由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Investment版 - Managed Funds Take Beating From Indexes
相关主题
Vanguard Admiral Shares requirement now $10,000公司401k里都是unit trust,很少mutual fund
all u need to know about mutual fundfund's expense ratio
为什么股票版在线人数是投资版的20倍呢。。请教一下actively managed mutual fund vs index mutual fund
准备买MFwipe out 了, 惨 (转载)
Index or active managed from bibbub大师大牛们请教一下money market的钱取出来不用交罚款吧
about active managed funds退休账户index fund 还是freedom 2045
[合集] about active managed fundstax managed mutual funds 和etf 那个更tax efficient
80% active MM lose to index....what 80%?鼓吹index的两大误区.
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: funds话题: managed话题: take话题: index话题: beating
进入Investment版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
t*******y
发帖数: 11968
1
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124036618955342011.html
By SAM MAMUDI
NEW YORK -- Investors in actively managed mutual funds for the past five
years have reason to wonder what they have been paying for: A new study from
Standard & Poor's finds that 70% of large-cap fund managers who use the S&P
500-stock index as a benchmark for comparison have failed to match the
performance of the index over that time.
Discuss
That is double-bad news, given that the index was down 19% in the five years
that en
c*****x
发帖数: 429
2
No surprise. They will each continue claiming that they belong to the other
30%.
s*******d
发帖数: 126
3
no kidding. And I bet the wsj article didn't even take taxes into account.
Read this artile from the NY Times.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/22/your-money/stocks-and-bonds/22stra.html?em
a quote:
"...net of all expenses, the actively managed fund would have to outperform
it by an average of 4.3 percentage points a year on a pre-expense basis."
good luck finding such a fund!
############################
February 22, 2009
Strategies
The Index Funds Win Again
By MARK HULBERT
THERE’S yet more evide

【在 t*******y 的大作中提到】
: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124036618955342011.html
: By SAM MAMUDI
: NEW YORK -- Investors in actively managed mutual funds for the past five
: years have reason to wonder what they have been paying for: A new study from
: Standard & Poor's finds that 70% of large-cap fund managers who use the S&P
: 500-stock index as a benchmark for comparison have failed to match the
: performance of the index over that time.
: Discuss
: That is double-bad news, given that the index was down 19% in the five years
: that en

n******n
发帖数: 12088
4
The usage of MF managers is to get the management fee. They have little
incentive to do good w.r.t fund buyers' interests.

from
&P
years

【在 t*******y 的大作中提到】
: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124036618955342011.html
: By SAM MAMUDI
: NEW YORK -- Investors in actively managed mutual funds for the past five
: years have reason to wonder what they have been paying for: A new study from
: Standard & Poor's finds that 70% of large-cap fund managers who use the S&P
: 500-stock index as a benchmark for comparison have failed to match the
: performance of the index over that time.
: Discuss
: That is double-bad news, given that the index was down 19% in the five years
: that en

1 (共1页)
进入Investment版参与讨论
相关主题
鼓吹index的两大误区.Index or active managed from bibbub大师
[合集] index fund一样make mistakeabout active managed funds
[合集] 鼓吹index的两大误区.[合集] about active managed funds
[合集] [原创]Index investing思辩未名版之一80% active MM lose to index....what 80%?
Vanguard Admiral Shares requirement now $10,000公司401k里都是unit trust,很少mutual fund
all u need to know about mutual fundfund's expense ratio
为什么股票版在线人数是投资版的20倍呢。。请教一下actively managed mutual fund vs index mutual fund
准备买MFwipe out 了, 惨 (转载)
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: funds话题: managed话题: take话题: index话题: beating