t***h
发帖数: 5601 | 1 2016-09-06 22:19 来自 能见度
澎湃新闻见习记者 王盈颖
http://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_1525020
河北科技大学副教授韩春雨NgAgo实验是否具有可重复性再起波澜。9月6日，有成都媒
体刊发了对韩春雨的专访，题为“《自然》已证实实验可重复但还有不确定因素影响实
验结果”。9月6日晚间，曾撰写关于韩春雨报道的《自然》杂志记者David Cyranoski
邮件回复澎湃新闻时表示，该报道“不应该被作为韩春雨实验可重复的证据。”
之所以9月2日之后，关于韩春雨NgAgo实验的可重复性问题再次成为学术界的焦点，源
于8月2日《人民日报》客户端报道称，“对于外界要求公开原始数据的要求，河北科技
大学表示，在一个月之内韩春雨将采取适当形式公开验证，届时将有权威第三方作证。”
新华社在8月2日题为《“网红”学者韩春雨：正在持续实验将适时公开验证》的报道中
，也提到了“一个月左右时间”、“权威第三方”。报道称，“对于国际上一些科学家
要求公布原始数据的要求，河北科技大学表示，在一个月左右时间后，韩春雨将采取适
当形式公开验证结果，届时将有权威第三方作证。”
但随着一个月承诺时限已过，9月6日，前述成都媒体刊发了对韩春雨的报道。记者表示
，采访内容都有录音。报道中，韩春雨否认自己曾表态一个月回复，说“《自然》杂志
已证实实验可重复，但还有不确定因素影响实验结果。”
澎湃新闻拨打韩春雨电话，无人应答，也没回复短信。9月6日晚间，David Cyranoski
和《自然·生物技术》发言人用邮件回复了澎湃新闻，表达了一致观点。同时，《自然
·生物技术》表示将按照既定流程来调查此事。
自然杂志记者David Cyranoski邮件原文如下：
I have not read the original article in Chinese so I cannot comment on that
quotation from Dr. Han. There might have been some kind of miscommunication.
What I can say is that my news article should not be taken as evidence that
Dr Han' experiments are reproducible. I did not carry out any independent
replication experiments, and thus cannot add any first-hand knowledge
regarding the findings. My article does reflect that there are differences
of opinion about the reproducibility of Dr Han's experiments, and as far as
I know, that controversy has not yet been resolved.
My work as part of the Nature news team and the Nature Biotechnology
editorial team are distinct, so I cannot comment on that journals
investigation into the matter.
By the way, have you tried to confirm with Dr Han that he actually said that?
《自然·生物技术》发言人邮件原文如下：
The article published in Nature on August 8th is a piece of journalistic
reporting by the Nature's news team and should not be considered to be
validation of the integrity of the research. Nature's news team is
editorially independent from the research editorial teams of Nature
Biotechnology, the journal Nature and the other Nature-branded journals and
any views or conclusions reported in news articles should not be considered
to be the views of the research editorial teams.
Nature Biotechnology is following established process to investigate the
issues. | h******k
发帖数: 15372 | |
|
