c********e
发帖数: 164 | 1 谢谢！
问大家一个问题, 关于绿卡的claim authorship
这个authorship只能是paper和conference abstract么？
如果给了一个talk，但是这个talk没有proceeding也没有正式的abstract，这个东西可
以算authorship么？（是个在某个公司的invited talk, 网上是有记录的，但是不是学
术presentation，所以没有conference abstract这种东西）
另一个问题是：eb1b一定要claim authorship么？可以只claim review和contribution
么？
自己的authorship太弱，真是不想claim.可是网上有人说, authorship和contribution
相辅相成，即使是eb1b也需要claim authorship，不然IO都懒得看contribution直接
reject了 |
d*******n
发帖数: 4778 | 2 如果你能提供证据是你的talk,个人认为应该算
第二个问题回答起来很难，不能说你claim review and contribution行或不行，你的
背景是什么情况，authorship弱，有多弱，说一下，可以帮你分析分析。
【在 c********e 的大作中提到】
: 谢谢！
: 问大家一个问题, 关于绿卡的claim authorship
: 这个authorship只能是paper和conference abstract么？
: 如果给了一个talk，但是这个talk没有proceeding也没有正式的abstract，这个东西可
: 以算authorship么？（是个在某个公司的invited talk, 网上是有记录的，但是不是学
: 术presentation，所以没有conference abstract这种东西）
: 另一个问题是：eb1b一定要claim authorship么？可以只claim review和contribution
: 么？
: 自己的authorship太弱，真是不想claim.可是网上有人说, authorship和contribution
: 相辅相成，即使是eb1b也需要claim authorship，不然IO都懒得看contribution直接
|
z**********8
发帖数: 766 | 3 talk可以算contribution，算authorship有点勉强 |
b*******e
发帖数: 24532 | 4
西可
这个不算。这个authorship可不是随便发表一篇technical report就是的，必须是
international circulated books or articles.
contribution
contribution
当然不一定。就看你能够做到哪一些了。 比如说有同学没文章，但是有很多牛逼专利
，并且创造了很大的价值，那当然也能够claim这一项。
【在 c********e 的大作中提到】
: 谢谢！
: 问大家一个问题, 关于绿卡的claim authorship
: 这个authorship只能是paper和conference abstract么？
: 如果给了一个talk，但是这个talk没有proceeding也没有正式的abstract，这个东西可
: 以算authorship么？（是个在某个公司的invited talk, 网上是有记录的，但是不是学
: 术presentation，所以没有conference abstract这种东西）
: 另一个问题是：eb1b一定要claim authorship么？可以只claim review和contribution
: 么？
: 自己的authorship太弱，真是不想claim.可是网上有人说, authorship和contribution
: 相辅相成，即使是eb1b也需要claim authorship，不然IO都懒得看contribution直接
|
d*******n
发帖数: 4778 | 5 http://www.yale.edu/perception/Brian/misc/musings/bjs-authorshi
"Authorship on a paper can signal that a person carefully designed a project
; that they wrote part or all of the paper; that they had no role in
designing or writing but that they nevertheless spent a significant amount
of time and effort working on it; that they simply had some particularly
good ideas relating to the project; that they belong to the lab in which the
project was conducted, but did not participate directly; that they helped
out with the data analysis; that they owned the equipment on which the
experiments were run; that they simply hold a senior position in the lab in
which the project was carried out but aren't even familiar with the specific
project; etc."
【在 z**********8 的大作中提到】
: talk可以算contribution，算authorship有点勉强
|
y****z
发帖数: 445 | 6 I also want to the issue of authorship. Every one, please express your
opinion.
For the conference abstract, can we claim the authorship to IO? |
y****z
发帖数: 445 | |
d*******n
发帖数: 4778 | 8 发信人: dharmacon (静心), 信区: Immigration
标 题: Re: 问二个eb1b claim authroship的问题
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Aug 19 09:03:20 2013, 美东)
http://www.yale.edu/perception/Brian/misc/musings/bjs-authorshi
"Authorship on a paper can signal that a person carefully designed a project
; that they wrote part or all of the paper; that they had no role in
designing or writing but that they nevertheless spent a significant amount
of time and effort working on it; that they simply had some particularly
good ideas relating to the project; that they belong to the lab in which the
project was conducted, but did not participate directly; that they helped
out with the data analysis; that they owned the equipment on which the
experiments were run; that they simply hold a senior position in the lab in
which the project was carried out but aren't even familiar with the specific
project; etc."
【在 z**********8 的大作中提到】
: talk可以算contribution，算authorship有点勉强
|
