as about the equivalent of
a U.S. system that has achieved IOC.
Q: China has already perfected the technology to fly that missile and also
the sensor systems for targeting. Has the entire system integration been
completed?
A: Typically, to have something that would be regarded as in its early
operational stage would require that that system be able to accomplish its
flight pattern as designed, by and large.
Q: But they have not conducted the actual flight test or the test to attack
moving ships yet, have they?
A: We have not seen an over-water test of the entire system.
Q: But do you believe they already have that capability?
A: I think that the component parts of the anti-ship ballistic missile have
been developed and tested.
Q: Is it a bigger threat to the United States than submarines in terms of
their anti-access area denial?
A: No, I don’t think so. Anti-access area denial, which is a term that was
relatively recently coined, is attempting to represent an entire range of
capabilities that China has developed and that other countries have
developed.
It’s not exclusively China that has what is now being referred to as A2/AD
capability. But in China’s case, it’s a combination of integrated air
defense systems, advanced naval systems such as the submarine, advanced
ballistic missile systems such as the anti-ship ballistic missile, as well
as power projection systems into the region.
The anti-access area denial systems, more or less, range countries,
archipelagos such as Japan, the Philippines and Vietnam, so there are many
countries in the region that are falling within the envelope of this, of an
A2AD capability of China. That should be concerning—and we know is
concerning—to those countries.
While it may be largely designed to assure China of its ability to affect
military operations within its regional waters, it is an expanded capability
that ranges beyond the first island chain and overlaps countries in the
region. For that reason, it is concerning to Southeast Asia, (and) it
remains concerning to the United States.
1 (共1页)
进入Military2版参与讨论
相关主题
反舰弹道导弹会不会引发核报复?F22高速滑跑是在哪年?
四代战机不比你一买菜车难?解放军执意武力统一台湾怎么办?美专家答复震动台湾 zz
印度人还是很镇定的薩德可攔截東風3 中國導彈戰略破功
说个稍微的题外话S Korea Deployed Cruise Missiles
F-35的IOC日期定了ZT美国里根号航母逼近朝鲜半岛,双航母演习已蓄势待发!
美国海军学院网站关于导弹打航母的report真的? 军事专家评出三大明星武器
Iran successfully tests radar-guided anti-ship ballistic missile转: 中国反舰弹道导弹作战过程
三哥在水下也射了ZTASBM究竟靠不靠谱,主要看这一段
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: china话题: anti话题: ballistic话题: capability话题: missile