g****a
发帖数: 1520 | | G********n
发帖数: 615 | 2 Peter Woit says:
November 26, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Curious,
I saw the document from Sen Hu you link to a few months ago, decided at the
time that it wasn’t a good idea to mention it on the blog. This was because
it seemed rather one-sided, and it was not clear at all that it was written
by someone expert enough in the technicalities and their history.
The Chen-Donaldson-Sun document did seem worth mentioning, since, while it
may be one-sided, it’s an authoritative representation of the views of some
of the principals in the the story. I’m glad to see that Tian has also
given his point of view. Hearing what they have to say directly from both
sides involved in this is a lot better than getting a one-sided argument
from some third party. So, at this point I don’t see anything particularly
useful about the Sen Hu document.
http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=6430#comments | T******a
发帖数: 4 | 3 这个peter woit在哥大，也是个胡森级别的人。老大岁数还是个senior instructor。
和胡森半斤八两，也属于围观群众。 | h********0
发帖数: 12056 | 4 没错， 这个人就是一个大鲁瑟。
【在 T******a 的大作中提到】
: 这个peter woit在哥大，也是个胡森级别的人。老大岁数还是个senior instructor。
: 和胡森半斤八两，也属于围观群众。
|
|
